Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[Hnykill22]

Intel Core i7 5820K @ 4.2 Ghz

 

[DeathtoGnomes]

Not OC'd yet.

Sorry trying different styles, which one looks most readable?
Link: Validation Page

 

[AhokZYashA]

after the newest update,
it looks a lot better now,

 

[Underdog]

Not OC'd yet.

Sorry trying different styles, which one looks most readable?
Link: Validation Page

M8 we have the same MB and cpu. 1.56v for stock is insane. set LLC to ultra high and try 1.35-1.375v.
FYI for 5.0ghz I use 1.52v (cpu vid) LLC set to high.
NB/HT 2.4ghz. Cpu/NB volts 1.25-1.3
Phase control: EXTREME
Probe set to current.
C6/C1/amd-v/epu/APM: Disabled
HPC mode. Enabled
Turbo disabled
Also a further note about ram, after much testing TRAS (cycle time) causes a memory stumble in sandras ram test unless it is between 21-24 clocks??????

 

[xvi]

They've updated the app just today, along with the bench tab, gotta redo all the benches yet again...

ya mine went up!

Mine did too. Considerably! Comparing results are going to be rather annoying now.

Old results in this post:
Single: 1364
Multi: 5162

HP Pavilion, Memphis-B motherboard.

View attachment 68585 View attachment 68584

 

[Blue-Knight]

Spoiler: Off topic

Sorry trying different styles, which one looks most readable?

I think the second is most readable.

 

[AhokZYashA]

its my laptop now,
it shows how slow is Haswell-ULT compared to an 8 years old desktop CPU.

 

[stoggs1]

not too bad for my xeons

 

[XSI]

Somehow this benchmark show that its really capable e8400@3.4 ghz vs I7 6 core
85 points difference with single core performance that's some strange diferrence, way too small. or is it?

 

[Frick]

How about making some nice tables with the results?

 

[Toothless]

 

[BarbaricSoul]

4Ghz, 5960x.

View attachment 68557

3930k at 4 GHz for comparison

 

[hat]

^^Notice the 5960x and 3930k both scored 1518 single threaded. what

 

[Toothless]

^^Notice the 5960x and 3930k both scored 1518 single threaded. what

Watch the 5960x be a uber beefed 3930k that Intel has kept secret.

 

[BarbaricSoul]

^^Notice the 5960x and 3930k both scored 1518 single threaded. what

yeah, I noticed that too. Hmmm, so how long will this thing stay relevant performance wise?

 

[P4-630]

i7-4700HQ @ 2.8Ghz

 

[kniaugaudiskis]

3930k at 4 GHz for comparison

Nice, my Xeon does about the same, but at 4.2GHz. Can you push your CPU higher?

 

[BarbaricSoul]

Can you push your CPU higher?

Easily, I've had it as high as 4.8 GHz, and can probably do more.

 

[cdawall]

View attachment 68682 View attachment 68683

Somehow this benchmark show that its really capable e8400@3.4 ghz vs I7 6 core
85 points difference with single core performance that's some strange diferrence, way too small. or is it?

It would show how little per-core IPC has increased with intel. That result makes me curious what its benching.

 

[kniaugaudiskis]

It would show how little per-core IPC has increased with intel. That result makes me curious what its benching.

Well, it also depends on wheter or not benchmark results of a similar version of the CPU-Z are being taken into consideration, because the latest version of 1.74.0 has shown a ~25% performance increase over 1.73.0, which is quite significant when it comes to synthetics.

 

[cdawall]

Well, it also depends on wheter or not benchmark results of a similar version of CPU-Z are being taken into consideration, because the latest version of 1.74.0 has shown ~25% performance increase over 1.73.0, which is quite significant when it comes to synthetics.

It probably just isn't updated numbers for their baseline. 25% per clock increase should be a little low, but that could be in setup.

 

[Ferrum Master]

Also got a boost @4,8GHz in 1.74

 

[DeathtoGnomes]

M8 we have the same MB and cpu. 1.56v for stock is insane. set LLC to ultra high and try 1.35-1.375v.
FYI for 5.0ghz I use 1.52v (cpu vid) LLC set to high.
NB/HT 2.4ghz. Cpu/NB volts 1.25-1.3
Phase control: EXTREME
Probe set to current.
C6/C1/amd-v/epu/APM: Disabled
HPC mode. Enabled
Turbo disabled
Also a further note about ram, after much testing TRAS (cycle time) causes a memory stumble in sandras ram test unless it is between 21-24 clocks??????

I was playing around forgot to set the voltage back. It's a new build (first AIO) so I'm gonna wait to OC until I got the temps locked down. When I do OC, its only gonna be a mild OC, so hopefully these setting you give me will work nice at 4.6 or 4.7.

I dread messing with the memory settings I know so little about them. With a mild OC, maybe I wont have to.

 

[Aquinus]

Now that I managed to get my 125Mhz BCLK strap to work again, I've started tweaking some things. I've brought memory up from 2000Mhz up to 2333Mhz by slightly lowering tRFC to 108 from 125, bumped the CL latency by 1 cycle and tRAS by 2 cycles. Hitting 2400Mhz requires loosening the timings a little more but, 2333Mhz is more than enough.

I'm about to see if I can get 4.75 stable using boot and additional boost voltage on top of the already defined offset.

Attempt at 4.625Ghz:

Attempt at 4.75Ghz:

 

[Ferrum Master]

Now that I managed to get my 125Mhz BCLK strap to work again, I've started tweaking some things. I've brought memory up from 2000Mhz up to 2333Mhz by slightly lowering tRFC to 108 from 125, bumped the CL latency by 1 cycle and tRAS by 2 cycles. Hitting 2400Mhz requires loosening the timings a little more but

How much Vtt and Vccsa are you using? Mine is a bitch. It cannot boot to 2400MHz from cold boot, if I boot 2133 then pull up to 2400 it works.

Never used bus straps tough... They seem odd to me.