• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD-made PlayStation 5 Semi-custom Chip Has Ray-tracing Hardware (not a software solution)

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,463 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Sony's next-generation PlayStation 5 could land under many Christmas trees...in the year 2020, as the company plans a Holiday 2020 launch for the 4K-ready, 8K-capable entertainment system that has a semi-custom chip many times more powerful than the current generation, to support its lofty design goals. By late-2020, Sony calculates that some form of ray-tracing could be a must-have for gaming, and is working with its chip designer AMD to add just that - hardware-acceleration for ray-tracing, and not just something that's pre-baked or emulated over GPGPU.

Mark Cerny, a system architect at Sony's US headquarters, in an interview with Wired, got into the specifics of the hardware driving the company's big platform launch for the turn of the decade. "There is ray-tracing acceleration in the GPU hardware," he said, adding "which I believe is the statement that people were looking for." Besides raw processing power increases, Sony will focus on getting the memory and storage subsystems right. Both are interdependent, and with fast NAND flash-based storage, Sony can rework memory-management to free up more processing resources. AMD has been rather tight-lipped about ray-tracing on its Radeon GPUs. CEO Lisa Su has been dismissive about the prominence of the tech saying "it's one of the many technologies these days." The company's mid-2019 launch of the "Navi" family of GPUs sees the company skip ray-tracing hardware. The semi-custom chip's GPU at the heart of PlayStation 5 was last reported to be based on the same RDNA architecture.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
4,681 (2.20/day)
Location
USA
System Name Paladius Tacet
Processor Ryzen 4800x
Motherboard MSI X570 Tomahawk
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34 DUO (custom aggressive fan curve)
Memory G.Skill 2x16 (32gb) 3600 cas 14-14-14-36 @ 1.43v
Video Card(s) Big Navi RDNA2
Storage Micron 2TB SSD
Display(s) Pixio Px7 27" 2560x1440 165hz IPS DCI-P3 95%
Case Corsair 110Q Silent + NZXT Aer-P exhaust fan
Audio Device(s) Logitech THX 2.1 and Schiit Modi 3 DAC
Power Supply EVGA 700w Gold
Does seem like wasted resources, 80% of the games that have RTX now don't impress me at all in toggle on/off youtube videos comparing it. I would have rather seen a beefier cheap allowing for other things to be turned up higher like shadows, etc... developers who want to do RTX on ps5 will probably have to turn down some other settings in their tweaking process sadly to achieve 60 fps 4k.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,642 (0.65/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1075T @ 3.8GHz / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) XFX RX 580 8GB + GT 620 (PhysX)/ GT 710 / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
Let's hope that AMD's hardware for ray tracing will also be usable for other stuff than ray tracing alone. So games that don't implement ray tracing can run even better.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,337 (4.07/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Let's hope that AMD's hardware for ray tracing will also be usable for other stuff than ray tracing alone. So games that don't implement ray tracing can run even better.
Can't be done that way. You either use fixed function hardware for better RT acceleration but no other use or you don't and have to rely on the shaders themselves.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,491 (1.94/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Well, the same units are usable for sound, I suppose :)
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
1,554 (0.44/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 5700 XT
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
Does seem like wasted resources, 80% of the games that have RTX now don't impress me at all in toggle on/off youtube videos comparing it. I would have rather seen a beefier cheap allowing for other things to be turned up higher like shadows, etc... developers who want to do RTX on ps5 will probably have to turn down some other settings in their tweaking process sadly to achieve 60 fps 4k.
Pretty much this.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
815 (0.29/day)
Processor i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB DDR4 4000/CL15
Video Card(s) 1080 Ti @ 2+ GHz
Storage 970 Evo Plus 1TB + 64TB NAS
Display(s) Asus PG279Q 27" 1440p/IPS/165 Hz/Gsync + LG C9 65" 2160p/OLED/HDR
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence STX w/ Upgraded Op-Amps
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Logitech G610 / MX Red + O Rings
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Does seem like wasted resources, 80% of the games that have RTX now don't impress me at all in toggle on/off youtube videos comparing it. I would have rather seen a beefier cheap allowing for other things to be turned up higher like shadows, etc... developers who want to do RTX on ps5 will probably have to turn down some other settings in their tweaking process sadly to achieve 60 fps 4k.
Raytracing is here to stay.
It is the only way to do proper shadows and lighting

You don't have to raytrace a whole scene. You can use it on certain elements, which limits performance-hit yet allowing for much better IQ.

Ampere next year will probably make RTX much more relevant. Turing is on the slow-side. Only 2080 Super and 2080 Ti can do it decently at 1440p.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
414 (0.14/day)
System Name Potato PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar MAX
Cooling All stocks
Memory 16GB Team Delta RGB DDR4 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT Mech OC + AMD Radeon Pro W5100
Storage Samsung 850 Evo 500GB + 10TB Toshiba
Display(s) Viewsonic XG3240C
Case Cougar MG120-G
Audio Device(s) SMSL SD-793II + ATH M20X || Optical to heavily modded Logitech z5500
Power Supply Seasonic X650 Gold
Mouse Logitech G304
Keyboard Logitech G613
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
So much skeptical :D
- First of all, Sony will not implement Microsoft DXR, they will have their on RTRT baked in Open GL or OpenCL. I believe they will address asymmetrical load type balance to both CPU and GPU, unlike Microsoft DXR that restrictive only to GPU.
- Sony has their own developer pool in SIE, unlike desktop , we only had one GPU maker to bribing every developer.
- Just like las said, you don't have to pull all feature in full scene, and top of that frame scaling was there to ease the process .
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,385 (0.50/day)
Raytracing is here to stay.
It is the only way to do proper shadows and lighting

You don't have to raytrace a whole scene. You can use it on certain elements, which limits performance-hit yet allowing for much better IQ.

Ampere next year will probably make RTX much more relevant. Turing is on the slow-side. Only 2080 Super and 2080 Ti can do it decently at 1440p.
"proper" shadows and lighting?

Games were experimenting with shadows and lighting back on the playstation1 FFS!

Yoiu dont "NEED" raytracing to make functional shadows and lighting. Just as games were doing terrain deformation long before DX11 came along, RT is jsut another way of doing shadows. It isnt the end all be all of graphics, and many people (including myself) have looked at "RT" enhanced games and see almost no improvement, certianly not enough to justify such a massive performance loss and dedicated hardware!
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
839 (0.18/day)
Location
Montreal
System Name Ryzen / Sairikiki / Tesseract
Processor 3600 / i7 920@3.73 / i5 4690k@4.2
Motherboard Steel Legend B450M / GB EX58-UDP4 / GB Z97MX-G5
Cooling Mugen 5 / Pure Rock / LQ-310
Memory Corsair Something 16 / Corsair Something 12 / Corsair 16
Video Card(s) Devil Vega 56 / Devil 480 / Aorus 580
Storage Way too many drives...
Display(s) AOC Q3279VWFD8 @ 40-75Hz / something / Sony w800b
Case EVOLV / AzzA 1000 / Carbide 240
Audio Device(s) Auzen Forte / board / Yamaha RX-V475 + Pioneer AJ
Power Supply EVGA 750P2 / Corsair HX750 / Dark Power PRO10
Mouse G700
Keyboard G910
Software w10 64
Benchmark Scores I don't play benchmarks...
Does seem like wasted resources, 80% of the games that have RTX now don't impress me at all in toggle on/off youtube videos comparing it. I would have rather seen a beefier cheap allowing for other things to be turned up higher like shadows, etc... developers who want to do RTX on ps5 will probably have to turn down some other settings in their tweaking process sadly to achieve 60 fps 4k.
There is a big difference between buying a first-generation, arguably-overpriced RTX card and hoping that software will pop out of nowhere... and a closed platform like the PS5 that will stay around for years and devs can optimize with more ease for. Then a good amount of RT games will bleed over from the PS and XB to PC and eventually you'll have plenty of software where RT doesn't feel tacked-on.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
332 (0.15/day)
Location
Poland
Raytracing is here to stay.
It is the only way to do proper shadows and lighting

You don't have to raytrace a whole scene. You can use it on certain elements, which limits performance-hit yet allowing for much better IQ.
I don't mind raytracing being there, it's one of the steps in graphics' technology evolution. However having part of a GPU only for certain use is like a technology from 15 years ago, when we had vertex and pixel shaders, which were later replaced by unified shaders.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
815 (0.29/day)
Processor i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB DDR4 4000/CL15
Video Card(s) 1080 Ti @ 2+ GHz
Storage 970 Evo Plus 1TB + 64TB NAS
Display(s) Asus PG279Q 27" 1440p/IPS/165 Hz/Gsync + LG C9 65" 2160p/OLED/HDR
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence STX w/ Upgraded Op-Amps
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Logitech G610 / MX Red + O Rings
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
"proper" shadows and lighting?

Games were experimenting with shadows and lighting back on the playstation1 FFS!

Yoiu dont "NEED" raytracing to make functional shadows and lighting. Just as games were doing terrain deformation long before DX11 came along, RT is jsut another way of doing shadows. It isnt the end all be all of graphics, and many people (including myself) have looked at "RT" enhanced games and see almost no improvement, certianly not enough to justify such a massive performance loss and dedicated hardware!
Yes you do. The shadows you see in games today, without raytracing, are not realistic. You can't do this without raytracing, DUH. Google it. Tons of video's about this. Game dev's talking about it. You know more than game developers?
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
84 (0.07/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 3900x @ 4.35ghz CCD0, 4.25ghz CCD1
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) MSI 5700 XT Evoke OC @ 2ghz 1.081v
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 1080p144hz, 1080p60hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
Does seem like wasted resources, 80% of the games that have RTX now don't impress me at all in toggle on/off youtube videos comparing it. I would have rather seen a beefier cheap allowing for other things to be turned up higher like shadows, etc... developers who want to do RTX on ps5 will probably have to turn down some other settings in their tweaking process sadly to achieve 60 fps 4k.
the fact that you associate ray-tracing with RTX is pretty fucked

"proper" shadows and lighting?

Games were experimenting with shadows and lighting back on the playstation1 FFS!

Yoiu dont "NEED" raytracing to make functional shadows and lighting. Just as games were doing terrain deformation long before DX11 came along, RT is jsut another way of doing shadows. It isnt the end all be all of graphics, and many people (including myself) have looked at "RT" enhanced games and see almost no improvement, certianly not enough to justify such a massive performance loss and dedicated hardware!
I wonder if you said the same about tessellation when it first became available on first-gen cards lol

Yes you do. The shadows you see in games today, without raytracing, are not realistic. You can't do this without raytracing, DUH. Google it. Tons of video's about this. Game dev's talking about it. You know more than game developers?
this guy gets it
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,337 (4.07/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
I wonder if you said the same about tessellation when it first became available on first-gen cards lol
Tessellation is still sparingly used, a decade after it was introduced.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
815 (0.29/day)
Processor i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB DDR4 4000/CL15
Video Card(s) 1080 Ti @ 2+ GHz
Storage 970 Evo Plus 1TB + 64TB NAS
Display(s) Asus PG279Q 27" 1440p/IPS/165 Hz/Gsync + LG C9 65" 2160p/OLED/HDR
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence STX w/ Upgraded Op-Amps
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Logitech G610 / MX Red + O Rings
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I don't mind raytracing being there, it's one of the steps in graphics' technology evolution. However having part of a GPU only for certain use is like a technology from 15 years ago, when we had vertex and pixel shaders, which were later replaced by unified shaders.
You are right - Nvidia found other uses for the tensor and rt cores outside of ray tracing tho. Can't remember the features, since I don't have Turing and I don't really care about Turing. I will get Ampere on launch tho.

This is brand new tech. I don't think ray tracing will matter before next year, with Ampere. Turing is too slow for proper ray tracing and I bet AMD's solution will be too (full scene ray tracing that is).

Ray tracing is part of the evolution for pc graphics, which has not changed for the last few years. Just more of the same. Ray tracing is going to bring us next level graphics, over time. True lighting and shadows (as in realistic).
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
84 (0.07/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 3900x @ 4.35ghz CCD0, 4.25ghz CCD1
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) MSI 5700 XT Evoke OC @ 2ghz 1.081v
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 1080p144hz, 1080p60hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
Tessellation is still sparingly used, a decade after it was introduced.
fact of the matter it is used and it is useful in the areas where it is used. saying that raytracing is useless is a stupid and ignorant thing to say. it's the next step game devs and hardware need to take in order to achieve the next-gen look without relying on rasterization hacks.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,337 (4.07/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
fact of the matter it is used
Fact of the matter is that it isn't used regularly because people figured out cheaper ways to achieve the same effect, see parallax occlusion mapping. RT isn't useless but there is no reason to believe it wont end up the same as tessellation did, a feature that was so expensive the hardware never managed to be scaled fast enough to be used effectively and rasterized methods proved to be good enough.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (6.74/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
yes,hardware is not software.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
84 (0.07/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 3900x @ 4.35ghz CCD0, 4.25ghz CCD1
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) MSI 5700 XT Evoke OC @ 2ghz 1.081v
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 1080p144hz, 1080p60hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
Fact of the matter is that it isn't used regularly because people figured out cheaper ways to achieve the same effect, see parallax occlusion mapping. RT isn't useless but there is no reason to believe it wont end up the same as tessellation, a feature that was so expensive the hardware never managed to be scaled fast enough to be used effectively and rasterized methods proved to be good enough.
sorry, but parallax occlusion mapping is a screen space effect and doesn't get close to tessellation in terms of the visual quality. not to mention the artifacting since it is a SS effect.
games will need to stop using hacks for effects to look truly mindblowing, and they will in time, just not very soon; real-time ray-tracing is the first step towards that
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,337 (4.07/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
sorry, but parallax occlusion mapping is a screen space effect and doesn't get close to tessellation in terms of the visual quality. not to mention
Well, sorry, but POM is not a screen space effect, I have a feeling you don't know these things work. Whereas tessellation generates tons of extra geometry (which is why it remained prohibitively expensive to this day and will continue to do so, as RT will probably do), POM works by displacing existing geometry to create depth in textures. It's much faster and is indiscernible from tessellation the vast majority of the time.

133704


As you can see there are also no artifacts since it's not a screen space effect. You probably seen POM countless times in games and didn't even know it, maybe you even mistaken it for tessellation.

games will need to stop using hacks
What's absolutely hilarious about this is you'd be amazed about the extent developers go to make DXR function in real time because it never works out of the box, they still need to find hacks to make it feasible.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (2.39/day)
Can't be done that way. You either use fixed function hardware for better RT acceleration but no other use or you don't and have to rely on the shaders themselves.
Not if the solution is built around FPGA, which is the most likely scenario.
It won't be as fast as purpose-built RT core, but it would allow a relatively quick reconfiguration to e.g. physics.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
2,282 (1.23/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Messages
166 (0.16/day)
System Name Lightning
Processor 4790K
Motherboard asrock z87 extreme 3
Cooling hwlabs black ice 20 fpi radiator, cpu mosfet blocks, MCW60 cpu block, full cover on 780Ti's
Memory corsair dominator platinum 2400C10, 32 giga, DDR3
Video Card(s) 2x780Ti
Storage intel S3700 400GB, samsung 850 pro 120 GB, a cheep intel MLC 120GB, an another even cheeper 120GB
Display(s) eizo foris fg2421
Case 700D
Audio Device(s) ESI Juli@
Power Supply seasonic platinum 1000
Mouse mx518
Software Lightning v2.0a
Cause noisy mess smoothed out by RTX are "proper" shadows and lighting.
lel xD don't forget to mention DLSS:
133711

it give you also "proper" anti aliasing, mutch like TXAA, only bether becuase it give even more blur :)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
252 (0.10/day)
I believe Ray Tracing is the future, but I also believe nVidia should have used their limited 12nm dieshrink to improve conventional rasterizing for the 20 Series and waited until the upcoming dieshrink (post-20 series) to tack on RTX. I think the real reason they didn't was because they had an inkling that next gen consoles were going to be pushing Ray Tracing and they decided to have the fundamentals in place long before that happened. Just like many other things that have hit PC gaming first, I believe it'll be when console games have the tech built-in at the base level that we'll see it become important to PC GPU's in general.

1) PC GPU's get it first in limited cases and it's amazing, if fringe.
2) Consoles make it commonplace in games.
3) Console ports carry it back over to PC and new GPU's have to be able to do it to make those games run well.

That's how I see it going for Ray Tracing. I assume that by the end of the upcoming console generation that Ray Tracing will have almost completely replaced conventional lighting and shadows in games because it probably is the better way to handle the problem. But I don't think nVidia made the right call with the 20 Series because I don't think they needed to be launched that far in advance of the next gen consoles and I do think smoother 4k/high framerate gaming across more segments would have been more useful to gamers of the last two years. Well, more useful than limited Ray Tracing effects that will quickly become obsolete when the next gen consoles have their own take that isn't exactly the same as RTX.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
19 (0.02/day)
Well, sorry, but POM is not a screen space effect, I have a feeling you don't know these things work. Whereas tessellation generates tons of extra geometry (which is why it remained prohibitively expensive to this day and will continue to do so, as RT will probably do), POM works by displacing existing geometry to create depth in textures. It's much faster and is indiscernible from tessellation the vast majority of the time.
RT is here to stay for sure. This is pretty straightforward if you know anything about how rendering works. Parallax occlusion mapping is not displacing any geometry and it's illusion breaks when view angle is big relative to plane normal. POM is a height map based UV search/lookup implemented by searching heightmap intersection along the view direction ray for the fragment processed, or it may be cone stepping, binary search or even ray marching. Search for relief mapping, look into relaxed cone stepping. It is fragment shader logic, no vertex/geometry involved.
 
Top