Friday, October 11th 2019

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare System Requirements Revealed

Ahead of its October 25 release, NVIDIA got hold of the system requirements for "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare," the month's hottest AAA release. NVIDIA is an extensive technical partner for the game's development, and the game is expected to feature NVIDIA RTX real-time ray-tracing at launch, along with support for NVIDIA Highlights and Ansel, although there's no mention of DLSS from NVIDIA. The game supports Windows 7, and isn't restricted to Windows 10. It calls for a whopping 175 GB of disk space. The bare minimum system requirements for a 1080p experience includes 8 GB of RAM, Intel Core i3-4130 or AMD FX-6300 processors, and GeForce GTX 670 or current-gen GTX 1650 graphics.

The recommended system requirements for 1080p 60 FPS without ray-tracing are Core i5-2500K or Ryzen 5 1600X processor, 12 GB of RAM, and either GTX 970 or current-gen GTX 1660 graphics. For 1080p 60 FPS with ray-tracing, the requirements climb up to RTX 2060 graphics. At the same resolution with 144 FPS frame-rate, "High" preset, and "competitive" performance that won't let you down in an online MP situation, you'll need at least a GeForce RTX 2070 Super, 16 GB of system RAM, and either Core i7-8700K or Ryzen 7 1800X processor. For 4K 60 FPS with ray-tracing, a high-end experience, you'll need at least an RTX 2080 Super graphics card, and either Core i7-9700K or Ryzen 7 2700X processor. The NVIDIA article doesn't mention AMD Radeon graphics cards. In the absence of ray-tracing, you can probably use an RX 590 for 1080p 60 FPS, RX 5700 for 1080p 144 FPS or 1440p 60 FPS.
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Call of Duty: Modern Warfare System Requirements Revealed

#26
Mescalamba
Competitive gaming = looks like crap and runs fast. Anyone taking this seriously will have game like that at 144 FPS with even lower HW than needed. I know my original MW didnt look nice, but it did run really fast. :D
Posted on Reply
#27
Agent_D
Ferrum MasterBasically where I said anything else. The high FPS needs the 9700k not the 4K one.
You're right, I misread the original; sorry about that!
Posted on Reply
#29
TheLostSwede
News Editor
FranciscoCLThe "Raytracing" variable is irrelevant to CPU requirements, that's why CPU don't change between 1080p60 with or without Raytracing.
However, 1080p144 is a more demanding task for CPU than 4k60 (with or without Raytracing), and it is curious that they recommend better CPUs for the latter.

That's why I agree with this post:
You clearly didn't play the beta...
Posted on Reply
#30
Renald
Patch day One : probably 60GB ... prepare not to play it Day one :D
Seriously, 175GB is pure madness
Posted on Reply
#31
Vayra86
Here is a tip, just avoid this junk. Saves you 175GB
Posted on Reply
#32
holyprof
JismBig textures is being overruled by both AMD and NVidia for applying texture compression to save on bandwidth happening within the memory bus. Nvidia does apply it a bit more stronger then AMD, but still. 175GB for a game is extreme dude. I recall having a PS4 being hooked to a 10/1mbit adsl line, since the area did'nt had any better. But it was a pain in the ass to even download a 5GB update. Imagine a 175GB for people over a 10mbit line lol.

But still; you dont tell me that the package of 175GB cannot be smaller. I think it's just alot of bloat inside a package.
I have the same problem. Using 20/1 Mbps ADSL (the best I can get where I live, there is 1Gbps fiber on the next street but my provider cba to extend the cables). After buying new Ryzen PC, i had to reinstall all games (20 steam games + WoW, StarCraft2, Heroes of The Storm + League of Legends). Took me 5 days 24h /day to finish :cry:. Now imagine i had 20 x 175GB games. No I couldn't, my poor 1GB SSD would explode :p
Posted on Reply
#33
64K
@jmcslob is right Activision has clarified that the 175 GB requirement is for the game and future DLC. I don't know how large the game itself will be. I have read that Red Dead Redemption 2 will require 150 GB of storage space.
Posted on Reply
#34
Th3pwn3r
Isn't this supposed to have a good single player? It came with my 2080ti but I haven't even tried to play it yet. I might not even have the storage space to run the game...it's getting to the point of where these games need to come pre-loaded on an external SSD with how much F'ing space they take up :( Shadow Of War took 90gb years ago and I thought that was crazy but to me it was worth it, this game...I don't know if it is.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 18th, 2024 03:20 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts