Curious as to what impact that the slower write speed has had with regard to any observed impacts on application performance ?
The reason I ask is that had a call from one of our users who was looking at his backup logs, who observed that "doing the math" his incremental backups each night while just a few seconds up to maybe 2 minutes at times, looking at the amount of data he backed up, it was at a rate much lower than advertised speeds. I explained that the software has to make alog of all the files , check the dates, determine what's changed, make a "shadow copy", replace the changed files, cretae alog and then go back and test to see whether the file copy was accurate.... there's a lot more going on than justbafile copy. But also, as these backups were being performed while he was sleeping, not that it's perhaps not worth concerning ones self about.
When I observe such performance issues, I like to categorize them into:
a) It's impacting my work efficiency or user experience
b) It's not doing the above but I still wanna know why.
c) It's isolated and evident only in benchmarks or 0 impact activities, and therefore don't care.
If it's a) solving the issue is given high priority ... If it's b) ... it's kind a back burner thing saved for a rainy day ... if it's c) everyone once and a while I will search for topics more out of curiosity then a desire to solve a problem that has 0 impact. The backup thing while sleeping would be a c)
I don't know if they choose the most stupid people for support at each company or it is something else. I am contacting Gigabyte support for almost a month, and they are super retarded. I clearly say in the ticket: "I have ram that is on my motherboard QVL", and the first they reply (after 10 days) they ask: "Did you check whether your ram is on QVL list?". And Samsung isn't any better, I know it because I tried to contact support once because of an issue with Galaxy S7/Android.
Is it a real person ?
I keep getting personal responses from Asus regarding my router. Note: This strats with an e-mail report where I teall them that I am having an issue with the USB ports on the router that are supposed to let you turn any printer into a network printer.
a) All PCs are wired ethernet connections to the router
b) All Printers are wired ethernet connections to the router, (2) Ethernet (MFP and Large format plotter) and (1) USB photo printer connected to USB Printer ports on router
The illustrations and descriptions in the MFP and printer manuals bear only a vague resemblance to what is on the screen. I can sometimes get this to work from 1 PC, but never a 2nd, 3rd etc.
Every email response starts with the respondent identifying themselves as say Bob, James, Bill..etc. The rest of the responses has slight chnages mostky in order of sencentez but all say the same thing. Just liek the scripts you get from telemarketers, and email scammers.
They all then say that if i follow the instructions below, they will be able to get me "on the internet"
1. One would think that since they rec'd an email, Im already on the internet.
2. One would think that if they read the email, they would have read one of the 12
***** "Remember again, I have no issues getting on the internet****
..... statements I type after every 2 sentence paragraphs.
And yet, evey email closes with instructions as to how to get on the internet and not a word about network printing.
