AutoFull M6 Ultra 2.0 Review - Official IEM 2026 Chair: How Does It Perform? 7

AutoFull M6 Ultra 2.0 Review - Official IEM 2026 Chair: How Does It Perform?

(7 Comments) »

Value and Conclusion

  • The AutoFull M6 Ultra 2.0 is priced at US$599/€599
  • Generally high-quality materials used
  • Wide adjustability
  • Comfort during reclined "relax" sessions
  • Several types of foam filling (PU, Cut)
  • Massage functionality
  • Cooling and heating functionality
  • Footrest
  • Generally easy to assemble
  • Power through USB port
  • Three years warranty worldwide (Lifetime frame warranty)
  • Just average overall comfort for tall users (190 cm/6'2"+)
  • Could be too narrow for broad-shouldered users
  • Wobbling of armrests
  • Cracking noises while using tilt-lock
  • Generally firm cushioning
  • Limited material selection (Protein leatherette)
  • Limited color selection (black-gold or full black)
We've reached the final part of our AutoFull M6 Ultra 2.0 gaming chair review. First and foremost, this model stands out thanks to its rather unusual electric features, including massage, ventilation, and heating. You could basically say that the manufacturer has taken a seat from a well-equipped car and brought it straight into our gaming room. But let's go through everything in a slightly more "condensed" form.

From the beginning—the chair arrived properly protected for transport, so I have no complaints here. Inside the box, we also find everything necessary to assemble the entire thing. Just like with the Cougar Terminator Air, the five-star base needs to be assembled separately, although this doesn't really make the process much more complicated. During assembly itself, I didn't run into any major problems, although one of the included screws was stripped. Fortunately, spare screws were provided, so this ended up being nothing more than a minor inconvenience. Once assembled, the chair looks somewhat out of this world and can leave you wondering, "Why does it look like this? What does all of this do?"—but definitely in a positive way. The overall build quality is good, although there are a few places where the stitching could have been done more precisely. The materials themselves, however, don't give me any reason to complain about their quality.

Of course, once we start using a new chair and take a closer look at its individual components, we begin to notice some imperfections—one of the most obvious being the armrests, which really are quite wobbly. Another issue is the noise coming from the tilt mechanism, as well as the lack of a multi-lock function. At the same time, we get a much better idea of how many features are available to adjust the chair to our needs and make use of its built-in electronics. You'll probably spend some time trying to find the right position, although in my case, I never managed to achieve completely satisfactory comfort. Ultimately, I think it's fair to say that despite being advertised as a chair for users up to 190 cm (6'2") tall, it may not necessarily be a good fit if you're right at the upper end of that range. This is particularly noticeable when adjusting the headrest or the large movable section in the center of the backrest, both of which can be difficult to position perfectly for someone of my height. I had no such complaints about the armrests, however, as their adjustment range is genuinely impressive.

It's also worth mentioning that if your main goal is simply to relax, this chair can do a surprisingly good job. The combination of a significant backrest recline, integrated footrest, and massage function makes it well suited to kicking back for a while. The cooling/ventilation feature I mentioned earlier can also be a real lifesaver on warmer days, while the heating function should come in handy when temperatures drop. That said, people with broader shoulders may not find it completely comfortable, as the backrest isn't particularly wide in this area. Overall, the chair is definitely on the "firm" side.

Alright, we've talked quite a bit about the chair itself, so now it's time to discuss the price. In Europe, the AutoFull M6 Ultra 2.0 costs €599, while in the U.S., you'll have to pay $599. That's certainly not a low price, but this chair does offer plenty of features that you simply won't find in most competing models. Of course, there is competition, some of which definitely offers a better experience in specific areas. Let's start with the most obvious "rival"—the DXRacer Martian XL. In Europe, it's significantly more expensive, with the XL version costing €729, while in the U.S. it's much closer in price to the chair featured in this review at $669. The Martian is definitely designed with larger, taller, and broader users in mind, and such people will probably find it more comfortable than the AutoFull model. In addition, U.S. buyers get a 5-year warranty instead of 3 years, although in Europe the situation is less impressive, with only 2 years of coverage. Of course, the "base" version doesn't offer massage, heating, or ventilation, but it does feature electrically adjustable lumbar support and backrest recline. Overall, I would also say that the DXRacer offers better build quality, although it comes with a lower weight capacity. It's certainly an interesting alternative if you're looking for another electronically adjustable chair, just with a slightly different approach to the available features.

Another competitive option that can rival the chair under review is the Razer Iskur V2, which costs €623 in Europe and $649 in the U.S. First and foremost, in terms of similarities, this chair also features lumbar support that covers a large portion of the backrest and can be adjusted across a wide range of positions. However, its armrests aren't quite as versatile as those found on the AutoFull model. On the other hand, it offers better comfort for taller users, as this chair is designed for people between 160 and 200 cm (5'3"–6'7") tall. But here we're back to square one, as the weight capacity is limited to 136 kg (299 lbs), which is lower than what the AutoFull offers. It's certainly an interesting option if you don't need all the features provided by an electric model, such as the footrest, and you're a taller user.

As is tradition, it's fitting to wrap up this look at interesting competitors with a third option: the ThunderX3 FLEX Pro ergonomic chair, which I had the pleasure of testing quite some time ago. It isn't a direct competitor in terms of price, as it costs around €450 in Europe and about $350 in the U.S. So it's noticeably cheaper, yet it still offers a lot when it comes to customization. First and foremost, you get even better armrests, adjustable backrest height, lumbar support, and generally a very wide range of adjustment in practically every direction. And then there's the multi-lock feature, which is so sorely missing here. It's a well-designed chair in this price range, but it's better suited to work and perhaps focused gaming than simply relaxing in. It isn't particularly soft—at least in the mesh version I tested—but thanks to that, you won't overheat during hot weather. As for the drawbacks, you could mention that it's still somewhat "wobbly," mainly because of the sheer number of adjustment options it offers.

Knowing all this, the time has come to ask myself the most important question: can I actually recommend buying the AutoFull M6 Ultra 2.0? It's difficult to give a definitive answer, although I can imagine this model working well for a fairly broad range of users. If the features related to the integrated electronics appeal to you and, after reading this review, you've determined that you won't be too tall for this chair, then it's certainly an interesting option to consider. Of course, you also have to take its downsides into account, which I've summarized for you above—the possibility that it simply won't fit you perfectly is something that shouldn't be ignored. This is a purchase that requires some careful consideration, and I can't recommend it to everyone. I can definitely give it a badge for innovation, but a broad recommendation? Here I have to say "no." I'll be waiting to see whether the manufacturer makes any improvements in the next version of this chair, because it definitely has potential.
Innovation
Discuss(7 Comments)
View as single page
Nov 14th, 2026 03:13 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts