Friday, July 22nd 2016

NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX TITAN X Pascal

In a show of shock and awe, NVIDIA today announced its flagship graphics card based on the "Pascal" architecture, the GeForce GTX TITAN X Pascal. Market availability of the card is scheduled for August 2, 2016, priced at US $1,199. Based on the 16 nm "GP102" silicon, this graphics card is endowed with 3,584 CUDA cores spread across 56 streaming multiprocessors, 224 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit GDDR5X memory interface, holding 12 GB of memory.

The core is clocked at 1417 MHz, with 1531 MHz GPU Boost, and 10 Gbps memory, churning out 480 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The card draws power from a combination of 6-pin and 8-pin PCIe power connectors, the GPU's TDP is rated at 250W. NVIDIA claims that the GTX TITAN X Pascal is up to 60 percent faster than the GTX TITAN X (Maxwell), and up to 3 times faster than the original GeForce GTX TITAN.
Add your own comment

162 Comments on NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX TITAN X Pascal

#151
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
ppn said:
Titan is what 1080 should have been. Hopefully 1180 will fix that.
This makes no sense. 1080 is not built on a flagship level chip. No x80 is. The 1080 is exactly what it "should have been" based on using a GP104 chip.
Posted on Reply
#152
BiggieShady
rtwjunkie said:
The 1080 is exactly what it "should have been" based on using a GP104 chip.
Right, because it is a fully enabled GP104 it could only be "more than it is" if it clocked higher and the max clocks are already over 2 GHz on most samples ... seems to me it's actually more than it should have been based on architecture and expected clocks.
Posted on Reply
#153
jabbadap
Uhh Titan X scratch that. Quadro p6000 will use full gp102:
NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Meanwhile P6000 features Pascal GP102 with 3840 CUDA cores (yikes, that’s more than TITAN XP!). The P6000 also features 24 GB GDDR5X memory (that’s why I think it’s GP102 not GP100).
Posted on Reply
#155
jabbadap
PP Mguire said:
Pic names say P5000 and P6000 but cooler screams M5000 and M6000 lol.
Well yeah they look the same on nvidia's own page too. Reuse of that cooler is easy for nvidia, when there's just Quadro.
Posted on Reply
#156
PP Mguire
jabbadap said:
Well yeah they look the same on nvidia's own page too. Reuse of that cooler is easy for nvidia, when there's just Quadro.
The sides say what card they are and are miraculously left out ;)
Posted on Reply
#157
jabbadap
PP Mguire said:
The sides say what card they are and are miraculously left out ;)
True true, could be just illustration picture of quadro, not the final product.
Posted on Reply
#158
PP Mguire
jabbadap said:
True true, could be just illustration picture of quadro, not the final product.
As a person who uses these cards, they're just pictures of the previous gen. Always take info from pages like videocardz and WCCF with a grain of salt. The specs could be true, but it's speculation. All the top Quadro cards have basically been "professional" versions of the top card for the consumers so it's unlikely it'll have more cores than the new TItan. If it is true, then they are holding out a bigger chip for later sadly. They also have cooler variances each gen.
Posted on Reply
#159
Darller
Let's make something completely clear. Those of us who can afford the halo cards like GTX TITAN X, TITAN X, etc. are not and will not be crying over the release of these new cards. We'll be placing our orders.

You know the performance levels everyone is drooling over with the 1080? I've been enjoying that (and more since I always use SLI) for over a year.

Pathetic, jealous little internet denizens hope that we feel badly about our purchases, but the reality is we don't. We can afford it, and that pisses you off. Work harder, get a better job or education... do something about your situation, because mine is fine.
Posted on Reply
#160
bug
Darller said:
Pathetic, jealous little internet denizens hope that we feel badly about our purchases, but the reality is we don't.
I don't think they "hope" anyone will feel bad, they just don't understand that there can be other buying criteria than "bang for buck". Bang for buck makes a lot of sense for many, but not all.
Posted on Reply
#161
BiggieShady
Darller said:
Let's make something completely clear. Those of us who can afford the halo cards like GTX TITAN X, TITAN X, etc. are not and will not be crying over the release of these new cards. We'll be placing our orders.

You know the performance levels everyone is drooling over with the 1080? I've been enjoying that (and more since I always use SLI) for over a year.

Pathetic, jealous little internet denizens hope that we feel badly about our purchases, but the reality is we don't. We can afford it, and that pisses you off. Work harder, get a better job or education... do something about your situation, because mine is fine.
Let me see if you made your thing completely clear ...

How can people cry over graphics card they can't afford when
a) you are the living proof there exists a person who can afford it and willing to pay for it
b) it makes you mad
c) the method "breathe Darller ... just breathe" doesn't work
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment