1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Announces the Ryzen 5 Series 6-core and 4-core Desktop Processors

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 16, 2017.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,133 (9.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16,881
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Following the successful introduction of AMD Ryzen 7 desktop processors including record pre-orders and award-winning performance, AMD today announced Ryzen 5 desktop processors will launch worldwide on April 11, 2017, offering disruptive price-to-performance for gamers and creators. With end users at the heart of everything AMD does, the new Ryzen 5 processors feature the powerful and efficient "Zen" architecture in 6-core,12-thread as well as 4-core, 8-thread options, to deliver enhanced performance, immersive experiences and high performance innovation to gamers and consumers worldwide with a price range of $169 to $249 USD SEP.

    "Ryzen will ultimately bring innovation and competition to virtually every segment of the PC market, and Ryzen 5 is the next big step on that journey, designed to achieve new levels of compute performance for millions of PC users," said Jim Anderson, senior vice president and general manager, Computing and Graphics Group, AMD. "AMD reinvigorated the high-performance desktop market with Ryzen 7 earlier this month, and AMD Ryzen 5 now brings the power and efficiency of the 'Zen' core to users in the highly popular sub-$300 segment of the market."

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Ryzen 5 Performance and Lineup
    During an event today in Beijing, China for press, customers, and partners, AMD outlined the AMD Ryzen 5 desktop processor lineup. AMD specifically designed these processors for performance desktop users, AAA-title and streaming gamers, and the new AM4 desktop platform. Featuring AMD SenseMI technology and impressive multi-tasking capabilities, the groundbreaking AMD Ryzen 5 adapts to consumers' needs with incredible responsiveness and performance. Previously, AMD demonstrated the Ryzen 5 1600X beating the Intel Core i5-7600K by 69 percent in CPU performance testing using Cinebench R15 multi-threaded.

    [​IMG]

    Game Optimizations
    With the announcement of the Ryzen 5 lineup, AMD reiterated its commitment to delivering excellent gaming performance to ensure existing and future game titles take full advantage of Ryzen.

    "We are impressed by the technological evolution enabled by the Zen architecture, which was designed to keep pace now and well into the future as gaming, eSports and virtual reality experiences continually push the limits of devices," said Vlatko Andonov, president of Bethesda Softworks. "Working with an all-new microarchitecture, like that in the Ryzen family of processors, means that everyone has the opportunity to raise their game and bring the very best interactive experiences to players. All of us at Bethesda are excited about working with AMD to keep evolving the premium performance that Ryzen offers."

    Ryzen 5 Processor and Platform Availability
    Availability for all four Ryzen 5 models begins April 11 at etailers around the world. All Ryzen processors support the new AM4 infrastructure, with motherboard designs being produced from top ODMs. Announced at CES 2017, AMD and its motherboard partners already debuted a wide array of new motherboards from ASRock, Asus, Biostar, Gigabyte, and MSI, all built upon the following desktop chipsets for AMD Ryzen processors -- the X370, B350 and the A320, the latter intended for mainstream PCs at new, consumer-friendly price points.

    [​IMG]

    New Coolers
    The AMD Ryzen 5 lineup also includes new Wraith coolers, including the Wraith Spire and the Wraith Stealth, available with select AMD Ryzen processors. These new AMD thermal solutions are designed to provide near-silent operation, with unique styling and superb cooling.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2017
  2. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,199 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    902
    Location:
    Australia
    Boost clock all cores or again only 1 core?
     
  3. Jism

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    248 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    The 1600x looks like a good model compared to the 1090T. 6 cores, 12 threads and a max turbo of 4GHz. Nice.
     
  4. ruff0r

    ruff0r

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    291 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    If they going to do it like with R7 . Boost to 4ghz on one core load. Base clock on all core loads.
     
  5. Lionheart

    Lionheart

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,246 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    978
    Location:
    Multidimensional
    Fantastic prices & all but I hope it has better overclocking support than R7
     
  6. ZoneDymo

    ZoneDymo

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,456 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    ya know, that unlocked banner is a little hilarious now that we know these processors dont overclock worth a damn.
    Not hating, I would love to upgrade to an 1800x right now, but still
     
  7. Hotobu

    Hotobu

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    319 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Got my eyes on the 1600X. If it boosts to 4.0 Fingers crossed that it can get to 4.2. I see this as a nice gaming alternative to the 7700 K. Not QUITE as fast, but it's got the extra two cores and is about 60% of the price. Yes please.
     
  8. deemon

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2015
    Messages:
    274 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    How is the CCX distribution on the R5 CPUs? 6 cores as 4+2 or 3+3?
    And on the 4 core parts? all 4 in one or 2+2? or some even weirder 3+1?
     
  9. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,133 (9.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16,881
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    On six-core parts, it could be 3+3, on quad-core parts it is 4+0.
     
  10. pky New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2014
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Why would you think the boost would be for all cores? When was there ever a desktop CPU (AMD or Intel) that boosted all cores to the max boost frequency?

    If you want all cores at a higher clock speed - OC the chip.
     
  11. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,199 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    902
    Location:
    Australia
    Pretty much all 4 core CPU's from the past 10yrs?

    Bulldozer would boost 4 cores to max boost out of the 8 cores
     
  12. Dethroy

    Dethroy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    731 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    626
    Location:
    Germany
    I've updated my Google spreadsheet accordingly ...
    Cell B2: choose the CPU you'd like to compare
    Cell D9: choose either all-core performance or dual core performance


    Ryzen_comparison.png
     
    Loosenut says thanks.
  13. geon2k2

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    174 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    44
    Just stumbled on a review from which I don't understand anything by the way, but I think these guys just did a 4 core 8 thread review of the Ryzen and 4 Ghz to 4Ghz comparison to i7 7700K and the results show them neck to neck (except FarCry for some reason, even though ~100 fps is great), with the Ryzen obviously being sensibly cheaper.

    http://www.zolkorn.com/reviews/amd-...re-i7-7700k-mhz-by-mhz-core-by-core/view-all/

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2017
  14. Vayra86

    Vayra86

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    1,848 (2.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,550
    Location:
    Arnhem, Netherlands
    None of the Intel CPUs boost on all 4 cores to the same clock. They lose 100 - 200 mhz when your application uses 3 or 4 cores respectively.

    If anything Bulldzoer is the exception to the rule.

    About the above benchmarks; 7700K can achieve a 25% higher clock (5Ghz) AND still leads by as much as 5-10% (sometimes even better) at the same clock as Ryzen... Its nice as a like-for-like comparison but it says literally nothing about the real world performance of the 7700K. All it really shows us is that the IPC of Ryzen is still a good 10% below Kaby.
     
  15. dreamer2908 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    Messages:
    5 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    From AnandTech,
     
  16. Dalai Brahma New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2015
    Messages:
    23 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    This disgust me...At least R3 / R5 4c / 8t could be 4 + 0 (1 ccx only)...
     
  17. Kanan

    Kanan

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2015
    Messages:
    2,233 (3.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,197
    Location:
    Europe
    10% at best. From where AMD comes that's a great achievement, and yet you always sound critical and negative about such positive things.

    If you can stress that Kaby Lake is in "real world" higher clocked, and it shows "nothing", then stress too, that the Ryzen 1800X is a 8 core and will easily destroy the 7700K 4 core in the soon enough future. The comparison is laughable, because Intels own 8 core loses against the 7700K too, but no one would replace his 5960X/6900K with an 7700K, the same goes with Ryzen 1800X. That 7700K is barely faster than my 3960X if at all. Those 5960X/6900K, overclocked on the same 4500MHz as my CPU, will easily destroy the 7700K. There's really no reason to defend the 7700K. Ryzen revision 2 (no, not Ryzen II, just rev 2), which will probably have better yield and thus higher clocks will win against 7700K too, even without high core utilization, it simply needs higher clocks and those will be delivered in time (at least for overclockers).
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2017
    Dethroy says thanks.
  18. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,347 (3.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,098
    Location:
    Home
    Ryzen 1400 at $169 sounds like its going to be king of mid range gaming.
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  19. Totally

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    232 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    56
    Location:
    Right where I want to be
    What GPU were they using, looks like they hit a bottleneck. Look at TPU's 1800 review the two chips do the same thing at with graphics maxed at 2560x1440
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2017

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)