• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

EU Fines Intel a Record €1.06 Billion in Antitrust Case

Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
555 (0.13/day)
Location
Indiana
System Name Evil Dragon
Processor AMD FX-8320 Vishera @4.7ghz
Motherboard Asus 970 pro gaming Aura
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H100i V2(fully Lapped). 4 40mm NB/VRM fans. 6 Thermaltake Riing 12 Series fans
Memory 2X8gig GeIL EVO Veloce Series DDR3 1600 @9.9.9.26
Video Card(s) Powercolor Red Devil RX 480 (1400/2100)
Storage PNY XLR8 480gig SSD. Patriot Pyro SE 60gig SSD.
Display(s) ASUS VP228H LED
Case Thermaltake Core V31
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1150 W/Creative Sound Blaster Cinema 2
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ 110
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
Software Win 10 Pro
While I agree with the decision, the fine is absolutely stupid. And just contributes to the "sue happy" world we live in......
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
967 (0.17/day)
Location
Danville IL
Processor I7 4770k
Motherboard ASUS z87 pro
Cooling Corsair a50
Memory 4x4 gig Gskil aries ddr3 1866
Video Card(s) Gigabyte r280x windforce
Storage intel 520 120 gig ssd
Display(s) 24 inch Asus IPS
Case Cool Master
Audio Device(s) realtek onboard
Power Supply hiper 880
Software win 7 ult
Intel should sue every company they gave a discount to and get their money back to pay the fine, that would make EU's BS go away. If it was breaking the law the buyers of the intel products knew also. Sue em Intel.
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
433 (0.11/day)
Location
You are here.
System Name Prometheus
Processor Intel i5 4690K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory Crucial Ballistix 32GB DDR3 1866Mhz CL8-8-8-24 1T 1.35V
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 4GB STRIX OC
Storage 2 x Intel 330 240GB + 2 x 2TB WD Green
Display(s) AMH A409U 4K
Case Metallic Gear Neo ATX
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio PCIe
Power Supply Seasonic X660
Mouse Razer Death Adder 2013
Keyboard Vortex Race 3 75% MX Brown
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64
I thought we were having a discussion on an open forum. You say something, I reply. I say something, you reply. I don't think I am out of line just because I am trying to defend my point. Calling me a troll (publicly, of all the possible ways) doesn't make me wrong. It just gives me more power.

If you don't want news to be open to discussion, close the threads. I think a news this important deserves an open discussion, with somewhat deeper remarks then just the traditional "serves them right!".

I will just say one last thing, then I will not post on this thread anymore. I have other posts in other threads, people actually considered me helpful. I don't have that many posts, you can check them.

About what I want to say, on the topic. An exclusivity contract is an exclusivity contract. You get rebates because you are exclusive (by definition). If you don't want to be exclusive, no problem, but you don't get the rebate, you pay the full price. There is no mention that the ones that wouldn't be exclusive would pay anything on top of the full price.

Anyway, smarter people then me (us) made the decision. And their decision is final (pending appeal). So that is it. Over and out.
 

derFeef

New Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
21 (0.00/day)
Processor Phenom II X4 945 @ 3.5
Cooling Noctua
Memory 4GB
Video Card(s) 4870 X2
Storage 2x WD Raptor 150GB
Display(s) Eizo HD2411W
Case Chieftech Dragon
Audio Device(s) Creatice X-Fi Fatality
Power Supply Be quiet! DPP 1000W
Software Vista 64 Ultimate
About what I want to say, on the topic. An exclusivity contract is an exclusivity contract. You get rebates because you are exclusive (by definition). If you don't want to be exclusive, no problem, but you don't get the rebate, you pay the full price. There is no mention that the ones that wouldn't be exclusive would pay anything on top of the full price.
But the contract was something like this:
Don not sell AMD products and you will get rebates with our products. Thats not a legal contract and this is what everything is about.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
5,052 (1.05/day)
Location
Manchester, United Kingdom
Processor AMD FX 8320 @ 4GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 rev1
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 4 x 4GB DDR3 Ripjawz 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vapor-X AMD R9 280X
Storage 1 x 500GB Samsung Evo 850, 1 x 500GB Vrap Data Drive, 3 x 2TB Seagate, 1 x 1TB Samsung F1
Display(s) 3 x DGM IPS-2402WDH
Case Coolermaster HAF X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Coolermaster 1000W Silent Pro M
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Anti-competition laws are there to stop one company becoming the dominant power in the market and forcing all the other businesses out of the market.

I'm sure I don't need to explain how bad it would be for the consumers if Intel was the only company in the x86 market? Stagnant market, no innovation, a company that can set WHATEVER price it wants. That is very bad for us.

Whatever you think of the A-C laws, what Intel did was against the law, they set out to force AMD out of business by forcing the OEMs, and smaller business to buy their products via various means. That is illegal, therefore they should be punished.
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
3,189 (0.70/day)
Location
CA, US
System Name bits and pieces
Processor Intel 8086K
Motherboard Gigabyte z390m
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB for now
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 AMP for now
Storage 280GB Optane 900P U.2 SSD + 4TB PCIe NVMe SSD
Display(s) BenQ 32" 4K monitor + Nixeus 27" IPS 1440p 144Hz
Case Silverstone Temjin TJ08B-E
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD --- Presonus Eris E5 w/ 2x JL Audio 10w0v3 Sealed --- JBL 4412
Power Supply EVGA 850W plat
Mouse Corsair M65 pro
Keyboard Gigabyte K83
Software Win 10 Pro x64
w8, so once a small company becomes successful and grows then they get fined for being top dog?
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
294 (0.06/day)
Location
Szekszárd, Hungary
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 955BE
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V Evo
Cooling Xigmatek HDT S1283
Memory 4GB Kingston Hyperx DDR3
Video Card(s) GigaByte Radeon HD3870 512MB GDDR4
Storage WD Caviar Black 640GB, Hitachi Deskstar T7K250 250GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster F2380M
Audio Device(s) Creative Audigy ES 5.1
Power Supply Corsair VX550
Software Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64
w8, so once a small company becomes successful and grows then they get fined for being top dog?
No, please read the topic, before you post something silly.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,250 (0.23/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Cooleer Master RP M520
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
w8, so once a small company becomes successful and grows then they get fined for being top dog?
top dog is not god to do whatever they want....
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
742 (0.17/day)
Location
Auckland
System Name PBD
Processor Core i5 760 @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Asus Maximus III Gene
Cooling Corsair H-50-1
Memory 4 x 4096mb G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 Cas7
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 670 DirectCU TOP
Storage Crucial 256GB SSD (system) + 2x Samsung F3 1TB (storage) + 2x 2TB Raid-1 NAS (backup)
Display(s) Dell SP2309w 23" 2048x1152
Case Antec Max Fusion Remote
Power Supply Corsair AX750W
Software Win 7 Pro x64
We're all paying for Intel's crimes ...

Suck it Intel. :D

All of you realise that we are paying for these crimes right now, don't you?

These anti-competitive practices were happening back in the days when AMD had processors that could actually compete with Intel's across the board. Because Intel limited and restricted the amount of AMD CPUs that were sold (and sold more of their own), AMD had less money to spend on R&D (and Intel had more). Consequently Intel comes out with Core 2 & i7 & AMD have fallen behind.

Imagine if AMD had had more $$ to research better CPUs? We might have been at a point now where AMD's Phenoms were competing with the i7. Therefore the i7 would probably be a damn sight cheaper. But they're not. We lose. We're stuck paying $1000+ for extreme series processors cause they have nothing to compete against. We lose.
 
Last edited:

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,804 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
They gave rebate under the condidtion not to build/sell AMD powered PC´s. Now if that is fair competition, there must be something wrong with your mind :eek:
You need some research on what are the actual charges leveled against Intel. Previous news. Intel bribed manufacturers to cancel/delay their products based on AMD CPUs, and dictating manufacturers on what share of their products should use Intel processors. It's illegal, and not just in my opinion, but that of not only EU, but also the governments of Japan, and Korea, with investigations backed by US Federal Trade Commission.
Problem? They got a huge GAIN with this. Please, research a bit :)

edit - from the source:
In addition to providing rebates to manufacturers that bought almost entirely Intel products, the Commission found that the chipmaker had paid them to postpone or cancel the launch of specific products based on AMD chips.
"dont sell AMD and get 30% off"
"sell less than 10% AMD and get 20% off"

etc.


Basically in the competitive PC world, it meant if you went with AMD... you lost out. you would never be able to price match your competitors. The general public knew "pentium" they dont know "athlon" - intel had made it so that if you sold AMD, your intel systems would cost too much and never sell, so it was intel or AMD - no middle ground.

And if you gotta pick one or the other, you go the one the public will buy... and that was intel.
This is why i agree that Intel should be fined.

The commission can charge as much as 10% of Intel's annual revenue as fine, which was $38 billion in 2008.
Only $1.06 Billion? Intel must be laughing hard: they gave a very serious blow to AMD (worth far more then this fine over the years, IMHO) and only pay this amount when they made $33.8 billion in 2008?

If i were the Intel CEO, i ought to be thinking something like this: "Outstanding!! We've crippled the competition severely and only have this to pay!"


For Intel, doing this payed off :mad:
 

tigger

I'm the only one
Supporter
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
11,134 (2.20/day)
System Name Black to the Core MKV
Processor Amd Ryzen 7 1800x
Motherboard Asus Prime B350-plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D15, 6x 140mm + 1 120mm controlled by Corsair commander pro
Memory 2x8gb G.Skill Flare X 2400 DDR4
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 1070 8GB
Storage Sandisk 256GB M2 ssd Boot and Seagate Barracuda 1TB Data+1TB WD Green
Display(s) Acer K272HL 27" 1080HD 75hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D 6 x 140mm fans
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC887 with Topping VX2 digital amp and Teac small hifi speakers
Power Supply Corsair CX550M
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Corsair K65 LUX
Software Win 10 Pro x64
They'll pay the fine out of the change tin on the ceo's desk.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,986 (8.45/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Only $1.06 Billion? Intel must be laughing hard: they gave a very serious blow to AMD (worth far more then this fine over the years, IMHO) and only pay this amount when they made $33.8 billion in 2008?

If i were the Intel CEO, i ought to be thinking something like this: "Outstanding!! We've crippled the competition severely and only have this to pay!"
Notice I said "up to". :)

W1zzard is right. In this conspiracy, Intel ended up gaining more than what the fine imposed attempts to put a stop to. In essence, all these years of proven malpractices were worth it, despite the fine. 1.06 B Euro really is peanuts at the macro-level. All these repercussions IMO are image cleanup, and sympathy harvest that automatically follow such judgements, in order to cushion the stock-price, and preventing a trench.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
742 (0.17/day)
Location
Auckland
System Name PBD
Processor Core i5 760 @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Asus Maximus III Gene
Cooling Corsair H-50-1
Memory 4 x 4096mb G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 Cas7
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 670 DirectCU TOP
Storage Crucial 256GB SSD (system) + 2x Samsung F3 1TB (storage) + 2x 2TB Raid-1 NAS (backup)
Display(s) Dell SP2309w 23" 2048x1152
Case Antec Max Fusion Remote
Power Supply Corsair AX750W
Software Win 7 Pro x64
This is why i agree that Intel should be fined.

Only $1.06 Billion? Intel must be laughing hard: they gave a very serious blow to AMD (worth far more then this fine over the years, IMHO) and only pay this amount when they made $33.8 billion in 2008?

If i were the Intel CEO, i ought to be thinking something like this: "Outstanding!! We've crippled the competition severely and only have this to pay!"


For Intel, doing this payed off :mad:

Agreed.

People here are getting riled up about how huge the fine is. €1,060,000,000 is a LOT of money to you, me, and Fred next door; but to Intel, who are worth €85,000,000,000+, it is nothing more than a kick in the nuts. It'll hurt for a bit, and the shareholders will be pissy come the AGM, but they'll get back up and keep riding the wave of the better products they could afford to research with the extra money that these crimes generated.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,804 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Notice I said "up to". :)

W1zzard is right. In this conspiracy, Intel ended up gaining more that what the fine imposed attempts to put a stop to. In essence, all these years of proven malpractices were worth it, despite the fine. 1.06 B Euro really is peanuts at the macro-level. All these repercussions IMO are image cleanup, and sympathy harvest that automatically follows, in order to cushion the stock-price, and preventing a trench.
I know. Even if the fine was the whole $3.8 billion, it would still be "pocket change" for Intel.

IMHO, a $20 billion fine would be a start ...
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,986 (8.45/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
$20 billion fine would be a start ...
$20 B would mean no more Intel in EU for a few years, reason being that Intel would not pay up and simply quit the market (and end up saving in the process). EU won't remain a viable market to sell in. No company in its right mind would pay that much. EU knows it can't overdo this. Market demand, AMD and other CPU makers exploiting conditions, and illegal imports would dent EU, which will then be forced to reconsider the fine. 1.06 B however, doesn't strike the threshold. Intel still has a lot to lose if it doesn't pay up that money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HTC

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,804 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
$20 B would mean no more Intel in EU for a few years, reason being that Intel would not pay up and simply quit the market (and end up saving in the process). EU won't remain a viable market to sell in. No company in its right mind would pay that much. EU knows it can't overdo this.
I see your point, and i have to agree: Intel would simply not sell to the EU, but they would still have to pay the fine.

There's a way to counter this, though: have EVERYBODY (countries) fine Intel. If so, Intel wouldn't stop selling everywhere, would they?


Still, how much do you think AMD lost?

If Intel hadn't done this, do you agree that AMD would have a better market share of the CPU market?

Let's imagine that AMD would have 15% more market share then it currently has: how much do you think that is worth? A TON more then the fine and don't forget to multiply that figure by the years this was going on ...
 
Last edited:

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,986 (8.45/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
I see your point, and i have to agree: Intel would simply not sell to the EU, but they would still have to pay the fine.

There's a way to counter this, though: have EVERYBODY (countries) fine Intel. If so, Intel wouldn't stop selling everywhere, would they?
EU lacks the capability to do that. Defaulting the fine would affect Intel's operations only in EU, nowhere else.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,804 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
EU lacks the capability to do that. Defaulting the fine would only affect Intel's operations in EU, nowhere else.
Yes, yes: i know. What i meant was to have all the other countries present Intel with a fine of their own.

Since the EU can't go after Intel the way they should, the combined fine (total from all the countries) should make a more realistic number: this way, Intel would be properly fined for it's dirty business practices.
 

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
20,156 (4.32/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Icarus Mk.V
Processor Intel 8600k@4.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Strixx Z370-F
Cooling CPU: BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro}
Memory 16 Corsair Vengeance White LED DDR4 3200Mhz {2x8GB}
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1080Ti Gaming OC|Accelero Xtreme IV
Storage Samsung 970Evo 512GB SSD (Boot)|WD Blue 1TB SSD|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) Asus PB278Q 27"
Case Corsair 760T (White)
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900/G502
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Although I have written this doesn't mean I agree with it. :)

If you ask me, giving rebates to use Intel chips, is very competitive. Its what drives prices down, competition, companies undercutting each other.

Are the EU going to fine car manufacturer's for you buying a car because they were offering you a discount making it cheaper than buying a similar car from another dealer? Wtf is the difference.

I'm getting bored of the EU fining everything that moves :ohwell:
I have never heard of Intel giving consumers 'rebates' to use their products, same as most other hardware manufacturers. Seems schemes like this only exist outside Europe.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
6,445 (1.32/day)
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
This is just ASKING for Intel to innovate like this:

1./ Implement a CPU with "licensed" not purchased microcode
2./ Annual fee of $10 to use, just like a road-tax license imposed by governments. The fee could be "waived" at the discretion of Intel, unless
3./ They get dicked around, in which case, the fee becomes due for immediate payment, else
4./ CPUs stop working as soon as they phone home through the internet

Part 4 works if the CPU needs to dial home once in a while to validate the license, otherwise, they expire.
 

Millenia

New Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2008
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
Location
Turenki, Finland
System Name PixelCruncher Mk. II
Processor AMD Phenom X4 965 @ 3,92GHz
Motherboard MSI GD70-790FX
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P
Memory 2x Patriot Viper DDR3-1600MHz Extreme
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD4870 1GB
Storage Samsung SpinPoint T166 500GB + Samsung SpinPoint F2 1,5TB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 226BW 22" widescreen
Case CM Storm Scout
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI XtremeGamer
Power Supply LC-Power Ozeanos 650W modular
Software Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit (Finnish)
Benchmark Scores 1337 in lulzmark
I have never heard of Intel giving consumers 'rebates' to use their products, same as most other hardware manufacturers. Seems schemes like this only exist outside Europe.
No, they were offering rebates to business partners (mainly companies like HP, Fujitsu-Siemens etc) with very strict conditions, effectively nearly forcing OEMs to build Intel systems. This resulted in a situation where AMD would have had to sell their CPUs to business partners for a LOT less than they cost to manufacture, and with AMD being the smaller company here they couldn't afford to.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,986 (8.45/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Yes, yes: i know. What i meant was to have all the other countries present Intel with a fine of their own.
If moving all countries to do the same thing was that easy, mankind would have colonized the moon, Mars, and Europa by now.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
5,052 (1.05/day)
Location
Manchester, United Kingdom
Processor AMD FX 8320 @ 4GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 rev1
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 4 x 4GB DDR3 Ripjawz 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vapor-X AMD R9 280X
Storage 1 x 500GB Samsung Evo 850, 1 x 500GB Vrap Data Drive, 3 x 2TB Seagate, 1 x 1TB Samsung F1
Display(s) 3 x DGM IPS-2402WDH
Case Coolermaster HAF X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Coolermaster 1000W Silent Pro M
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
w8, so once a small company becomes successful and grows then they get fined for being top dog?
No, there's a difference between a company that becomes successful through it's own marketing and products, and a company that becomes successful by bribing others.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,250 (0.23/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Cooleer Master RP M520
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
i forget...

is not only Intel fault;the companies who has bought with special rebates are guilty also; they have charged the final consumer with a high profit margin;they deserve also to be fined
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
3,095 (0.55/day)
Location
Visalia, CA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K @ 5GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime Z370-A
Cooling Swiftech H220-X
Memory 2x16GBs G.Skill Trident DDR4 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix 2080 Ti Black Ops Ed
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Sony 75" 4K HDR TV - Samsung Odyssey VR
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T
Audio Device(s) Sony STR-DN1080 - 7.2 Klipsch Dolby ATMOS Speaker Setup
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 1300W
Keyboard Logitech K830 wireless keyboard/trackpad
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
No matter how you cut it, one billion euros seems kinda harsh doesn't it?

I mean, it's not like Intel didn't break the law, and I'm all for breaking bad corporate practices, but with the economy being as bad as it is, do you really think its necessary to rule a fine so high? I know it wont put Intel out of bussiness neither, but in times like this when PC sales are down overall (even Atom shipments have decreased by 33% this quarter) do you have to necessarily beat them to the ground? (even tough Intel has enough cash to pay the fine...).

The point is they were found guilty by a jury and all, and they certainly have to pay for it and stop these practices immediately; but how do they determine consumers in general have been affectted to the tune of one billion euros by their practices?

Besides, is this money going to be used to benefit the consumers in the end? What will the EU do with all this money? Send relief checks to anyone who bought a PC in Europe in the last 10 years?

Just my two cents...
 
Last edited:
Top