Thursday, October 12th 2017

Intel Delivers 17-qubit Superconducting Chip with Advanced Packaging to QuTech

Today, Intel announced the delivery of a 17-qubit superconducting test chip for quantum computing to QuTech, Intel's quantum research partner in the Netherlands. The new chip was fabricated by Intel and features a unique design to achieve improved yield and performance. The delivery of this chip demonstrates the fast progress Intel and QuTech are making in researching and developing a working quantum computing system. It also underscores the importance of material science and semiconductor manufacturing in realizing the promise of quantum computing.

Quantum computing, in essence, is the ultimate in parallel computing, with the potential to tackle problems conventional computers can't handle. For example, quantum computers may simulate nature to advance research in chemistry, materials science and molecular modeling - like helping to create a new catalyst to sequester carbon dioxide, or create a room temperature superconductor or discover new drugs. However, despite much experimental progress and speculation, there are inherent challenges to building viable, large-scale quantum systems that produce accurate outputs. Making qubits (the building blocks of quantum computing) uniform and stable is one such obstacle.
Qubits are tremendously fragile: Any noise or unintended observation of them can cause data loss. This fragility requires them to operate at about 20 millikelvin - 250 times colder than deep space. This extreme operating environment makes the packaging of qubits key to their performance and function. Intel's Components Research Group (CR) in Oregon and Assembly Test and Technology Development (ATTD) teams in Arizona are pushing the limits of chip design and packaging technology to address quantum computing's unique challenges.

About the size of a quarter (in a package about the size of a half-dollar coin), the new 17-qubit test chip's improved design features include:
  • New architecture allowing improved reliability, thermal performance and reduced radio frequency (RF) interference between qubits.
  • A scalable interconnect scheme that allows for 10 to 100 times more signals into and out of the chip as compared to wirebonded chips.
  • Advanced processes, materials and designs that enable Intel's packaging to scale for quantum integrated circuits, which are much larger than conventional silicon chips.
"Our quantum research has progressed to the point where our partner QuTech is simulating quantum algorithm workloads, and Intel is fabricating new qubit test chips on a regular basis in our leading-edge manufacturing facilities," said Dr. Michael Mayberry, corporate vice president and managing director of Intel Labs. "Intel's expertise in fabrication, control electronics and architecture sets us apart and will serve us well as we venture into new computing paradigms, from neuromorphic to quantum computing."

Intel's collaborative relationship with QuTech to accelerate advancements in quantum computing began in 2015. Since that time, the collaboration has achieved many milestones - from demonstrating key circuit blocks for an integrated cryogenic-CMOS control system to developing a spin qubit fabrication flow on Intel's 300mm process technology and developing this unique packaging solution for superconducting qubits. Through this partnership, the time from design and fabrication to test has been greatly accelerated.

"With this test chip, we'll focus on connecting, controlling and measuring multiple, entangled qubits towards an error correction scheme and a logical qubit," said professor Leo DiCarlo of QuTech. "This work will allow us to uncover new insights in quantum computing that will shape the next stage of development."


Advancing the Quantum Computing System
Intel and QuTech's work in quantum computing goes beyond the development and testing of superconducting qubit devices. The collaboration spans the entire quantum system - or "stack" - from qubit devices to the hardware and software architecture required to control these devices as well as quantum applications. All of these elements are essential to advancing quantum computing from research to reality.

Also, unlike others, Intel is investigating multiple qubit types. These include the superconducting qubits incorporated into this newest test chip, and an alternative type called spin qubits in silicon. These spin qubits resemble a single electron transistor similar in many ways to conventional transistors and potentially able to be manufactured with comparable processes.

While quantum computers promise greater efficiency and performance to handle certain problems, they won't replace the need for conventional computing or other emerging technologies like neuromorphic computing. We'll need the technical advances that Moore's law delivers in order to invent and scale these emerging technologies.

Intel is investing not only to invent new ways of computing, but also to advance the foundation of Moore's Law, which makes this future possible.
Add your own comment

47 Comments on Intel Delivers 17-qubit Superconducting Chip with Advanced Packaging to QuTech

#26
Prima.Vera
ToothlessMakes one wonder how these things would become a household item with that extreme cooling needed.
They won't. Why do you need a quantum computer in your house?? This will be so strictly regulated by the Governments that even a Private corporation won't be allowed to own those...
Posted on Reply
#27
ty_ger
Prima.VeraThey won't. Why do you need a quantum computer in your house?? This will be so strictly regulated by the Governments that even a Private corporation won't be allowed to own those...
Agreed. Having the the theoretical power to easily break any public key encryption system would certainly need to be heavily regulated.
Posted on Reply
#28
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Prima.VeraThey won't. Why do you need a quantum computer in your house?? This will be so strictly regulated by the Governments that even a Private corporation won't be allowed to own those...
Private companies have more D-Wave computers than the government does at present. I think Google has several by itself while ORNL (US government) only just got one.
Posted on Reply
#29
ty_ger
FordGT90ConceptPrivate companies have more D-Wave computers than the government does at present. I think Google has several by itself while ORNL (US government) only just got one.
But none of the Quantum Computers work yet. So............

If/Once they do work, there would suddenly become a serious threat to the security of the infrastructure which our modern society is built on, and heavy regulation would be forced, wanted, and even welcomed by the majority.
Posted on Reply
#30
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
D-Wave does work. The latest model is guaranteed to have 2000+ functioning qubits.
D-Wave 2000Q quantum computers are available this quarter for shipment, with systems also accessible to subscribers remotely over the internet.
D-Wave is the leader in the development and delivery of quantum computing systems and software, and the world’s only commercial supplier of quantum computers.
Posted on Reply
#31
Rehmanpa
But the biggest question that no-one has asked yet is this, will it run minecraft??
Posted on Reply
#32
ty_ger
FordGT90ConceptD-Wave does work. The latest model is guaranteed to have 2000+ functioning qubits.
Garbage. It is not a real general purpose quantum computer. It can only find solutions to a small group of types of problems; and with very questionable performance.
D-Wave's "Quantum computers" are NOT general purpose quantum computers. They can only do quantum annealing, which allows a small subset of problems to be solved. They can't run Shor's or Grover's algorithms, as these aren't quantum annealing problems. It's also still an open question whether D-Wave's machines even provide any speedup over classical simulated annealing systems.
Posted on Reply
#33
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Because qubit processors are naturally slow at processing binary data. It doesn't make sense to buy a multi-million dollar specialized processor to solve 1+1. Qubit processors excel in areas where deep branching is necessary. If I understand it correctly, the 2000 qubit model could solve 2000 if...then statements nested in each other in a few cycles. A traditional binary processor would take thousands of times longer with significant memory overhead to solve the same problem.
Posted on Reply
#34
Bytales
ty_gerAgreed. Having the the theoretical power to easily break any public key encryption system would certainly need to be heavily regulated.
What will be the Point of "encrypting" files, if goverments will be able to use their regulated Quantum Computer Clusters to break the encryption whenever they please.
Might as well not encrypt at all.
Posted on Reply
#35
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
FordGT90ConceptA qubit is very well defined, like a bit. A bit is true or false while a qubit is true, false, or both. They may take different approaches to creating a quantum processor but a qubit is a qubit. Intel could have a vastly higher cycle rate than D-Wave does but, at this point, I doubt it.
Sure. But as with bits, there are a myriad of ways to get that qubit to do work, and because of quantum magic it's really hard to verify their operation. In a decade or two when we know more we might be able to evaluate performance and different architectures, but until then it's apples and oranges.
Posted on Reply
#36
Basard
I seem to remember, in the late 90's, seeing something on the discovery channel about these.... Of course my memory has been clouded over the last fifteen years.... But progress remains the same. Qubits "could" do this or "may be able to" do that... yadda yadda... We never had this much trouble with transistors.

I say that if you're going to go through all the trouble to cool these things down to near absolute zero, then you may as well just throw a binary chip in there and clock it to a billion terahertz.
Posted on Reply
#37
bug
BasardI seem to remember, in the late 90's, seeing something on the discovery channel about these.... Of course my memory has been clouded over the last fifteen years.... But progress remains the same. Qubits "could" do this or "may be able to" do that... yadda yadda... We never had this much trouble with transistors.

I say that if you're going to go through all the trouble to cool these things down to near absolute zero, then you may as well just throw a binary chip in there and clock it to a billion terahertz.
Of course we didn't have this much trouble with transistors. Transistors weren't doing anything new, they were simply taking over the duties of tubes. A qubit is, among other things, a new type of "electric" component. And we do need to figure out how that influences designs, logic and yes, what type of work they can help with.
Posted on Reply
#38
Boosnie
OSdevrOn the subject of cooling there are already devices called cryocoolers that are the size of a small thermos and can reach cryogenic temperatures.
you forgot to check what wikipedia says for "cryogenic temperatures".
Posted on Reply
#39
Boosnie
bugFlight was impossible for millennia ;)
Pleas, for the sake of my sanity, stop with this nonsense.
Cooking was impossible for millennia
Sharpening a stick was impossible for millennia
Rowing a boat was impossible for millenia.

We are not talking about building a relatively simple device that will be readily mass produced and available in a not too distant future.
We are talking about pinpoint an exact basic particle out of a gazillion others and keeping it masked from another gazillion continuously zipping through and around, perturbing the em field ad destroying the measurament.
This requires a crapton of energy and you will be never, ever, ever, never be able to do it on your lap on your couch.
The energy bill will not change, ever. Maybe you can devise clever methods to do it, but energy is energy, what you put in is what you get out.
Posted on Reply
#40
Basard
Boosniewhat you put in is what you get out.
Until you add the human factor.... Then you get bitcoins.
Posted on Reply
#41
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
FrickSure. But as with bits, there are a myriad of ways to get that qubit to do work, and because of quantum magic it's really hard to verify their operation. In a decade or two when we know more we might be able to evaluate performance and different architectures, but until then it's apples and oranges.
Not really. Any logic processor can be used to do the same work a quantum processor can do but there's clear performance advantages for specific types of problems. Quantum computers are very much ASIC. Like I said, for simple math problems CISC/RISC will be far more economical. Quantum computers for solving problems that CISC/RISC struggle with (like deep branching logic). In those tests, Qunatum computers are millions of times faster. For companies and governments that need that kind of compute power, the price is worth it. This one relatively small machine (about the size of an upright fridge) can do as much compute work as a massive cluster super computer without complex code to distribute the work.

Deep Wave requires 25 kw of continuous power. That's about as much as your average electric furnace. This is not something people will be using at home any time soon.
Posted on Reply
#42
ty_ger
BytalesWhat will be the Point of "encrypting" files, if goverments will be able to use their regulated Quantum Computer Clusters to break the encryption whenever they please.
Might as well not encrypt at all.
Umm.... ... .. . .. . your password is sent from your computer to the server where it is verified.

Maybe the "point of Encrypting your connection" will be to keep 7 billion other humans on this earth from draining your bank account every second of your life. I said infrastructure, not files.

If a general purpose quantum computer is ever physically possible, either it will need to be an extremely rare and heavily regulated item, or some genius will need to find a brand new way of securing our $19 trillion dollar infrastructure to replace the current method we use which was found as a mathematical law back in the year 1640; and every website, server, and service everywhere on the planet will need to change the way that they send, receive, and verify password information both server-side and client-side.
Posted on Reply
#44
ty_ger
FordGT90ConceptBecause qubit processors are naturally slow at processing binary data. It doesn't make sense to buy a multi-million dollar specialized processor to solve 1+1. Qubit processors excel in areas where deep branching is necessary. If I understand it correctly, the 2000 qubit model could solve 2000 if...then statements nested in each other in a few cycles. A traditional binary processor would take thousands of times longer with significant memory overhead to solve the same problem.
You are massively over-simplifying things. No, it isn't simply that these d-wave processors are unable to process binary data. The problem is that these d-wave processors are unable to perform the majority of types of quantum calculations. Therefore they "don't work". The d-wave processors are only able to perform a small subset of types of quantum calculations. They are only able to perform optimization-type calculations where the best solution to a problem is the output. They are unable to perform the holy grail of quantum calculations where every possible outcome is revealed at the same time; unless they test every possible outcome individually at a speed which is just as fast or slower than any other standard general purpose computer.
Posted on Reply
#45
ty_ger
FordGT90ConceptQuantum entanglement has a solution for that too:
www.livescience.com/60645-quantum-encrypted-message-sent-between-buildings.html
Yes, in 2015, I have read about quantum encrypted message tests. Until a solution is available worldwide, until the solution is refined to the point that information can be reliably transmitted or received from anywhere in the world, and until the entire infrastructure is converted -- at the cost of a massive amount of money -- , only a very few will be allowed to own a general purpose quantum computer. That is of course assuming that a general purpose quantum computer will some day exist.
Posted on Reply
#46
Prima.Vera
Just develop a standard binary supercomputer of at least 1 Exaflop performance, and make it design a new Quantum Supercomputer technology. ;)
Posted on Reply
#47
Manoa
I wanne this quantum, it the mhz
for quantum ray tracing video card
I wanne see what monsters realy looks like lel
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 24th, 2024 03:11 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts