• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

The Move Away From x86 To ARM Processors On The Desktop To Start Soon - Survey

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#1
It looks like there's a subtle but relentless push to get ARM CPUs into desktop PCs. Morgan Stanley recently surveyed 30 PC makers (names not revealed) and discovered that 40% of them are interested in trying out ARM-based PCs within the next two years. As we reported previously that the Wintel alliance appears to be crumbling, this finding appears to add weight to that assertion. Of course, there's a huge mountain to climb before ARM processors can compete head to head with high performance x86, as explained in our article, not least because Microsoft won't begin supporting ARM until Windows 8 is released late next year and the fact that the vast majority of existing software won't run on ARM. A real catch-22 if ever there was one. Just as crucially, the many high performance enhancements and interface standards that currently go into making a modern x86 chip fly will also have to go into an ARM – and developing that isn't going to be cheap, although it may not take that long, since these are tried and trusted technologies that need to be applied. Still, the interest is there and Morgan Stanley expect that 10% (39 million) PCs, excluding tablets, will have an ARM processor at their heart. If true, it will make for interesting times.

Show full news post
 

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,381 (10.17/day)
Likes
18,023
Processor Intel i7 8700k
Motherboard Gigabyte z370 AORUS Gaming 7
Cooling Water
Memory 16gb G.Skill 4000 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 1080
Storage 3 x Samsung Evo 850 500GB, 1 x 250GB, 2 x 2TB HDD
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake X5
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
Software Windows 10
#2
I don't currently see the point of an ARM "desktop" at all. A lot needs to be done before it's even remotely viable.

edit: 5-10 years isn't "soon" in the computer world.
 
Last edited:

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#3
I don't currently see the point of an ARM "desktop" at all.
Without all those issues being addressed, I'd agree. Yet, there's interest, so one has to ask why that's so.

Think about it: imagine that the ARM architecture gets the needed makeover and let's put aside that it should handily beat an equivalent x86, you will have lots of manufacturers making it. That equals lots of competition and therefore low prices (cartels aside...) Imagine getting something like a 2700K for half of its current price, or less? That would be fantastic and we would have cheap-ish, high performance processors from many sources to choose from, just like we do with other components such as memory, motherboards, PSUs etc. Ultimately, these manufacturers might be interested in this simply because it will make their boxes cheaper.

EDIT: I don't think we'll see serious competition for 5-10 years though.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
1,833 (0.56/day)
Likes
523
System Name Computer
Processor 1700X
Motherboard CH6
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory G.Skill 32GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo Msata
Display(s) LG 23" IPS
Power Supply Seasonic 760 Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 64-Bit
#5
I will believe it when I walk into walmart and buy one
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
2,191 (0.66/day)
Likes
1,068
Location
Texas
System Name Behemoth-6700k
Processor i7 6700k @ 4.7Ghz 1.37v
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth Z170 Mark 1
Cooling D5 Vario w/ EK X-Top; EK 240 PE, EK 420 PE; EK RES X3 150; HeatKiller IV Pro
Memory 32Gb (4x8Gb) GSkill Ripjaws 3000Mhz @ 15/16/16/35 1.35v
Video Card(s) Zotac 1080ti Amp Extreme
Storage Crucial M500 240GB; Mushkin 1TB SSD x 2; WD Blue 2TB; WD Black 1TB x2
Display(s) Acer XR341CK 34" 3440x1440; LG 27" 1920x1080
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo; Phanteks F140SP Fans x 12 (6 x Top Rad); Noctua IPPC-2000 x4 (Bottom Rad)
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 1350
Mouse MS Trackball Optical
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB; Razer Tartarus Chroma
Software Windows 10 Pro
#6
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
1,335 (0.33/day)
Likes
90
Processor e8200 3.93mhz@1.264v
Motherboard P5E3 Pro
Cooling Scythe Infinity
Memory 4gb of G.Skill Ripjaw 6-7-7-18@1404 and 1.62v
Video Card(s) HIS 5770 v2 940/1275mhz stock volts
Storage 1TB Hitachi
Display(s) Acer 22" Widescreen LCD
Case Blue Cooler Master Centurion
Audio Device(s) Onboard audio :(, and Klipsch 5.1 Pro Media's
Power Supply 650 Watt BFG
Software Vista 64 Ultimate
#7
I doubt it is for the US market. It is probably for China and countries where low power consumption is more critical.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,546 (3.88/day)
Likes
10,908
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
#8
Sounds like nVidia marketing, to me.:laugh:
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,280 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,375
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#9
Note the wording, "ARM based PC". That could mean Tablets, laptops, or desktops. It doesn't specifically mean desktop. I see ARM making a big push into Tablets. I don't see them even coming close to being even a minor player in the desktop market any time soon.
 
Last edited:

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.94/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#10
Ugh, here we go again. :rolleyes:

ARM will not even be able to make any significant impact in the desktop market for years and years to come, period.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
746 (0.20/day)
Likes
88
#11
Just like Linux...

Oi! Did I say that out loud? :p

In all seriousness though, everything has their place.
 

tigger

I'm the only one
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
10,476 (2.44/day)
Likes
1,673
System Name Black to the Core MKIV
Processor Intel I7 6700k
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming socket 1151
Cooling NZXT Kraken X61 280mm radiator
Memory 2x8gb Corsair vengeance LPX 2400 DDR4
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon R9 290 4gb ddr5
Storage Patriot Blast 120gb ssd Boot and WD10EADX-22TDHB0 1TB Data
Display(s) Dell 2408WFP 24" 1920x1200
Case Nzxt IS 340
Audio Device(s) Asus xonar dsx pci-e
Power Supply Corsair CX750
Mouse Logitech G502
Software Win 10 Pro x64
#12
Arm is a uk company, so it might be possible with a bit of research to find out if they are working on a arm x86 alternative, though i guess if they are it will be a secret.

Just got back from work too :D
 

option350z

New Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
115 (0.04/day)
Likes
28
Location
Gurnee, IL
Processor AMD Phenom II x2 550BE
Motherboard Asus M4A79T Deluxe
Cooling OCZ CNPS10X Flex (Dual 80cfm fans)
Memory OCZ Reaper 1866 4GB
Video Card(s) ASUS EAH4870 Dark Knight 1G
Storage 150gb WD Raptor
Display(s) Viewsonic Optiquest Q22wb
Case Apevia X-Navigator
Power Supply OCZ ModXStream Pro 500W
Software Windows 7 Ulitimate (64bit)
#13
Problem being we already had a company try using an IBM RISC in the PC market. Remember the G series of Apple towers anyone? We all know what happened with that. Problem with RISC processors is that in order to do the same complex task as one of our AMD or Intel Processors can do; That RISC processor has to process more lines of simple code, which is not always the quickest route. Along with the hardware aspect, this is more suited to be a GPU architecture if anything in my opinion. Our GPUs operate similar to this. However they are different.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Messages
316 (0.08/day)
Likes
27
Location
UK
System Name Moose 1055
Processor AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
Motherboard ASRock 990FX Extreme3
Cooling Thermaltake PW 850i Liquid Cooler and loads of Case Fans
Memory OCZ (2x2GB) + Crucial (2x4GB) = 12GB DDR3 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Powercolor R9 285
Storage Corsair BX100 250GB + 2 x Western Digital Caviar Black 750GB
Display(s) Hanns G LCD 22" + Acer LCD 22"
Case NZXT Hades Mid Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 650W
Mouse Gigabyte M6900
Software Windows 10 Enterprise
#14
ARM are a UK company? Opinion of them improved hugely lol!
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
68 (0.02/day)
Likes
12
#15
This depends on how you define "desktop" or "PC" as they are very broad terms, but saying 10% would be ARM-based in the future (though no date?) isn't all too unreasonable to me. Just think of thin clients for example which I expect to increase even more with cloud computing being more and more prominent in production environment. And not to mention tablets (and to some extent smartphones) which are primarily alienating the netbooks for everyday consumption and light production.

Personally I wouldn't mind a HTPC using less than handful of watts during playback. Would it matter to the end-user if it's ARM of x86 based? I doubt it if the front-end is similar (or the same). Would power consumption matter more in the future? I'd say so, people are getting more 'aware' and the less something uses, whilst delivering the same experience, the better.

Dying to see what the first Haswell chips will bring to the table.
 

MagpieX

New Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Likes
2
#16
[...] Problem with RISC processors is that in order to do the same complex task as one of our AMD or Intel Processors can do; That RISC processor has to process more lines of simple code, which is not always the quickest route.[...]
Pretty sure that's more an issue of optimization during compilation, only very rarely software is written in assembler language these days.
RISC differs from CISC in that RISC op codes are like building blocks - like LEGO blocks - forming the command and every opcode uses the same small amount of cycles to execute whereas in CISC architecture all codes may use up a certain amount of multiple cycles even empty ones for alignment and sub-operations ignoring. In general CISC architecture operates on load-execute-store-erase basis requiring the processing unit to load a value from and back to memory every time even if that one is needed again for the next command.
RISC architecture is able to store values for later use within registers reducing the amount of (redundant) memory access needed. The actual down side of RISC architecture is - as hinted in my first sentence - the bigger code size because say a command to divide two values will just be the op code for the command and two references to the operands whereas in RISC it's several opcodes with the references included. Depending on the size and optimization it might however be negligible.
Either way modern optimization techniques in hardware and software made RISC architecture's advantages minimal in comparison to CISC and RISC CPUs weren't popular not because the architecture sucks but because in case of Apple the political decision was made because IBM didn't make much progresses with their PowerPC architecture especially in terms of performance per power usage and Intel seemed to deliver.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
497 (0.15/day)
Likes
117
Location
Hampshire, UK
System Name If you name your systems, get a girlfriend...
Processor i7 4770k
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Custom waterloop around Black Ice GTX 360
Memory 16GB DDR3
Video Card(s) R9 290
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 1TB
Case HAF 932
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Windows 10 x64
#17
I don't currently see the point of an ARM "desktop" at all. A lot needs to be done before it's even remotely viable.
Don't even get me started on that, because I may start trolling badly....

FFS !
Use open source solutions !

OK. ok... calming down... few breaths...

Windows 8 is going to be a major step in good direction.
Developer twats that used proprietary APIs will realise that using OpenGL, OpenCL, OpenAL, and OpenWhatever :) will allow them to release their products for Linux, Max, x86PC and ARM PC with little porting effort.

I think the ARM architecture is inherently better than x86 for everything, not just smartphones.
Have you seen Ubuntu running on Gumstix Overo ?
A "full-sized" desktop ARM CPU will wipe the floor with x86.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#18
I think the ARM architecture is inherently better than x86 for everything, not just smartphones.
Have you seen Ubuntu running on Gumstix Overo ?
A "full-sized" desktop ARM CPU will wipe the floor with x86.
Yes! So true. So many so-called "knowledgeable" types have no clue of this. As I've been saying repeatedly, put the same technological "turbocharger" technologies into an ARM CPU and it will indeed wipe the floor with x86, as it's inherently more efficient and faster.

Now, this is pure speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised if Intel have made such ARM prototypes to investigate this and have found it to be true. The only reason they stick to x86 and don't embrace ARM is because of that semi-exclusive licensing deal they made with AMD.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
4,012 (1.47/day)
Likes
630
Location
UK
System Name PC
Processor AMD FX 8320E @4.3ghz
Motherboard Asrock 970 extreme3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC12DX, 3 x NZXT FN 140mm, 1x NZXT FV V2 120mm
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance Blue 1600mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS R9 290 DCII-OC 4GB
Storage 128GB Kingston V200 SSD 1TB WD Blue, 750GB Maxtor
Display(s) LG 27MB85Z 27" 1440p
Case NZXT Source 340
Power Supply Thermaltake 675w
Mouse Logitech G500S
Keyboard Logitech G510S
Software Windows 8.1 64 bit
#19
Windows 8 is going to be a major step in good direction.
Developer twats that used proprietary APIs will realise that using OpenGL, OpenCL, OpenAL, and OpenWhatever will allow them to release their products for Linux, Max, x86PC and ARM PC with little porting effort.
I fail to see how Windows 8 would change it too much, since Direct X, Physx etc are mostly built into windows or the drivers, A lot of proprietary API's will remain in just as much use as they always did

A higher uptake of Linux might make them use Open standards, but windows 8 probably won't
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
496 (0.14/day)
Likes
115
System Name Epsilon
Processor A12-9800E 35watts
Motherboard MSI Grenade AM4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB DDR4 2400 Kingston Hyper X
Video Card(s) Radeon R7 (IGP / APU)
Storage Samsung Spinpoint F1
Display(s) AOC 29" Ultra wide
Case Generic
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 380w
Software Windows 10
#20
don't want to be a dreamer, but If AMD made the first 32 and 64 bit processor maybe they make the first x86 and ARM processor, enabling windows 8 to run both x86 apps and ARM.

I'm saying something crazy?
 

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
15,315 (4.00/day)
Likes
4,724
Location
US
Processor 2500k \ 3770k
Motherboard ASRock Z68 \ Z77
Memory Samsung low profile 1600
Video Card(s) XFX 6770 \ XFX R9 290X
Storage Intel 80Gb (SATA2) WD 250Gb \ Team SSD+Samsung Evo 250Gb+500Gb+ 2xCorsair Force+WD250GbHDD
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ Toshiba HDTV 1080P
Case HTPC400 \ Thermaltake Armor case ( original ), With Zalman fan controller ( wattage usage ).
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V475 \ Marantz SR5008 Tannoy Mercury MKII Paradigm 5SE + Tannoy Mercury F4
Power Supply PC&Power 750w \ Seasonic 750w MKII
Mouse MS intelimouse \ Logitech G700s + Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ ROCCAT MK Pro ( modded amber leds )
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
#21
ARM are a UK company? Opinion of them improved hugely lol!
hehe, then when\if arm makes a impact MS or some body will buy them out as there is always some foreign country buying out UK business. With MS saying they will support ARM i am sure it's opened a fair few eyes of other companys.

Any linux support arm ?..

I think they might reach for nettop\laptop side of things and smaller.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#22
don't want to be a dreamer, but If AMD made the first 32 and 64 bit processor maybe they make the first x86 and ARM processor, enabling windows 8 to run both x86 apps and ARM.

I'm saying something crazy?
No, it's not impossible. A transition layer between old and new is what's needed. The ARM is so much smaller than x86 that you could probably build both to be high performance in the one chip. Or perhaps both processors could be put on the one motherboard. The Acorn Risc PC, which used an early ARM processor did just this and it worked really well. I could run RISC OS natively and Windows 95 on a physical 486 plugged into it. Both could run at the same time, too. Very impressive for 1994.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.94/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#23
Yes! So true. So many so-called "knowledgeable" types have no clue of this. As I've been saying repeatedly, put the same technological "turbocharger" technologies into an ARM CPU and it will indeed wipe the floor with x86, as it's inherently more efficient and faster.

Now, this is pure speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised if Intel have made such ARM prototypes to investigate this and have found it to be true. The only reason they stick to x86 and don't embrace ARM is because of that semi-exclusive licensing deal they made with AMD.
You put those same technological advances into an ARM cpu, and it loses it's efficiency just as quickly as x86. It's low power because it's reduced in function.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#24
You put those same technological advances into an ARM cpu, and it loses it's efficiency just as quickly as x86. It's low power because it's reduced in function.
No it won't lose anything: remember, I'm not talking about making a low power ARM as in watts consumed. I'm talking about turbocharging data processing performance, like x86 has been - let ARM consume 100 watts or more! The ARM architecture is very streamlined, so will respond very well to these enhancements and I believe it will leave x86 (and x64 extensions) in the dust in every respect. Heck, the x86 instruction set wasn't terribly efficient when it came out, let alone now.
 

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,381 (10.17/day)
Likes
18,023
Processor Intel i7 8700k
Motherboard Gigabyte z370 AORUS Gaming 7
Cooling Water
Memory 16gb G.Skill 4000 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 1080
Storage 3 x Samsung Evo 850 500GB, 1 x 250GB, 2 x 2TB HDD
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake X5
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
Software Windows 10
#25
The ARM architecture is very streamlined, so will respond very well to these enhancements and I believe it will leave x86 (and x64 extensions) in the dust in every respect.
How so?

Heck, the x86 instruction set wasn't terribly efficient when it came out, let alone now.
In what ways is it inefficient? How would you improve the x86 instruction set to make it more efficient?