• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Test your PC's 64 bit capabilities

It appears that this is a test that the 2990WX is not the best at. I assume it is not using all of the cores.

zp5tm1qbi6.jpg

Its using all the cores its just the overall RYZEN efficiency is not that good at the compute task it's testing for DP. as you can see from the other RYZEN results including the 2600 above and my 1950X..

Dammit you beat me to posting my 2990WX result -_-
 
assume it is not using all of the cores.

Or, this supports AVX 512. It does say the CPU test is run in native machine code so it wouldn't surprise me.
 
Its using all the cores its just the overall RYZEN efficiency is not that good at the compute task it's testing for DP. as you can see from the other RYZEN results including the 2600 above and my 1950X..

Dammit you beat me to posting my 2990WX result -_-

Fair enough. How does your 2990WX compare? Mine isn't the best clocking chip thanks to the weak motherboard VRM section.
 
Fair enough. How does your 2990WX compare? Mine isn't the best clocking chip thanks to the weak motherboard VRM section.
im finishing testing the 1950X on several coolers then she goes in.

I have a X399 Tai Chi and a X399 Gaming 7 to try on... so the VRM on both are plenty capable, but tbh at 4.2ish is about the limit for most of the 2990WX I have seen/used. thats the most common stopping point for most 2nd Gen Ryzen dies.
 
im finishing testing the 1950X on several coolers then she goes in.

I have a X399 Tai Chi and a X399 Gaming 7 to try on... so the VRM on both are plenty capable, but tbh at 4.2ish is about the limit for most of the 2990WX I have seen/used. thats the most common stopping point for most 2nd Gen Ryzen dies.

I overheat the taichi one even with active cooling on it. I don't know that I would call it plenty capable.
 
I overheat the taichi one even with active cooling on it. I don't know that I would call it plenty capable.
Thats wierd.. I have the full-size Tai Chi board and it does rather well with my initial 2990WX testing.. I will definitely let you know with my retail chips how it goes.
 
Thats wierd.. I have the full-size Tai Chi board and it does rather well with my initial 2990WX testing.. I will definitely let you know with my retail chips how it goes.

It isn't awful, but it definitely is starting to cut it close. Power off is normally a few hours into heavy use. System is in a case however with two hot 1080Ti's that really need to be watercooled. So I do have more heat than a standard user. Problem is gone with the side panel off. It probably would be fine if there was a better cooler for the board. I did not have this issue with my Asus X99m board with its nice finned HS for the MOSFETs
 
Once Im back from the dead I will post, im currently in limbo
 
Stock i7-6700 and MSI 1060 Gaming X 6GB (Windows 10 Pro 1803, NVIDIA 399.24)
GPGPU.png
 
Performs as advertised (7.1 TFLOP):
gpgpu.png


So, please post your double precision figures.
Virtually nothing GPGPU uses double precision so NVIDIA/AMD have gravitated away from it. The highest double precision cards, AFAIK, are second generation GCN cards which have a 2:1 single:double rate. AMD made the double precision compute power available...and no developers really took advantage of it. Come fourth generation, well, you can see how little double precision is worth in 2018. They will do it...lazily (16:1). Pascal is even worse (~30:1) and so is Turing (~32:1)
 
Last edited:
Pretty sure Tahiti was also half Double Precision.

Edit: Tahiti was GCN V1, R9 290 was Hawaii GCN V2 but I thought GCN V1 did have half DP.
 
Last edited:
gpgpu.png

hahaaaa.. just having fun
actually not bad for old school stuff
 
gpgpu2.png
gpgpu2.png


gpgpu2.png
gpgpu.png
gpgpu2.png
gpgpu.png

gpgpu2.png
gpgpu.png


gpgpu.png


I have some more with i5-2500, xeon e3-1240, with some of these vgas and various laptops if someone interested i can post more.
Sorry if it too much :)
 

Attachments

  • gpgpu1.png
    gpgpu1.png
    124.1 KB · Views: 246
Pretty sure Tahiti was also half Double Precision.

Edit: Tahiti was GCN V1, R9 290 was Hawaii GCN V2 but I thought GCN V1 did have half DP.
You're right, and it's 1:4 not 1:2. Hawaii/Grenada dropped to 1:8.
 
I wrote "LIKE 128 bit" meaning apps will be slow as hell

Quantum computing is still very far away from the efficiency of binary for executing code though. And it may never get there. Its not a 'better' computer, its a different one, that opens up new possibilities. One of the things it is extremely good at is cryptography, so yes in terms of security it will be a game changer. But for playing Crysis? Nah.

1546165861395.png
 
Here is my results....hmm interesting to see that RX 480/580 getting better results in double precision then GTX 1080...

AIDATEST.png
 
interesting to see that RX 480/580 getting better results in double precision then GTX 1080...

It's all about the DP FPU ratio, 1:16 vs 1:32.
 
i havnt a clue what the numbers mean o_Oo_O
a64.PNG
 
Back
Top