• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

ScienceMark thread (with score list)

Status
Not open for further replies.
still waiting for my new parts for my upgrade to AM2
 
i have a 130nm proc. and i wonder if anyone with the same one can do this same score or better also

my 3000 also a 130nm but s754 does 1053 w/ ddr266 @ 2.46ghz
 
my 3000 also a 130nm but s754 does 1053 w/ ddr266 @ 2.46ghz

nice was ur voltage pushed also i didnt use and volt mods just just raised my fsb
 
nice was ur voltage pushed also i didnt use and volt mods just just raised my fsb

1.578v no mods on the board just what it offered i think my highest clock was only limited by my stock hsf
 
hello

i have run this benchmark and the score is so bad for my system :ohwell:

what can i make for a better score ?

 
hello

i have run this benchmark and the score is so bad for my system :ohwell:

what can i make for a better score ?


it would help turn off the music...
wich are your system specs :)
 
UPDATED

**********************************************
SCIENCEMARK 2.0 RESULTS 12/10/2006 "TOP 10" CLUB:
**********************************************



  • 1.) Alpha0ne = 2223.24 (3.9Ghz via 9x mult. X 434mhz FSB Intel Core2Duo E6600 Asus P5WDH 2x1GB G.Skill PC6400HZ)

  • 2.) Devious = 2181.97 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3942mhz)

  • 3.) IluvIntel = 2133.59 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3595.5mhz)

  • 4.) VOCCH = 1971.06 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3500mhz)

  • 5.) g R 3 i F = 1944.00 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3402mhz)

  • 6.) MikeLopez = 1877.09 (via 7x mult. X 470mhz FSB Intel Core2Duo E6300@3290mhz)

  • 7.) W2hCYK = 1813.82 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3300mhz)

  • 8.) LT Jws = 1799.60 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3304mhz)

  • 9.) mandelore = 1665.51 (Athlon64 4000+ @ 3193.0mhz (277.6x11.5)

  • 10.) cadaceva = 1648.73 (AMD Opteron 170 @ 3097.3mhz (269x11.5)
=================================================
TOP 10 AVERAGE RESULT = 1925.861
=================================================

**************************************************
SCIENCEMARK 2.0 RESULTS 08/25/2006 (ALL outside TOP 10):
**************************************************


  • 11.) Wolverine = 1553.53 (A64 3700+ SD @ 3ghz (300x10)

  • 12.) giorgos.th = 1541.53 (A64 3700+ SD @ 3047.02mhz(275.49*11)

  • 13.) Urlyin = 1537.93 (175 Dual Core Opteron @2800mhz)

  • 14.) Tatty_One = 1516.48 (Athlon 4000+@3100mhz)

  • 15.) Ketxxx = 1510.77 (Athlon 3500+@2900mhz)

  • 16.) Dj Dn = 1461.97 (Opteron 165 2700mhz)

  • 17.) X800 = 1459.10 (A64 x2 4800+ watercooled @2751mhz)

  • 18.) g12rxz = 1456.09 (AMD A64x2 n4200+ @ 2.6ghz)

  • 19.) Tigger69 = 1448.51 (Pentium D930@4416.8mhz)

  • 20.) Judas = 1442.51 (AMD Athlon 64x2 4200+@ 2796mhz)

  • 21.) Alec§taar = 1440.60 (AMD A64x2 4800+@ 11x 257 = 2827.2mhz)

  • 22.) lapenski = 1426.95 (AMD Opteron 148 @2860.4mhz)

  • 23.) JNT Raptor = 1422.72 (AMD A64x2 3800+@2712.1mhz)

  • 24.) 33 = 1395.99 (AMD A64 3000+@2856MHZ)

  • 25.) pt = 1383.88 (AMD A64 3000+@2745mhz)

  • 26.) Ketxxx = 1374.96 (A64 3200+ @ 2.65GHz - VENICE

  • 27.) Lekamies = 1371.23 (AMD A64 3000+@2700mhz)

  • 28.) Steevo = 1360 (AMD 4000+ San Diego @ 3.0 1.65vcore)

  • 29.) randomperson = 1208.27 (AMD ATHLONx2 3800+@2400mhz)

  • 30.) Canuto = 1190.71 (Pentium D 930 @ 3720mhz)

  • 31.) DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E = 1157.92 (Intel Pentium 4 520@3707.6mhz)

  • 32.) amd64skater = 1127.08 (AMD Athlon64 3500+@2419.8)

  • 33.) ace80 = 1121.98 (P4 550@3789.5GHz)

  • 34.) newmodder = 1119.29 (AMD Athlon64 3500+ 205fsb x 11 mult)

  • 35.) zekrahminator = 1101.54 (AMD ATHLON x2 3800+@stock)

  • 36.) Thermopylae_480 = 1095.84 (P4 530@3699.9GHz)

  • 37.) cdawall = 1053.52 (AMD ATHLON64 3000+@2.46ghz)

  • 38.) Polaris573 = 1040.76 (P4 Northwood@3.2GHz)

  • 39.) Polaris573 = 1016.19 (Amd Athlon 64 3000+@2350mhz)

  • 40.) W2hCYK = 1011.54 (P4 Prescott@3400mhz)

  • 41.) MikeLopez = 1000.03 (AMD 3400 (S754)

  • 42.) Casheti = 931.40 (Pentium D 920@2800.80MHz)

  • 43.) Solaris17 = 886.72 (AMD ATHLONXP@2340MHZ)

  • 44.) Twinz = 852.66 (AMD ATHLON64 3700+@2532MHZ)

=================================================
Average 34 non-top 10 testers =
=================================================
P.S.=> Achilles from the film "TROY", said it best:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alec§taar


"Is there NO ONE ELSE!?!"




==================================================
When you guys run the ScienceMark 2.0 test? Do it THIS way:
==================================================

A.) Remove as MANY BACKGROUND APPS RUNNING AS YOU CAN, & even stop your EXPLORER.EXE SHELL using taskmgr.exe!

* An example post of someone doing this is here you can refer to & follow, has details, for BACKGROUND APPS CUTOFFS OPTIMIZATIONS:
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showth...138#post140138
---------------------------------------------------------------
B.) Stop as many services as you can using services.msc (or, via msconfig, whatever you are most comfortable with): You (@ least I can) can run with this MINIMUM SET OF SERVICES GOING (or just set ones you are NOT SURE OF, to MANUAL startup in services.msc):

  • DCOM Server Process (it may be possible to DISABLE this one, but some apps need it)

  • EventLog (may be possible to disable, but not 100% sure, because some security settings demand logging & if unable to log? System WILL shutdown!)

  • Plug and Play

  • Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - NEVER SHUT THIS DOWN or your system WILL LAG BAD!

  • Security Accounts Manager

(Some of those? You may not even HAVE on XP, not sure anymore, but point is there! ABOVE ALL - If you are NOT SURE what to do here? Ask, or just don't do anything @ all... it can be 'somewhat risky')

** An example post of someone doing this is here you can refer to & follow, has details, for SERVICES CUTOFFS OPTIMIZATIONS:

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showth...048#post140048
---------------------------------------------------------------
C.) Lastly/Optionally, startup ScienceMark 2.0 (using its File Menu, Run Submenu to browse for it if need be on disk) & try it @ HIGH, or ABOVENORMAL CPU Priority!

(When you run it by rightclicking on it as you startup the program & it comes into taskmgr.exe's PROCESS tab view as visible, give the benchmark program THAT MUCH MORE CPU PRIORITY possible - then, RUN IT!).

NOTE:
When you are @ highest o/c's possible for your rig? It can get "touchy" using HIGH cpu priority, SO, if you can't finish the test? Step down to AboveNormal or Normal CPU priority via taskmgr.exe on ScienceMark2.exe!
---------------------------------------------------------------
D.) When done: Restart services you need, via service.msc right-click popup menu or START/STOP command there WHILE IN THE PROCESSES TAB, & restart explorer.exe (your desktop GUI shell) using taskmgr.exe's File menu, RUN submenu item. Then, post your CPU-z 1.36 data & score in photos in this thread. Thanks!
==================================================
 
Last edited:
1gb infineon ddr pc 3200
512 mb noname pc 3200
256mb noname pc 2700

:wtf:
let me guess, diferent timmings, diferent speeds..., you just discovered the reason, wich are your full sys specs
 
Last week i took my gf old comp out from the cupboard that hasn't been used in about 2 years. Its an intel celeron 1.7Ghz, 512mb pc2100. Just reformatted it to use as a media centre in the front room (works perfectly:) )
Anyhow, thought i'd give u all a laugh with a few benchmarks!
3D03 would only run 1 game test(on board graphics)
SM wouldn't even run the full test, so officially it has no score.
I'll run SM again on my main comp next week when i should be receiving infrareds old mobo, and clocking my p4 into the sky! :D
 

Attachments

  • Capture001.jpg
    Capture001.jpg
    65.8 KB · Views: 445
  • Capture003.jpg
    Capture003.jpg
    116 KB · Views: 462
  • Capture004.jpg
    Capture004.jpg
    98.8 KB · Views: 395
Damn PT, I didnt realise you had logged my score! I am gonna have to improve on it now......wait out!
 
I like to take things in small steps! here is my 2nd run. I'll run her at 3.2Gig at the weekend which will bring my memory upto DDR500 also so should be good for about 1540+......Just gotta beat Ket!!!!!
 

Attachments

  • Tatty_3.1Gig.JPG
    Tatty_3.1Gig.JPG
    174.8 KB · Views: 446
Damn PT, I didnt realise you had logged my score! I am gonna have to improve on it now......wait out!

always a pleasure to help :D
*updated*
 
As always.....your too kind!.....eat your heart out Ket!!!!! 3rd run is in and I havent got near to my 3.2+ yet on the CPU, damn his memory must be running tight and fast my DDR400 is running at practically 500Mhz now on 2.5-3-2-6@1T!!!!
 

Attachments

  • Tatty_3rdRun.JPG
    Tatty_3rdRun.JPG
    94.5 KB · Views: 430
good score, don't forget that ketxxx is going to get better memory soon :D
*updated*
 
good score, don't forget that ketxxx is going to get better memory soon :D
*updated*


Ahhhh cr*p!!! I still reckon with about 3.25Gig i will be good for about 1550 so it will be a tight one! the only thing is my memory will be running with a divider at about 464Mhz then so not quite as much bandwidth, its that balancing act between raw CPU power and memory performance. By the way, that run was at 3.1Gig.
 
By the way, that run was at 3.1Gig.

got to edit that :)
btw, at a lower divider my score lowered about 100pts in a 100mhz cpu increase, and it was not stable (lack of chipset voltage) :(
 
1073. Athlon 64 3000+@ 2.5GHZ Cool&Quiet OFF. I can't imagine 50MHZ jumping 30 pts in this score, so I think the C&Q had something to do with it.
 
and clocking my p4 into the sky! :D

Yes it needs to be sent into the sky, all preschott P4's should be euthanized :eek: :o :D :laugh:
 
and then carbonized :toast: :roll:

Hehe yes, they do a good enough job of carbonising by themslves, along with mobo components and your PSU too if its loaded enough and you dont have a monster that can handle the power load/drain :rolleyes: :nutkick: :toast: :laugh:
 
Hehe yes, they do a good enough job of carbonising by themslves, along with mobo components and your PSU too if its loaded enough and you dont have a monster that can handle the power load/drain :rolleyes: :nutkick: :toast: :laugh:

if that don't happen, the cpu fan will go 100% and you will become deaf :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top