Wednesday, March 19th 2008

WD Launches the 640GB Caviar SE16 3.5-inch Hard Drives

WD announced today that it is now shipping in volume its WD Caviar SE16 640 GB 3.5-inch hard drives based on 320 GB-per-platter technology -- a platform that it has been shipping since January 2008 and is serving as the foundation of all of the company's 3.5-inch drive families. Ideal for data-intensive applications, high-performance computing and multimedia systems, the WD Caviar SE16 640 GB drives deliver high performance with their extreme areal density, 3 Gb/s transfer rate, and Native Command Queuing (NCQ). Its two-platter design promotes cool, quiet operation in a high-capacity drive.

"The 640 GB capacity point will be an important one for our desktop customers, and WD is leading high-volume shipments to the channel and OEM customers," said Don Bennett, general manager and vice president of WD's desktop business unit. "Two-platter hard drives have always been the perfect balance of value, capacity and performance for many of our customers. Today's common two-platter drives are limited to 500 GB, but we are expanding capacity by 28 percent on the same design with WD's leading technology heads and disks."

The 320 GB-per-platter technology is being deployed across WD's desktop, enterprise, consumer electronics and external hard drive product lines, including additional capacity points, throughout this calendar year.

The WD Caviar family of 3.5-inch desktop hard drives delivers high performance with 3 Gb/s transfer rate, Native Command Queuing (NCQ), and cool operating temperatures and quiet operation, enabling customers to integrate WD products in the most demanding desktop and external storage environments.

Price and Availability
WD Caviar SE16 640 GB (model WD6400AAKS) hard drives may be ordered on the company's online store and through select distributors and resellers. Manufacturer's Suggest Retail Price (MSRP) for the WD Caviar SE16 640 GB is $139.99 USD. More information about WD Caviar desktop drives may be found on the company's Web site here.
Source: WesternDigital
Add your own comment

30 Comments on WD Launches the 640GB Caviar SE16 3.5-inch Hard Drives

#27
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
DanishDevilMaybe I meant to say Sandra :D
ewww ugly icons in sandra these days. this program is a piece of crap for the user interface, and loves throwing benchmark results that just aim to confuse...

since it would be an ass to take a million screenshots, i'm just going to give the numbers.
Oh and while these are on different motherboards, they both use intels ICH9 SATA controller on a P35/G35 chipset. Its VERY comparable.


first: samsung 500GB SATA-II 16MB cache.
Drive Index: 60.56MB/s
Random access time 13ms

For the raptor X 150GB:
61.37MB/s
8ms

so the raptor can move the same bandwidth, but accesses files in 2/3 the time. sums it up pretty well with my experience, actually.
Posted on Reply
#28
DanishDevil
I'll redo the benchmarks this weekend, but I know for a fact that my transfer rate for the 7200.11 is higher than the Raptor. And the Raptor's cleanly formatted.

I'm glad I went for the 32mb cache. I think that's what's making a bit of difference.
Posted on Reply
#29
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
DanishDevilI'll redo the benchmarks this weekend, but I know for a fact that my transfer rate for the 7200.11 is higher than the Raptor. And the Raptor's cleanly formatted.

I'm glad I went for the 32mb cache. I think that's what's making a bit of difference.
its something i've been saying for a while now: raptors were lightning. The problem is modern hard drives have caught up in the transfer speeds. Raptors still have the lead in access times making them great for an OS or games drive, but in overall throughput a larger drive can be faster, and more cost effective.

edit: SSD drives make raptors look like snails for access times too, the future is looking all smiles :)
Posted on Reply
#30
DanishDevil
Yep! Until I can afford a nice and quiet SSD, I'm going 7200.11! [/off topic] I bet these WD's will perform well too!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 15th, 2024 20:59 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts