Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2

[Jeno]

Or maybe Darwin or New Guinea do an Aussie region one drp.

thats never gonna happen :shadedshu... but it wont stop us wishing!

 

[Triprift]

Yeah your probably right i just thought it would be something different from the usual european ww2 setting we normally get.

 

[eidairaman1]

Nice, now Maybe they will get smart and incorporate a different Anticheat method that is not Punk Buster.

 

[InnocentCriminal]

I didn't get into WaW at all. For me it lost all of the appeal CoD 2 & CoD 4 had. I'm looking forward to MW2 though.

 

[Darknova]

Oh you mean the heavily modified CoD2 engine that was used in CoD4?

And the heavily modified quake 3 engine used in cod and cod2

Virtually every game engine is a heavily modified version of a previous engine, there's no getting away from that, but the end product that CoD4 used is still a good engine you must admit.

I hate to break it to you guys but you're wrong about Treyarch. They have made a CoD game for the PC before. Ever heard of United Offensive? A lot of the elements you love from CoD4 were first started by the founders of Treyarch. Please guys if you don't enjoy playing WW2 games I understand but that doesn't make CoD:WW a bad game. Its everything that CoD 4 was plus more. Only set in WW2.

Well I didn't know that, I thought CoD3 was the first one Treyarch made.

And no, WaW is not CoD4 + more, I enjoyed WaW (and I have nothing against WW2 except that there are too many WW2 games), but in the end it got boring, the best missions were the Russian ones, the American ones dragged on IMO.

 

[inf3rno]

Yeah Happy wishing MW2!!!!!!!!!

 

[eidairaman1]

COD 4 Engine is actually 1 that many games should be based upon, for fact its not as Demanding as the friggin Crysis Engine- opens up more playability/customers which in turn more sales of the game for PC, otherwise most would buy for the XB360.

 

[inf3rno]

Why cant i play call of duty axis campaign??/

 

[DanishDevil]

SO looking forward to this

I, for one, would like to see a slightly less linear campaign. Maybe with a few endings and a few choices as to what to do in certain situations that affect the outcome of the game It would sure make for some great replayability! (is that a word???)

 

[InnocentCriminal]

I'm hoping the multiplayer will be the new Battlefield 2. CoD 4 + Tanks/Planes and Choppers = SCHWEEET!

 

[HolyCow02]

I'm hoping the multiplayer will be the new Battlefield 2. CoD 4 + Tanks/Planes and Choppers = SCHWEEET!

Personally, I think that would ruin it. It would make it a completely different multiplayer game.

This is very exciting though. CoD4 was great, and I didn't even think about getting WaW because it is a Treyarch game, and the last Treyarch game I played was CoD3 which was horrible. I was actually mad that I played that game. Now I am in no way saying WaW is a bad game, but I would rather have an Infinity Ward over a Treyarch game.

 

[johnnyfiive]

Its been confirmed. Infinity Ward is going back to the future with the next installment due fall 2009. This means you guys that hate WW2 can stop bitching now. Oh man I can't wait. I want it all over my face.

Ill be getting this assuming I'm done with Fallout 3 and all its DLC nutty goodness.

Source

lol!

 

[johnnyfiive]

CoD 4 > World at War.

Yep. I'm definitely ready for Modern Warfare II. BRING IT (but please not all over my face).

 

[chris89]

I'm Looking forward to CoD6, as i skipped CoD5, as the only WW2 themed FPS i play is Red Orchestra online.

 

[Morgoth]

i would like to see a game where you can play as german soldier ww2 or bundeswehr (modern german army)
i hate it why it allways to be amerikan army or some korea, soviet army

 

[PCpraiser100]

Modern Warfare 2 will most likely be nothing different if Infinity Ward never stops thinking better graphics with World at War. And besides, what war would they think of next now that they launched an edited War on Terror? World War 3? I don't think so.

 

[InnocentCriminal]

Personally, I think that would ruin it. It would make it a completely different multiplayer game.

Why d'you think it would ruin it? I can't help but see it as the next evolutionary step for the series tbh. WaW has Tanks and the a-like, so I can only presume that MW2 will as well. Map sizes will almost certainly be increased (they better be) and I can only hope that it's the same multiplayer, with new weapons and vehicles.

 

[TheMailMan78]

CoD: UO was the best multiplayer that has been done with the series. CoD4 was nice and I loved it but UO had jeeps, tanks, flak cannons and massive maps. CoD4 had perks. Combine the two and you have another hit I think. FYI UO was made by Treyarch and it was great. If you want to blame someone for CoD3 then blame Activation. It was a forced release. Treyarch only had a few MONTHS to make it. For the time they had I think they did a great job.

Also did you guys know CoD:WW was in development BEFORE CoD4 was released? The only problem I have with Treyarch is they are two damn slow to patch or release.

Heres and article to help explain things better. I sound to much like a fanboy reading this now

Infinity Ward's Call of Duty 4 was fantastic. Treyarch's CoD3 wasn't as fantastic. Granted, it was pretty good! But honestly, not as good as Infinity Ward's CoD2. (See where this is going?) Says CoD5 senior producer Noah Heller:

I'd say that one of the things that's hard for a player to understand, I'm sure you guys can understand it because you have a lot more insight into the industry, is that Call of Duty 3 was about eight months end to end for development... And it's very hard to make a great game in that time. Call of Duty 3 is a very good game. It sold very well so a lot of people must have liked it... But it's not the game this team could have made if it had the time to polish to the level they needed to... Look at the great games of just this last six months or year. Look at Modern Warfare, look at BioShock, look at GTA 4. What these games have in common is enough time to polish and iterate on it, and I think as an industry we're learning how important that is... I feel like it's a little bit of an underdog story almost. Here's a team that's never had a chance to actually make a game with this much time. Modern Warfare comes along and raises the bar really high and now the team says, we've got to show what we've got, we've got to show up with a great game or else the players aren't going to want to play it. Expectations are so high.

They are, they really are. Treyarch was given a two year development cycle for CoD5, so hopefully that extra time in the oven will pay off. Willing to give World War II another spin if the game dazzles.

Source

 

[Jakl]

Dope cant wait

 

[rangerone766]

sounds good, i like cod4. i'm not really that good a fps, but it doesnt stop me from playing and enjoying them.

i'm still waiting for a game to match bf2. bf2 was revolutionary i believe. just reinstalled bf2 the other day, its still a great game.

 

[HolyCow02]

Why d'you think it would ruin it? I can't help but see it as the next evolutionary step for the series tbh. WaW has Tanks and the a-like, so I can only presume that MW2 will as well. Map sizes will almost certainly be increased (they better be) and I can only hope that it's the same multiplayer, with new weapons and vehicles.

sounds good, i like cod4. i'm not really that good a fps, but it doesnt stop me from playing and enjoying them.

i'm still waiting for a game to match bf2. bf2 was revolutionary i believe. just reinstalled bf2 the other day, its still a great game.

Because it would make it battlefield 2. or 2142. not CoD. But again, thats just how I feel

 

[InnocentCriminal]

I think it would make it better than Battlefield 2 - it'd be the next evolutionary step of that game as well. I really enjoy BF2 but CoD 4 has massively different feel to it (obviously) so I can only use BF2 as a comparative as I can't really think of a game that my initial ideas of how Infinity Ward are going to build upon CoD 4.

They could just make another killer CoD 4 with the inclusion of vehicles and large maps, but even then I can't help but want to compare it to BF2 - which, in my eyes, is not a bad thing at all. Don't forget, I'm just talking about the multiplayer here, not the single player.

 

[DrPepper]

Because it would make it battlefield 2. or 2142. not CoD. But again, thats just how I feel

Yeah but there would be less glitches and the teams would be even so it was down to skill and not because the chinese jet has a hitbox the size of an atom

 

[chris89]

Overal my Fav Modern Combat games are:

ARMA
Operation Flashpoint
Call of Duty 4

The Orginal Rainbow six games (Rouge Spear and number 1)

 

[freaksavior]

Lady s and gentlemen we have another land before time on our hands. Call of duty 3476: Historical modernized world at warfare

I like #2 and #4 but this is getting ridiculous