• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Processor GFlops Compilation

Fitseries3 said:
Fitseries3 | Intel | 2x Xeon x5677 @ 4.24ghz (westmere-EP) |103.5649| 8.63125 | 64-bit | 16thread SR2 FTW
Click to expand...
slaughterhouse :eek:
thx for showing this fits :rockout:
 
Table updated.

And thank you fits for cracking 100 GLOPS and breaking the table...it was fun to go back and 0 fill the rest of the scores on my netbook so the table would sort right...ya lucky bastard!:D
 
JrRacinFan | AMD | Phenom II 720 BE @ 3.6 |034.9885| 9.719 | 64-bit | 3 Threads
Capture040.jpg


Just verify I am running @ 3.6Ghz
http://img.techpowerup.org/100519/Capture039.jpg

Nice fits!!!! :eek:
 
Table updated.

Hey fits, have you tried running to different processors in that board? I was just wondering if it was true that eVGA made it possible. And what about UP processors?
 
it can only run xeons with dual qpi. you can however run 2 different ones though. i only have these atm
 
Add me

gja822 | AMD | Athlon 64 x2 Dual Core 5200+ @ 2.8GHz | 003.30962 | 01.18120 | 32bit |

I wonder, why it is SO low, the GFlops/GHz I mean.
 

Attachments

  • GFlops.jpg
    GFlops.jpg
    60.8 KB · Views: 545
add me please

AthlonX2 | Intel | Xeon W3520 4ghz | 056.7980 | 15.738 | 64-bit |

ibt.png
 
Table updated.

gja822 said:
gja822 | AMD | Athlon 64 x2 Dual Core 5200+ @ 2.8GHz | 003.30962 | 01.18120 | 32bit |

I wonder, why it is SO low, the GFlops/GHz I mean.
Click to expand...

It doesn't seem too bad for your processor, maybe a little low, but not majorly low.
 
me again with a small OC to 3.0GHz

Athlonite | AMD | Athlon x2 7750BE 3.0GHz | 48.504 | 016.168| 64-bit |

GFlops.JPG
 
Last edited:
add me
its my laptop,
stock and fully stable with undervolting
AhokZYashA | Intel | Core 2 Duo T5450 @ 1.66GHz | 006.68582 | 002.00755 | 32-bit | 2GB of RAM but only ~800MB are available.

ibt1.jpg
 
AhokZYashA said:
add me
its my laptop,
stock and fully stable with undervolting
AhokZYashA | Intel | Core 2 Duo T5450 @ 1.66GHz | 006.68582 | 002.00755 | 32-bit | 2GB of RAM but only ~800MB are available.

http://img.techpowerup.org/100527/ibt1.jpg
Click to expand...

maybe you would like to shut down all the stuff sitting in the systray like uTorrent and the other unnecessary programs that are stealing valuable CPU cycles :toast:
 
ill try that again this night,
also ill try that with my pc..
because im not at home now.
:grin:
 
gja822 said:
gja822 | AMD | Athlon 64 x2 Dual Core 5200+ @ 2.8GHz | 003.30962 | 01.18120 | 32bit |

I wonder, why it is SO low, the GFlops/GHz I mean.
Click to expand...
Must be the app leaning more on intel archi.. dunno.
 
Fitseries3 said:
Fitseries3 | Intel | 2x Xeon x5677 @ 4.24ghz (westmere-EP) |103.5649| 8.63125 | 64-bit | 16thread SR2 FTW
Click to expand...

Impressive! Shouldn't it be 24.4257 GFlops per Ghz though??

Or I'm missing something?
 
Add Me

Pembo210 | Intel | Core i5-750 @ 3.3GHz | 045.21908 | 13.70275 | 64-bit
stabletest.jpg
 
Last edited:
gja822 said:
gja822 | AMD | Athlon 64 x2 Dual Core 5200+ @ 2.8GHz | 003.30962 | 01.18120 | 32bit |

I wonder, why it is SO low, the GFlops/GHz I mean.
Click to expand...


with 4GB of DDR2-800 one wonders why your not running windows Vista or 7 x64 and making full use of your ram
 
Athlonite said:
with 4GB of DDR2-800 one wonders why your not running windows Vista or 7 x64 and making full use of your ram
Click to expand...
Becouse my primary OS is FreeBSD 7.2 (64-bit of course), that can get much more of RAM and CPU (not GPU, but mine is too weak anyway) for applications, than Windows (taking in account the OS self-demand). And at times I have been deciding on what Windows to install, 32-bit have seemed to be more driver supported. By the way, I don't have applications to fill-up all my RAM. :) What conserns my question, I knew my processor is not at top of performance scale, but didn't realise how far it is from there...
 
Table Updated.

Pembo210 said:
I just realized that my results log shows
"Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz
Clock Speed: 2.54 GHz"

Should I be dividing by 2.54, 2.67, or 3.3 for my gflops/ghz? :wtf:
Click to expand...

Divide by whatever your actual clock speed is, which in your case should be 3.3GHz.
 
Cool. Thats what I did first go round.:cool:
Thanks
 
Add Me Please

Bjorn_Of_Iceland | Intel | Q9550 @ 3.91GHz |050.11068| 12.816 | 64-bit |

1-10.jpg


Thanks! :D
 
gja822 said:
Becouse my primary OS is FreeBSD 7.2 (64-bit of course), that can get much more of RAM and CPU (not GPU, but mine is too weak anyway) for applications, than Windows (taking in account the OS self-demand). And at times I have been deciding on what Windows to install, 32-bit have seemed to be more driver supported. By the way, I don't have applications to fill-up all my RAM. :) What conserns my question, I knew my processor is not at top of performance scale, but didn't realise how far it is from there...
Click to expand...

actuall win7 x64 is really well supported for drivers out of the box and if not then 9 ot of 10 times windows update will have it if it wasn't available at the time windows 7 went to press that 1 out of 10 is usually just an out of the way no name piece of hardware thats never had support for an OS newer than XP...

and you'd be quite surprised just how zippy win7 x64 really is even on older hardware..

I sold a friend of mine my old skt 939 athlon64 x2 4800+ with 2GB of ram, he used win 7x32 on it and it was ok a wee bit dog slow at times so he asked if win7x64 would run i said sure would but might be a bit slower for you than 32bit well imagine our surprise when win7 x64 is actually quite a bit quicker than x32 bit so my advice give some serious thought mate you'll not regret it

and yes not even my Athlon x2 7750BE can hack it with the new boys now and its quite a bit newer than yours so don't feel to bad about it atleast it works right mostly these threads like this are about ePenis envy whos is bigger or in our case faster
 
Last edited:
add me
AhokZYashA | Intel | Core 2 Duo E7400 @ 3.6GHz | 022.345 | 006.20694 | 32-bit | highest overclock my board allows
ibt-22.34.jpg


AhokZYashA | Intel | Core 2 Duo T5450 @ 1.66GHz | 007.510125 | 004.52417 | 32-bit | shutting down all processes
ibt-standard.jpg
 
see didn't i tell ya that 007.510125 is better than 006.68582 by 0.824305 .... :)
better than with all the progies running in the back ground stealing CPU cycles, You gained nearly a GFlop extra... strange that the test took longer though i would have thought it would have taken a little less time to complete hmmm weird
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top