Hello, as long as you didn't apply to a profile or at startup, it should be fine. Either way thanks to
@biffzinker for sharing the screenshots over here that I had sent in the discord, and to elaborate upon this that 1.5-1.55v Vcore is
NOT using the protections from AMDs PBO system and manual removes these protections, 1.55v
static through a single core is not the same as
PBO and 1usmus removes the protections during this process and runs a Prime AVX1 test (more suitable towards RAM/IMC) for the testing process which drives the core to the ground and will cause degradation to the processor in most scenarios, Anyone using this with renoir avoid it period - unless you want your processor degraded
Some more fun of CTR2.0:
View attachment 190211
And a new article written on the matter from "Chip":
There are times when being a journalist is exciting.Your team writes something important, people engage with it and it generates a large response. Unfortunately, those are often the exact situation…
chipsandcheese.com
Either way, do not trust this tool and run PBO instead or manual with safe vcore.
Edit: (another screenshot from a renoir sample)
View attachment 190213
@trickson Care to explain why you're bombarding posts with the 'haha' reaction on? Is there something we're doing wrong with CTR2.0 for it to degrade processors and consistently damage CPUs along with shoving down 1.5V into a 3970X? Or running completely unsafe all-core load vcore?????????? Care to elaborate?
in all seriousness, the entirety of my old chip was a [barely] living testament to "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" - read: don't overclock a turd 
