Wednesday, June 21st 2023

Geekbench Leak Suggests NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Nearly 20% Faster than RTX 3060

NVIDIA is launching its lower end GeForce RTX 4060 graphics card series next week, but has kept schtum about the smaller Ada Lovelace AD107 GPU's performance level. This more budget-friendly offering (MSRP $299) is rumored to have 3,072 CUDA cores, 24 RT cores, 96 Tensor cores, 96 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It will likely sport 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit wide memory bus. Benchleaks has discovered the first set of test results via a database leak, and posted these details on social media earlier today. Two Geekbench 6 runs were conducted on a test system comprised of an Intel Core i5-13600K CPU, ASUS Z790 ROG APEX motherboard, DDR5-6000 memory and the aforementioned GeForce card.

The GPU Compute test utilizing the Vulkan API resulted in a score of 99419, and another using OpenCL achieved 105630. We are looking at a single sample here, so expect variations when other units get tested in Geekbench prior to the June 29 launch. The RTX 4060 is about 12% faster (in Vulkan) than its direct predecessor—RTX 3060. The gap widens with its Open CL performance, where it offers an almost 20% jump over the older card. The RTX 3060 Ti presents around 3-5% faster performance over the RTX 4060. We hope to see actual in-game benchmarking carried out soon.
Sources: Tom's Hardware, VideoCardz, BenchLeaks Tweet
Add your own comment

30 Comments on Geekbench Leak Suggests NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Nearly 20% Faster than RTX 3060

#26
64K
Over at Videocardz they are reporting up to 18% faster which doesn't mean a lot until we see a suite of games getting benched (hopefully here on TPU).

My impression so far is that the RTX 4060 will be a fail but I want to see the review to be sure one way or another.
Posted on Reply
#27
dlgh7
64KOver at Videocardz they are reporting up to 18% faster which doesn't mean a lot until we see a suite of games getting benched (hopefully here on TPU).

My impression so far is that the RTX 4060 will be a fail but I want to see the review to be sure one way or another.
I mean the 4060 ti is a fail at a hundred dollars more. I can't see how the 4060 vanilla is going to redeem a product that already is horrible. Maybe if it has been released at like $229 the 4060 may have been alright. 4070 should live at the no higher than $400 level.
Posted on Reply
#28
watzupken
fancuckerdespite the usual reservations this effectively negates the RX 7600, it will handily trounce it in RT and provide the superior upscaling implementation, DLSS, to boot. you also need to take the price of tsmcs n5 process into consideration.
I feel the only benefit for Nvidia is DLSS, which is critical for lower end cards. RT, you can forget about it, unless you don't mind dropping all other visual qualities just for the sake of RT. And while I understand that TSMC 5nm is not cheap, but the target market segment is in the first place very price sensitive. If you are bumping prices up, will the performance uplift be worth it. Sure it can be up to 20% faster than a RTX 3060 12GB, but the lack of VRAM is already a problem now. So you will surely see the RTX 3060 12GB edging out the 4060 in new game titles.
Posted on Reply
#29
dlgh7
watzupkenI feel the only benefit for Nvidia is DLSS, which is critical for lower end cards. RT, you can forget about it, unless you don't mind dropping all other visual qualities just for the sake of RT. And while I understand that TSMC 5nm is not cheap, but the target market segment is in the first place very price sensitive. If you are bumping prices up, will the performance uplift be worth it. Sure it can be up to 20% faster than a RTX 3060 12GB, but the lack of VRAM is already a problem now. So you will surely see the RTX 3060 12GB edging out the 4060 in new game titles.
every legitimate source would disagree with you. DLSS is only beneficial when you get to high frame rates. If a card can't process textures it only amplifies the issues. It can't fix them. Every reliable source has agreed with this including Digital Foundry.
Posted on Reply
#30
thunderingroar
fancuckerAnd memory is at a premium in terms of manufacturing cost.
No its not??? There was an article here recently stating that 8GB of gddr6 costs like 30 bucks. And it makes sense, prices of RAM/SSDs have plummeted recently, 1TB gen3 SSDs goes for 50$ and 64GB of ddr5 200$.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 30th, 2024 19:51 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts