1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Dilemma: Core i7 920 or Phenom II 955

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Yukikaze, Apr 23, 2009.

?

What would you guys get ?

  1. Intel Core i7 920 + 3x2Gb DDR3

    53.3%
  2. AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition + 4x2Gb DDR3

    46.7%
  1. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,350 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Location:
    Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
    Alright. Those OCZs look good.

    I think I am all set, thanks everyone and especially n-ster. First I need to finish the case and migrate my Q9650. Then when the DDR3 gets here, I'll start crackin' on the new build. Prices are bound to drop a bit here over the next couple of weeks, too.

    What about some kit to fit my ultra 120 onto the LGA1336 ? Anyone knows about something of the sort ?
     
  2. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,995 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,449
    I'll look into your CPU fan later.. (gtg) but no problem for the help ;) i7 is what I'm all about, even though I can't afford it xD

    Yes I think I already saw a lga1366 backplate btw... I think that now they come with it....
     
    Yukikaze says thanks.
  3. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,135 (4.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,458
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    I look over at the 3dmark boards and see Cheap 955 CPU out running Intels 1 thousand dollar CPU.

    Looks to me AMD with overclock = WIN

    BTW I'll have a QX9650 new in a box for sale next week for 450.....I see you have a Q9650
     
  4. mp3boy

    mp3boy New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Messages:
    150 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    dude. The i7. NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER...especially if you oc :toast:
     
  5. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,981 (2.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,754
    Location:
    PA, USA
    MATX boards have terrible heat sinks... personally I'd go with the entry gigabyte board. Rock solid and supports SLI/Crossfire and the board will run more cool. I hate OCZ btw... I wouldn't suggest them. Go for the 1066 CAS 7 Crucials.
     
  6. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,995 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,449
    Seriously? you find that your board runs too hot? but doesn't the DFI DK let you OC with lower voltages, a big advantage no? He's looking for a 4ghz OC too, so I would still suggest the DFI DK... in my mind, the 2nd best would be Gigs ud4p :) But you don't like your DFI? At one point EVERYONE was praising them like there'S no tomorow lol...

    Yea I know you hate OCZ... but you gotta admit at at ddr3 1600 cl7, if it runs fine on stock, your good to go!

    but I'm looking forward to your comments on DFI DK/UT vs UD3/UD4p/ud5...
     
  7. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,350 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Location:
    Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
    We weren't discussing an mATX board for the Core i7 build though. The DFI DK X58-T3eH6 is a full sized board, not an mATX one. The JR X58-T3H6 is mATX.

    I'd rather get RAM that is faster at stock, and I have a pair of OCZ Platinum Low Latency DDR1 in my P4 still going strong (and still doing 2.85v CL2-2-2-5 at DDR-390Mhz). Even the OCZ Value sticks I've had overclocked like crazy (I ran OCZ Value DDR2 800Mhz at 1110 with CL6-6-6-18 and 1.85v). Never had any problems with OCZ, so I am going to get those, unless there is a problem with the specific tri-channel kit that was mentioned.

    What about the Asus P6T or the Foxconn X58 Renaissance?

    Heck, screw it, if a P6T Deluxe, or the X58 Extreme by GB would be better bets, let me know. This won't break the piggybank, either.

    Edit: The Foxconn X58 Bloodrage is highly praised by the Ninjalane review. It is priced competitively here, considering that it comes with a Creative Sonar X-Fi and seems to overclock very well.

    Bah. Market research in a new tech zone, gonna take a while to make a decision...
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2009
  8. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,399 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,410
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    IS there any thought behind this? The i7 for sure is a synthetic monster, but gaming performance the PII's are sweeping the feet out under the i7's, even the lower PII's.... He didn't really say a benching rig.

    Just qouting you, I did read the rest, but no point in quoting basically the same answers.
     
  9. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    14,639 (4.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,212
    Gaming Performance and Price would tell me the Phenom 2 Rig will suffice for sometime.
     
  10. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,995 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,449
    in multi-GPU, PII doesn't "sweep the feet out of" the i7 at all.... if anything, it'll be the opposite... and in single GPU, i7 equals PII pretty much...

    I tell you... DFI DK OCs VERY well for the price.... if there are boards similar in price or lower, but look better or something, and you like that, then you can get it... but sseriously, here at TPU, the DFI DK is looked as godly... kinda like those crucials too... because they yielded the best OCs for us... but there are some others that are good, so just name the model and we can inform you ;)
     
  11. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,399 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,410
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    When you have a PII 920 (yes with a single GPU) beating a i7 965 in Crysis I would calll that sweeping feet, thats over $800 difference in price right there.

    The big advantage to the i7 is the HT, and that isn't applied in gaming, so imo just not worth it. I mean it's a great setup, but if it's just going to be for gaming, both will be great choices, but the PII will get it done and done well for a bit less.
     
  12. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,876 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    691
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    it is widely known that i7 runs very hot. Those with an i7 setup have reportedly done away with their central heat.
     
  13. Assassin48

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,459 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    515
    Location:
    95350
    and stove/BBQ

    :roll::roll:
     
  14. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,350 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Location:
    Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
    I tend to run multi-GPU setups (previous one was 8800GT SLI, now the HD4870X2) and this is another reason I prefer the X58 based system - It allows for both CFX and SLI if one is more appealing than the other at the moment.

    The DFI DK is pretty much decided for me as the motherboard.
     
