Wednesday, August 30th 2023

GC-HCPE Power Connector Can Supply more Than 600 Watts to GPU

Twitter/X user @momomo_us has unveiled official documentation detailing a new GC-HPCE power connection standard to supply additional GPU power throughout motherboard. This connector can deliver over 600 Watts of power, surpassing 12VHPWR connector's capacity. The GC-HPCE power connector features four groups of pins. Sixteen pins are dedicated to power delivery, while the remaining twelve facilitate communication between the motherboard and the graphics card. Its size is comparable to the regular PCIe x1 connector. Positioned in alignment with the primary PCIe x16 slot on a motherboard, the GC-HPCE power connector is situated behind the x16 slot, typically where the motherboard chipset heatsink is found. This strategic placement ensures the graphics card can be easily slotted into both connectors, simplifying installation. The connector's design negates the need for an additional locking mechanism, as the x16 slot's existing lock sufficiently secures the graphics card.

First showcased at Computex, this connector was featured in several prototype motherboards and graphics cards, emphasizing its potential to enhance cable management and aesthetics. By eliminating supplementary power cables from the graphics card and channeling power through the motherboard, the graphics card's appearance remains uncluttered, and cable management behind the motherboard tray becomes more streamlined. Intriguingly, this connector is a familiar design. It's a modified version of the High Power Card Edge (HPCE) standard prevalent in the server industry. While ASUS has been the primary proponent of this connector, it remains to be seen if other companies will adopt this standard for their consumer products. Additionally, routing power throughout the motherboard will require manufacturers to include additional power regulating circuitry, potentially driving motherboard costs up. It is also not an agreed upon industry standard, which could block some future GPU upgrades from happening.

You can check out ASUS'es implementation of the Back-to-Future (BTF) motherboard that supports this connector below.

Sources: @momomo_us, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

72 Comments on GC-HCPE Power Connector Can Supply more Than 600 Watts to GPU

#26
iO
aktpuAs I prefer ITX form factor, I don't really like this
Just put some cables on the connector and use it like a regular cable from the PSU.
mITX would be ideal for this as you could use any mainboard with this proprietary GPU.




But what's really needed is an update to the ancient 20 year old PCIe connector, ie like the PECFF spec which supports 660W@12V.

Posted on Reply
#27
Pumper
A GPU for people who don't want to ever sell their used hardware, because 99% of second hand market buyers would not even look at those.
Posted on Reply
#28
Panther_Seraphin
With every increasing power demands can we finally move AWAY from 12V being the standard and moving towards 24/36v as the standard??

Your EPS plugs that are used for CPUS and in the Datacenter on accelerator cards could do nearly 800 watts in 8 Pins.

Just moving to 24V would mean the current 8 pin connector can support 300 watts, hell the PCI-e slot could in theory support 150 watts. In theory it should also increase efficency slightly across the board as well.
Posted on Reply
#29
dalekdukesboy
Vayra86The 12VHPWR plot thickens... the wires don't though

This is getting comical at this point...
Not looking forward to >350W GPUs tbh
We already got them…
Posted on Reply
#30
bug
Vayra86The 12VHPWR plot thickens... the wires don't though

This is getting comical at this point...
Not looking forward to >350W GPUs tbh
You should be thankful you don't (yet) need The Flash to kickstart your GPU, like he "kickstarted" Superman in Justice League :p
Posted on Reply
#31
Daven
dj-electricTo give a bit of background before deploying what's probably not gonna be a very popular read, especially among tons of short, mostly dismissive comments:
A part of what I do for a living is design wires and connectivity for compute systems. That means dealing with cables, connectors, PCBs and everything in between.
That also, unfortunately, means dealing with connector companies such as Molex, Samtec, TE, Phoenix and others. There are politics in the retail side of this market.

What the PC power and connectivity market has performed in recent times has been, at best, irresponsible for the longevity of power standards.
We had a crossroads, an opportunity to reinvent ATX and any other power standard in order to improve efficiency, reduce waste and improve performance of power systems in this market. Maybe at this point, its goin to be moot talking about how 24V regulation has matured a ton and we could have used DC-DC components to move ourselves to 24V inputs, save tons of copper, increase energy efficiency and reduce cable clutter.

For a market with such large components such as ATX/MATX boards and gigantic graphics cards, the choice of dense and tiny connectors have been absolutely criminal.
I don't know who in those organizations determined that the use of connectors such as the infamous 12VHPWR was a good idea, but both mechanically and electrically it has been a very bitter choice.

All we really had to do is stick to mini-fit, and just go with a 10pin or at most a 12pin, with half pos half neg pins. That's it. Even at a 10pin config such connector would have been able to provide up to 600W of power at 12V (5 leads at 16AWG for each polarization). The transition between dual 6+2 to this would have been absolutely seamless in terms of lead to lead purpose.

We could have had a good thing going, with properly mechanically secured latches. They had to screw things up with this goofy micro-fit connectors.
The electric car charging connector standard is going through this right now. And they are fighting up against Big Oil, the star of criminal corporatism. If the car industry can sort it out, so can the PC power connector industry.
Posted on Reply
#32
Teiji
Not gonna lie. Those motherboard pics they showed look really clean. I'm also liking the ports on the back, instead of the side/front. Please bring this to SFX!
Posted on Reply
#33
Wirko
This is a great opportunitly for a transition to a higher voltage (or rather, a non-fixed voltage). It's now or never. But obviously it's going to be wasted.
Posted on Reply
#34
TheinsanegamerN
Panther_SeraphinWith every increasing power demands can we finally move AWAY from 12V being the standard and moving towards 24/36v as the standard??

Your EPS plugs that are used for CPUS and in the Datacenter on accelerator cards could do nearly 800 watts in 8 Pins.

Just moving to 24V would mean the current 8 pin connector can support 300 watts, hell the PCI-e slot could in theory support 150 watts. In theory it should also increase efficency slightly across the board as well.
Because you'll still need 12v for CPUs, fans, ece, so you are only introducing more standards that would need new power supplies, motherboards, and additional VRMs added to already expensive components.
aktpuAs I prefer ITX form factor, I don't really like this
This would make more sense in a new form factor altogether, one that uses blade connectors for the PSU as well, much like data center PCS. It eliminates the cable problem altogether.
Posted on Reply
#35
Panther_Seraphin
TheinsanegamerNBecause you'll still need 12v for CPUs, fans, ece, so you are only introducing more standards that would need new power supplies, motherboards, and additional VRMs added to already expensive components.
Im not just talking for GPUs, Im talking for everything. So everything moves over to 24v. You could design in "compatability" with existing 12V supplies into the newer VRM/voltage controllers similar to how PSUs have active correction for voltages between 100 and 250.

Only have an older 12V supply? It draws double the current up to a set amount. Have a newer supply? Then use things like the sideband connectors in the 12VHPWR or sense capabilities in the regulators.

Hell the current 24 pin ATX connectors has a non used pin that could be a sense/communication pin for that exact purpose as the -5v it was intented for was removed in 2004 from the ATX spec. IMO the AXT12VO was a missed opportunity to move us into the 21st century in this aspect.
Posted on Reply
#36
Vayra86
bugYou should be thankful you don't (yet) need The Flash to kickstart your GPU, like he "kickstarted" Superman in Justice League :p
You need this guy too... plus mandatory "ma-maaa-maaauw" while you're booting.

Posted on Reply
#37
fevgatos
Vayra86That applies just the same to GPUs that top the charts by using an immense amount of power; feed that beast and all you get is more of it, with less pressure on arch and tech advancements, because why would they?

I don't understand your post. The 4070 is getting the same performance as a 3090 with half the power draw. The 4090 is getting almost twice the 3090s performance with the same power draw. Gen on gen those are insane gains, so what immense amount of power are you actually talking about? :D
Posted on Reply
#38
80251
TheinsanegamerNBecause you'll still need 12v for CPUs, fans, ece, so you are only introducing more standards that would need new power supplies, motherboards, and additional VRMs added to already expensive components.


This would make more sense in a new form factor altogether, one that uses blade connectors for the PSU as well, much like data center PCS. It eliminates the cable problem altogether.
In the industrial fan world, +24V fans are as common as +12V fans and more efficient -- the datasheets indicate less power is used to power a +24V fan than a +12V fan of the same model type, but this seems to be only true for really powerful industrial fans that you would never use in PC unless you were deaf.
Posted on Reply
#39
TheinsanegamerN
80251In the industrial fan world, +24V fans are as common as +12V fans and more efficient -- the datasheets indicate less power is used to power a +24V fan than a +12V fan of the same model type, but this seems to be only true for really powerful industrial fans that you would never use in PC unless you were deaf.
We are not building industrial PCs. We are building consumer PCs. Why not move to 120v equipment, since that is also used in industrial applications?
Panther_SeraphinIm not just talking for GPUs, Im talking for everything. So everything moves over to 24v. You could design in "compatability" with existing 12V supplies into the newer VRM/voltage controllers similar to how PSUs have active correction for voltages between 100 and 250.

Only have an older 12V supply? It draws double the current up to a set amount. Have a newer supply? Then use things like the sideband connectors in the 12VHPWR or sense capabilities in the regulators.

Hell the current 24 pin ATX connectors has a non used pin that could be a sense/communication pin for that exact purpose as the -5v it was intented for was removed in 2004 from the ATX spec. IMO the AXT12VO was a missed opportunity to move us into the 21st century in this aspect.
so, your suggestion to the cost issue is to design transformers into motherboards to step up voltage from 12v to 24v? Do you know how expensive/ space consuming that would be?

Absolute genius! :slap:

Also, hilariously you mention the "21st century" while ignoring that the 24 pin ATX connector is a 21st century occurrence. 1990s machines had either the old 6+6 pin or the 20 pin connector.
Posted on Reply
#40
MarsM4N
Why fix something that wasn't broken in the first place? :kookoo: The cable wasn't a problem until Nvidia came around the corner with their power hog GPU's big as bricks that didn't fit into PC cases & with the most dumb cable placement where you couldn't close the side panel without bending the cable and causing a short. Not to forget their cheaply engineered 12VHPWR connector. We don't need new connectors, we need companies to not adopt Nvidia's nonsense.

I already know what's going to happen if they bring on this connector. Brick like GPU's will sag, which will reduce pin contact & you'll end up with a 12VHPWR "Adapter Gate" 2.0 with PC's catching fire. :) Plus it will not only toast your GPU & connector, it will toast your motherboard, too. Maybe that's their goal?

Posted on Reply
#41
fevgatos
MarsM4NWhy fix something that wasn't broken in the first place? :kookoo: The cable wasn't a problem until Nvidia came around the corner with their power hog GPU's big as bricks that didn't fit into PC cases & with the most dumb cable placement where you couldn't close the side panel without bending the cable and causing a short. Not to forget their cheaply engineered 12VHPWR connector. We don't need new connectors, we need companies to not adopt Nvidia's nonsense.

I already know what's going to happen if they bring on this connector. Brick like GPU's will sag, which will reduce pin contact & you'll end up with a 12VHPWR "Adapter Gate" 2.0 with PC's catching fire. :) Plus it will not only toast your GPU & connector, it will toast your motherboard, too. Maybe that's their goal?

Power hog GPUs. Ada are by far the most efficient GPU's on planet Earth. But they are power hogs, rofl
Posted on Reply
#42
80251
I see what TheinsanegamerN is saying, it would have to be a whole new standard to use +24V power. Supposedly switching VRM's are more efficient the higher the voltage differential between source and output and power losses due to i^2*R losses would less at +24V than +12V so maybe it would be better to settle on a newer, higher voltage standard, maybe even higher than +24V. I believe Noctua, Nidec, Delta, Sunon, SanAce already make +24V, PWM speed-controlled fans. At higher voltage you might be able to get away w/less leads too (since the current will be less), so maybe the 24-pin power connector could go back to being 20-pin and the 8-pin supplemental power connector could go back to being a 4-pin.
Posted on Reply
#43
Panther_Seraphin
TheinsanegamerNso, your suggestion to the cost issue is to design transformers into motherboards to step up voltage from 12v to 24v? Do you know how expensive/ space consuming that would be?
No. Im saying we design the boards slightly different and source slightly different power stages etc.....

You do realise a LOT of the stuff we have out there is actually fairly wide ranging in terms of voltage input?

AOZ5311NQI-03 - Currently a favoured power stage in 4xxx series GPUs
AOZ5616BQI - A possible drop in replacement to be able to utilise a 24v source.

Same Output ratings, same packaging. PWM signals would have to be reworked from 5V currently to 3V. Which may actually simplify circuitry as there is no 5V source for Graphics cards directly from Mobo or cable currently.

Guess what, both of those above power stages accepts 12 Volts. Only the bottom one would support 24. So its there, just needs a little work from the PSU. Mobo, graphics makers etc etc etc to come to an agreement on a standard to enable a transition from 12V currently to 24V in the future. Maybe the use of sideband connectors on top of existing ones would be viable similar to what Nvidia did in the power delivery of the 4xxx series. No sideband connectors means the board expects 12V, sideband connectors can then be used to confirm voltage supplied from PSU is 24V.
Posted on Reply
#44
N/A
dj-electricStaying with mini-fit would actually save money. It was decided costs would increase when picking the new 12VHPWR connector.
I want Mega fit to power a 4090 with 4pins connector. but my next SFX-L psu has only microfit on it.
Posted on Reply
#45
Chrispy_
No No NO NO NO!!!!

This isn't a new power connector. It's an entirely unnecessary VANITY connector to move the cable from the front of the card to the back of the board. You still have to plug in the usual power connector to the back of the motherboard, but this adds one extra point of failure and ties you into this premium-priced ecosystem of CC-HCPE-compaible boards, cases, and graphics cards.

Unless you're a blind, gullible fool, you must be able to see that the only benefit to this is vanity builds. It adds cost and complexity, reduces choice of components you can use, and most importantly it negatively impacts power delivery by adding a whole extra layer of connectors and traces that are 100% unnecessary.
Posted on Reply
#46
Legacy-ZA
bugIt would still mean additional traces or layers on the motherboard, driving prices further up :( Possibly additional VRMs, too.
But neat from an install point of view.
Yes, cost, and of course, now you have another point of failure to worry about, the motherboard.
Posted on Reply
#47
dj-electric
N/AI want Mega fit to power a 4090 with 4pins connector. but my next SFX-L psu has only microfit on it.
I work with Mega fit, love it. Absolutely solid. Unfortunately Mega fit is very Molex. Its more Molex than mini-fit and micro-fit who are also designed by a standard common with others
Posted on Reply
#48
R-T-B
Vayra86the wires don't though
That's never really been the issue. If it was, every single card connector would burn every single time.
Posted on Reply
#49
mechtech
BORING *Torgue*

We should have bus bars inside PC because more copper.......
Posted on Reply
#50
LabRat 891
WirkoThis is a great opportunitly for a transition to a higher voltage (or rather, a non-fixed voltage). It's now or never. But obviously it's going to be wasted.
TheinsanegamerNBecause you'll still need 12v for CPUs, fans, ece, so you are only introducing more standards that would need new power supplies, motherboards, and additional VRMs added to already expensive components.


This would make more sense in a new form factor altogether, one that uses blade connectors for the PSU as well, much like data center PCS. It eliminates the cable problem altogether.
Panther_SeraphinIm not just talking for GPUs, Im talking for everything. So everything moves over to 24v. You could design in "compatability" with existing 12V supplies into the newer VRM/voltage controllers similar to how PSUs have active correction for voltages between 100 and 250.

Only have an older 12V supply? It draws double the current up to a set amount. Have a newer supply? Then use things like the sideband connectors in the 12VHPWR or sense capabilities in the regulators.

Hell the current 24 pin ATX connectors has a non used pin that could be a sense/communication pin for that exact purpose as the -5v it was intented for was removed in 2004 from the ATX spec. IMO the AXT12VO was a missed opportunity to move us into the 21st century in this aspect.
80251In the industrial fan world, +24V fans are as common as +12V fans and more efficient -- the datasheets indicate less power is used to power a +24V fan than a +12V fan of the same model type, but this seems to be only true for really powerful industrial fans that you would never use in PC unless you were deaf.
TheinsanegamerNWe are not building industrial PCs. We are building consumer PCs. Why not move to 120v equipment, since that is also used in industrial applications?


so, your suggestion to the cost issue is to design transformers into motherboards to step up voltage from 12v to 24v? Do you know how expensive/ space consuming that would be?

Absolute genius! :slap:

Also, hilariously you mention the "21st century" while ignoring that the 24 pin ATX connector is a 21st century occurrence. 1990s machines had either the old 6+6 pin or the 20 pin connector.
80251I see what TheinsanegamerN is saying, it would have to be a whole new standard to use +24V power. Supposedly switching VRM's are more efficient the higher the voltage differential between source and output and power losses due to i^2*R losses would less at +24V than +12V so maybe it would be better to settle on a newer, higher voltage standard, maybe even higher than +24V. I believe Noctua, Nidec, Delta, Sunon, SanAce already make +24V, PWM speed-controlled fans. At higher voltage you might be able to get away w/less leads too (since the current will be less), so maybe the 24-pin power connector could go back to being 20-pin and the 8-pin supplemental power connector could go back to being a 4-pin.
Panther_SeraphinNo. Im saying we design the boards slightly different and source slightly different power stages etc.....

You do realise a LOT of the stuff we have out there is actually fairly wide ranging in terms of voltage input?

AOZ5311NQI-03 - Currently a favoured power stage in 4xxx series GPUs
AOZ5616BQI - A possible drop in replacement to be able to utilise a 24v source.

Same Output ratings, same packaging. PWM signals would have to be reworked from 5V currently to 3V. Which may actually simplify circuitry as there is no 5V source for Graphics cards directly from Mobo or cable currently.

Guess what, both of those above power stages accepts 12 Volts. Only the bottom one would support 24. So its there, just needs a little work from the PSU. Mobo, graphics makers etc etc etc to come to an agreement on a standard to enable a transition from 12V currently to 24V in the future. Maybe the use of sideband connectors on top of existing ones would be viable similar to what Nvidia did in the power delivery of the 4xxx series. No sideband connectors means the board expects 12V, sideband connectors can then be used to confirm voltage supplied from PSU is 24V.
There's a way to avoid changing an ENTIRE industry to get +24V to a single high-wattage device. In fact, we just need to look through ATX spec's history.

Make "-12V" required, not optional.
just invert an independent +12V Rail, already common in PSUs.
Plus, GPUs already have separate power planes; one from the slot, one from auxiliary 6/8/12-pin input(s)


kbreee.blogspot.com/2013/11/dc-transmission-and-distribution.html

I may not be a big fan of Thomas Edison, but he (and the big brains w/ big pockets that standardized US Mains Power) already figured this problem out:
Edison 3-Wire Power Distribution - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17757744/


www.eeeguide.com/comparison-of-conductor-material-in-overhead-system/
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 21st, 2024 12:59 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts