Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[NSX05]

What the heck happened to cpuZ's bench scores ? They are like less than half of what they used to be if that

It looks like I'll have to run my bench again and seems they change the scaling of the results

Not even that. Going by the two stock Ryzen 7 1700X scores, single-thread dropped from 2,139 to 370.

Incidentally, there's something that has just struck my mind. Check out the single-thread graph for v1.7.9.0. Look at the scores for the Core i7-6700K and Core i5-7600K. Both at 4.20 GHz, yet the 7600K is 7.2% faster, and with a lower base clock frequency at that. IPC-wise, Skylake and Kaby Lake are absolutely identical so that doesn't explain it either.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Yeah even my score went down from 2200 to 500 less than a quarter. As long as the scoring is for every processor My pentium should still be in third place for single thread performance

 

[NSX05]

Yeah even my score went down from 2200 to 500 less than a quarter. As long as the scoring is for every processor My pentium should still be in third place for single thread performance

It's at the top.

 

[jboydgolfer]

It's at the top.

For now

As a tip to anyone who might read this. Run the benchmark a minimum of 3 times for your best score. My first was 504, then 512, & finally 516 when i ran out of patience. I havent adjusted voltage yet, i should be able to reach 4.8 + ghz if i do

 

[MrGenius]

I have one score I was interested in seeing lower than before. And I believe I win.

Celeron Northwood-128 @ 2.0GHz

 

[jboydgolfer]

I have one score I was interested in seeing lower than before. And I believe I win.

Celeron Northwood-128 @ 2.0GHz
View attachment 87068
View attachment 87070
View attachment 87069

Did you hit the start button?

 

[MrGenius]

Did you hit the start button?

I assume you mean the "Bench CPU" button. Oh yes. The zeros for ST and MT and 0.57 for MT Ratio appeared shortly after which.

EDIT: AND I just beat your ST score by 1 point!

i5-3570K @ 5.0GHz

MT Ratio looks like 3.97 or 3.98. Let's call it 3.975?

EDIT 2: One more. Because I can.

E8600 @ 3.33GHz

 

[NSX05]

For now

As a tip to anyone who might read this. Run the benchmark a minimum of 3 times for your best score. My first was 504, then 512, & finally 516 when i ran out of patience. I havent adjusted voltage yet, i should be able to reach 4.8 + ghz if i do

You talked that one up. Incidentally, I did forget to say that for all of my results, I did exactly what you stated.

I have one score I was interested in seeing lower than before. And I believe I win.

Celeron Northwood-128 @ 2.0GHz

Oh man... NetBurst at its finest.

I assume you mean the "Bench CPU" button. Oh yes. The zeros for ST and MT and 0.57 for MT Ratio appeared shortly after which.

EDIT: AND I just beat your ST score by 1 point!

i5-3570K @ 5.0GHz

MT Ratio looks like 3.97 or 3.98. Let's call it 3.975?

Yikes. The Bridges were such good overclockers.

 

[Komshija]

@MrGenius :

That voltage! What were the temps after CPU-Z bench?

 

[FC Copenhagen]

 

[Kliim]

@FckMoaners try version 1.79.0

 

[jboydgolfer]

AND I just beat your ST score by 1 point!

Sorry bud.... i was being "modest" . got 12 more points by chance?

 

[FC Copenhagen]

@Kliim I see your point. Big decrease in scores. Benchmark has changed to something else?

 

[NSX05]

@Kliim I see your point. Big decrease in scores. Benchmark has changed to something else?

I think it's either SSE3 or SSE4 (was previously SSE2). One method to find out would be if anyone has a Merom/Conroe Core2 Duo (E4000/E6000/T5000/T7000), to run the benchmark and compare with the Penryn chips we have in the graphs. If Penryn has a noticeable improvement, we can safely assume SSE4.

On another note, your 6700K is now at the top. It's safe to say that Ryzen won't be getting up there, unless there are some LN2 overclockers here who happen to own Ryzen...

 

[Deleted member 163934]

Athlon II X4 640

Pentium G3260

single core Athlon x4 / singler core Pentium = ~0.4 same ratio as in the old test

Doubt I will be able to get the scores for my other 3 cpu: Sempron 145, AMD Athlon 64 x2 4000+ and AMD Athlon X2 5400B. The Sempron 145 is used in the pc that is basicaly a TV in my father's room (TV broke and I found a solution without costs ), the AMD Athlon X2 5400B has Win 7 x86 and I think I need x64 for the test and the AMD Athlon 64 x2 4000+ is in the pc that will become a router as soon as I get a decent psu for it (no hdd... I understand it will consume more than a router but well...).

 

[MrGenius]

@MrGenius :
View attachment 87090

That voltage! What were the temps after CPU-Z bench?

I don't know for sure on that one. I didn't check. But I just ran it again to get an idea. Max of 74°C ain't too bad.

Some benchmarks require even more voltage than that @ 5.0GHz too. Namely Valley and Superposition. The highest I run it is 1.680V @ 5.0GHz. That either gets the job done or I quit trying.

Them volts are pretty scary though. I only run them that high for occasional benches. And I lower them below 1.52V @ 4.8GHz, or less, immediately afterwards. So far no issues.

Sorry bud.... i was being "modest" . got 12 more points by chance?

Damn! You win then. I've run it a bunch of times now and that's my highest ST score. And 5.1GHz is a no go. So it's looking like I'm all tapped out for ST.

I did manage to up my MT score by 6 points though.

i5-3570K @ 5.0GHz

 

[NSX05]

Athlon II X4 640
Pentium G3260

Doubt I will be able to get the scores for my other 3 cpu: Sempron 145, AMD Athlon 64 x2 4000+ and AMD Athlon X2 5400B. The Sempron 145 is used in the pc that is basicaly a TV in my father's room (TV broke and I found a solution without costs ), the AMD Athlon X2 5400B has Win 7 x86 and I think I need x64 for the test and the AMD Athlon 64 x2 4000+ is in the pc that will become a router as soon as I get a decent psu for it (no hdd... I understand it will consume more than a router but well...).

Thank you for the Athlon and Pentium. They have been added to the graphs. You can run the 32-bit version of the program, though I'm not sure what kind of impact that will have on the scores. I've just run both versions. You will definitely want to run the 64-bit version with a 64-bit-capable processor. My scores for 32-bit were less than half what they were for 64-bit (237/576 vs. 85/249).

Does anyone have a Core2 Duo E6300, E6400, E6600 or E6700 that they could test?

 

[TheRagnarok]

My current Xeon setup.
Was able to boot it at 5Ghz, but not stable.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Xeon 1231 V3 a suprisingly capable CPU.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

8 years old Xeon W 3520

Base clock 2.67ghz overclocked to 4.2ghz which is about 60 per cent or something.

@basco

 

[NSX05]

8 years old Xeon W 3520

Base clock 2.67ghz overclocked to 4.2ghz which is about 60 per cent or something.

Approximately, what voltage did you achieve that at? (I am assuming the 0.944 V reading is too low).

 

[jboydgolfer]

8 years old Xeon W 3520

Base clock 2.67ghz overclocked to 4.2ghz which is about 60 per cent or something.

@basco

I wish I could overclock my Xeon

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Approximately, what voltage did you achieve that at? (I am assuming the 0.944 V reading is too low).

1.26 v

 

[NSX05]

1.26 v

Awesome, thanks. All up-to-date.

 

[birdie]

Ryzen what?

That's a six years old CPU without OC.