- Aug 2, 2011
- 1,370 (0.33/day)
|Processor||Core i9 10940X @ 4.9GHz|
|Motherboard||Asrock Taichi XE|
|Cooling||Custom loop, 2x360mm radiator,Lian Li UNI, EK XRes140,EK Supremacy EVO|
|Memory||4x8GB G.Skill RGB 3600MHz C16|
|Video Card(s)||EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra OC Scanner core +750 mem|
|Storage||960 EVO 1TB,XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB,Micron 1100 2TB SSD,OCZ Vector 512GB,1.5TB Caviar Green|
|Display(s)||Acer X34S, Acer XB270HU|
|Case||LianLi O11 Dynamic White|
|Audio Device(s)||Logitech G-Pro X Wireless|
|Power Supply||EVGA P3 1200W|
|Mouse||Logitech G502 Lightspeed|
|Keyboard||Logitech G512 Carbon w/ GX Brown|
|VR HMD||HP Reverb G2 (V2)|
Small number ...there's a lot of 1440p 120/144hz users who are still using monitors with Dual DVI...
Man everytime I invest in an Nvidia product, right after wards..something like this comes out.. wtf
I wonder what happens when you use a DVI - D to Display Port adapter.
I don't think there are any people at 1440P with 120Hz-144Hz going over a dual link DVI, as that connection does not have enough bandwidth to support what you speak of. This is why you see display port on monitors that support those specs.