Ryzen 3000 listed online early on russian site.

[Vario]

1090T january 2010

i7 980X march 2010


Can't believe it's 9 years ago.

Which of those two is still perfectly viable today? Most 980x went to 4.5 Ghz, 6 core, 12 thread. Too bad the spectre meltdown fixes neuter them a bit.

 

[Deleted member 50521]

So no 12C, no 16C.


AdoredTV just got a huge slap on the face.

Damn!

 

[HTC]

So no 12C, no 16C.


AdoredTV just got a huge slap on the face.

Damn!

I'll just leave this here ...

EDIT

OTOH, it totally confirms the "advertised" clocks as bogus since even AMD hasn't finalized them yet: that goes for both Adored and the Russian site in the OP.

 

[SL2]

Which of those two is still perfectly viable today?

1090T: $295

980X: $999, plus higher board cost.

Your point being..?

 

[Deleted member 50521]

I'll just leave this here ...

EDIT

OTOH, it totally confirms the "advertised" clocks as bogus since even AMD hasn't finalized them yet: that goes for both Adored and the Russian site in the OP.

Sure you can keep on hyping. For the majority the hype train just crashed spectacularly, AMD stock also crashed.

At least we can agree to write off AdoredTV as fake news now.

 

[Super XP]

Yeah, EPYC Rome with its chiplet thingies hasn't been launched yet.. only previews so far.

It's 9 months since the launch of Ryzen 2000, I don't really expect AMD to end it so soon..

Ryzen 2000 or ZEN + simply refined ZEN. The real next gen is ZEN 2 based on 7nm. In my opinion, AMD would be smart to capitalize on this for 2019.

 

[HTC]

Sure you can keep on hyping. For the majority the hype train just crashed spectacularly, AMD stock also crashed.

At least we can agree to write off AdoredTV as fake news now.

1st dude, that i know of, that mentioned chiplet concept, months before we knew about it in Zen 2's Epyc.

So the dude speculates somethings wrong. News flash: it's called speculation.

Feel free to write the guy off, if you so wish. Personally, i like some of his videos like the one linked above allot more than the speculation ones, but that's me.

 

[Vya Domus]

The CES hype had nothing to do with all this.

Zen 2 is here, chiplets are here. Take a hint as to what will eventually come.

 

[Deleted member 50521]

The CES hype had nothing to do with all this.

Zen 2 is here, chiplets are here. Take a hint as to what will eventually come.

Wut will come?

 

[Wavetrex]

At least we can agree to write off AdoredTV as fake news now.

Actually, by looking at the picture and at the AM4 CPU in Lisa Su's hand, as well as the performance results ( 8-core matching 9900K performance) I would say that Jim ( Adored ) was completely ON THE SPOT and his leak is 99% accurate !
The design clearly shows this can be extended to 16 cores if needed.

What Jim missed is the MOMENT OF TIME when such 16 core chip will be launched, and it's obvious it's going to be later, probably autumn, after Intel releases their rumored 10-core on mainstream... AMD will hit back with 12-core and possibly 16-core.

And the fact that this Engineering Sample manages to equal (or beat 9900K) means his frequencies are also very plausible.

We are really looking at a revolution in chip design... too bad it will only happen in Q3, Q4 and not as early as "right now".

 

[HTC]

Actually, by looking at the picture and at the AM4 CPU in Lisa Su's hand, as well as the performance results ( 8-core matching 9900K performance) I would say that Jim ( Adored ) was completely ON THE SPOT and his leak is 99% accurate !
The design clearly shows this can be extended to 16 cores if needed.

What Jim missed is the MOMENT OF TIME when such 16 core chip will be launched, and it's obvious it's going to be later, probably autumn, after Intel releases their rumored 10-core on mainstream... AMD will hit back with 12-core and possibly 16-core.

Agreed.

 

[phanbuey]

Actually, by looking at the picture and at the AM4 CPU in Lisa Su's hand, as well as the performance results ( 8-core matching 9900K performance) I would say that Jim ( Adored ) was completely ON THE SPOT and his leak is 99% accurate !
The design clearly shows this can be extended to 16 cores if needed.

What Jim missed is the MOMENT OF TIME when such 16 core chip will be launched, and it's obvious it's going to be later, probably autumn, after Intel releases their rumored 10-core on mainstream... AMD will hit back with 12-core and possibly 16-core.

And the fact that this Engineering Sample manages to equal (or beat 9900K) means his frequencies are also very plausible.

We are really looking at a revolution in chip design... too bad it will only happen in Q3, Q4 and not as early as "right now".

Time to save money.

 

[cdawall]

Actually, by looking at the picture and at the AM4 CPU in Lisa Su's hand, as well as the performance results ( 8-core matching 9900K performance) I would say that Jim ( Adored ) was completely ON THE SPOT and his leak is 99% accurate !
The design clearly shows this can be extended to 16 cores if needed

His "leak" included clock speeds how on earth are we going to know how correct it is before amd releases what models they will offer...?

 

[Hellfire]

Surprised more people weren't impressed with the announcement. Sure, a lot of details to be confirmed but what we've seen is very promising.

Essentially what we saw was two mainstream desktop CPU with 8 cores, 16 threads matched up against each other, What I saw was nice and shows plenty of room for improvement. Esepcially for a 16c/32t model with the room for the additional die, which seems conveniently marked out.


Obviously it's still all up in the air, however it is still very promising and looks like it'll be a very good, cost effective build.

 

[SL2]

Surprised more people weren't impressed with the announcement. Sure, a lot of details to be confirmed but what we've seen is very promising.

Agreed. It basically was everything we could expect, but since people were fed all these rumors they could only get disappointed. We can't buy it tomorrow, what a surprise.

I too believed in the rumors for a while, and just because the model specs looked realistic I forgot the "when",
but then I saw that Ryzen 2000 was only 9 months old, server CPU's wasn't launched yet (and those were supposed to come first), and 7 nm is still very new.

More AMD CPU's were sold in germany than Intel's CPU's recently, so no hurry in replacing that, obviously. Vega being launched was more expected, AMD needs it so badly.

 

[NdMk2o1o]

Agreed. It basically was everything we could expect, but since people were fed all these rumors they could only get disappointed. We can't buy it tomorrow, what a surprise.

I too believed in the rumors for a while, and just because the model specs looked realistic I forgot the "when",
but then I saw that Ryzen 2000 was only 9 months old, server CPU's wasn't launched yet (and those were supposed to come first), and 7 nm is still very new.

More AMD CPU's were sold in germany than Intel's CPU's recently, so no hurry in replacing that, obviously. Vega being launched was more expected, AMD needs it so badly.

Same in the UK and Intel doesn't even make the top 5 on amazon, they have 3 in the top 10

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Best-Sellers-Computers-Accessories-Processors/zgbs/computers/430515031

 

[Hellfire]

Agreed. It basically was everything we could expect, but since people were fed all these rumors they could only get disappointed. We can't buy it tomorrow, what a surprise.

I too believed in the rumors for a while, and just because the model specs looked realistic I forgot the "when",
but then I saw that Ryzen 2000 was only 9 months old, server CPU's wasn't launched yet (and those were supposed to come first), and 7 nm is still very new.

More AMD CPU's were sold in germany than Intel's CPU's recently, so no hurry in replacing that, obviously. Vega being launched was more expected, AMD needs it so badly.

But apart from not being released today, what is there to be disappointing about? The information we got given and shown was nice and promising.

For the first preview of the chip showing it beating 9900K in cinebench was great. I think the big thing for this will be pricing, and this is where I hope AMD are competitive (like they have always been) The 9900K is currently around £500 in the UK, if this chip comes in around the £399 mark then I'll be definitely buying one. Although if they release a 16/32 I may go for that instead.

 

[SL2]

But apart from not being released today, what is there to be disappointing about?

Nothing, IMO.

AMD had to watch themselves not revealing too much in advance. All they showed was that they could match the 9900K in one benchmark, with less power used.
Final clock speeds and core counts are still unknown, although some will keep on speculating and making up their own "leaks" as if they haven't learned anything.

The only thing worse than these kind of rumors are "fan renders", a completely waste of time. Both only makes people disappointed. Same goes for movie trailers haha, haven't seen a FULL one for years.

 

[EarthDog]

Surprised more people weren't impressed with the announcement. Sure, a lot of details to be confirmed but what we've seen is very promising.

Essentially what we saw was two mainstream desktop CPU with 8 cores, 16 threads matched up against each other, What I saw was nice and shows plenty of room for improvement..

For me, I need to see clocks and overclocking... pricing... was any of that released? Its hard to get excited not knowing a darn thing about it outside of how it performs against a 9900K. I am sure further tweaks will place yield a couple more percent improvements (via clockspeeds). So that (only) is something to be excited about... I'll reserve judgement until details........ANY details are released.

My interest is piqued, but in order to be impressed, there needs to be something impressive shown.

 

[Space Lynx]

I mean Lisa Su already announced a late summer release date (at CES this year) for this chip, and actual stock is usually delayed... so your looking at Fall 2019 actual in stock for the masses release date... and Intel 10nm will be right around the corner at that point...

Will be interesting for sure, but something tells me Intel 10nm will still be gaming king at 1080p, etc. Not that it matters, and I most likely am buying Zen 2 myself, just saying, King is King until King is Dethroned... and Intel will probably still win, especially in min fps.

 

[Hellfire]

I mean Lisa Su already announced a late summer release date (at CES this year) for this chip, and actual stock is usually delayed... so your looking at Fall 2019 actual in stock for the masses release date... and Intel 10nm will be right around the corner at that point...

Will be interesting for sure, but something tells me Intel 10nm will still be gaming king at 1080p, etc. Not that it matters, and I most likely am buying Zen 2 myself, just saying, King is King until King is Dethroned... and Intel will probably still win, especially in min fps.

Will Intel 10nm be right around the corner, with no working chips and well, nothing to speak off, massively delayed?

For me, I need to see clocks and overclocking... pricing... was any of that released? Its hard to get excited not knowing a darn thing about it outside of how it performs against a 9900K. I am sure further tweaks will place yield a couple more percent improvements (via clockspeeds). So that (only) is something to be excited about... I'll reserve judgement until details........ANY details are released.

My interest is piqued, but in order to be impressed, there needs to be something impressive shown.

I could understand that, I guess I am one who gets excited early and easily.

 

[lexluthermiester]

could understand that, I guess I am one who gets excited early and easily.

You're not alone. I do that too.

 

[Xzibit]

Should have that looked at by a medical professional.


About the Chips the early Ryzen 1 ES if you recall had a lower than release base clock (ES were shown at 2.8 & 3.2) before they were finalized at 3.0, 3.4 & 3.6

 

[EarthDog]

Yep.. I fully expect it to be about as fast as it can be arch wise at this point with some clock and binning improvements similar to above. If tht is true, even if they cant get past their own boost, if they are closer to 5ghz (xfr) than 4.5, and surely they'll have under cut price, they'll have a winner. But amd marketing (among others) is ridiculous so I wait.

 

[Super XP]

AMD is keeping this new upcoming ZEN 2 somewhat Quiet, as to not spill the beans to the competition.
Can't wait till more concrete information comes out. This will hopefully be the turning point for AMD & competition in itself.