Corsair RM Series 850 W Review 0

Corsair RM Series 850 W Review

Efficiency, Temperatures & Noise »

Test Setup

All measurements were performed using two Chroma 6314A mainframes equipped with the following electronic loads: six 63123A [350 W each], one 63102A [100 W x2], and one 63101A [200 W]. The aforementioned equipment is able to deliver 2500 W of load, and all loads are controlled by a custom-made software. We also used a Picoscope 3424 oscilloscope, a Picotech TC-08 thermocouple data logger, a Fluke 175 multimeter, and a Yokogawa WT210 power meter. We also included a wooden box, which, along with some heating elements, was used as a hot box. Finally, we had at our disposal four more oscilloscopes (Rigol 1052E and VS5042, Stingray DS1M12, and a second Picoscope 3424), and a CEM DT-8852 sound level meter. You will find more details about our equipment and the review methodology we follow in this article. Finally, we conduct all of our tests at 40°C-45°C ambient to simulate with higher accuracy the environment seen inside a typical system, with 40°C-45°C being derived from a standard ambient assumption of 23°C and 17°C-22°C being added for the typical temperature rise within a system.

Primary Rails Voltage Regulation

The following charts show the voltage values of the main rails, recorded over a range of 60 W to the maximum specified load, and the deviation (in percent) for the same load range.







5VSB Regulation

The following chart shows how the 5VSB rail deals with the load we throw at it.


Hold-up Time

Hold-up time is a very important PSU characteristic. It represents the amount of time, usually measured in milliseconds, that a PSU can maintain output regulations as defined by the ATX spec without input power. In other words, it is the amount of time the system can continue to run without shutting down or rebooting during a power interruption. The ATX spec sets the minimum hold-up time to 16 ms with the maximum continuous output load. In the following screenshot, the blue line is the mains signal and the yellow line is the "Power Good" signal. The latter is de-asserted to a low state when any of the +12V, 5V, or 3.3V output voltages fall below the undervoltage threshold, or after the mains power has been removed for a sufficiently long time to guarantee that the PSU cannot operate anymore.



The registered hold-up time was longer than the minimum. The unit then passes this test successfully. Its test result shows that you won't have any problems should power somehow cease instantly.

Inrush Current

Inrush current or switch-on surge refers to the maximum, instantaneous input current drawn by an electrical device when first turned on. Because of the charging current of the APFC capacitor(s), PSUs produce large inrush current right as they are turned on. Large inrush current can cause the tripping of circuit breakers and fuses and may also damage switches, relays, and bridge rectifiers; as a result, the lower the inrush current of a PSU right as it is turned on, the better.



Inrush current was low, especially for a unit of this capacity. Chicony did a good job here, since they managed to restrict the inrush current of the large bulk cap used to pass the hold-up time test.

Voltage Regulation and Efficiency Measurements

The first set of tests revealed the stability of the voltage rails and the efficiency of the RM850. The applied load was equal to (approximately) 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 80%, 100%, and 110% of the maximum load the PSU can handle. We conducted two additional tests. In the first test, we stressed the two minor rails (5V and 3.3V) with a high load while the load at +12V was only 0.10 A. This test reveals whether the PSU is Haswell ready or not. In the second test, we dialed the maximum load the +12V rail could handle while the load on the minor rails was minimal.

Voltage Regulation & Efficiency Testing Data
Corsair RM850
Test12 V5 V3.3 V5VSBPower
(DC/AC)
EfficiencyFan SpeedFan NoiseTemp
(In/Out)
PF/AC
Volts
20% Load12.316A (12.29A)1.982A1.975A0.985A169.75W90.33% 0 RPM0 dBA 41.27°C0.922
12.031V5.044V3.339V5.063V187.92W 42.98°C230.2V
40% Load25.062A (25.37A)3.979A3.988A1.186A339.70W92.20% 0 RPM0 dBA 46.29°C0.974
11.992V5.023V3.308V5.043V368.44W 49.34°C230.1V
50% Load31.349A (31.66A)4.975A4.997A1.590A424.59W92.23% 0 RPM0 dBA 50.66°C0.982
11.968V5.013V3.299V5.020V460.37W 55.74°C230.2V
60% Load37.647A (37.60A)5.991A6.007A2.000A509.56W91.96% 0 RPM0 dBA 54.93°C0.987
11.948V5.004V3.294V4.994V554.09W 48.26°C230.1V
80% Load50.475A (50.49A)8.024A8.053A2.414A679.47W91.27%1350 RPM42 dBA 41.34°C0.992
11.909V4.982V3.278V4.968V744.45W 47.17°C230.0V
100% Load63.984A (64.50A)9.059A9.091A3.041A849.20W90.39%1435 RPM43.3 dBA 43.20°C0.994
11.871V4.965V3.265V4.928V939.50W 48.82°C230.0V
110% Load71.281A (72.77A)9.064A9.101A3.045A934.10W89.86%1435 RPM43.3 dBA 45.88°C0.995
11.847V4.960V3.263V4.921V1039.50W 51.89°C229.9V
Crossload 10.101A (0.713A)18.014A18.002A0.004A150.82W84.42%672 RPM31.4 dBA 43.22°C0.916
12.028V4.964V3.342V5.090V178.66W 48.13°C230.3V
Crossload 270.792A (73.14A)1.000A1.003A1.001A853.02W90.74%1435 RPM43.3 dBA 45.32°C0.994
11.861V5.011V3.303V5.029V940.10W 50.94°C230.0V

Voltage regulation may not be super-tight, but all rails are still within 3%, and the PSU also managed to deliver its full power and even more at more than 45°C ambient. These results show that Corsair was rather conservative on the maximum operating temperature. The PSU also operated in fanless mode at up to 60% load—we were even troubled by the high ambient the PSU reached. We were afraid the fan controller was broken since the fan refused to spin up, but Corsair really meant to make this unit super-quiet, and the metal plate on which the main PCB sits effectively absorbs heat, allowing for the fan to engage as late as it does. Yet its high internal temperatures may affect the unit's reliability in the long run, but Corsair does provide the RM850 with a five-year warranty, so they must be pretty sure about its reliability. We should also note that output noise was low and not annoying, even when the fan spun up to full speed, at least to our ears.

The numbers in parenthesis, in the 12V current output cells of the above table, show the readings we took through Corsair Link—readings were very close to the real ones in all cases.

Several screenshots of the Corsair Link software, which we took during our test sessions, follow. The order of the screenshots is the same as the order of the tests in the above table (20% load to Cross-load 2 test).

Next Page »Efficiency, Temperatures & Noise
View as single page
Apr 26th, 2024 18:37 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts