Thursday, May 26th 2022

AMD RDNA 3 GPUs to Support DisplayPort 2.0 UHBR 20 Standard

AMD's upcoming Radeon RX 7000 series of graphics cards based on the RDNA 3 architecture are supposed to feature next-generation protocols all over the board. Today, according to a patch committed to the Linux kernel, we have information about display output choices AMD will present to consumers in the upcoming products. According to a Twitter user @Kepler_L2, who discovered this patch, we know that AMD will bundle DisplayPort 2.0 technology with UHBR 20 transmission mode. The UHBR 20 standard can provide a maximum of 80 Gbps bi-directional bandwidth, representing the highest bandwidth in a display output connector currently available. With this technology, a sample RDNA 3 GPU could display 16K resolution with Display Stream Compression, 10K without compression, or two 8K HDR screens running at 120 Hz refresh rate. All of this will be handled by Display Controller Next (DCN) engine for media.

The availability of DisplayPort 2.0 capable monitors is a story of its own. VESA noted that they should come at the end of 2021; however, they got delayed due to the lack of devices supporting this output. Having AMD's RDNA 3 cards as the newest product to support these monitors, we would likely see the market adapt to demand and few available products as the transition to the latest standard is in the process.
Source: FreeDesktop (Linux Patch)
Add your own comment

54 Comments on AMD RDNA 3 GPUs to Support DisplayPort 2.0 UHBR 20 Standard

#51
Space Lynx
Astronaut
zlobbyI personally use many IPS, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro monitors. They have native 10-bit HDR, LFC, 144Hz, with blue-light filter (important!). Good viewing angles, low latency, no PWM and zero burn-in as I have many static elements displayed 24/7 on them.

For TV I use Samsung QLED and LG NanoCell but I prefer the LG ones.

Phones are another thing - all my phones are with OLED and PWM, simply because there isn't any current model with non-PWM dimming. At least not to my knowledge.
why does it need a blue light filter? you only need that at night time I thought and even then you can just use a software like f.lux?
Posted on Reply
#52
mama
Where are the DP 2.0 monitors?
Posted on Reply
#53
zlobby
CallandorWoTwhy does it need a blue light filter? you only need that at night time I thought and even then you can just use a software like f.lux?
Mainly because of this eyesafe.com/bluelight/
And software distorts color temperature. Plus you can't be 100% sure if the software doesn't have a bug and just boost the red pixels, instead of dimming the blue ones.

IDK about you guys but I won't risk my vision for a few bucks more.
Posted on Reply
#54
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
CallandorWoTwhy does it need a blue light filter? you only need that at night time I thought and even then you can just use a software like f.lux?
Software will never do the job properly, ever.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 21st, 2024 07:46 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts