1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Removes Restriction on ATI GPUs with NVIDIA GPUs Processing PhysX

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 28, 2010.

  1. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,354 (3.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,099
    Location:
    Home
    Start of a series of events that will put Nvidia into my good books, or calculated decision for publicity?
     
  2. GotNoRice

    GotNoRice

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    127 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Location:
    Northern California
    Windows Vista was updated to WDDM1.1 at the same time it got DirectX11, in the platform update:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_Platform_Update#Platform_Update
     
    AsRock and Mussels say thanks.
  3. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    16,225 (3.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,403
    Location:
    Parkland County, Alberta
    Hmmm...

     
    AsRock and Mussels say thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  4. dadi_oh

    dadi_oh New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    809 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    Location:
    Almonte, Canada
    The GT 240 is a good bet. Got mine on a Newegg shell shockers for less than $50. Has really low power consumption (40nm process) and no extra power connector needed. And with 96 shaders I have yet to see it use more than 50% GPU usage. If that is the case then even a lowly GT 220 would do (48 shaders).
     
    TRIPTEX_CAN says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. xtremesv

    xtremesv

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    117 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    El Salvador
    LOL, sad I just recently sold my GT220 PPU which initially I bought to play BAA. I would’ve kept it if only I could’ve also used it as a CUDA dedicated card to enable the special filters in Just Cause 2.
     
  6. $immond$ New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    394 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Edmonton
    I knew Nvidia was going to do this, I am not sure why this was a shocker. This is just another reason why I will still buy Nvidia products.
     
  7. GotNoRice

    GotNoRice

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    127 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Location:
    Northern California
    That quote about the Desktop Windows Manager not using DX10.1 is just about Aero. In Vista Aero uses DX9, in 7 Aero uses DX10.1 (or 9 via feature level support). All it's saying is that Vista still uses DX9 for Aero and was never updated to use 10.1.

    It's not talking about game support or anything like that.
     
  8. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,885 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,509
    You hit the nail on the head. There is no telling when they will re-activate this policy.
     
    qubit says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  9. dadi_oh

    dadi_oh New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    809 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    Location:
    Almonte, Canada
    I couldn't get it to work on my son's machine with Vista Home Premium 32 bit. Trying to find the actual "platform update" in the myriad of updates at download.microsoft was impossible. The machine was fully updated via windows update but it still didn't work. Couldn't find the actual "platform update" even though the wikipedia article gives the date of the release.

    Has anyone ACTUALLY got Vista to run with ATI and Nvidia drivers at the same time?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. DaedalusHelios

    DaedalusHelios

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,980 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC, USA
    You definately need G92 8800gt or better for physX in games like Batman: AA and others. The Shellshocker right now is not good enough if that is what you might be looking at as 128bit memory cripples that card. :toast:


    They won't because the cat is now out of the bag. Lets not let pessimism and paranoia infect the thread. We have no reason to think they would be ok with commiting reputation suicide by revoking it. It would mess up marketing campaigns and things that are similar in the retail segment. The only "what if" is will they enable its acceleration on ATi GPUs. It would work as well and there is no denying that, but it could still work.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2010
  11. kenkickr

    kenkickr

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,025 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,756
    But at least we know it's breakable if they do go back to "blocking" out ATI.
     
  12. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    45,917 (9.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,465
    Location:
    Australalalalalaia.
    it was cracked/broken before Nv reversed it anyway.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  13. Phxprovost

    Phxprovost Xtreme Refugee

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,217 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    262
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    O rite cause a company that gives the CEO a "working sample" held together by wood screws clearly cares what the public thinks :rolleyes:
     
  14. DannibusX

    DannibusX

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,553 (0.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,036
    Location:
    United States
    I'll keep my eye on this, if nVidia is seriously going to allow their cards to be used as PPUs I will buy a new card for PhysX. One of the 200 series. I'm using an 8800GT at the moment.
     
  15. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,355 (2.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,179
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Well, if you have Core i7, you don't even need HW PhysX, I tried it with enabled Advanced PhysX and it worked pretty well on CPU itself. Maybe slight slowdown but still pretty much playable. Opposed to Mirror's Edge where it will lag like insane with Advanced PhysX with only one physics affected object moving around. Heh.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    45,917 (9.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,465
    Location:
    Australalalalalaia.
    i want details on whatever it is you are discussing. you have aroused my curiousity.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  17. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    16,225 (3.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,403
    Location:
    Parkland County, Alberta
    He's talking about the developer conference where JH firist showed Fermi, which was a GTX480 with the end sawn off.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    45,917 (9.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,465
    Location:
    Australalalalalaia.
    i wanna seeeeee it
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  19. DaedalusHelios

    DaedalusHelios

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,980 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC, USA
    Yeah man they are like evil incarnate and eat babies. Seriously, real babies. They aren't even dead yet when they start eating them. A comic book villian runs Nvidia and he will never stop until the whole world hates him.

    OR

    Nvidia operates like any other business and profit is their only concern. AMD, Intel, and Nvidia all answer to stock holders. AMD is not the Messiah, and Nvidia is not run by Satan.
     
  20. Phxprovost

    Phxprovost Xtreme Refugee

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,217 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    262
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    :wtf: cause i ever made that claim right? Im simply saying it would not surprise me at all if maybe 3 months from now Nvidia decides to off this in a driver update....you know kinda like they did in the past? Or are we just choosing to ignore that? :rolleyes:
     
  21. theubersmurf

    theubersmurf

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    865 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    101
    Location:
    Dawn
    The unreal engine is heavily licensed and uses physx, that alone may make it worthwhile.
     
  22. crow1001

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    382 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    WTF has physx got to offer apart from some crappy effects that have no effect on gameplay whatsoever, very limited support in games " current and in the future " with the majority being complete balls, oh yeah expect 50% drop in FPS with phsyx hardware accelerated games. Havok FTW.:rockout:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  23. MilkyWay

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    7,181 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    731
    to late because the amount of games that use physx is limited and the popularity it had has dropped, they kinda dropped it when people where buying second cards for physx

    to me its a waste of say £20-£40

    but nice gesture if you have one lying around
     
  24. DaedalusHelios

    DaedalusHelios

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,980 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC, USA
    I am just tired of the cartoon-like paranoia. People circumvented it and that is why they just opened it up and left it for all to use IMO. You know they did a while back and now the two reasons they were holding back are gone. The other reason was a lack of high end offerings to combat ATi in the time gap before release thanks to fab issues. They also desperately need to move G92 derivatives and the best way to do so is SLI support and/or PhysX friendly cards. You don't remove support unless you have a damn good reason because it is a business.
     
  25. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    16,225 (3.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,403
    Location:
    Parkland County, Alberta
    10 Year Member at TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)