Friday, July 23rd 2021
Valve Claims Steam Deck Can Run Entire Steam Library Within Performance Target
Valve has recently stated in a recent interview with IGN that they haven't encountered a single Steam game that could not run on the Steam Deck at their performance target. The performance target set by Valve is 30 FPS at the device's native resolution of 1,280 x 800 and according to Valve developers, this was achieved with new and old titles. The Steam Deck is powered by a custom AMD quad-core Zen2 SoC with RDNA2 graphics which is paired with 16 GB of LPDDR5 memory.
Source:
Valve (via IGN)
ValveAll the games we wanted to be playable, it's really the whole Steam library there. We haven't really found something that this device couldn't handle yet,
119 Comments on Valve Claims Steam Deck Can Run Entire Steam Library Within Performance Target
DP 1.4 is the superior spec, and supports higher resolutions at higher framerates. THAT's why it was listed instead of HDMI. Moreover, it's targeted at PC gamers, who overwhelmingly use monitors instead of TVs that lack DP inputs.
Bottom line, you're speculating hard. Don't spread your speculation as fact.
(edit for the trolls: and every time they've had to edit it, it's because the true spec was better)
I think it supports hdmi hubs but no proof on that.
As for OP I would be fine with 90%, shrug hopefully they're right.
And from actual statements from Valve any USB-C dock will work and the deck can output over 4K
I tried games on my phone once...until my eyeballs felt like they were going to fall out. I get a headache just looking at that thing.
I am really hoping someone tries to copy and improve the steam deck. It isnt hard to imagine Epic porting SteamOS and putting it on next gen hardware in a similar handheld device.
And that's with a 4500U having a Vega 6, the steam deck will have higher GPU frequencies, higher CU count, considerably better IPC from RDNA, higher memory bandwidth and etc etc. It should really run it considerably better than the 4500U.
I think that people are too skeptical about the performance when Renoir already does it with a worse iGPU. Plus, you can probably tweak stuff to make it run better, AMD always overvolts their chips.
what are the full specs??
USB-C > adapter > HDMI is good because it's not just an HDMI port - you can do so much more with it.
Mini HDMI > adapter > HDMI is audio/video only - If you need USB as well, then it's just another port adding to cost and adding another dirt/dust ingress point.
Although you didn't mention it, MicroHDMI is a fragile abomination that should never have existed. Managing a fleet of corporate laptops for two decades, I can say for sure that even careful users will wear them out and break them, their cables, or both. It's too small to be a reliable connector.
That is why there even are windows native games that run faster on Linux. (although, that happens rarely)
To my knowledge perf is roughly in the same ballpark most of the time.