- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 20,859 (3.40/day)
System Name | Pioneer |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen R9 7950X |
Motherboard | GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans... |
Memory | 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310 |
Storage | 2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs |
Display(s) | 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display |
Case | Thermaltake Core X31 |
Audio Device(s) | TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED |
Power Supply | FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W |
Mouse | Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless |
Keyboard | WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps |
Software | Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 |
It's certainly not good but it's also being monitored by far more than just Canada.Tritium is ok, but Fukushima plant has been spilling worse since they first tried to cap it, a good chunk of the pacific ocean is radioactive and Canada turned off our west coast radiation detectors under Harper when they started going off so people aren't told how bad it really is.
The general advice right now in west coast beach towns is if you see something metal on the beach, "leave it"
Indeed. Radiation works along the same principal. It's literally everywhere, but absorbed quantity matters, not just "it's there or not."So you're saying if i eat 100KG of sugar, i'll get obese - but if we split that up to a thousand people who get 100 grams each, one randomly will just get obese?
Thats now how math works. In my example none of them will get obese, and in the terms of radiation that needs to actually penetrate all barriers and then cells to do damage, it's not a linear curve - the greater the dilution, the far greater reduction in harm it can do.
Slightly OT, but this is also why we moved from roetgens to rads as a unit of measure.