  15. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,995 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,449
    if you would test them OCed... a i7 920 would be VERY close to a PII 955 ... in single GPUs... i7 940 or 965 SUCK... 920 owns (price/performance wise)... a 4 to 4.2 ghz OC on air on i7 is very common... as for heat, i7 is DESIGNED to take heat... you can run them at 80 to 90 centigrate no problem... in multi-GPU, especially 3+, i7 920 KILLS PII...
     
  16. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,260 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,008
    Location:
    Miami
    of course there is... the Phenom II 955 won't last as long as the core i7 will... and show me one review where the Phenom II "sweeps the feet out under" the i7. That's a lie. The only instance of that is a crossfire review by annandtech and that had more to do with the 790FX being a better Xfire chipset - and only in two games out of many. In single-gpu and in CPU bound instances, the phenom loses.

    Once the next gen cards come out, you will see the phenom start to fall behind the i7, especially in multi GPU configs. The only reason that the phenom II keeps up is that it has enough juice to run everything you need today. The i7 on the other hand, has enough juice to keep up for some time to come. If you can get the fastest tech right now, for not all that much more, then why not do it?
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2009
  17. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,995 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,449
    phanbuey... in your 1st paragraph, you mean that in multi-gpu phenom loses no? anyhow... what I want to make as a point is that the reviews have a PII 955 at 3.2ghz vs a i7 920 at 2.66... i7 OCs much better than PII... but they could at least test this in 4ghz each... in that case i7 wins hands down... If he wouldn't OC, then its a different story
     
  18. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,399 (3.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,410
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    I'm sure it would be very close, both are awesome processors. Really for gaming the performance difference is going to be neglible is what I'm trying to say.

    [​IMG]

    There you go, even PII 720 > i7 lineup. And look at that Q9550S kicking it!
     
    phanbuey says thanks.
  19. trt740

    trt740

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,938 (2.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,113
    To answer the question if you have the money a I7 rig will be faster but run a bit hotter. If you want to build it cheaper, have it run cooler and have extra money for a better GPU go PII.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  20. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,260 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,008
    Location:
    Miami
    :twitch: well... alright then. The Q9550 beating it makes me a little suspicious tho, I gotta say...

    http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i7-multigpu-sli-crossfire-game-performance-review/19

    "Far Cry 2 is not different. As you can see FC2 is very CPU limited on both the E8400 Dual Core processor yet also on the snazzy QX9770 based platform. But again a massive win on Core i7."
     
  21. bpgt64

    bpgt64

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,682 (0.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    265
    Location:
    ATL, GA
    Well, your forgetting one thing...

    GPUs are only JUST now starting to benefit from Quad cores, and even then its marginal. Go look at say, Tomshardware.com or any other benching site and you'll see how little difference is really made by quad cores, and the new i7 architecture, with reference to games in the 1680x1050 category. My E8400 at 4.0ghz plus a HD 4870 X2 destroys every game I throw at it, with max settings and 1680x1050. That includes; TF2, Far Cry 2, Crisis(original, warhead, and wars), and many many more. CPU doesn't matter nearly as much as GPU and it seems you have that covered. So I'd do which ever was cheaper.

    The prior paragraph is based on the idea that your talking about gaming. So I am assuming that your using a standard LCD moniter with no higher than 60 hz, so any benchmarks that show games with 160fps, are stupid. Applications wise the i7 does a good job of kicking the AMD in the nuts however. Unless you REALLY wanna blow the cash, go with which ever is cheaper.
     
  22. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,995 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,449

    Who in their good mind would run an i7 at 2.66?

    Do you agree that i7 OCs to 4ghz easy? so does the PII 940? 4ghz is an average OC for both right?

    GUESS WHO WOULD KILL THE OTHER??? i7 :D

    PII 955 sucks (for the price I mean) so do i7 940 and i7 965

    IMO, you can't go wrong with PII 940BE or 720BE :)
     
  23. wiak

    wiak

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,813 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    221
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Norway
    support the under dog, you save over ~$100 you can use on a SSD, bigger harddrive or faster graphics card like 4870 X2 ;)
    it all depends what you are gonna us it for to, if your a gamer then just get the Phenom II, its even faster than i7 in games at high detail/AF/AA and resolution
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  24. bpgt64

    bpgt64

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,682 (0.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    265
    Location:
    ATL, GA
  25. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,350 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Location:
    Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
    Well, the decision to go i7 already fell for me and the thread was already half-derailed into "This ! That !".

    In an attempt to bring it a bit back to the track, here's the rationalization behind going with the Core i7:

    Support the underdog is hardly an incentive to buy, at least for me. Besides, my paycheck is paid by the guys who make the i7 :D

    For real though: I am a gamer and a tinker/bencher both, and I already have the HD4870X2 which will be used in that rig (My Q9650 gets the 9600GT and the 8600GT for PhysX). I cannot buy a SSD for 100$ here (not even for 200$, actually) and I run RAID0 setups which are more attractive in perf * size / price ratio. Finally, CPU-wise the Core i7 costs approx. as much as the Phenom II 955 (Again, over here), with the 50$ difference between the DFI board and a good AM3 board over here being a moot point since the X58 allows me to run SLI or CFX, while on the AM3 platform only CFX is an option (And I am no GPU fanboy, I want to be able to buy whatever is best at the moment, and always have the option to expand to a multi-GPU setup by the same manufacturer down the road).

    Finally, as to why not buy the 940BE - That was the original plan, but I'd rather buy a system with RAM which will be reused in the future, so DDR2 is out.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)