• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD and NVIDIA Add-in-Board GPU Market Share from 2002 to Q3/2016

Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,471 (0.64/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1455T(Unlocked 645) @ 3.7GHz @ 1.30V / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) GT 710 / XFX RX 580 8GB + GT 620 (PhysX) / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
Nvidia 8000, 9000, 200 - Tesla.
Nvidia 400, 500 - Fermi.
Nvidia 600, 700 - Kepler (with the 750Ti Maxwell starring as the red headed step-child)
Nvidia 900 - Maxwell
Nvidia 1000 - Pascal

Let's take a look at the red camp now
AMD HD7000 - GCN 1.0 & 1.1
AMD Rx200 - GCN 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2
AMD Rx300 - GCN 1.0, 1.1 & 1.2

So really, you can look at this any way you want. Imho, Nvidia at least looks like it's mimicking intel's tick-tock and AMD is worse, because unless you're buying the most expensive parts it pretty much guarantees you're getting an older design/process.

*I've only included retail desktop parts, because OEM and laptop parts are a mess in both camps.
Nvidia is doing it with it's pockets full. AMD's pockets are full of debts. I love how people don't give any excuses to a company that is fighting two fronts, at the same time, against stronger companies and with billions in debts and at the same time they will find plenty of excuses for companies that have the upper hand and billions of cash to spare. And as always the GT730 example is ignored because (usual excuse) it can't run modern titles at 4K @60fps with everything at ultra. I mean we have an example where a company sells three totally different cards under the same name, and NO ONE CARES. But AMD, that sells cards under different names and at price points where the cards are competitive if not better value options, it's guilty.

Anyway I stop here before a certain moderator starts getting worried.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,808 (4.08/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Ac
G92 used in:
8800GTS
9600GTX
GTS250

That is as bad as AMD have been, yet because of the Nvidia marketing it started the Ati/AMD decline.
Actually, that's not as bad as AMD. 8800GTX was G80, built on 90nm, 9600GTX was G92(4?) built on 65 or 55nm. Like I said, more like a tick-tock strategy. In taking GPUs and bringing them to a new node, some of them kept existing configurations. However, virtually the entire lineup consisted of a single generation. When AMD mixes various GCN revisions under the same series, it means you actually get different capabilities from different GPUs (as in one offers hardware decoding for something while the next one may not).
What was horrible was the naming. I'm a hardware enthusiast and I could never find my way around the GT, GTS, GTX, GS, GSO and GTO nomenclature. That was a clusterfuck by itself.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,808 (4.08/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Nvidia is doing it with it's pockets full. AMD's pockets are full of debts. I love how people don't give any excuses to a company that is fighting two fronts, at the same time, against stronger companies and with billions in debts and at the same time they will find plenty of excuses for companies that have the upper hand and billions of cash to spare. And as always the GT730 example is ignored because (usual excuse) it can't run modern titles at 4K @60fps with everything at ultra. I mean we have an example where a company sells three totally different cards under the same name, and NO ONE CARES. But AMD, that sells cards under different names and at price points where the cards are competitive if not better value options, it's guilty.

Anyway I stop here before a certain moderator starts getting worried.
As if it's my problem AMD got themselves into that position.

And I don't think this is a case of cutting anyone slack. Users unrealistically expect entire new lineups each year. That's not economically feasible and it doesn't happen. But of the two strategies, I find Nvidia's less confusing (at least for non-techies), that's all.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
670 (0.36/day)
What was horrible was the naming. I'm a hardware enthusiast and I could never find my way around the GT, GTS, GTX, GS, GSO and GTO nomenclature.
Basically: GTX > GTS > GT > GS/GSO.

The 7900GTO was a downclocked 7900GTX sold on the cheap to clear out the stock before the 8800 made it worthless.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,650 (5.65/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Ac

Actually, that's not as bad as AMD. 8800GTX was G80, built on 90nm, 9600GTX was G92(4?) built on 65 or 55nm. Like I said, more like a tick-tock strategy. In taking GPUs and bringing them to a new node, some of them kept existing configurations. However, virtually the entire lineup consisted of a single generation. When AMD mixes various GCN revisions under the same series, it means you actually get different capabilities from different GPUs (as in one offers hardware decoding for something while the next one may not).
What was horrible was the naming. I'm a hardware enthusiast and I could never find my way around the GT, GTS, GTX, GS, GSO and GTO nomenclature. That was a clusterfuck by itself.
The mixing gcn in the same line up yet keep ignoring nvidia doing essentially the same thing

8800GTS 320/640MB vs the 8800GTS 512. Same line up, same name, different chip. The 8800GTS 512 then became the 9800GTX, 9800GTX+, GTS250 and GTS250G. Nvidia actually took something sold and marketed as a upper midrange and convinced everyone it was a top tier card the next generation. I'm not even mad that's impressive, but on that note if AMD would have taken the R9 290 and resold it as the R9 390x you would have ostracized them and accused them of everything under the sun.

Move onto a couple gens later and we have the 580 vs the 480 which was purely a single SP unlocked and a mature process.

This isn't a new trick. Companies rebrand crap, hell nvidia still sells the 8400GS and god knows what GPU it's actually based off this week.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
577 (0.46/day)
that's what you got if you try to rebrand same things, especially twice !
Only the 7970 was rebranded twice. This is far from abnormal in the graphics card world. The R9 390 is a single rebrand and the R9 380 is a newer Tonga based GPU.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,650 (5.65/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Only the 7970 was rebranded twice. This is far from abnormal in the graphics card world. The R9 390 is a single rebrand and the R9 380 is a newer Tonga based GPU.
To be fair the Pitcairn silicone was used in three generations. 7850/7870->270/270x->370/370x
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
282 (0.08/day)
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 945
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
Memory 6gb DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD6870
Storage Seagate 1tb
Display(s) Acer AL2216W
Case Generic
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Ultra LS-550
If AMD doesn't do something about the 460's lack of performance relative to GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti, that gap is going to get even bigger. nVidia's partners are going to be peddling those cards to the low end of the market as fast as they can make them and 460 is going to get squashed.
 

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
20,022 (4.33/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Icarus Mk.V
Processor Intel 8600k@4.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Strixx Z370-F
Cooling Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 16 Corsair Vengeance White LED DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1080Ti Gaming OC|Accelero Xtreme IV
Storage Samsung 970Evo 512GB SSD (Boot)|WD Blue 1TB SSD|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) Asus PB278Q 27"
Case Corsair 760T (White) {1x140mm NF-P14s|1xCorsair ML120 Pro|4xML140 Pro}
Audio Device(s) 1080Ti to AVR {AVR:Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150}
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900/G502
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
I expected that with HD 4870 and HD 4850 AMD would have gained more market share back then, but it seems that people where hypnotized with the Nvidia logo much earlier than what I thought.
I had 4870s in CF. They ran hot but i utterly loved them. Got about 830mhz on the core when it came to overclocking. Not sure about the ram speed though, bit too long ago for me to remember
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,536 (0.69/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300 with Omron main switches.
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
If AMD doesn't do something about the 460's lack of performance relative to GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti, that gap is going to get even bigger. nVidia's partners are going to be peddling those cards to the low end of the market as fast as they can make them and 460 is going to get squashed.
Isn't there like a 470LE or smth in the works
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,650 (5.65/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
213 (0.08/day)
System Name "Da Krawnik Six Hunnit"
Processor Intel i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 EVO (B3)
Cooling H100i w/2x Bitfenix Spectre Pros + Bitfenix Spectre Pro Blue LED 1x 200mm + 1x 120mm
Memory Patriot Intel Extreme Masters Limited Edition 8GB (2x4GB) 1600MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 @ 1491MHz (Actual Boost) / 7.6GHz
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250GB + 2x WD Green 2TB + 1x WD Green 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430T 144Hz
Case Corsair 600T w/full custom 1/2" acrylic side panel
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Power Supply Coolermaster Silent Pro 850w
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD (laser)
Keyboard Corsair K65 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Couldn't care less about benchmark scores.
So much for the RX 480 dominating the mainstream market.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
213 (0.08/day)
System Name "Da Krawnik Six Hunnit"
Processor Intel i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 EVO (B3)
Cooling H100i w/2x Bitfenix Spectre Pros + Bitfenix Spectre Pro Blue LED 1x 200mm + 1x 120mm
Memory Patriot Intel Extreme Masters Limited Edition 8GB (2x4GB) 1600MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 @ 1491MHz (Actual Boost) / 7.6GHz
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250GB + 2x WD Green 2TB + 1x WD Green 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430T 144Hz
Case Corsair 600T w/full custom 1/2" acrylic side panel
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Power Supply Coolermaster Silent Pro 850w
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD (laser)
Keyboard Corsair K65 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Couldn't care less about benchmark scores.

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,650 (5.65/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
*fixed*

nVIDIA doesn't rebrand flagships.
9800GTX and GTX+ would have been just as flagship as the 7970 was to AMD. That card from nvidia was already just a rebranded 8800GTS 512 and rebranded into the GTS250 after. SO what were you saying? Let me guess the 9800GX2 was the flagship? Wait that was just two underclocked 8800GTS 512's.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
213 (0.08/day)
System Name "Da Krawnik Six Hunnit"
Processor Intel i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 EVO (B3)
Cooling H100i w/2x Bitfenix Spectre Pros + Bitfenix Spectre Pro Blue LED 1x 200mm + 1x 120mm
Memory Patriot Intel Extreme Masters Limited Edition 8GB (2x4GB) 1600MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 @ 1491MHz (Actual Boost) / 7.6GHz
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250GB + 2x WD Green 2TB + 1x WD Green 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430T 144Hz
Case Corsair 600T w/full custom 1/2" acrylic side panel
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Power Supply Coolermaster Silent Pro 850w
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD (laser)
Keyboard Corsair K65 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Couldn't care less about benchmark scores.
9800GTX and GTX+ would have been just as flagship as the 7970 was to AMD. That card from nvidia was already just a rebranded 8800GTS 512 and rebranded into the GTS250 after. SO what were you saying? Let me guess the 9800GX2 was the flagship? Wait that was just two underclocked 8800GTS 512's.
Interesting, because...

A very smart man at Intel once told me that when designing a microprocessor you can either build a new architecture, or move to a smaller manufacturing process, but you don't do both at the same time. The reason you don't do both is because it significantly complicates the design, validation and manufacturing processes - you want to instead limit the number of variables you're changing in order to guarantee a quick ramp up and good yields of your silicon.

NVIDIA followed this rule of thumb with the GT200, building its "brand new" (or at least significantly evolved) architecture on a tried-and-true 65nm process instead of starting at 55nm. Despite AMD building both RV670 and the new RV770 GPU on TSMC's 55nm process, NVIDIA hadn't built anything on a smaller than 65nm process, including the 1.4 billion transistor GT200.
-Anandtech
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,650 (5.65/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Interesting, because...

A very smart man at Intel once told me that when designing a microprocessor you can either build a new architecture, or move to a smaller manufacturing process, but you don't do both at the same time. The reason you don't do both is because it significantly complicates the design, validation and manufacturing processes - you want to instead limit the number of variables you're changing in order to guarantee a quick ramp up and good yields of your silicon.

NVIDIA followed this rule of thumb with the GT200, building its "brand new" (or at least significantly evolved) architecture on a tried-and-true 65nm process instead of starting at 55nm. Despite AMD building both RV670 and the new RV770 GPU on TSMC's 55nm process, NVIDIA hadn't built anything on a smaller than 65nm process, including the 1.4 billion transistor GT200.
-Anandtech
That quote is literally worthless in this context. It has zilch to do with nvidia doing the exact same thing as amd, actually worse I don't remember amd rebranding a mid range high end as a flagship card in their entire history as a company.

Also for note a wise man once said the sun revolved around the earth.

Not to mention amd and nvidia just moved new gpus to a brand new process.
 
Last edited:

synapse

New Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Everyone should pray for a 50/50~ market, if AMD goes bankrupt we are f******, Nvidia & Intel can do w/e they want with their pricing.

You should thank AMD instead of bashing.
 
Last edited:

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,650 (5.65/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Everyone should pray for a 50/50~ market, if AMD go bankrupt we are basically fucked, Nvidia & Intel can do w/e they want with their pricing.

You should thank AMD instead of bashing.
AMD can go bankrupt and it wont change things. People forget how important it is to have a competitor the term monopoly gets dropped and then Intel is split into 6-8 companies. Intel doesn't want that and would bail AMD out to save themselves.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,471 (0.64/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1455T(Unlocked 645) @ 3.7GHz @ 1.30V / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) GT 710 / XFX RX 580 8GB + GT 620 (PhysX) / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
AMD can go bankrupt and it wont change things. People forget how important it is to have a competitor the term monopoly gets dropped and then Intel is split into 6-8 companies. Intel doesn't want that and would bail AMD out to save themselves.
Maybe 10 years ago, but not today, or tomorrow.

Intel will not split for the same reason Nvidia is not going to split. We could also say that Nvidia should split because it will be the only remaining company selling DirectX compatible discrete GPUs into the x86 market. But no one says anything about Nvidia. Why? Because none of those companies will have any problems with, for example, FTC. None will split. The reason why we think that Intel would split, is because we are remembering this argument from a long time ago, when the market was completely different.

Intel will just point the finger to the ARM platform.
Nvidia will just point the finger to Intel's 70% market share when counting integrated GPUs.


Also 50%-50% is not the best percentage we should hope for. No, the best is 40% AMD - 60% Nvidia. Because AMD, if it doesn't build another bulldozer again with Zen, will gain GPU market share anyway, thanks to the APUs. So to have a balance, we need Nvidia to remain the stronger GPU company in the discrete GPU market. Just not in the extend it is now. We need a more balanced market where AMD has at least 25% of the CPU market, sells plenty of APUs and also it is as competitive to Nvidia as it was a few years ago, before the Maxwell series.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,650 (5.65/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Intel will not be able to point at arm. They are not in the desktop market, this works in the same way Microsoft had to save apple since it couldn't point at linux.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,808 (4.08/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Everyone should pray for a 50/50~ market, if AMD goes bankrupt we are f******, Nvidia & Intel can do w/e they want with their pricing.

You should thank AMD instead of bashing.
Nvidia isn't stupid. Why do you think they left the whole console market to AMD for an entire generation? ;)
 
Top