• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Low FPS on Stupid games ?!

Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
911 (0.36/day)
Location
Al Balqa', Jordan
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600, OC: 4.0 GHz @1.3 V
Motherboard ASRock B450 Steel Legend, BIOS Version: 10.31 [Beta]
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML120L V2 RGB, 5x Galax Vortex Wind-02 (3x Front Intake + 2x Top exhaust)
Memory Kingston FURY Beast RGB 3600 MT/s 32 GB (4x 8GB), (KF436C17BBA/8)
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Dual OC
Storage Kingston NV2 1 TB
Display(s) MSI PRO M251 (HDMI), Running @104 Hz
Case Cooler Master MasterBox MB520
Audio Device(s) HP H360G USB
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE 550 80+ White
Mouse HP G200 Black
Keyboard Redragon MITRA K551-1 RGB
Software Windows 11 Home
Desktop_2018_06_05_03_33_37_562.jpg


guys i have a real problem and its pissing me off , its when i run games for example(gta sa) i should be able to play such game on 9999k with super ultra and 9999 FBS but when setting the settings on very high i only get maximum 35 FBS ???!, but why!.guys please dont say check your task manager because this is screen shot for my task manager (just ignore msi afterburner and the 2 below it), just look at my cpu usage below! even my gpu is overclocked 25%
 
Edit: You've got something turned on in NVCP that you shouldn't. Most likely...
 
i dont agree in your expectation of 9999FBS. your PC is (no offense intended) less than capable. I had that GPU almost 10 years ago, and it couldn't play Grandtheft auto then very well , combined with that archaic cpu.... its possible my iPhone is more powerful
 
why dont you run GTA, while running a monitor application, then take a screenshot, and post that image, so we can see the perf.
 
why dont you run GTA, while running a monitor application, then take a screenshot, and post that image, so we can see the perf.
i did it dude i only get 35 FBS maximum .btw i will do it in moments.

For some reason i cant insert the photo,btw i just realised that i have a very very insane bottleneck ! Gpu usage:99%|Cpu usage: around 15% ! .
 
Man if you think a GT210 can do anything you're very wrong, and this is coming from someone who had the 220.

Even in that era is was so far from anything decent.
 
For some reason i cant insert the photo,

Just to be specific, run MSI afterburner while you run Grandtheft auto for 5 minutes, be certain you have monitoring on. Under settings you can set it to monitor CPU &GPU usage, temperature, as well as system and video memory usage, be sure these are included along with frames per second

222222.PNG



3333333.PNG
 
Last edited:
Man if you think a GT210 can do anything you're very wrong, and this is coming from someone who had the 220.

Even in that era is was so far from anything decent.
LOL,yes i know, i am going to buy a zotac gtx 650 ti so soon.

Man if you think a GT210 can do anything you're very wrong, and this is coming from someone who had the 220.

Even in that era is was so far from anything decent.
My gpu is not even from the gt series its just a normal geforce !

Just to be specific, run MSI afterburner while you run Grandtheft auto for 5 minutes, be certain you have monitoring on. Under settings you can set it to monitor CPU &GPU usage, temperature, as well as system and video memory usage, be sure these are included along with frames per second

View attachment 102083


View attachment 102084
Thanks man i will try it later, i am now using my phone
 
View attachment 102082

guys i have a real problem and its pissing me off , its when i run games for example(gta sa) i should be able to play such game on 9999k with super ultra and 9999 FBS but when setting the settings on very high i only get maximum 35 FBS ???!, but why!.guys please dont say check your task manager because this is screen shot for my task manager (just ignore msi afterburner and the 2 below it), just look at my cpu usage below! even my gpu is overclocked 25%

Not with a 210 1GB which is just a replacement for a IGP of that Generation. Get a 7770, 7870, 250/X.
 
The 210 was a decent card considering the cost but for modern demanding games it is a potato.
 
Man, where are you from? Even GTX 650 Ti is 3-4 years old at thos point. Buy a GTX 1050 or sth. Or even better upgrade the whole system to Ryzen 5 2400G at cheap. You won't even need to buy a graphics card.
 
Man, where are you from? Even GTX 650 Ti is 3-4 years old at thos point. Buy a GTX 1050 or sth. Or even better upgrade the whole system to Ryzen 5 2400G at cheap. You won't even need to buy a graphics card.

Why don't you click his name and find out, the 650 ti is generations ahead of the igp replacement board he has.
 
Buddy your entire system is old as hell. I wouldn't bother upgrading anything.
Keep it until you you get enough money for a Ryzen 2200G.

The 210 was a decent card considering the cost but for modern demanding games it is a potato.
210 was never a decent card, low cost or not..
 
