• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Settles Class-Action Lawsuit Over GTX 970 Memory

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,828 (8.40/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
NVIDIA settled in a 2015 class-action lawsuit against it, for misrepresenting the amount of memory on GeForce GTX 970 graphics cards. The company has agreed to pay every buyer of the card USD $30 (per card), and also cover the legal fees of the class, amounting to $1.3 million. The company, however, did not specify how much money it has set aside for the payout, and whether it will compensate only those buyers who constitute the class (i.e. buyers in the U.S., since that's as far as the court's jurisdiction can reach), or the thousands of GTX 970 buyers worldwide.

"The settlement is fair and reasonable and falls within the range of possible approval," attorneys for the proposed Class said in the filing. "It is the product of extended arms-length negotiations between experienced attorneys familiar with the legal and factual issues of this case and all settlement class members are treated fairly under the terms of the settlement." The class alleged that NVIDIA falsified the amount of memory a GeForce GTX 970 GPU can really use, when an investigation found that it could only address 3.5 GB of it properly. NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang apologized to buyers about the issue and promised that it would never happen again.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,828 (8.40/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
If NVIDIA is smart, it will compensate US buyers $30 USD, and to people outside the US, it will voluntarily give away a Steam game key to a AAA game as compensation. If it doesn't do that, people outside the US will start class-actions of their own, and maybe the courts will set a higher compensation than $30/buyer. I bet EU regulators will order NVIDIA to give everyone $329.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,124 (4.15/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
If NVIDIA is smart, it will compensate US buyers $30 USD, and to people outside the US, it will voluntarily give away a Steam game key to a AAA game as compensation. If it doesn't do that, people outside the US will start class-actions of their own, and maybe the courts will set a higher compensation than $30/buyer. I bet EU regulators will order NVIDIA to give everyone $329.
I think it's much more difficult to start a class action in EU that it is in the US (in some EU countries, class action is not even available). And even then, this action was settled, there's no guaranteed win.

Edit: I'm not sure what the poll is about. It's like people complaining they bought a car having a V8 engine, but 2 cylinders are smaller than the others. First, equal cylinder sizes (memory inferface bus width) is not a given, it's just they way it's usually (always?) implemented. Second, you didn't buy the car for each cylinder's individual performance, but for the overall performance. Third, you actually got 8 cylinders (4GB VRAM). The only good thing coming out of the whole debacle is that it (hopefully) prevents atypical memory configurations from becoming the norm.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,803 (1.68/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
If NVIDIA is smart, it will compensate US buyers $30 USD, and to people outside the US, it will voluntarily give away a Steam game key to a AAA game as compensation. If it doesn't do that, people outside the US will start class-actions of their own, and maybe the courts will set a higher compensation than $30/buyer. I bet EU regulators will order NVIDIA to give everyone $329.
I am in favor of keeping US and EU lawsuits like this separate, despite the extra legal fees for Nvidia.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,103 (1.11/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Night Rider | Mini LAN PC | Workhorse
Processor AMD R7 2700X | Ryzen 1600X | i7 970
Motherboard MSi AM4 Pro Carbon | GA- | Gigabyte EX58-UD5
Cooling AMD Wraith cooler| Stock Cooler, Copper Core)| Big shairkan B
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill Ripjaws 3600MHz| 2x8GB Corsair 3000 | 6x2GB DDR3 1300 Corsair
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 OC in Sli | Inno3d GTX 1050 TI | MSI RX 580 8GB
Storage 250GB Plextor SSD Por 5 /1TB WD Black | 500GB SSD WD, 2x1TB, 1x750 | WD 320/Seagate 320
Display(s) LG 27" 1440P| Samsung 20" S20C300L/DELL 15" | 22" DELL/19"DELL
Case LIAN LI PC-18 | Mini ATX Case (custom) | Atrix C4 9001
Audio Device(s) Onboard | Onbaord | Onboard
Power Supply Silverstone 750 | Silverstone Mini 450W | Corsair CX-750
Mouse Coolermaster Pro | Rapoo V900 | Gigabyte 6850X
Keyboard MAX Keyboard Nighthawk X8 | Creative Fatal1ty eluminx | Some POS Logitech
Software Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64/Windows 10 Home
Thats around $40 Aussie dollars, yes please!
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
798 (0.37/day)
Processor I5 4690K @ 4.8 Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7
Cooling Swiftech H140X
Memory 16GB Crucial BallistiX 1866Mhz
Video Card(s) GTX 1070 G1 Gaming
Storage 850 PRO 1TB SSD, 840 EVO 500GB SSD, 850 EVO 500GB
Display(s) Nixeus EDG 27-Inch IPS 1440P, 144HZ 16:9
Case NZXT H440 Red/Black
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse G600
Keyboard G710+
Software Win 10 64B
Where do I get my 30 dollars? I haz a feeling by the time I get it it wont even be worth the time tho.

" NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang apologized to buyers about the issue and promised that it would never happen again. "

LUL. Right.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
42 (0.01/day)
System Name HydroAMD
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero w/ EK Monoblock
Cooling Watercooling: 360mm + 240mm Fans: 6x Corsair RGB 120mm
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ @3200Mhz
Video Card(s) RX Vega 64 w/ EK Fullcover Waterblock
Storage Samsung Evo 960 500GB - 1TB 850 Pro - 512GB 850 Pro - 500GB 850 Evo
Display(s) Samsung 32" Curved QHD C32HG70 2560×1440
Case Corsair Crystal 570X
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DGX
Power Supply Corsair AX860
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Chroma
Software Windows 10 Pro
I'm not sure what the poll is about. It's like people complaining they bought a car having a V8 engine, but 2 cylinders are smaller than the others. First, equal cylinder sizes (memory inferface bus width) is not a given, it's just they way it's usually (always?) implemented. Second, you didn't buy the car for each cylinder's individual performance, but for the overall performance. Third, you actually got 8 cylinders (4GB VRAM). The only good thing coming out of the whole debacle is that it (hopefully) prevents atypical memory configurations from becoming the norm.
First of all, how dare you try to defend Nvidia. This was settled in court showing the crippled card had an issue, and the people won. Why would you argue against a courts findings? Just face the facts that these cards where/are a sham that everyone had high expectations for, and Nvidia is a highly disingenuous company for going out of their way to put out a product that has issues. Shame on Nvidia. They knew what they did from the start. It proves they have no care about proper innovation and their customers.

Since the findings came out on the internet a while ago, I have vowed to never buy an Nvidia product ever again.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,740 (0.40/day)
Processor 5930K
Motherboard MSI X99 SLI
Cooling WATER
Memory 16GB DDR4 2132
Video Card(s) EVGAY 1080 nilla
Storage SEVERAL SSD"S
Display(s) Catleap/Yamakasi 2560X1440
Case D Frame MINI drilled out
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse DEATH ADDER
Keyboard Razer Black Widow Tournament
Software W10HB
Benchmark Scores PhIlLyChEeSeStEaK
First of all, how dare you try to defend Nvidia. This was settled in court showing the crippled card had an issue, and the people won. Why would you argue against a courts findings? Just face the facts that these cards where/are a sham that everyone had high expectations for, and Nvidia is a highly disingenuous company for going out of their way to put out a product that has issues. Shame on Nvidia. They knew what they did from the start. It proves they have no care about proper innovation and their customers.

Since the findings came out on the internet a while ago, I have vowed to never buy an Nvidia product ever again.
Do you even own a computer? If so why haven't you filled out "Your System Spec's"?

@the OP, this all brings a song to heart(TRUE COLORS). But Nvidia is a COMPANY and as such (especially in today's economy)lets face if you have worked for a CORP you do things you would not normally do............


 
Joined
Jul 29, 2016
Messages
16 (0.01/day)
System Name Chroma
Processor Intel® Core™ i5-8400
Motherboard MSI B360M PRO-VDH
Cooling SilentiumPC Spartan 3 PRO HE1024
Memory Patriot Viper 4 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1060 GAMING X 6GB
Storage Crucial BX100 250GB + old WD Green 2TB + Toshiba E300 2TB
Display(s) LG 22MP65
Case SilentiumPC Gladius M35
Power Supply SilentiumPC Supremo L2 V2 550W
Mouse Razer Lachesis 5600
Keyboard Sharkoon Skiller MECH SGK3
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,740 (0.40/day)
Processor 5930K
Motherboard MSI X99 SLI
Cooling WATER
Memory 16GB DDR4 2132
Video Card(s) EVGAY 1080 nilla
Storage SEVERAL SSD"S
Display(s) Catleap/Yamakasi 2560X1440
Case D Frame MINI drilled out
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse DEATH ADDER
Keyboard Razer Black Widow Tournament
Software W10HB
Benchmark Scores PhIlLyChEeSeStEaK
That's not what the lawsuit was about, at least your name isn't myhairb@llsake :roll:
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,124 (4.15/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
First of all, how dare you try to defend Nvidia. This was settled in court showing the crippled card had an issue, and the people won. Why would you argue against a courts findings? Just face the facts that these cards where/are a sham that everyone had high expectations for, and Nvidia is a highly disingenuous company for going out of their way to put out a product that has issues. Shame on Nvidia. They knew what they did from the start. It proves they have no care about proper innovation and their customers.

Since the findings came out on the internet a while ago, I have vowed to never buy an Nvidia product ever again.
Well, you don't even seem to understand what a settlement is, so it's pointless to argue further.

Plus, I'm not defending Nvidia, as I have stated, I wouldn't want to see widespread usage of the solution they chose for the GTX 970. At the same time, I'm not arguing in favour of protection against stupidity either: the card has been benchmarked all over the place, no one can claim they thought they were buying something and got something else instead. More to the point, I go to TPU, I can see the MSI 970 does 42.9fps in Alien Isolation at 4k. That's what I get off the shelf, regardless of how those 42.9fps are delivered.

From your own link:
The card has all of the ROPs of GTX 1080 and 80% of the memory bandwidth, however what it doesn’t have is GP104’s 4th GPC. Home of the Raster Engine responsible for rasterization, GTX 1070 can only setup 48 pixels/clock to begin with, despite the fact that the ROPs can accept 64 pixels. As a result it takes a significant hit here, delivering 77% of GTX 1080’s pixel throughput. With all of that said, the fact that in-game performance is closer than this is a reminder to the fact that while pixel throughput is an important part of game performance, it’s often not the bottleneck.
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
203 (0.11/day)
they _lied_ about the rop count (only 56 instead of the advertised 64) and the l2 cache size (only 1.7mb instead of advertised 2mb) which are worse issues than the 0.5gb slow memory interface/partition (those fake numbers were writen on the boxes of the cards and their documentation for christ sake!), and yet their "apology" never mentioned any of these issues. im not surprised if a similar "trick" happens in the future, that company is used to throw dirt into consumers eyes and calling it innovation.

and like btarunr said, maybe this can be extended worldwide with a free game or discount towards new hardware acquisition (they now sell card direct to customer so it would kinda make sense for user upgrading from a 970 in the near future).
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
1,691 (0.36/day)
Would be nice if this could be followed, and info on how to claim the $30 per card once directions are made available. I know we went through a handful of 970's (and still have some in use).
 

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
8,268 (2.10/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
they _lied_ about the rop count (only 56 instead of the advertised 64) and the l2 cache size (only 1.7mb instead of advertised 2mb) which are worse issues than the 0.5gb slow memory interface/partition (those fake numbers were writen on the boxes of the cards
Are these technical specs actually listed to the consumers? I'm not sure if they are or are not and that is an important point. They certainly (despite 970's obvious goodiness) deserve this as the card didn't have 'fully functional' as construed on the box Memory. I wont defend that - if the box says 4Gb you expect 4Gb of memory working at the same rate, not partitions within that bracket at slower speeds.

But if you start going down the path of examining tech specs not released to consumers then I deserve a rebate for both my ATI crossfire configs as they never ran as I expected. I'm not talking about game support but the specific stuttering issue that meant a lot of my 5850 and 7970 crossfire gaming was worse than single card. I genuinely expected smoother game play but I did not get that. ATI must have known what they were selling surely (after all, they fixed wit with XDMA)- so let's talk compensation on that.
This isn't an Nvidia fan boy position (as stated - they deserve the fines and settlement for the 970 issue) rather an educated position on "how far do you want to take the major players specs and slide info"? The RX480 didn't quite seem to deliver on performance/watt as suggested by their presentations either (unless we trawl through the precise conditions that must be met to meet that perf increase) - do we sue?

Who's more likely to shaft you? Right now - probably Nvidia because they can afford to. AMD can't afford to make big PR mistakes, they need to play safe but rest assured in the past they have shafted you. Where's @HumanSmoke? He's a factoid on the dubious history of each brand.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,124 (4.15/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
The RX480 didn't quite seem to deliver on performance/watt as suggested by their presentations either (unless we trawl through the precise conditions that must be met to meet that perf increase) - do we sue?
And it's not a 150W part as advertised. Do we sue for that, too?
 
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
851 (0.19/day)
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
System Name Ryzen/Laptop/htpc
Processor R9 3900X/i7 6700HQ/i7 2600
Motherboard AsRock X470 Taichi/Acer/ Gigabyte H77M
Cooling Corsair H115i pro with 2 Noctua NF-A14 chromax/OEM/Noctua NH-L12i
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 32GB @3200/16GB DDR4 2666 HyperX impact/24GB
Video Card(s) TUL Red Dragon Vega 56/Intel HD 530 - GTX 950m/ 970 GTX
Storage 970pro NVMe 512GB,Samsung 860evo 1TB, 3x4TB WD gold/Transcend 830s, 1TB Toshiba/Adata 256GB + 1TB WD
Display(s) Philips FTV 32 inch + Dell 2407WFP-HC/OEM/Sony KDL-42W828B
Case Phanteks Enthoo Luxe/Acer Barebone/Enermax
Audio Device(s) SoundBlasterX AE-5 (Dell A525)(HyperX Cloud Alpha)/mojo/soundblaster xfi gamer
Power Supply Seasonic focus+ 850 platinum (SSR-850PX)/165 Watt power brick/Enermax 650W
Mouse G502 Hero/M705 Marathon/G305 Hero Lightspeed
Keyboard G19/oem/Steelseries Apex 300
Software Win10 pro 64bit
First of all, how dare you try to defend Nvidia. This was settled in court showing the crippled card had an issue, and the people won. Why would you argue against a courts findings? Just face the facts that these cards where/are a sham that everyone had high expectations for, and Nvidia is a highly disingenuous company for going out of their way to put out a product that has issues. Shame on Nvidia. They knew what they did from the start. It proves they have no care about proper innovation and their customers.

Since the findings came out on the internet a while ago, I have vowed to never buy an Nvidia product ever again.
mate, obvious nvidia fanboy is obvious.. regardless though, people should vote with their wallet, which they dont, because they dont care, they care more for how they will be perceived by their social circle, and there nvidia=bigger epenis. i dont bother anymore.. its pointless. stupidity is invincible after all. we are talking about a company that has 80% of the market, yet still uses shady tactics, and most people dont give a flying f@ck.. yet they will bitch about how amd doesnt compete.. there is no hope for the human race.. 30$ LOL
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
1,051 (0.19/day)
Location
Ards
System Name Jezebelle
Processor i5 4690K
Motherboard MSI Z97M-G43
Cooling Noctua NH-U12
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport
Video Card(s) GTX 1070 Ti
Storage Sandisk Ultra II 480GB, Sammy 1TB F3
Display(s) BenQ Xl2411Z
Case Fractal Define Mini
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 7.1 HD, does the job!
Power Supply Enermax Infiniti 720W
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Winblows 10 Pro
And it's not a 150W part as advertised. Do we sue for that, too?
That issue has been addressed though AND the green team (of which I'm now part of) had a so I large issue with the last generation cards spiking above stated power draw figures. Everyone's at it, don't worry!
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,124 (4.15/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
That issue has been addressed though AND the green team (of which I'm now part of) had a so I large issue with the last generation cards spiking above stated power draw figures. Everyone's at it, don't worry!
Addressed, yes. Power draw from the socket was limited to 75W, but the card can still draw more than 75W from the PCIe connector (and does so by default). So it's still a card that uses over 150W, being sold as a 150W card.
 

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
8,268 (2.10/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
mate, obvious nvidia fanboy is obvious.. regardless though, people should vote with their wallet, which they dont, because they dont care, they care more for how they will be perceived by their social circle, and there nvidia=bigger epenis. i dont bother anymore.. its pointless. stupidity is invincible after all. we are talking about a company that has 80% of the market, yet still uses shady tactics, and most people dont give a flying f@ck.. yet they will bitch about how amd doesnt compete.. there is no hope for the human race.. 30$ LOL
C'mon dude. You offend many people that buy Nvidia simply because their top end is faster. Why do you equate that with epeen? If I want to buy the fastest gfx card in a generation, I will (if i want to shell out for it). It doesn't make me a fanboy of whatever brand I buy and it doesn't make me a cock waving technotwat. It's attitudes that you display (somehow without even noticing o_O) that are the epitome of a fanboy. When you simply slag off someone because of what they buy because it's not your choice - THEY are the fanboy? Seriously?
So, I should not buy a GTX 1080 because the Fury X is slower? WTF? (FTR, I'm sticking with my 980ti because I'm still on W7). And I really must not buy a GTX1070 because it's cheaper than Fury X and in most circumstances, faster?

