D
Deleted member 24505
Guest
intel has 80% of the market so i doubt it.
System Name | BEAST |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i7 920 C0 Quad Core Processor LGA1366 2.66GHZ Bloomfield 8MB LGA batch 3844A509 |
Motherboard | ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 X58 ATX LGA1366 DDR3 |
Cooling | CoolIt ECO A.L.C. 120mm radiator |
Memory | G.SKILL F3-12800CL8TU-6GBPI PC3-12800 6GB 3X2GB DDR3-1600 CL8-8-8-21 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Radeon HD 4890 1GB 850MHZ 1GB 3.9GHZ GDDR5 PCI-E 2XDVI HDTV |
Storage | SAMSUNG SPINPOINT F1 750GB X 2, WD2500KS 250GB, WD15EARS 1.5TB, WD20EARS 2.0TB |
Display(s) | LG W2361V-PF Monitors 23” Widescreen LCD Monitor (23.0” diagonal) |
Case | Cooler Master CM 690 II Advanced |
Power Supply | Thermaltake Toughpower 600W Power Supply ATX V2.2 20/24PIN EPS12V Qfan 140MM Fan Active PFC |
Software | Windows 7 Pro 64bit |
Processor | INTEL CORE I9-9900K @ 5Ghz all core 4.7Ghz Cache @1.305 volts |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX |
Cooling | CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM 6x120mm fans push pull |
Memory | CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 3000Mhz 4x8 32gb @ 4000Mhz |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING |
Storage | ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB 3D NAND NVMe,Intel 660p 1TB m.2 ,1TB WD Blue 3D NAND,500GB WD Blue 3D NAND, |
Display(s) | 50" Sharp Roku TV 8ms responce time and Philips 75Hz 328E9QJAB 32" curved |
Case | BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE, |
Power Supply | 1600 Watt |
Software | Windows 10 |
Processor | INTEL CORE I9-9900K @ 5Ghz all core 4.7Ghz Cache @1.305 volts |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX |
Cooling | CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM 6x120mm fans push pull |
Memory | CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 3000Mhz 4x8 32gb @ 4000Mhz |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING |
Storage | ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB 3D NAND NVMe,Intel 660p 1TB m.2 ,1TB WD Blue 3D NAND,500GB WD Blue 3D NAND, |
Display(s) | 50" Sharp Roku TV 8ms responce time and Philips 75Hz 328E9QJAB 32" curved |
Case | BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE, |
Power Supply | 1600 Watt |
Software | Windows 10 |
Processor | Intel Core i9 11900K |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI Z590 Carbon EK X |
Cooling | Custom Water |
Memory | Team DDR4 4000MHz |
Video Card(s) | ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC |
Storage | WD WN850 1TB |
Display(s) | 43" LG NanoCell 4K 120Hz |
Power Supply | Asus Thor 1200w |
Mouse | Asus Strix Evolve |
Keyboard | Asus Strix Claymore |
Processor | Intel i7 4770K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asrock |
Cooling | Water |
Memory | Team Xtreem LV 16GB (2x8GB) |
Video Card(s) | EK Full WB HD7970 |
Display(s) | CROSSOVER 27Q LED-P 27" |
Case | Danger Den Torture Rack |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | CORSAIR Professional Series Gold AX1200 |
Software | W 10 Pro |
System Name | Dell XPS 15 9560 |
---|---|
Processor | I7-7700HQ |
Memory | 32GB DDR4 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 1050/1080 Ti |
Storage | 1TB SSD |
Display(s) | 2x Dell P2715Q/4k Internal |
Case | Razer Core |
Audio Device(s) | Creative E5/Objective 2 Amp/Senn HD650 |
Mouse | Logitech Proteus Core |
Keyboard | Logitech G910 |
2.7GHz:shadedshu thats not even close to how much it can OC to. and that just shows a little OC can beat FX-62 at 2.8GHz so that just shows notting what the C2D's can do
Processor | Intel Core i9 11900K |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI Z590 Carbon EK X |
Cooling | Custom Water |
Memory | Team DDR4 4000MHz |
Video Card(s) | ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC |
Storage | WD WN850 1TB |
Display(s) | 43" LG NanoCell 4K 120Hz |
Power Supply | Asus Thor 1200w |
Mouse | Asus Strix Evolve |
Keyboard | Asus Strix Claymore |
System Name | Box of Distraction |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7 1800X |
Motherboard | Crosshair VI Hero |
Cooling | Custom watercooling |
Memory | G.Skill TridentZ 2x8GB @ 3466MHz CL14 1T |
Video Card(s) | EVGA 1080Ti FE. WC'd & TDP limit increased to 360W. |
Storage | Samsung 960 Evo 500GB & WD Black 2TB storage drive. |
Display(s) | Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" 1440P 165hz Gsync |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo Pro M |
Audio Device(s) | Phillips Fidelio X2 headphones / basic Bose speakers |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova 750W G3 |
Mouse | Logitech G602 |
Keyboard | Cherry MX Board 6.0 (mx red switches) |
Software | Win 10 & Linux Mint |
Benchmark Scores | https://hwbot.org/user/infrared |
Processor | Intel i7 4770K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asrock |
Cooling | Water |
Memory | Team Xtreem LV 16GB (2x8GB) |
Video Card(s) | EK Full WB HD7970 |
Display(s) | CROSSOVER 27Q LED-P 27" |
Case | Danger Den Torture Rack |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | CORSAIR Professional Series Gold AX1200 |
Software | W 10 Pro |
Processor | INTEL CORE I9-9900K @ 5Ghz all core 4.7Ghz Cache @1.305 volts |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX |
Cooling | CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM 6x120mm fans push pull |
Memory | CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 3000Mhz 4x8 32gb @ 4000Mhz |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING |
Storage | ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB 3D NAND NVMe,Intel 660p 1TB m.2 ,1TB WD Blue 3D NAND,500GB WD Blue 3D NAND, |
Display(s) | 50" Sharp Roku TV 8ms responce time and Philips 75Hz 328E9QJAB 32" curved |
Case | BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE, |
Power Supply | 1600 Watt |
Software | Windows 10 |
but who well win if they where both OC to the Max? we all know. sorry didnt know the FX-62 was 2.8 stock but it wont get much oc over the 6800 but right now C2D's are better untill AMD comes out with something better.
it just matters who comes out on top not which brand it is
Processor | Q6600 G0 @ 3.2Ghz |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus p5k-Premium/Black Pearl |
Cooling | Luna Block, 240mm rad |
Memory | Patriot Extreme PC2-6400 2x2GB |
Video Card(s) | Saphire 5850 1GB |
Storage | 60GB SSD + 2x500GB/1TB/2TB |
Display(s) | Samsung 226BW and 50" Panasonic S2 |
Case | Silverstone TJ-09 |
Audio Device(s) | X-fi Prelude |
Power Supply | Enermax Galaxy Dxx 850watt |
Software | Windows7 32Bit |
Benchmark Scores | Super Pi 1M 14.333 |
if will use your eyes you will notice that NONE of the amd are even overclocked,i dont give a damn if the c2d can overclock im talking stock speeds AMD wins hands down
Processor | INTEL CORE I9-9900K @ 5Ghz all core 4.7Ghz Cache @1.305 volts |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX |
Cooling | CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM 6x120mm fans push pull |
Memory | CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 3000Mhz 4x8 32gb @ 4000Mhz |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING |
Storage | ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB 3D NAND NVMe,Intel 660p 1TB m.2 ,1TB WD Blue 3D NAND,500GB WD Blue 3D NAND, |
Display(s) | 50" Sharp Roku TV 8ms responce time and Philips 75Hz 328E9QJAB 32" curved |
Case | BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE, |
Power Supply | 1600 Watt |
Software | Windows 10 |
Well since everyone overclocks, we should be comparing overclocks lol and I dont just use my computer for gaming so c2d works great for me. I convert movies to ipod..,. and that take alot to rip one fast.
I'm not a diehard intel fan or nothing either... if it wasent for c2d I would be using an amd cpu atm.... I will go with the best chip/price ratio.
Processor | P4 3.2ghz pressy |
---|---|
Motherboard | Abit ic7 max-3 |
Cooling | All PolarFlo TT series w/ some DD maze4 blocks too |
Memory | 2x 512mb G-skill pc4400 TCCD |
Video Card(s) | X850XT PE |
Storage | 2x 300gb sATA maxtor |
Display(s) | CTX 17" lcd |
Case | Custome modded Koolance pc2-650 |
Audio Device(s) | standard sound blaster |
Power Supply | kingwin ABT-600cw |
Software | XP pro, Macromedia 8 suite, SwishMax, PS CS2....etc..etc |
ok i have found some comparitive benchmarks,showing that amd is still right with the infamous C2D they even overclocked the e6400to 2.7ghz,lol in my opinion INTEL SUCKS!!
System Name | Media PC |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core-i5 4460 |
Motherboard | Asus H97i plus |
Cooling | Noctua LH-9i with upgraded NF-A9, x2 Noctua NF-F12 |
Memory | 8GB x2 Corsair Vengeance 1600mhz kit |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte Super clocked GTX970 itx |
Storage | 1TB western digital black 2.5" |
Display(s) | Samsung 55" Plasma |
Case | Fractal Design Node 202 |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard DSP, sound forwarded to Onkyo receiver in 2.1 mode |
Power Supply | Fractal Design 430w itx PSU |
Mouse | Logitech Wireless gaming mouse |
Keyboard | Logitech Wireless, Xbox One S controller |
Software | Windows 10 pro |
System Name | Hell PC |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i7 4820k @ 4'50GHz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 BIOS F17 |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D14 |
Memory | 4x 4GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1333 |
Video Card(s) | Asus GTX 770 Direct CU II @ 1306/3746 |
Storage | OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SATA III, Seagate 1'5TB SATA II, Seagate 2TB SATA III |
Display(s) | Acer V243HAObd |
Case | Thermaltake Overseer RX-1 |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC898 HD 7.1 |
Power Supply | Nox Pulsar Blue 750w |
Software | Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 x64 |
Benchmark Scores | 3Dmark Ice Storm: 176205 3Dmark Cloud Gate: 25357 3Dmark Fire Strike: 7760 |
i think that AMD has a patent on the onboard memory controller, i could be wrong but i dont think Intel have any plans of using it. I went to a seminar at quakecon and one thing they did was talk about how infferior AMDs controller was.
Processor | Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK |
Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans |
Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1 |
Video Card(s) | Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC |
Storage | WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS) |
Display(s) | AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular |
Mouse | Coolermaster Storm Octane wired |
Keyboard | Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech |
Software | Win 10 Home x64 |
System Name | Media PC |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core-i5 4460 |
Motherboard | Asus H97i plus |
Cooling | Noctua LH-9i with upgraded NF-A9, x2 Noctua NF-F12 |
Memory | 8GB x2 Corsair Vengeance 1600mhz kit |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte Super clocked GTX970 itx |
Storage | 1TB western digital black 2.5" |
Display(s) | Samsung 55" Plasma |
Case | Fractal Design Node 202 |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard DSP, sound forwarded to Onkyo receiver in 2.1 mode |
Power Supply | Fractal Design 430w itx PSU |
Mouse | Logitech Wireless gaming mouse |
Keyboard | Logitech Wireless, Xbox One S controller |
Software | Windows 10 pro |
Both AMD and Intel holds about a 90% of the patens of the CPU world, but both companies have signed a long list of 'understanding agreements' wich usually licenses technologies form one to another, os it's not a closed door. Anyways I've read that IBM and even Intel did tests of the onboard memory controllers years ago, it's jsut that back then it didn't help enough the architectures they had. And as far as I've heard, Intel is planning the use of onboard memory controller for 2008 if I'm not mistaken.
Processor | DualCore AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+ (o/c 2801mhz STABLE (Ketxxx, POGE, Tatty One, ME)) |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (PCIe x16, x4, x1) |
Cooling | PhaseChange Coolermaster CM754/939 (fan/heatsink), Thermalright heatspreaders + fan built on (RAM) |
Memory | 512mb PC-3200 DDR400 (set DDR-33 for o/c) by Corsair (matched pair, 2x256mb) 200.1/200mhz |
Video Card(s) | BFG GeForce 7900 GTX OC 512mb GDDR3 ram (o/c manually to 686 core/865 memory) - PhaseChange cooled |
Storage | Dual "Raptor X" 16mb 10krpm/RAID 0 Promise EX8350 x4 PCIe 128mb & Intel IO chip/CENATEK RocketDrive |
Display(s) | SONY 19" Trinitron MultiScan 400ps 1600x1200 75hz refresh 32-bit color |
Case | Antec Super-LanBoy (aluminum baby-tower w/ lower front & upper rear cooling exhaust fans) |
Audio Device(s) | RealTek AC97 onboard mobo stereo sound (Altec Lansing ACS-45 speakers - 10 yrs. still running!) |
Power Supply | Antec 500w ATX 2.0 "SmartPower" powersupply |
Software | Windows Server 2003 SP #1 fully patched, & massively tuned/tweaked to-the-max (plus latest drivers) |
quad core will be pretty useless for most games anyway
Processor | AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-60 (Trinidad) |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS F3Ka (ATI RS690M) |
Cooling | stock |
Memory | Nanya 2x1GB ddr2 667@5-5-5-15-2T |
Video Card(s) | ATI Mobility Radeon HD2600 512MB DDR2@ 580mhz/486mhz |
Storage | 160GB on laptop+250GB external |
Display(s) | ASUS 15.4 |
Case | Asus Laptop F3Ka chassis |
Audio Device(s) | on-board |
Power Supply | 1:30minutes battery |
Software | "genui xp", 'cause i hated vista |
Processor | Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK |
Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans |
Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1 |
Video Card(s) | Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC |
Storage | WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS) |
Display(s) | AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular |
Mouse | Coolermaster Storm Octane wired |
Keyboard | Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech |
Software | Win 10 Home x64 |
Directly now, due to CURRENT game code designs (using coarse threading, which means sending network code to 1 cpu, game loop to another CPU, sound to yet another potentially available CPU core, etc.)?
I agree, MOSTLY, about it benefitting the game code ITSELF, directly!
However, how about INDIRECTLY (you'll see my point on this)?
I.E. -> What about the ability to send OS services, trayicon apps, &/or other backgrounded tasks (such as other apps running) to CPU cores the game's threads may not be running on, OR saturating yet totally?
I can see gamecode starving 2 CPU cores for available cycles to process interrupts on!
Especially IF the user runs many background apps/services/trayicon based apps alongside games (not trimming them as many folks do & I've actually been doing since NT 3.51, for efficiency)!
That would leave the CPU cores that game's threads are using "more open" since they do not HAVE to be the ones running the other tasks you are also running alongside running your game (and, you ALWAYS are)...
This happening means that moving other processes running OR the game itself (even if multithreaded) onto a CPU core(s) that isn't burdened by running as many other threads, or none yet, could literally feasibly/possibly have ALL to itself!
Here? Well, the more cores present? The merrier!
This would benefit games even, albeit indirectly, by running other apps on 2-N cores potentially available, leaving more CPU cycles for games (single OR multithreaded) threads, w/ less contention for interrupts on the CPU core the games are running on!
APK
P.S.=> Think about what I am trying to say in this example, & offer your thoughts on it if you wish... Yes, games are largely MOSTLY GPU bound, but there still IS the CPU processing element, & now that multithreaded gaming has come along & most of your apps you run, odds are, ARE multithreaded? This can help! apk