You've got an ancient, mid range CPU coupled to an ancient and very low end graphics cards. No way is that setup gonna ever give you a high framerate, end of story.

You need to scrap that PC and start over with something high end and modern. It's gonna cost a lot, there's no way round that.
 
Last edited:
Man if you think a GT210 can do anything you're very wrong, and this is coming from someone who had the 220.

Even in that era is was so far from anything decent.

as ex-user of G210 and ENGT 220, I can confirm that
GT 220 at least twice as fast as G210
 
The 210 was a decent card considering the cost but for modern demanding games it is a potato.
Even in 2009 the GT 210 was a piece of crap
perfrel.gif

While not on the list, it was roughly as good as a 9400GT. A GT 1030 can give top cards on this list a good run of their money, let alone any decent 2018's gaming capable card.
 
I think someone's trying to take the piss. just because you meet the min specs for a game to run on it doesn't mean you'll get "9999FPS" at any res/QA settings
even a low powered Ryzen 5 2400G and mobo with 8GB ddr4 ram will not get 9999FPS but it will get you a much smoother experience than the ancient junk your running at present
but even if you don't want to go the whole system route then atleast an HD7850/GTX650Ti will get you better than what you have right now
 
View attachment 102082

guys i have a real problem and its pissing me off , its when i run games for example(gta sa) i should be able to play such game on 9999k with super ultra and 9999 FBS but when setting the settings on very high i only get maximum 35 FBS ???!, but why!.guys please dont say check your task manager because this is screen shot for my task manager (just ignore msi afterburner and the 2 below it), just look at my cpu usage below! even my gpu is overclocked 25%

GTA: San Andreas has a frame limit for a reason. High frame rates cause weird physics glitches. If you turn it off in in-game settings, you should turn on v-sync in your GPU control panel or the physics engine will go nuts. You can also gain smoothness by turning off smoke effects and turning off antialiasing.
 
I think someone's trying to take the piss. just because you meet the min specs for a game to run on it doesn't mean you'll get "9999FPS" at any res/QA settings even a low powered Ryzen 5 2400G and mobo with 8GB ddr4 ram will not get 9999FPS but it will get you a much smoother experience than the ancient junk your running at present
but even if you don't want to go the whole system route then atleast an HD7850/GTX650Ti will get you better than what you have right now
I don't get it, did someone mistake this for DBZ universe or did they have a marathon session of DBZ legends on their S9 :shadedshu:
 
Even in 2009 the GT 210 was a piece of crap

While not on the list, it was roughly as good as a 9400GT. A GT 1030 can give top cards on this list a good run of their money, let alone any decent 2018's gaming capable card.

Depends what your expectations are I guess. I bought one in 2010/11 (can't remember the exact year for sure). Bearing in mind it was the cheapest card I could buy I was quite happy.

I certainly wouldn't have recomended it to play games with then, let alone now.
 
GTA:SA has a capped framerate if I remember correctly.
 
I don't get it, did someone mistake this for DBZ universe or did they have a marathon session of DBZ legends on their S9 :shadedshu:
man i know i will note get 9999 FBS, but i mean at least 60 FBS
Man, where are you from? Even GTX 650 Ti is 3-4 years old at thos point. Buy a GTX 1050 or sth. Or even better upgrade the whole system to Ryzen 5 2400G at cheap. You won't even need to buy a graphics card.
i will buy a gtx 650 ti and the next upgrade will be at least 6 gb of ram and maybe an i5 2500k and a gtx 1050

Even in 2009 the GT 210 was a piece of crap
perfrel.gif

While not on the list, it was roughly as good as a 9400GT. A GT 1030 can give top cards on this list a good run of their money, let alone any decent 2018's gaming capable card.
i bought this gpu in maybe 2011-12 and it was the cheapest gpu available.

Why don't you click his name and find out, the 650 ti is generations ahead of the igp replacement board he has.
i know man he made me feel like i'am buying a gpu from 1963, the gtx 650 ti is more powerful then my gpu by 400% (at least).

gta_sa_2018_06_05_04_04_50_363.jpg


man i know i will note get 9999 FBS, but i mean at least 60 FBS

i will buy a gtx 650 ti and the next upgrade will be at least 6 gb of ram and maybe an i5 2500k and a gtx 1050


i bought this gpu in maybe 2011-12 and it was the cheapest gpu available.


i know man he made me feel like i'am buying a gpu from 1963, the gtx 650 ti is more powerful then my gpu by 400% (at least).

gta_sa_2018_06_05_04_04_50_363.jpg
insane bottleneck
 
I'm confused on why you keep saying FBS.
 
Back
Top