• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Processor GFlops Compilation

onepost | AMD | PII 720 @ 3.6 | 34.3358 | 9.5377 | 64-bit | Notes
 

Attachments

  • gflops.jpg
    gflops.jpg
    195.7 KB · Views: 622
Table Updated
 
hey guys joined the forum for this post...couldnt find anything like this anywhere else.
Here's my rig:
Alienware Aurora (dont know me please i got it as a free upgrade to an older system that i got for dirt cheap)
i7 975 stock speeds
1066mhz ddr3
Alienware X58 board
5870 crossfire

My scores under 8 thread and maximum stress level i get around 45.1 gflops.
Is this normal for stock speeds? turbo mode bumping it up to 3.4
Thanks!!
 
Welcome to TPU, shhhpark. :toast:

If you have a moment, go to the UserCP and put in your system specs. Makes like a lot easier for you and anyone trying to help you.
 
so is it true that xbox 360 has a more powerfull cpu than a modern quad core???
 
No, by a long shot. It is a tri-core with SMT (6 threads at once). A Core i7 with hyperthreading enabled (8 threads) would have no trouble shaming it.
 
No, by a long shot. It is a tri-core with SMT (6 threads at once). A Core i7 with hyperthreading enabled (8 threads) would have no trouble shaming it.

but these numbers seem to be bigger then a 4 ghz nehalem and xenon runs at 3.2ghz :confused:

96.0 GFLOPS theoretical peak performance (single-precision)
57.6 GFLOPS theoretical peak performance (double-precision)
 
im seeing from reading pasts posts that memory speed is important in this score? Time to upgrade to 1600mhz ram right?
 
but these numbers seem to be bigger then a 4 ghz nehalem and xenon runs at 3.2ghz :confused:

96.0 GFLOPS theoretical peak performance (single-precision)
57.6 GFLOPS theoretical peak performance (double-precision)
The CPU in Xbox 360 was designed for high FLOP performance. It gets slaughtered in integer performance.

Intel Core i7 980X = 102 GFLOP (double-precision)
 
Not to mention Theoretical Peak Performance isn't what is being tested here. People only use theorectical when they know it isn't true.
 
Heh, true. XD

Just like "dynamic power" on speakers or peak throughput on LinPACK. Only sustained matters.
 
add me

add me:cry:
 

Attachments

  • screenshoot.jpg
    screenshoot.jpg
    150.7 KB · Views: 658
add me

Here is my submission...so weird last night ran the same test and was getting scores in the 30s-up to 45 is something wrong with my cpu?
 

Attachments

  • gflops.JPG
    gflops.JPG
    171.7 KB · Views: 619
Fitseries3 | Intel | Xeon x5677 @ 4.51ghz (westmere-EP) | 58.198675 | 12.9043 | 64-bit | loose timings @ 8thread

Capture041.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fitseries3 | Intel | Xeon x5677 @ 4.51ghz (westmere-EP) | 60.6167 | 13.4405 | 64-bit | loose timings @ 4thread <-- takes #1 spot :toast:

Capture042.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fitseries3 | Intel | Xeon x5677 @ 4.51ghz (westmere-EP) | 60.7515 | 13.4704 | 64-bit | loose timings @ 6thread

odd but faster yet...

Capture043.jpg
 
well heres mine @ stock cpu tried one at 3333MHz but on the 5th run it shit it's dacks rebooted my pc :eek:

Athlonite | AMD | Athlonx2 7750BE (kuma B3)@ 2700MHz | 52.1325secs 17.146575Gflops | x64 bit
burn baby.JPG
 
Last edited:
Add me

Hockster | Intel | i7 860@3684 | 43.5343 | 11.8171 64 bit, 8 threads
 

Attachments

  • burnin.jpg
    burnin.jpg
    182.6 KB · Views: 596
Table Updated
 
[-erick-] | Intel | i7 920 4.2ghz | 54.03576 GF | 12.865 | 32bit | 4cores

2d7dapx.png


are my numbers correct?
 
Add This Hahah!

Fitseries3 | Intel | 2x Xeon x5677 @ 4.24ghz (westmere-EP) |103.5649| 8.63125 | 64-bit | 16thread SR2 FTW

Capture054696.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top