• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

OpenGL Fur Benchmark

a bit of clocking and fast fan speeds

8475 happy with that

4870x2 and qx9650@3800
 

Attachments

  • overclocked4870furmark.jpg
    overclocked4870furmark.jpg
    184.3 KB · Views: 383
Last edited:
YO....Fastest AGP 3850 Furmark Yet!!!

I beat U Lemonadesoda....woooohooooo :nutkick:

This is an HIS ICQ3 HD3850 512 AGP!!!

3360 furmarks.. See attached.

LOL,
jtleon
 

Attachments

  • Furmarkjtleon1.gif
    Furmarkjtleon1.gif
    10.1 KB · Views: 534
Lt_JWS
Sapphire 3850 512 @ 825/1000
3607
 
Lt_JWS,

I formally accept your challenge - as you have dethroned my 3850 lead!!! Of course yours is PCIE, not AGP!

I sincerely doubt your Sapphire is 100% stable at those overclock levels (my HIS was OC'd to 837/1080 producing 3360 Furmarks). I was unable to run FEAR at those OC levels.

Largon, sir perhaps it is wise to distinguish those few AGP entries in your excellent tally list.

Thanks & Regards,
jtleon
 
Lt_JWS
Sapphire 3850 512mb @ 877/1035
3828



Thats about all she's got on air ;)
 
LT What drivers r u running?
jtleon
 
but that is 64bit Vista....and God only knows what ur CPU speed is ...looks like CPU-Z and Furmark can't agree...WTH!
 
Furmark & CPUZ don't agree on CPU speed!

LT, What is ur actual CPU speed?

jtleon
 
LT, What is ur actual CPU speed?

jtleon

he must have speedstep or ce1 i think its called lol forgot turned it off long time ago
 
LT, What is ur actual CPU speed?

jtleon

i think it is 3.2ghz when the benchmark is running but speedstep kicks in and lowers it
 
Its @ 3.2Ghz and will do 3.48 fine on stock air... but the CPU seems makes hardly any difference in this test....
 
Johnspack
Palit 280GTX@720/1144/1100
4801 .. first run, Ill get more!
furmarkgtx2.jpg
 
Its @ 3.2Ghz and will do 3.48 fine on stock air... but the CPU seems makes hardly any difference in this test....

Exactly Lt. The e1200 good clockin' ones have an internal max of approximately 3525mhz. I know mine dies on anything 439FSB and beyond, no matter which multiplier or vcore. I've had her cranked up to 1.57v.

Also, nice scores everyone!!!!
 
2nd run on my palit 280gtx, 700/1500/1150
4975
furmarkgtx3.jpg
 
Specs as listed. Cards at stock. V1.0.0.

88777231jj8.jpg
 
weird, I'm only getting 31000ish score now with my 4850. Of course this is with a new install of Vista and cat 8.9s. Furthermore, watching my ATI CCC while performing the test, I see my gpu activity stays around 82-86%. Is there a setting somewhere I need to turn off to get better performance?

ah, I see...ATI downclocks the GPU to prevent burnouts. ok, well that makes sense. 90C is a bit warm!
 
rename the application to etqw.exe and you'll see much better results.
 
Last edited:
Whoa?!
It seems AMD has fixed/added CrossFire support for FurMark.

Minimum FPS seems low, though...
 
Last edited:
Renaming the exe makes all the difference. I scored 4398 without renaming it.

Whoa?!
It seems AMD has fixed/added CrossFire support for FurMark.

Minimum FPS seems low, though...


The min FPS occurred only at the beginning for about 3 frames after that it was much higher.

nice score :toast:


so did you do that one again ?

where do you rename it ?

You rename it in the program file. I dont know if single cards will benefit or even if SLi setups will either. I think this just allows the ATI drivers to get both cards cookin.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top