Thursday, November 19th 2015

Intel Core i7 "Broadwell-E" to Launch in Q2-2016

The next update to Intel's high-end desktop (HEDT) platform will arrive no sooner than Q2-2016 (April-June), according to a leaked company roadmap slide for its client computing platforms. These chips will be based on Intel's 5th generation Core "Broadwell" micro-architecture, although in the lineup, they will be sold as Core i7-6800 and i7-6900 series.

Core i7 "Broadwell-E" will see Intel release its first consumer 10-core processor, besides 6-core and 8-core. The cheapest ($400-ish) part will likely be 6-core, the mid-tier part ($600-ish) will likely be 8-core, and the top-dog $1000 part 10-core. The TDP for these parts will continue to be rated at 140W. These chips will be supported by existing LGA2011v3 motherboards, with a firmware update, just like Core i7 "Ivy Bridge-E" were supported by existing LGA2011 motherboards of the time. Elsewhere on the roadmap, we see Core "Kaby Lake" desktop processors making an entry in Q4-2016.
Sources: BenchLife.info, Many Thanks to TheLostSwede for the tip.
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Intel Core i7 "Broadwell-E" to Launch in Q2-2016

#26
johnspack
Here For Good!
Yes, buy those Broadwell-Es, and sell your used Haswell-Es nice and cheap please! I need a cheap 8 core with higher ipc.....
Posted on Reply
#27
Serpent of Darkness
I would roll laughing if 3 to 6 months down the line, they make another variant with 12 cores. Name it Intel Core i7 "Broadwell-E X" 6990x SEE (Super Extreme Edition). Similar scenario like the i7 980x on the old 1366 platform. From 960, they came out with the 975, and then jump to the 980x right before X99 was released. I think my next setup or built will be a 2 physical processor Mobo with next Gen cores for rendering... Here is my thoughts on i7 6950x: 2 extra "cores," less than 10% gains on PC gaming at 4.0Ghz, barely can OC to 5.0Ghz at high temperatures, extra 2 cores don't do squat for PC gaming, but rendering and number crunching is improved by another 20%--GG come send more money to Intel PC enthusiast. <3 <3 Intel.
Posted on Reply
#28
HumanSmoke
Serpent of DarknessSimilar scenario like the i7 980x on the old 1366 platform. From 960, they came out with the 975,
That would be - in a word - wrong.
1. The i7 975XE ($999), was a D0 successor to the C0 step i7-965XE (also $999). The i7-960 ($562) was a successor to the i7-950 (also $562)
2. " From 960, they came out with the 975" . No mean feat considering the 975 actually launched 4 months before the 960.
Serpent of Darknessand then jump to the 980x right before X99 was released.
Actually, the 980X dropped in March 2010. The X79 (not X99) platform didn't launch until November 2011. For those counting, that's over a year and a half between the two. Even if you use the actual product progression ( i7-990X -> i7-3960X), the gap is 9 months....and pretty much everyone knew the 990X was a last hurrah and benchmark queen for the X58 platform.
Serpent of DarknessI think my next setup or built will be a 2 physical processor Mobo with next Gen cores for rendering Here is my thoughts on i7 6950x: 2 extra "cores," less than 10% gains on PC gaming at 4.0Ghz, barely can OC to 5.0Ghz at high temperatures, extra 2 cores don't do squat for PC gaming, but rendering and number crunching is improved by another 20%
You know that i7's lack a second QPI and aren't compatible with dual socket (C612) boards right? I'd suggest some research before doing the CPU and mobo buying.
Posted on Reply
#29
mcraygsx
I hope it overclocks fast better then Broadwell 5770C and offers better IPC as compare to Haswell-E
Posted on Reply
#30
bubbleawsome
Dang, I could use more cores. This cores>clockspeed thing is pretty good, hoping it trickles down to 6-core normal i7's by the next generation or two.
Posted on Reply
#31
mcraygsx
bubbleawsomeDang, I could use more cores. This cores>clockspeed thing is pretty good, hoping it trickles down to 6-core normal i7's by the next generation or two.
6 - Core for mainstream should be standard by now.
Posted on Reply
#32
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Disappointed, I am. Haswell-E to Broadwell-E is insignificant. I think I wait for Kaby Lake or Skylake.
Posted on Reply
#33
EpicShweetness
mcraygsx6 - Core for mainstream should be standard by now.
Unfortunately it is not, I blame lazy programming with lots of software, not just games, that hasn't made the need for more than 4 cores more than "mainstream".
Posted on Reply
#34
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
There isn't many workloads out there that can put >4 cores to work outside of CAD/encoding/scientific. Not because it couldn't but modern CPUs are so powerful they tackle it with ease. In the case of games, the GPU will usually bottleneck before the CPU.

LGA-2011 is a workstation/server platform for a reason.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 13:58 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts