Wednesday, August 30th 2023
GC-HCPE Power Connector Can Supply more Than 600 Watts to GPU
Twitter/X user @momomo_us has unveiled official documentation detailing a new GC-HPCE power connection standard to supply additional GPU power throughout motherboard. This connector can deliver over 600 Watts of power, surpassing 12VHPWR connector's capacity. The GC-HPCE power connector features four groups of pins. Sixteen pins are dedicated to power delivery, while the remaining twelve facilitate communication between the motherboard and the graphics card. Its size is comparable to the regular PCIe x1 connector. Positioned in alignment with the primary PCIe x16 slot on a motherboard, the GC-HPCE power connector is situated behind the x16 slot, typically where the motherboard chipset heatsink is found. This strategic placement ensures the graphics card can be easily slotted into both connectors, simplifying installation. The connector's design negates the need for an additional locking mechanism, as the x16 slot's existing lock sufficiently secures the graphics card.
First showcased at Computex, this connector was featured in several prototype motherboards and graphics cards, emphasizing its potential to enhance cable management and aesthetics. By eliminating supplementary power cables from the graphics card and channeling power through the motherboard, the graphics card's appearance remains uncluttered, and cable management behind the motherboard tray becomes more streamlined. Intriguingly, this connector is a familiar design. It's a modified version of the High Power Card Edge (HPCE) standard prevalent in the server industry. While ASUS has been the primary proponent of this connector, it remains to be seen if other companies will adopt this standard for their consumer products. Additionally, routing power throughout the motherboard will require manufacturers to include additional power regulating circuitry, potentially driving motherboard costs up. It is also not an agreed upon industry standard, which could block some future GPU upgrades from happening.You can check out ASUS'es implementation of the Back-to-Future (BTF) motherboard that supports this connector below.
Sources:
@momomo_us, via Tom's Hardware
First showcased at Computex, this connector was featured in several prototype motherboards and graphics cards, emphasizing its potential to enhance cable management and aesthetics. By eliminating supplementary power cables from the graphics card and channeling power through the motherboard, the graphics card's appearance remains uncluttered, and cable management behind the motherboard tray becomes more streamlined. Intriguingly, this connector is a familiar design. It's a modified version of the High Power Card Edge (HPCE) standard prevalent in the server industry. While ASUS has been the primary proponent of this connector, it remains to be seen if other companies will adopt this standard for their consumer products. Additionally, routing power throughout the motherboard will require manufacturers to include additional power regulating circuitry, potentially driving motherboard costs up. It is also not an agreed upon industry standard, which could block some future GPU upgrades from happening.You can check out ASUS'es implementation of the Back-to-Future (BTF) motherboard that supports this connector below.
72 Comments on GC-HCPE Power Connector Can Supply more Than 600 Watts to GPU
mITX would be ideal for this as you could use any mainboard with this proprietary GPU.
But what's really needed is an update to the ancient 20 year old PCIe connector, ie like the PECFF spec which supports 660W@12V.
Your EPS plugs that are used for CPUS and in the Datacenter on accelerator cards could do nearly 800 watts in 8 Pins.
Just moving to 24V would mean the current 8 pin connector can support 300 watts, hell the PCI-e slot could in theory support 150 watts. In theory it should also increase efficency slightly across the board as well.
Only have an older 12V supply? It draws double the current up to a set amount. Have a newer supply? Then use things like the sideband connectors in the 12VHPWR or sense capabilities in the regulators.
Hell the current 24 pin ATX connectors has a non used pin that could be a sense/communication pin for that exact purpose as the -5v it was intented for was removed in 2004 from the ATX spec. IMO the AXT12VO was a missed opportunity to move us into the 21st century in this aspect.
Absolute genius! :slap:
Also, hilariously you mention the "21st century" while ignoring that the 24 pin ATX connector is a 21st century occurrence. 1990s machines had either the old 6+6 pin or the 20 pin connector.
I already know what's going to happen if they bring on this connector. Brick like GPU's will sag, which will reduce pin contact & you'll end up with a 12VHPWR "Adapter Gate" 2.0 with PC's catching fire. :) Plus it will not only toast your GPU & connector, it will toast your motherboard, too. Maybe that's their goal?
You do realise a LOT of the stuff we have out there is actually fairly wide ranging in terms of voltage input?
AOZ5311NQI-03 - Currently a favoured power stage in 4xxx series GPUs
AOZ5616BQI - A possible drop in replacement to be able to utilise a 24v source.
Same Output ratings, same packaging. PWM signals would have to be reworked from 5V currently to 3V. Which may actually simplify circuitry as there is no 5V source for Graphics cards directly from Mobo or cable currently.
Guess what, both of those above power stages accepts 12 Volts. Only the bottom one would support 24. So its there, just needs a little work from the PSU. Mobo, graphics makers etc etc etc to come to an agreement on a standard to enable a transition from 12V currently to 24V in the future. Maybe the use of sideband connectors on top of existing ones would be viable similar to what Nvidia did in the power delivery of the 4xxx series. No sideband connectors means the board expects 12V, sideband connectors can then be used to confirm voltage supplied from PSU is 24V.
This isn't a new power connector. It's an entirely unnecessary VANITY connector to move the cable from the front of the card to the back of the board. You still have to plug in the usual power connector to the back of the motherboard, but this adds one extra point of failure and ties you into this premium-priced ecosystem of CC-HCPE-compaible boards, cases, and graphics cards.
Unless you're a blind, gullible fool, you must be able to see that the only benefit to this is vanity builds. It adds cost and complexity, reduces choice of components you can use, and most importantly it negatively impacts power delivery by adding a whole extra layer of connectors and traces that are 100% unnecessary.
We should have bus bars inside PC because more copper.......
ATX spec'shistory.Make "-12V" required, not optional.
just invert an independent +12V Rail, already common in PSUs.
Plus, GPUs already have separate power planes; one from the slot, one from auxiliary 6/8/12-pin input(s)
kbreee.blogspot.com/2013/11/dc-transmission-and-distribution.html
I may not be a big fan of Thomas Edison, but he (and the big brains w/ big pockets that standardized US Mains Power) already figured this problem out:
Edison 3-Wire Power Distribution - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17757744/
www.eeeguide.com/comparison-of-conductor-material-in-overhead-system/