Thursday, December 26th 2013
Intel Core i7 "Haswell-E" to Launch in Q3 2014
Intel is planning to launch its 4th generation Core i7 HEDT (high-end desktop) platform, codenamed "Haswell-E," in the third quarter of 2014 (after June), which should space its launch roughly a year from Core i7 "Ivy Bridge-E." With Haswell-E, Intel is expected to increase core counts across the board, launching an "affordable" six-core part around the $400 mark, an eight-core part around the $600 mark, and an Extreme Edition eight-core part around the $1,000 mark. The three will be based on the LGA2011-3 socket, which has the same pin count as today's LGA2011, yet is incompatible with it, because the pin map of Haswell-E will differ from its predecessors'. Driving the platform will be Intel's X99 Express chipset, with support for up to ten SATA 6 Gb/s ports, and a large number of USB 3.0 ports. Some of the first X99 motherboards are expected to be unveiled at Computex 2014.
Sources:
WCCFTech, VR-Zone
63 Comments on Intel Core i7 "Haswell-E" to Launch in Q3 2014
is there truly anybody in the enthusiast community that is not aware of intel's tick - tock modus operandi ?
and please with the amd is cheaper.... we know....and don't care.......
...o.k. you can hate me now..
Not fake ones using slightly-better-than-hyperthreading nonsense to give themselves pseudo-octacore and then repeat it long enough that people actually forget that's what they're offering.
Intel will be offering genuine octacore's with hyperthreading to boost the thread count up to 16. It's only taken... years and years?
Not saying that AMD's '8-core' solutions are bad, per se, just that it's always irritated me how said solutions can be bested by Quad-cores.
I'm considering the 5930K or whatever the cheapest, non extreme 8-core (if there is one) to replace my 2600K and P67 chipset. IB-E didn't really offer the performance improvement that I was looking at, not to mention the older chipset released at the same time as my P67.
The Haswell-e offering, including PCH, is what I was expecting from SB-e (with the exception of DDR4). Given that, it isn't a reasonably intelligent expenditure to get features I've managed without for two years already. Assuming the pricing was a bit more reasonable, or I was replacing something older than SB-e, Haswell-e makes sense. Right now, a new platform for incremental improvements and extra connectivity isn't capable of justifying the cost.
Also Haswell cores are not much faster than Ivy cores which are barely faster than Sandy cores when you talk clock per clock performance and unfortunately this difference get wiped out because most Sandy cores can do 5Ghz+ but only some Ivys can get 5Ghz and almost no Haswells get to 5Ghz. Now take of 100mhz of of the max OC for ever 2 extra cores and you end up with Haswell-e octas looking like they will average 4.5Ghz on water.
Good Lord I don't know why some folks took my decision to upgrade way too seriously. What's wrong with swithcing to x99? Wait until Q3 2014 then you all can judge whether my decision to upgrade is pointless or not. Remember, we don't know what a x99 board can do yet. So hold your horses. I bet. With this and Kaveri, 2014 surely is going to be an interesting year.:toast:
If more cores really helps you do what ever you're doing (no, it won't help with gaming at the moment,) then you can already get a 12c/24t 2011 Xeon. Considering it appears that you're willing to dump as much money as is needed into it, then go by two of them and a server board and completely forget the PCH because you'll have 80 PCI-E lanes to use.
Most people don't have the money to afford a 4960x, forget two Titans. Money probably means a bit more to a lot of people here than it does to you. I'm just saying.
But on topic 2 pricey and i cannot say i need the extra cores anyways.
Possibly the haswell-e will have the soldered on IHS and this will help a lot I bet.
Also guys don't feed the troll. Probably by then your x58 might be worth upgrading finally (since they are still really badass processors) or it may be better yet to go for a used older ivy/sandy and break even on cost for a 15-20% improvement.
I call mine rigs and boxen.... but I fold for a hobby so... that's why the high core count on everything.
I just wish intel didnt lock the high core count models. :(
I have lots of high end parts floating around... I don't really have more money to throw around than the average person I just put a higher portion of my income at computing than most.
My rigs are definitely worth more than my car. It is just a matter of priorities.
My priority is that my family comes first, not my computer, but that's just me and my situation.
That's a damn costly hobby!
I'm with you on the Intel's locked Xeons, for what they cost Intel could just leave the multiplicator unlocked, atleast on higher end parts!
2011 is long time on market, 3 years. Maybe they need to change something to improve performance. 2011 was for two Extreme generation, that's not bad.
In all seriousness though, 2011 has been out for a while and all things considered, it has held up pretty well against even newer CPUs that are coming out. Much like how X58 still serves a lot of people very well.
For me, my 3820 performs exceptionally and only when I do media encoding do I really max out the CPU, but I don't do that all that often. Until I need more cores, I doubt I'll upgrade it.
I much prefer the term "system" or to just call it what it actually is rather then some slang term.