• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

I'm looking for a good tool to make the 3D scanning of my mini-pc using the photogrammetry and my Kinect 2.

Status
Not open for further replies.
2 cents plus 3 dollars will buy you a cup of coffee. I think that you wanting to build your own tablets and cell phones without even the willingness to learn how to solder, use cad, or code is funny, and perhaps a bit naive.

Half true. To learn how to soldering is not on my plans as It is not in your plan,for example,to study Freud's thought. Simply the time for me is not yet came. I feel not ready to go deeply in that field. Even because I'm realizing that's not strictly necessary. I see that I can build a tablet without solder anything. Sure,it will become rudimentary and toy-like, not a product that can compete on the market. But it should not. I can't start selling small or large quantities of devices on the market. And so I'm fine with making it a spartan one. I also like the idea of being able to attach and detach as many components as possible from each other, in order to make it easier to replace them, without having to ask someone to carry out professional (and expensive) operations ; but it's on my plans learning how to use CAD.

I would like to pay the coffee to you. Or if you prefer a beer. Because even if I perceive you as a bit gruff, I still believe that you are a person that worth keeping as a friend.
 
Freud does not impress me. He had a very poor capacity for real empathy with people. I put little stock in the words of drunks and druggies.....and Freud was both. I do not believe that sex is the sole motivator for all human action, and there are many in your field that would agree with me.
 
Freud does not impress me. He had a very poor capacity for real empathy with people. I put little stock in the words of drunks and druggies.....and Freud was both. I do not believe that sex is the sole motivator for all human action, and there are many in your field that would agree with me.

That's a rumor, a nonsense. Freud spoke of sexual life as a life made up of relations between the two sexes,male and females, not of sexual intercourse only . It's also a bullshit to think that Freud took drug for recreational purposes. Freud took drug to study its effects. But he smoked too much. How many cigarettes do you smoke ?
 
Why are nearly all of Freud's theories disregarded by modern psychology? Because they mostly lack scientific basis.

"The Interpretation of Dreams" is just the rantings of a junkie. "Totem and Taboo" is not much better. "Moses and Monotheism" is an affront to the Jewish faith.

Polymorphous perversity of Infantile sexuality. Oedipus Complex. Women having penis envy, while boys have castration anxiety.....these theories are creepy and best left not discussed here.

I know lots of people (myself included) that are in control of their hormones and answer to a high power. You can think what you like about Freud and his psychoanalytical babble. I am perfectly capable of reading it and understanding it to my own satisfaction. You are not the only one with an education.

How many cigarettes do you smoke ?

I don't smoke.

I would like to pay the coffee to you. Or if you prefer a beer. Because even if I perceive you as a bit gruff, I still believe that you are a person that worth keeping as a friend.

Don't patronize me.

You don't know me. I don't know you, but I have not tried to analyze you.

Now, lets get back to tablets that look like Speak & Spells



Speak_&_Spell_(original_style).jpg
 
If you say I'm analyzing you, you don't know what an analysis is. I can't analyze someone in a chat and making a small superficial interpretation does not mean analyzing you. Your writing style is too acidic. I'm not able to handle this level of acidity.
 
Very false and offending. You simply don't tolerate those people who try to get to the result by finding some /anyway,licit/ workaround to work less. Why? Because you are a professionist,you work well,maybe even too much. You are too fussy. So fussy to don't understand that my project is a little project. For sure I want to be satisfied by the result,but I have a limited budget and no commercial ambition. And anyway,you can't blame if I have no experience,I'm here to learn,for sure I'm not here to be discouraged by someone,even if he is experienced. I see a lot of experienced users here. So,every suggestion I see is useful but not essential until I will understand what will be the next step to do for my project.

What amazes me a lot is a cultural difference that I see. You are convinced that one can do everything one wants, perhaps just by reading the instructions on the internet. Me and those who live in my cultural environment are aware of our limits and we do what we can do. The rest we either outsource or we give up adding functions that we are aware we cannot master.

I also read that someone is convinced of the uselessness of even going to university / college to get a theoretical-practical basis. In my cultural universe, having a school education is fundamental. And I have a humanistic one,not an electrical / electronical engineering one,so I can certainly only aspire to do something simple.

Surely you and me don't play the same music. What I can't stand about you is a sort of intolerance that I perceive you might have with those who don't play the same music that you play or a music that you don't like. Instead of saying, okay we don't vibrate in the same way, it's okay, you continue to say and not say, increasing the score for S-TKUC (and that's okay, he's great), but for me there is never an appreciation for the time and resources that I put into the project. Your continuous desire to indirectly devalue my efforts, I find it an ambiguous behavior and a little bit intolerant towards cultural and sensitivity diversity,by the way, that you deduce based on what you read, because you can't see / feel my emotions in real time. But you attribute to me what you perceive without even asking yourself the question if evaluating whether what you perceive can be compatible with what I perceive. My two cents as a psychologist.

You certainly think you know a lot about people you don't know at all. Call it what you like.

As for my "acidity"

6c53f1f75f6edc3c5b3f43d1f770d96f.jpg
 
A real analysys follows precise rules that cannot be respected where we are now. You can call it naive psychology. That's what comes across to me in what you write and how you write it. Anyway,really do you think it's useful to focus your attention to what I write and not focusing your attention to the reasons why I wrote that ? It would be useful for you to reflect on the way you carry yourself. I say this to tell you something that can be useful to you to improve your relationship with others, if it is along the lines of the relationship you have with me.

Post #154 does not offer absolutely any chance to reply for me. Your beliefs are so net and fruit of such a deconstructed vision of Freud's thought
that you take away from me the desire to argue especially because you do not take into consideration the socio-cultural context in which his thought was born. 80 years have passed, today many of Freud's theories are outdated, but we can save something. Do you want to save something ?


It is a gross error to extrapolate from a broader context only some parts of the speech to support your thesis....

6c53f1f75f6edc3c5b3f43d1f770d96f.jpg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top