Stop being silly with comments about Nvidia and epeen. I could argue the same about any gamer that has bought a Radeon Pro Duo (or a Titan Z). It is absolute nonsense to tell people to buy a slower card if they want to buy the faster card (or the quieter, etc). Yes, there are fanboys but aim your guns at them directly and don't make stupid and sweeping generalisations about peoples buying choices.

And social circle? Are you completely delusional? Why would my social circle influence my gfx choice? Most of my friends don't even know what the inside of a PC looks like, let alone what brand is inside it.

Yeah, so stop making infantile, fanboy call outs, when they simply shine a giant fanboy light on your own head. :slap:
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,261 (2.98/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Phantom
Processor Core i7-8700k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F Black CPU cooler
Memory 2x 16GB Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black; 1x400GB VelRptr; 1x 3TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
First of all, how dare you try to defend Nvidia. This was settled in court showing the crippled card had an issue, and the people won. Why would you argue against a courts findings? Just face the facts that these cards where/are a sham that everyone had high expectations for, and Nvidia is a highly disingenuous company for going out of their way to put out a product that has issues. Shame on Nvidia. They knew what they did from the start. It proves they have no care about proper innovation and their customers.

Since the findings came out on the internet a while ago, I have vowed to never buy an Nvidia product ever again.
Dude, get real. This is about a video card. What lives were hurt? Is this a major problem, like faulty natural gas lines, or brakes on a car that don't work? No, it's a video card, a luxury item. Yes, NVIDIA was wrong, but don't try to make it out like they slaughtered thousands of innocent lives.

And for the record, the 970 performed equally as well after the news as it did before. And it surely didn't stop the record sales of it after the memory news either....people still thronged to it. Why? Because it was a damned good card, as anyone who ever ACTUALLY owned one knows.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,360 (6.06/day)
Location
The Kitchen Table
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
I am in favor of keeping US and EU lawsuits like this separate, despite the extra legal fees for Nvidia.
As an EU citizen, fully in agreement with that.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,779 (3.72/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech G602
Software MacOS 10.15.6
And for the record, the 970 performed equally as well after the news as it did before. And it surely didn't stop the record sales of it after the memory news either....people still thronged to it. Why? Because it was a damned good card, as anyone who ever ACTUALLY owned one knows.
...but will the 970 have less longevity as a result? More games are using more and more VRAM and I'm sure the issue will become more apparent as that becomes the case for more games. Just because it wasn't an issue then and isn't quite an issue now, doesn't mean it won't be an issue in a year. As I said in another thread about VRAM that is semi-related:
VRAM capacity is one of those things that doesn't matter until you don't have enough of it.
In other words, if you're not using that much, it won't be a problem.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,261 (2.98/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Phantom
Processor Core i7-8700k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F Black CPU cooler
Memory 2x 16GB Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black; 1x400GB VelRptr; 1x 3TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
...but will the 970 have less longevity as a result? More games are using more and more VRAM and I'm sure the issue will become more apparent as that becomes the case for more games. Just because it wasn't an issue then and isn't quite an issue now, doesn't mean it won't be an issue in a year. As I said in another thread about VRAM that is semi-related:

In other words, if you're not using that much, it won't be a problem.
Well the thing is, the card is already two years old. It's a mid-grade card. The realistic lifecycle that most people I am aware of with mid-tier cards is 2-3 years. As fast as GPU technology changes and advances, it's pointless to buy a card because of what you think you might need two to 3 years from now. Invariably, that guess will end up wrong.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,779 (3.72/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech G602
Software MacOS 10.15.6
Well the thing is, the card is already two years old. It's a mid-grade card. The realistic lifecycle that most people I am aware of with mid-tier cards is 2-3 years. As fast as GPU technology changes and advances, it's pointless to buy a card because of what you think you might need two to 3 years from now. Invariably, that guess will end up wrong.
You say that but, I had my first 6870 for 6 years and got a second one for CFX when one wasn't enough after 3 years.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,050 (0.29/day)
Class action lawsuits seems only possible in USA or Canada or whatever. Not for europe. If anyone remembers the VW diesel scandal, it settled for billions of dollars in USA and buyers, but we in Europe get no compensation at all. They'd simply reflash your car's ECU to match the CO2 and thats it.

So yes, lawsuit is good, makes Nvidia think twice about putting false advertisement about their cards. AMD camp is cheering now.
 
Top