Wednesday, January 23rd 2019

Intel Achieves Gender Pay Equity Globally

Today, Intel announced a major milestone in global inclusion - achieving gender pay equity across our worldwide workforce while also adding stock-based compensation to its pay equity analysis. Our commitment to achieving gender pay equity is central to making Intel a truly inclusive workplace, which we believe is a key factor in employee performance, productivity and engagement. A diverse workforce and inclusive culture are essential to our evolution and growth.

Intel defines pay equity as closing the gap in the average pay between employees of different genders or races and ethnicities, where data is available, in the same or similar roles after accounting for legitimate business factors that can explain differences, such as performance, time at grade level and tenure.
In addition to expanding pay equity to our global workforce, we have also evolved our methodology to take a more comprehensive approach to analyzing our global workforce pay data and closing identified gaps. In the past, adjustments were only made to the cash portion of employees' compensation, meaning base pay and bonus. In 2018, we began evaluating total compensation, including stock grants.

With a diverse workforce of approximately 107,000 regular employees in over 50 countries, identifying and closing gender pay equity gaps is a complicated task. Our legal and human resources teams worked with an external vendor to use proven statistical modeling techniques to identify countries where a gender pay gap existed. Individual employees in these countries who were identified as having a gap received appropriate adjustments.

Different countries have varying legislation around how pay equity is measured. In the U.K., for example, the data compares the average employee compensation for all men to all women. The result of this measurement methodology reflects that Intel has a lower representation of women in senior roles. This is a gap we - and the entire technology industry - are working hard to address. We continue to improve representation and progression opportunities for women at Intel, in all countries in which we do business.

Our work in pay equity is never done. We will continue to assess and close pay gaps to maintain gender pay equity globally. We will also maintain race and ethnicity pay equity in the U.S.

In October, we announced reaching full representation in our U.S. workforce two years ahead of our 2020 goal. Global pay equity is another step in our journey to create a more inclusive workplace where all employees feel supported and empowered to create the future.

I am proud to highlight Intel's ongoing commitment to doing what's best for all of our employees. We encourage all companies to join us in making pay equity a global priority.

The above is an opinion editorial by Julie Ann Overcash of Intel Corporation. Julie Ann Overcash is vice president of Human Resources and director of Compensation and Benefits at Intel Corporation.
Add your own comment

81 Comments on Intel Achieves Gender Pay Equity Globally

#51
phanbuey
ValantarThat's a view with a very short historical horizon. Binary gender as we know it is to a large degree a 20th century (Western) phenomenon - quite a few cultures, including Western countries, have had non-binary gender structures before modernity. The 20th century (and the 19th, though to a lesser degree) was generally characterized by ever-increasing systematization and formalization of designations, which (thanks in large part to the lack of actual knowledge among a lot of the people making these definitions official, or their morality) has created a far more rigid and restrictive society than any seen before. "PC culture" is a necessary and obvious response to this, particularly later developments such as gender studies and understandings of social interaction such as actor network theory - these are schools of thought that seek to break down oversimplified and overly restrictive categorizations that don't match reality so that we can understand reality better. Period. They're not always right (at least not right off the bat), but they generally move us in a positive direction.
I'm not sure how you're defining rigidity here as most historical societies Western, Middle Eastern and Asian pre-19th century were lethal when breaking social norms by virtually any measure (i.e. Inquisition, pre-meiji restoration japan, russia etc.). In the middle east there are still radical sects throwing homosexuals off rooftops -- I'm pretty sure they're more rigid than any 20th century western society barring a few extreme outliers.

Also:
www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2018/10/10/grievance-studies-academia-fake-feminist-hypatia-mein-kampf-racism-column/1575219002/

Essentially, gender studies and 'grievance studies' fields that followed changed and it isn't actual 'knowledge' at this point - it is a field of study that morphed into a self-perpetuating body, as evidenced by that group of researchers, and it behaves as repackaged institutional morality (religion) for the modern age -- right down to the censorship of art (videogames) and speech, for the sake of moving in 'a positive direction'. Religion always sought to define reality for you, and these fields of thought fit this need perfectly.
Posted on Reply
#52
Nkd
DivergeI'm not buying it. There's inequity between the same genders and titles of people. So much so that corporation don't want people to have discussions of salaries or raises among coworkers.
This! Big time, its pretty much stab in the back lol.

Here is my example:
Honestly, it doesn't have to be Gender pay equality, its pay equality in general. Workplace pay inequality is cancer. I will give you an example. I work for Blue and white Globe (you can guess the company), after working 6 years a lot of us realized how much less the existing employees are getting in the same title. Its really mind blowing. Someone who they recently hired into the same position as mine or even title below me can be making up to 15-20k more in salary than me. Wanna know something even better? I was actually making 25-30k less than the guy who just got hired in the same position as me. But they wanted to make us feel better and gave everyone a new base and for me, it was a 7k increase but still way below others. The pay gap is so bad within the company that is literally a tragedy. There isn't one person that's happy in my position. My buddy has been with the company for 10 years and he makes the same as me in salary. He just told me that someone new they hired is getting almost 20k higher in salary than us.

Our immediate managers are pretty honest and they tell us they are able to offer max money to a new hire regardless of experience but the leadership won't let them increase base for existing employees in the same position lol. So I am all for gender pay equality but there are a lot of men not getting equal pay either lol!

Let me add I am talking about men here who have busted their ass for the company!
Posted on Reply
#53
hat
Enthusiast
NkdThis! Big time, its pretty much stab in the back lol.

Here is my example:
Honestly, it doesn't have to be Gender pay equality, its pay equality in general. Workplace pay inequality is cancer. I will give you an example. I work for Blue and white Globe (you can guess the company), after working 6 years a lot of us realized how much less the existing employees are getting in the same title. Its really mind blowing. Someone who they recently hired into the same position as mine or even title below me can be making up to 15-20k more in salary than me. Wanna know something even better? I was actually making 25-30k less than the guy who just got hired in the same position as me. But they wanted to make us feel better and gave everyone a new base and for me, it was a 7k increase but still way below others. The pay gap is so bad within the company that is literally a tragedy. There isn't one person that's happy in my position. My buddy has been with the company for 10 years and he makes the same as me in salary. He just told me that someone new they hired is getting almost 20k higher in salary than us.

Our immediate managers are pretty honest and they tell us they are able to offer max money to a new hire regardless of experience but the leadership won't let them increase base for existing employees in the same position lol. So I am all for gender pay equality but there are a lot of men not getting equal pay either lol!

Let me add I am talking about men here who have busted their ass for the company!
That sounds awful backwards. Shouldn't you make more than the new guy? :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#55
Nkd
hatThat sounds awful backwards. Shouldn't you make more than the new guy? :shadedshu:
Yep! Awful it is. Since I learned how underpaid I am it really killed my morale. So kinda hard to swallow that. A lot of the guys I knew have left the company or are looking to leave. I am in the same boat. Literally, I could go to centurylink or comcast and make 80-100k salary. Loyalty doesn't pay bills you know.

Pretty much the article linked by @phanbuey above explains our situation. ROFL!
Posted on Reply
#56
R-T-B
BeertintedgogglesOr it's a case of giving actual/personal events instead of relying on other's experiences. Also known as first hand knowledge.
With a statistics based thing like gender inequality, it's bigtime reaching.
Posted on Reply
#57
TheGuruStud
Wait, people besides SJWs believe the pay gap is real (in the US)?
Posted on Reply
#58
danbert2000
TheGuruStudWait, people besides SJWs believe the pay gap is real (in the US)?
My fiancee had a coworker that was just hired onto her team that automatically got the same pay as a more experienced woman that had the same exact job for years. He was younger, had less experience, and was objectively worse at his job. He then got a raise and earns more than that woman. The woman got a smaller raise. My fiancee was also sort of his superior and got paid less even though she was tasking him with work. And when she asked for a raise larger than 2% after taking on many new responsibilities and earning a PMP certification, she got called pushy and was in the negotiation for four hours. Still didn't get a bigger raise. And then another man that was doing web development who she also manages on one of his projects got a raise to her salary level because his manager saw that she was earning more than him, even though he does not do the same work. That was literally the reason he gave. She was making that much so why not give him a raise too.

Sure, they are anecdotes, but you're kind of an idiot if you think there is no pay gap whatsoever. That or brainwashed. Which would you prefer I think of you?
Posted on Reply
#59
TheGuruStud
danbert2000My fiancee had a coworker that was just hired onto her team that automatically got the same pay as a more experienced woman that had the same exact job for years. He was younger, had less experience, and was objectively worse at his job. He then got a raise and earns more than that woman. The woman got a smaller raise. My fiancee was also sort of his superior and got paid less even though she was tasking him with work. And when she asked for a raise larger than 2% after taking on many new responsibilities and earning a PMP certification, she got called pushy and was in the negotiation for four hours. Still didn't get a bigger raise. And then another man that was doing web development who she also manages on one of his projects got a raise to her salary level because his manager saw that she was earning more than him, even though he does not do the same work. That was literally the reason he gave. She was making that much so why not give him a raise too.

Sure, they are anecdotes, but you're kind of an idiot if you think there is no pay gap whatsoever. That or brainwashed. Which would you prefer I think of you?
There isn't any systemic pay gap. It's been proven. Women hardly negotiate and are satisfied at their jobs while making less money. They also pursue promotions far less frequently. What you're describing is a normal hiring process. I was hired making a lot more money than the older employees simply because the market demanded it. The only shady thing here is IF the raises are true with no outside factor other than gender. Likely, he knows the kid and is displaying favoritism (and the budget is controller so he's screwing her to give him raises). She can sue, but unless he's done this to others, then idk if you can prove anything. She needs to quit without notice.

If everyone could just pay them less, then corporations would just hire mostly women to save all that money lol.
Posted on Reply
#60
danbert2000
TheGuruStudThere isn't any systemic pay gap. It's been proven. Women hardly negotiate and are satisfied at their jobs while making less money. They also pursue promotions far less frequently. What you're describing is a normal hiring process. I was hired making a lot more money than the older employees simply because the market demanded it. The only shady thing here is IF the raises are true with no outside factor other than gender. Likely, he knows the kid and is displaying favoritism (and the budget is controller so he's screwing her to give him raises). She can sue, but unless he's done this to others, then idk if you can prove anything. She needs to quit without notice.

If everyone could just pay them less, then corporations would just hire mostly women to save all that money lol.
What if they also had bias while hiring? Then they would be preferring men even though they could pay women less. I had my boss tell me to pass on a woman, who he probably could have paid less because that is the way the world works even though you are certain otherwise, because he was hoping "someone better" would come along. We ended up hiring a worse man. Usually the person deciding pay is different than the person deciding on hiring, as well, at least in corporate America. And that's where most of the high tech people work anyway. We decide to hire and then the negotiations on pay start. So your premise just doesn't apply to what I have seen.

Your argument is full of logic holes. Do you even work with other people in an office environment? It's all over the place so I'm assuming you just like to accrue the benefits and ignore the cause.

What arrogance to say "it's been proven" too. It clearly hasn't been proven. And you can send me all the fringe YouTube videos you want, gender bias in hiring and pay is something I see constantly even though my company tries to lead the way in leveling that shit out.
Posted on Reply
#61
phanbuey
TheGuruStudThere isn't any systemic pay gap. It's been proven. Women hardly negotiate and are satisfied at their jobs while making less money. They also pursue promotions far less frequently. What you're describing is a normal hiring process. I was hired making a lot more money than the older employees simply because the market demanded it. The only shady thing here is IF the raises are true with no outside factor other than gender. Likely, he knows the kid and is displaying favoritism (and the budget is controller so he's screwing her to give him raises). She can sue, but unless he's done this to others, then idk if you can prove anything. She needs to quit without notice.

If everyone could just pay them less, then corporations would just hire mostly women to save all that money lol.
You just said there is no systemic gap, but then gave reasons for a systemic gap and called it the 'normal hiring process'.
Posted on Reply
#62
TheGuruStud
danbert2000What if they also had bias while hiring? Then they would be preferring men even though they could pay women less. I had my boss tell me to pass on a woman, who he probably could have paid less because that is the way the world works even though you are certain otherwise, because he was hoping "someone better" would come along. We ended up hiring a worse man. Usually the person deciding pay is different than the person deciding on hiring, as well, at least in corporate America.

Your argument is full of logic holes. Do you even work with other people in an office environment? It's all over the place so I'm assuming you just like to accrue the benefits and ignore the cause.

What arrogance to say "it's been proven" too. It clearly hasn't been proven. And you can send me all the fringe YouTube videos you want, gender bias in hiring and pay is something I see constantly even though my company tries to lead the way in leveling that shit out.
You think it only works against women? Are you insane? You know what they do where I work? They're all SJWs in upper management. If you're a foreigner, minority, woman, or gay, then you have priority when being hired. Combine any of those together and you're guaranteed to be hired. They brag about their "diversity" as if that makes a good employee. Get off your bullshit bandwagon. Yeah, you can't eradicate biases, but to say that women are paid less across the board (at 23% no less LOL) as SJWs believe is just bullshit.

And wrong, statistics are where I got my statements from. Here, I'll let a fellow asshole say it:
phanbueyYou just said there is no systemic gap, but then gave reasons for a systemic gap and called it the 'normal hiring process'.
You are dense AF. I said nothing of the sort. New people often get paid more and WHO YOU KNOW counts more than ANYTHING.
Posted on Reply
#63
buggalugs
This reminds me of "pay equity" in Tennis. Women now earn the same prize money as men........the thing is, men play 5 sets and women play 3 sets.

Men play for almost twice as long as the women, so in reality women have a privilege of getting paid the same for half as much work.
Posted on Reply
#64
danbert2000
TheGuruStudYou think it only works against women? Are you insane? You know what they do where I work? They're all SJWs in upper management. If you're a foreigner, minority, woman, or gay, then you have priority when being hired. Combine any of those together and you're guaranteed to be hired. They brag about their "diversity" as if that makes a good employee. Get off your bullshit bandwagon. Yeah, you can't eradicate biases, but to say that women are paid less across the board (at 23% no less LOL) as SJWs believe is just bullshit.

And wrong, statistics are where I got my statements from. Here, I'll let a fellow asshole say it:



You are dense AF. I said nothing of the sort. New people often get paid more and WHO YOU KNOW counts more than ANYTHING.
I'm sorry, that is complete bullshit. Most upper management votes Republican for their unsustainable tax cuts. No serious person uses the term SJW when they're talking about Fortune 50 upper management. You are off in your own land now and I am telling you, here in my world, pay gaps are real, bias in hiring is real. You should come visit sometime.
Posted on Reply
#65
mtcn77
danbert2000I'm sorry, that is complete bullshit. Most upper management votes Republican for their unsustainable tax cuts. No serious person uses the term SJW when they're talking about Fortune 50 upper management. You are off in your own land now and I am telling you, here in my world, pay gaps are real, bias in hiring is real. You should come visit sometime.
No wonder, Trump is a Randist.
Posted on Reply
#66
TheoneandonlyMrK
BeertintedgogglesFunny, I didn't put any statistics in that comment at all but go ahead and start an opinionated argument such as yours with a false base of "facts / more complex view of the world". Plenty of studies have also shown that taking many sick days does the opposite of what you say and actually is detrimental to the company whether it be from reduced production or from resentment from fellow employees. See, I can make points without citing the actual studies as well. Lets up the ante a little now, throw in some affirmative action in the hiring bias and now you still want to act like there's this invisible force keeping down other genders and races? Sorry, but if that behavior really was rampant in this day and age of instant internet fame, it would be plastered everywhere and there would be an abundance of instances to cite instead of opinions.
That's blind of the bias individuals have, individuals make the choices based on their assumptions and opinions it's always going to end bad for someone like males from here on in if companies only hire women for the next few years , which obviously won't happen but it will a bit.
Posted on Reply
#67
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
BeertintedgogglesThere is no patriarchy keeping women down, they do that just fine themselves.
There is extensive evidence available that in most corporations as well as smaller businesses that a man and a woman who both hold the same job title and have the same skills, the man will nearly always be paid more. The gender gap is real.

Try approaching this from a selfish standpoint. Don’t you (if you have one), want your wife to make as much as a man with the same job title? That’s more money for your household.

My better half has a great job and makes very good money, which she negotiated well for (despite one person here who claimed women don’t negotiate salaries). She is paid for being smart and successful. No way does that extra money in our household bother me.
Posted on Reply
#68
Prince Valiant
I wish people would post statistics if they're going to make claims about them.
Posted on Reply
#69
Assimilator
So my post calling out people for being terrible gets deleted, but the misogynistic, unsourced rubbish posted by the same people gets left up? (No, Jordan Peterson's drivel doesn't count as "evidence", nor do your rambling anecdotes about how the two women you know are terrible people. Perhaps they're terrible because you are.)

Shameful, absolutely shameful. @W1zzard is this really the type of forum you want to operate?
Posted on Reply
#70
Nkd
Pay gap is real. I have already stated this. AT&T doesn’t want people talking about pay. But we do because we give a damn about one another. Even the new guys tell me it’s bullshit. And they feel bad how I have been working in the same position for 4 years is making less. Only because I was an existing employee when I transferred in to that position.

Now here is the thing if I quit and go work for another company for a year and come back I can skip a few spots and my management will hire me back at much higher rate lol. It’s the upper leadership that fails and the HR department. Our managers don’t even blame us if we quit and leave. They actually support us lol.
Posted on Reply
#71
phanbuey
AssimilatorSo my post calling out people for being terrible gets deleted, but the misogynistic, unsourced rubbish posted by the same people gets left up? (No, Jordan Peterson's drivel doesn't count as "evidence", nor do your rambling anecdotes about how the two women you know are terrible people. Perhaps they're terrible because you are.)

Shameful, absolutely shameful. @W1zzard is this really the type of forum you want to operate?
Mine got deleted too, but whatever, no biggie.

Probably just a right leaning mod doing their best to keep it civil.

I like JBP's stuff, he doesn't deny that there is a gender gap, he just notes that the gap is not purely Gender based (which is true, it's not JUST that they are women but everything else that is brought with that, personality types, negotiating skills etc.). I honestly don't see him as far right, more center probably -- He would most likely support an impartial compensation system if i was to guess.

This the pay gap is very analogous to buying cars. There was a time when you were a woman if you went by yourself to purchase a car or even get it repaired you were at a high risk of getting absolutely fleeced (still are in some areas). Overall guys were better because they generally knew more about cars and were bigger a-holes when haggling. And because of that women would always take a guy relative/friend/significant other for backup.

Salaries are similar in that regard, that if you give women training/tools to deal with the situation optimally there wouldn't really be a gap. It's not that car dealerships were gender biased, it's that they took advantage where they could, and that fell out along gender lines as a side effect. That didn't make the gap any less real, however, and the new haggle-free apps and price lookup tools were excellent in addressing this.
Posted on Reply
#72
Easo
If this truly is the same pay for the same position and experience, I am glad.
P.S.
But yeah, I knew what the comments would be like just by seeing the news title. The usual suspects crawled out of the woodwork, as expected.
It indeed is impossible to change the thinking in just a few decades after centuries of "traditions".
Posted on Reply
#73
Eric3988
Does this include all 9000 genders or just "men and women", because if not REEEEEEE!!!
Posted on Reply
#74
diatribe
NkdPay gap is real. ... And they feel bad how I have been working in the same position for 4 years is making less.
What you are describing is salary compression. It's not the same thing a gender pay equality. Market forces drive supply and demand of job positions. The good news for you is that you have the opportunity to make more money. You just have to leave your current employer.
Posted on Reply
#75
lexluthermiester
Wow, the snowflaking is strong with this thread!

Folks, regardless of your feelings for Intel, any improvement towards wage equality is good progress. Now lets focus on Samsung, Microsoft, Apple, Google, AMD, NVidia, Sony, Qualcom and all of the other major tech companies who have yet to enact competent wage equality in any serious fashion.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 21:04 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts