Thursday, July 21st 2022

Intel Raptor Lake ES CPU Visits CPU-Z Database

More details of Intel's upcoming Raptor Lake CPUs have tipped up online, as someone submitted the results of a CPU-Z benchmark to the CPU-Z database. The CPU in question is most likely one of the by now, many ES samples of what should be the Core i9-13900K, which means the multiplier is still limited to 50x, which means the clock speeds can't go beyond 5 GHz. Even so, the extra E-cores helps it best the Core i9-12900K in the multithreaded test over 1400 points, using the average results for all 12900K CPUs in the database. It's also faster than the average Core i9-12900KF in the single-threaded test, but it doesn't quite manage to beat the Core i9-12900K results here.

The test system was admittedly not the very best possible hardware, as an MSI Pro Z690-A DDR4 motherboard was used and the CPU was paired with 32 GB of CAS19 DDR4 2666 MHz memory, so there's clearly potential for improvement here. The test system was also using Windows 10, which is potentially another bottleneck when it comes to taking advantage of all the extra E-cores. The E-Cores reached a top speed of 2.99 GHz, with the P-cores peaking at 4.99 GHz. The CPU was hitting 100 degrees C during the test, which suggests that some serious cooling is going to be needed for these CPUs. Intel is likely to reveal its Raptor Lake CPU's during the Intel Innovation '22 event in San Jose, which kicks off on the 27th of September.
Sources: CPU-Z, via @TUM_APISAK
Add your own comment

14 Comments on Intel Raptor Lake ES CPU Visits CPU-Z Database

#2
john_
That 13000 bar looks way to long compared to the one at over 8000.
Posted on Reply
#3
Unregistered
TheLostSwedeThe CPU was hitting 100 degrees C during the test, which suggests that some serious cooling is going to be needed for these CPUs.
That totally depends on what cooler they were using, if it was a single 120mm fan tower, then there is no wonder iit hit 100c. It might run a lot cooler with a better cooler.

Making dumb jokes about the high temp is childish when the cooler used is not even known.
#4
TheLostSwede
News Editor
TiggerThat totally depends on what cooler they were using, if it was a single 120mm fan tower, then there is no wonder iit hit 100c. It might run a lot cooler with a better cooler.

Making dumb jokes about the high temp is childish when the cooler used is not even known.
Unknown. But the days of air coolers seem to be way behind us for these kind of chips.
Posted on Reply
#5
Unregistered
TheLostSwedeUnknown. But the days of air coolers seem to be way behind us for these kind of chips.
Well the rest of the system was nothing special, so i doubt they put a high end cooler on it.

If you buy a CPU like a 13900k, I am pretty sure you are not going to spend £30 on a cooler for it.
#6
MarsM4N
Core Voltage 1,476v, I see. :wtf: Doesn't sound like a safe "daily driver" non hydrogen setting.

i9-12900K stock VCore: 0.85v - 1.275v, OC max. 1.37v (acc. to der8auer)

Bet they did even run all the other CPU's with stock settings, lol.
Posted on Reply
#7
Unregistered
MarsM4NCore Voltage 1,476v, I see. :wtf: Doesn't sound like a safe "daily driver" non hydrogen setting.

i9-12900K stock VCore: 0.85v - 1.275v, OC max. 1.37v (acc. to der8auer)

Bet they did even run all the other CPU's with stock settings, lol.
No wonder it was 100c, there is no way I would run my 12700k with a vcore like that.
#8
Dr. Dro
MarsM4NCore Voltage 1,476v, I see. :wtf: Doesn't sound like a safe "daily driver" non hydrogen setting.

i9-12900K stock VCore: 0.85v - 1.275v, OC max. 1.37v (acc. to der8auer)

Bet they did even run all the other CPU's with stock settings, lol.
This is an early ES processor and from the CPU-Z screenshot, it seems to be a revision A0 sample as well.

Stepping A0 processors are the earliest silicon to tape out and these are distributed to OEM partners for development, testing and validation purposes before any specification has been ratified or finalized, I would consider almost nothing that this processor displays or shows as accurate and/or final.

I would not be surprised if it was running at 1.475v, but I would equally not be surprised if the sensor data is busted and plain doesn't work with this silicon.
Posted on Reply
#10
docnorth
TiggerThat totally depends on what cooler they were using, if it was a single 120mm fan tower, then there is no wonder iit hit 100c. It might run a lot cooler with a better cooler.

Making dumb jokes about the high temp is childish when the cooler used is not even known.
Don't bother, with this voltage even the final chip would hit 100 degrees C with proper cooling.
Prima.VeraDude...1.476V !!
Probably very early and unstable sample.
Posted on Reply
#11
Recca29
SO about 10% faster than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in multi threading.
11841+10%=13025.1
Posted on Reply
#12
mama
Looks like a beast in multicore work. I will be waiting for reviews, however.
Posted on Reply
#14
Unregistered
Crackong100 degrees


So sick of seeing your anti Intel crap might as well just ignore your posts in future.
Add your own comment
May 16th, 2024 19:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts