1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

New Performance/Gaming Computer Build, budget ~$1500 give or take

Discussion in 'System Builder's Advice' started by vawrvawerawe, Nov 11, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs


    I ran prime 95 and Furmark with 2 cards and the system did not pull 400 watts Dave. Enlighten me on this if you can. I ran power consumption a few months ago and could run again if needed.
     
    vawrvawerawe says thanks.
  2. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    you get what you pay for.


    cooling is more critical with IVB vs SNB, since TIM between IHS and silicon is different. Hyper212+, on SNB, no problem, avg 125-140W OC to 4.5 GHz. With 3770k, no way, even though power draw is less.

    Running furmark and prime95 is stupid. no actual game draws power like that, nor does folding. Furmark is far too unrealisitic.


    You test to maximize power draw, I test real-world, by using the PC through the week. Power meter sits directly above my monitor, so I can look at a glance, and also records maximums. Pretty basic, actually.
     
    vawrvawerawe says thanks.
  3. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,896 (13.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,304
    Have you bothered to look at reviews for these products?
     
  4. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Since most reviews tend to not always agree on stuff...I'd ask even if I did read every one, just for realistic user response. Cherry picking samples, and all that, although, I gotta say, I don't think I've ever got a really good review sample. Not REALLY good.
     
    vawrvawerawe says thanks.
  5. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    yes, i read several pages of reviews for each of the products.

    Is it necessary to get another cooler or will the stock work fine if not overclocked?
     
  6. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    stock is fine, or else, they'd not include a cooler at all. Would be a lawsuit(nefarious device).


    However, at the same time, there's this thing, I think it goes: for every 10 C dropped, IC life can double? I dunno is that is true, or still applies...but it does kinda highlight how critical cooling can be, even if running stock.
     
    vawrvawerawe says thanks.
  7. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Good to know. Would lower temperature also affect power efficiency (noticeably)?
     
  8. Sir B. Fannybottom

    Sir B. Fannybottom

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,947 (2.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,218
    Maybe a few watts from the fan not needing to run as fast. Pennies a month
     
  9. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    What did you run to full load the system?
     
  10. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    P95 Blend and BF3.
     
  11. Irony

    Irony

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,721 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    442
    Location:
    Outer Rim system of the interwebz
    Its barely sufficient. I wouldn't want to use the stock cooler to even run prime95 for very long at stock speeds. Hyper 212 is a decent cooler for the money. But ultimately, like someone already said, you pretty much get what you pay for with coolers. Pricier ones like silver arrow, nh-d14 and such are going to cool better
     
    Folding for Team TPU
  12. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs


    I just ran on 2 cards and it was up to 775 watts. Good stuff.:toast:

    3770K @ 4.7GHz and 2 x radeon 7970's at 1200/1600. I did pump the voltage on the cards up to 1.2volts just to see the result.
     
    vawrvawerawe says thanks.
  13. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Yeah, you're pushing an extra 100 MHz over what I do, so seems pretty accurate for silicon differences between chips and VGAs, between yours and mine.

    So now, If going to OC that rig 24/7, I'd buy a PSU rated for 20% over that 775W you got...so say 1000W. I've been recommending 850W PSUs for dual GPU systems with OC for years now...and many have said that's too much.
     
    vawrvawerawe says thanks.
  14. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Can anyone tell me specifically if and where my build will bottleneck?
     
  15. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    The user.
     
    scaminatrix and repman244 say thanks.
  16. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    lol I mean hardware of course ;)
     
  17. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,104 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    456
    :laugh:
    It's not a question of if, there is always a bottleneck.

    For your usage, IMO it's either the CPU or the GPU.
     
  18. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    ok, but my CPU is 3770K and GPU is 7950 Crossfire (x2). So please clarify.
     
  19. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    Depends what you are doing. Normal system will have no issues.
     
  20. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,104 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Example:
    If a game loads your CPU to 100% and GPU stays at 50% you aren't utilizing your GPU to it's full potential.
    So there is always some sort of a bottleneck, but you should be looking at the framerates you want to achieve.
    Ideal situation would be using 100%CPU for feeding the GPU to it's 100% but you won't have that.
     
  21. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Yes, exactly, so where will my system, parts listed in this thread, most probably bottleneck?
     
  22. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    HDD/SSD.

    CPU speed still plays a role as well, with older stuff, however, most newer stuff is GPU-bottlenecked, depending on resolution. stuff = apps.

    SO like posted above, it depends on what you're doing, exactly.


    2x7970, obviously, is faster. you coudl say GPU is bottleneck, there. So...

    there's aren't much faster CPUs, but for multi-threaded work, obviously more cores is better.


    That why one of the first questions asked for system builds is what the PC will be used for.
     
    vawrvawerawe says thanks.
  23. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    ... and $500 more expensive
     
  24. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,104 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Both me and cdawall answered, it depends what you do.

    Use my example and just flip it around.

    You will always have a bottleneck, the only way not to have one is to have a system that would do anything in t = 0 which is impossible.
     
  25. vawrvawerawe

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    581 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    thanks. pictures coming soon. :)
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page