Tuesday, April 19th 2016

NVIDIA to Launch Mid-range GP106 Based Graphics Cards in Autumn 2016

NVIDIA is expected to launch the first consumer graphics cards based on the GP106 silicon some time in Autumn 2016 (late Q3-early Q4). Based on the company's next-generation "Pascal" architecture, the GP106 will drive several key mid-range and performance-segment (price/performance sweetspot) SKUs, including the cards that succeed the current GeForce GTX 960 and GTX 950. Based on the way NVIDIA's big GP100 silicon is structured, assuming the GP106 features two graphics processing clusters (GPCs), the way the current GM206 silicon does; one can expect a CUDA core count in the neighborhood of 1,280. NVIDIA could use this chip to capture several key sub-$250 price points.
Source: SweClockers
Add your own comment

55 Comments on NVIDIA to Launch Mid-range GP106 Based Graphics Cards in Autumn 2016

#51
Casecutter
OctaveanI like the idea that ~$200 will yield good 1440p performance so let's hope nVidia agrees
As the 7870 offered strong 1080p upon it's release, that's what RTG is targeting more this time a card the fulfills a resolution.
Consider how the 7770 was kind of the last card you needed for targeting 1680x1050, the entry Polaris will be that to 1080p.

Lastly, I should clarify I don't see RTG release MSRP being $200 for the 1440p card, that's what it will be more after working down within time and competition. I want to say it will take the 380X $230 price point, or yes up to the $250 MSRP as it was for the 7870 as the competition was tardy at that time to the tune of like 6 months, and then was more a card for 1680x1050. At the time the GTX 660 came along AMD had many Pitcairn XT SKU's in the $200 range.
Posted on Reply
#52
rruff
OctaveanThat's a two way street isn't it,....?
It's competition. If AMD makes a successful bid to claw back market share, then we will see lower prices. Otherwise, not so much.

I'm particularly interested in the processor side of AMD since they haven't put up a decent fight in that category for a long time, and it shows.
Posted on Reply
#53
Octavean
rruffIt's competition. If AMD makes a successful bid to claw back market share, then we will see lower prices. Otherwise, not so much.

I'm particularly interested in the processor side of AMD since they haven't put up a decent fight in that category for a long time, and it shows.
Even Intel seems to be devaluing the PC market so I question the motivation AMD would have to claw their way back into the PC enthusiasts high-end market. Backend / Enterprise performance will always be needed one would think but I have some concerns about where the market is going with respect to people like US:

www.pcper.com/news/Processors/How-Intel-Job-Cuts-and-Restructuring-Affect-Enthusiasts
Posted on Reply
#54
rruff
OctaveanEven Intel seems to be devaluing the PC market so I question the motivation AMD would have to claw their way back into the PC enthusiasts high-end market.
$200 isn't high end. But high performing processors will be needed for both AI and VR. I see big growth in these for the foreseeable future, as in trillions of $$$. But we badly need AMD (or someone) to get in a more competitive position to push innovation and pricing.
Posted on Reply
#55
cadaveca
My name is Dave
OctaveanEven Intel seems to be devaluing the PC market so I question the motivation AMD would have to claw their way back into the PC enthusiasts high-end market. Backend / Enterprise performance will always be needed one would think but I have some concerns about where the market is going with respect to people like US:

www.pcper.com/news/Processors/How-Intel-Job-Cuts-and-Restructuring-Affect-Enthusiasts
The first comment on that article pretty much sums it all up pretty nicely.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 03:48 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts