Tuesday, August 1st 2017

Intel Readies Four 6-core "Coffee Lake" SKUs, Including Two Core i5

Intel is beginning to feel the pinch of AMD Ryzen 7-series, and the upper-end of the Ryzen 5-series, which offer better multi-threaded performance than similarly-priced quad-core Intel Core i7 and Core i5 "Kaby Lake" processors, and reasonably good single-thread performance, and platform costs. The company is responding in force with four new six-core SKUs, and for the first time since "Nehalem," the company isn't changing the socket with the introduction of its third mainstream-desktop micro-architecture on a given process. The 8th generation Core "Coffee Lake" mainstream-desktop processors will be built in the existing LGA1151 package, and will hopefully support existing motherboards through BIOS updates, even though Intel plans a new 300-series chipset to go with these chips.

The six-core "Coffee Lake" processor lineup addresses not just the higher-end of the lineup with Core i7 SKUs, but also the mid-range of it, with Core i5 SKUs. One of these could even scrape the sub-$200 price-point. Of the four confirmed SKUs are the top-dog Core i7-8700K, its slightly cheaper sibling, the Core i7-8700 (non-K); and the Core i5-8600K, with its cheaper sibling, the Core i5-8400. Of these the i7-8700K and i5-8600K are unlocked. The Core i7 parts feature HyperThreading enabling 12 logical CPUs for the OS to deal with, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache; while the Core i5 parts lack HyperThreading, and only feature 9 MB of L3 cache. The clock speeds and other features are tabled below. The company plans to launch these four either by the end of Q3 (late-September) or some time in Q4, before Holiday.
Source: Anandtech Forums
Add your own comment

107 Comments on Intel Readies Four 6-core "Coffee Lake" SKUs, Including Two Core i5

#76
Sandbo
Finally Intel is growing more fingers than 4, still this is a bit late to stop AMD from taking a large part of its market.

I have been a fans of facts and thus buying ONLY Intel CPUs over almost the past decade.
My 7 year old Xeon-1235 (Sandy Bridge) workstation just got old enough and I decided to upgrade, the choice became so obvious that it has to be Threadripper.

-Supports ECC RAM out of the box, no need to beg for a server CPU that has a funny lock removed (well server chipset as well).
-Give 64 PCI-E lanes, go check Intel's.
-$999, just two months after the release of the Intel $999 Skylake-X 7900, AMD will totally claim the champion of performance
Posted on Reply
#77
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Hugh MungusBut not THAT significantly and real cooling requirements differ quite a bit (mostly negatively) often times with Intel cpu's. Ryzen cpu's actually can make do with crappy 65W/95W tdp coolers without throttling. Intel cpu's often can't. Interesting isn't it?
Intel and AMD rate their products differently. The cooler provided by Intel is substantially smaller than the one provided by AMD for the same TDP rating.

Intel box coolers will happily maintain maximum non-boost settings 24/7 anything over that is turbo and is not calculated into tdp.

AMD box coolers are larger and they even went as far as to have the thermal sensor lie to the motherboard on the x series chips to keep the CPU in its boost bins longer. Their core throttling is also nothing short of Jim Keller's genius at work. Overall "TDP" in a stock chip is maintained quite well. You can really see the effects of this when you start turning AMD cool and quiet things off. Man that power consumption starts walking up...

My guess would be the attempt from amd is to provide a better gaming experience since they have the weaker performing cpu in that aspect. They will both easily throttle under the stock cooler and video rendering so that part is mute. This would be for anything not bundled with the wraith max cooler which is roughly equal to a hyper 212 (150w tdp)
Posted on Reply
#78
Unregistered
cdawallIntel and AMD rate their products differently. The cooler provided by Intel is substantially smaller than the one provided by AMD for the same TDP rating.

Intel box coolers will happily maintain maximum non-boost settings 24/7 anything over that is turbo and is not calculated into tdp.

AMD box coolers are larger and they even went as far as to have the thermal sensor lie to the motherboard on the x series chips to keep the CPU in its boost bins longer. Their core throttling is also nothing short of Jim Keller's genius at work. Overall "TDP" in a stock chip is maintained quite well. You can really see the effects of this when you start turning AMD cool and quiet things off. Man that power consumption starts walking up...

My guess would be the attempt from amd is to provide a better gaming experience since they have the weaker performing cpu in that aspect. They will both easily throttle under the stock cooler and video rendering so that part is mute. This would be for anything not bundled with the wraith max cooler which is roughly equal to a hyper 212 (150w tdp)
Yup

Depends and that boost thing is dumb on Intel's part and the bit about AMD is a bit vague

(Ry)Zen 7( threadripper) actually performs similarly to Intel 8-core+ nowadays, so Intel is only partially better for gaming and the wraith spire can cool a r7 cpu at 3.9-4ghz on all cores, so it won't throttle stock.
#79
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Hugh MungusYup

Depends and that boost thing is dumb on Intel's part and the bit about AMD is a bit vague

(Ry)Zen 7( threadripper) actually performs similarly to Intel 8-core+ nowadays, so Intel is only partially better for gaming and the wraith spire can cool a r7 cpu at 3.9-4ghz on all cores, so it won't throttle stock.
Spire cooler throttle over 3.7ghz on all cores in anything heavy.

Cross core latency unless you have a good 3200mhz ram kit leaves a lot to be wanted from Ryzen. Performance is not like an 8 core Intel in games a multitude of reviews show them lagging behind.
Posted on Reply
#80
Unregistered
cdawallSpire cooler throttle over 3.7ghz on all cores in anything heavy.

Cross core latency unless you have a good 3200mhz ram kit leaves a lot to be wanted from Ryzen. Performance is not like an 8 core Intel in games a multitude of reviews show them lagging behind.
Reviews that are many months old now generally. Just look at hardware unboxed's latest video. Unless you really want that one extra frame a second, ryzen isn't really worse at 1080p and 1440p is a better choice nowadays anyway. 1600 4ghz was also similar to a 7800x oc-ed. Only competitive 1080p players MIGHT have a use for skylake-x in gaming.
#81
Captain_Tom
Hugh MungusReviews that are many months old now generally. Just look at hardware unboxed's latest video. Unless you really want that one extra frame a second, ryzen isn't really worse at 1080p and 1440p is a better choice nowadays anyway. 1600 4ghz was also similar to a 7800x oc-ed. Only competitive 1080p players MIGHT have a use for skylake-x in gaming.
Except they should be using Kabylake @ 5.2GHz if they are professional gamers.

The fact is that the only CPU with any real advantage now is the i7-7700K with extreme cooling at 5GHz+, and only for 200Hz 1080p gaming. Literally any other situation is better covered by an AMD cpu. In fact Skylake-X has lower IPC than both Kabylake/Broadwell and Zen, so it is a wholly useless product line-up.
Posted on Reply
#82
Unregistered
Btw, you'll need a 300 series mobo for coffee lake. Does anyone want to change their statement?!
#83
Slizzo
MxPhenom 216Meh, Asus has lost its way IMO. I cant wait too see what AsRock and MSI have up their sleeve for Z370 motherboards.
I agree with this whole heartedly. Looks like ASUS has a growing issue with boot times before handing off to OS. Didn't know how terrible it was personally until I finally bought a board that wasn't ASUS (On a cheap-o MSI X99A Raider now).
Posted on Reply
#84
trparky
And it's official... new motherboards for this new chip even if you already have a Socket LGA1151.
Posted on Reply
#85
Captain_Tom
trparkyAnd it's official... new motherboards for this new chip even if you already have a Socket LGA1151.
That would have been really nice if it could have been dropped into existing motherboards...
Posted on Reply
#86
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Hugh MungusReviews that are many months old now generally. Just look at hardware unboxed's latest video. Unless you really want that one extra frame a second, ryzen isn't really worse at 1080p and 1440p is a better choice nowadays anyway. 1600 4ghz was also similar to a 7800x oc-ed. Only competitive 1080p players MIGHT have a use for skylake-x in gaming.
I still play with multiple ryzen systems across multiple brands and boards and every single company still has heavily limited ram compatibility issues that do not exist with skylake/kabylake. Ryzen performs worse by a decent margin at 1080P, when really pumping framerates it was also slower at 1440P. Just because the gap isn't massive does not excuse it. The piss poor chip clocking has a huge todo with this. If the core clocks were closer to intel then this would be a lot more mute of a point, if the ram clocked correctly, this would be a lot more mute, if the platform wasn't so finicky this would be a lot more mute. However the entire platform is pretty terrible as far as I am concerned, I have seen way too many issues already.

I await Threadripper diligently and hope the better binning for these chips allows a higher peak overclock even if it is limited by number of cores. Until then I have yet to have a chip that performs overall better than my years old 5960x@4.8.
Posted on Reply
#87
Prima.Vera
So 6 is the new 4?
Why not 8?? Is intel going for another 10 years with 6 Cores only?
Posted on Reply
#88
Unregistered
cdawallI still play with multiple ryzen systems across multiple brands and boards and every single company still has heavily limited ram compatibility issues that do not exist with skylake/kabylake. Ryzen performs worse by a decent margin at 1080P, when really pumping framerates it was also slower at 1440P. Just because the gap isn't massive does not excuse it. The piss poor chip clocking has a huge todo with this. If the core clocks were closer to intel then this would be a lot more mute of a point, if the ram clocked correctly, this would be a lot more mute, if the platform wasn't so finicky this would be a lot more mute. However the entire platform is pretty terrible as far as I am concerned, I have seen way too many issues already.

I await Threadripper diligently and hope the better binning for these chips allows a higher peak overclock even if it is limited by number of cores. Until then I have yet to have a chip that performs overall better than my years old 5960x@4.8.
Bench scores+settings, core and memory clocks (screenshot). Untill then, the evidence tells a different story.
#89
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Hugh MungusBench scores+settings, core and memory clocks (screenshot). Untill then, the evidence tells a different story.
What evidence, some online benchmarks from YouTube?

Out of curiosity how many Ryzen systems have you built and tweaked?
Posted on Reply
#90
Assimilator
cdawallI await Threadripper diligently and hope the better binning for these chips allows a higher peak overclock even if it is limited by number of cores. Until then I have yet to have a chip that performs overall better than my years old 5960x@4.8.
I'm waiting for the Ryzen 2 platform. Not only will AMD have had the chance to mature the silicon and AGESA to a stable state, which should fix most of the compatibility issues, they will hopefully also add some more PCIe lanes to their horribly crippled chipset. Seriously, 8x PCIe 2.0 lanes on the "highest-end" X370 - when Intel Z270 has up to 24 PCIe 3.0 lanes - is a bloody joke.

But Ryzen 2 is apparently only launching in 2019, and I need a new system long before then, so Coffee Lake/Z370 is probably what I'm gonna go for. Despite my desire to support AMD's new CPU, the Ryzen platform as a whole is still too immature and feature-limited. Threadripper's 60 PCIe lanes are tempting, but that platform is also likely to have bugs, plus it's hella expensive. I may just end up going for KBL-X + X299 and dropping in a newer, cheaper, higher-core-count CPU as time goes by.
Hugh MungusBench scores+settings, core and memory clocks (screenshot). Untill then, the evidence tells a different story.
LOL, the evidence is in literally any review of a Ryzen motherboard on the Internet. If you can find one that doesn't mention memory compatibility issues, you have a case; until then, stop trolling.
Posted on Reply
#91
Unregistered
AssimilatorI'm waiting for the Ryzen 2 platform. Not only will AMD have had the chance to mature the silicon and AGESA to a stable state, which should fix most of the compatibility issues, they will hopefully also add some more PCIe lanes to their horribly crippled chipset. Seriously, 8x PCIe 2.0 lanes on the "highest-end" X370 - when Intel Z270 has up to 24 PCIe 3.0 lanes - is a bloody joke.

But Ryzen 2 is apparently only launching in 2019, and I need a new system long before then, so Coffee Lake/Z370 is probably what I'm gonna go for. Despite my desire to support AMD's new CPU, the Ryzen platform as a whole is still too immature and feature-limited. Threadripper's 60 PCIe lanes are tempting, but that platform is also likely to have bugs, plus it's hella expensive. I may just end up going for KBL-X + X299 and dropping in a newer, cheaper, higher-core-count CPU as time goes by.



LOL, the evidence is in literally any review of a Ryzen motherboard on the Internet. If you can find one that doesn't mention memory compatibility issues, you have a case; until then, stop trolling.
I wasn't talking about memory compatibility. Check the context. Untill then, stop trolling! ;)
#92
Liviu Cojocaru
So Intel remains Intel...new socket for Coffee Lake, I guess this move is to keep the price point for the Kaby Lake
Posted on Reply
#93
bug
Liviu CojocaruSo Intel remains Intel...new socket for Coffee Lake, I guess this move is to keep the price point for the Kaby Lake
Tbh, if you're on Skylake or Kaby Lake already, upgrading to Coffee Lake makes little sense regardless of the motherboard. Hell, I've upgraded from Sandy Bridge to Skylake and the biggest gain was... the motherboard.
Posted on Reply
#95
bug
Liviu Cojocaruforgot the 6c/12t part?!
No, I just don't see it as reason enough to upgrade. It's unlikely your needs are not satisfied by an 8T Kaby Lake, but a 12T Coffee Lake will do. If your typical usage needs threads, you're more likely to go for AMD instead.
Posted on Reply
#96
Liviu Cojocaru
bugNo, I just don't see it as reason enough to upgrade. It's unlikely your needs are not satisfied by an 8T Kaby Lake, but a 12T Coffee Lake will do. If your typical usage needs threads, you're more likely to go for AMD instead.
going AMD would mean to change platforms...that would not be great. it would've been way better if these CPU's would work with the 200 series mb's
Posted on Reply
#97
bug
Liviu Cojocarugoing AMD would mean to change platforms...that would not be great. it would've been way better if these CPU's would work with the 200 series mb's
Your circular reasoning is complete now.
Posted on Reply
#99
Unregistered
For everyone interested,threadripper supports 3600mhz quadchannel 32GB RAM with an aorus gaming 7! Turns out that mobo also has wifi+BT4.2, btw.

Coffeelake is lucking like a clusterf***. Z370 up to 6 cores, but not z270, so you need a new mobo anyway for the 6-cores AND new 300 series mobos that do NOT support old cpu's! That's going to confuse many people.
#100
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Hugh MungusFor everyone interested,threadripper supports 3600mhz quadchannel 32GB RAM with an aorus gaming 7! Turns out that mobo also has wifi+BT4.2, btw.

Coffeelake is lucking like a clusterf***. Z370 up to 6 cores, but not z270, so you need a new mobo anyway for the 6-cores AND new 300 series mobos that do NOT support old cpu's! That's going to confuse many people.
Gigabyte announced 3600mhz ram compatibility with Ryzen. That doesn't mean it works.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 17:37 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts