Tuesday, November 2nd 2021
G.SKILL Showcases DDR5-7000 CL40 Extreme Speed Memory
G.SKILL International Enterprise Co., Ltd., the world's leading manufacturer of extreme performance memory and gaming peripherals, is thrilled to announce the achievement of DDR5-7000 CL40-40-40-76 32 GB (2x16 GB) extreme speed, passing the Memtest stability test. 7000MT/s memory speed is an exciting milestone, as it was only seen under liquid nitrogen sub-zero temperature cooling not long ago in overclocking records. Accomplished with high-performance Samsung DDR5 components, this extreme speed memory is truly worthy of the G.SKILL flagship Trident Z5 family classification.
G.SKILL has been dedicated to develop the fastest possible DDR5 memory on the latest 12th Gen Intel Core desktop processors and Intel Z690 chipset motherboards. Today, G.SKILL is proud to announce the feat of reaching DDR5-7000 extreme speed, while maintaining an ultra-low CAS latency timing of CL40-40-40-76. The memory modules that reached this monumental achievement is built with high-performance Samsung DDR5 components, and has shown to be stable under Memtest. Please refer to the screenshot below.
"We are seeing amazing overclocking potential of DDR5 memory on the latest 12th Gen Intel Core desktop processors and Intel Z690 chipset motherboards," says Tequila Huang, Corporate Vice President of G.SKILL International. "DDR5-7000 is an incredible milestone for us, and we will continue to work with our industry partners to develop ever-faster DDR5 memory for PC enthusiasts and overclockers."
DDR5-6666 CL40 - Fastest on Intel XMP 3.0 List
Following in the footsteps of extreme-performance memory kits, the G.SKILL DDR5-6666 CL40 memory kit is currently the fastest memory kit on the Intel XMP 3.0 memory list. To view the list, please refer to this page.
G.SKILL has been dedicated to develop the fastest possible DDR5 memory on the latest 12th Gen Intel Core desktop processors and Intel Z690 chipset motherboards. Today, G.SKILL is proud to announce the feat of reaching DDR5-7000 extreme speed, while maintaining an ultra-low CAS latency timing of CL40-40-40-76. The memory modules that reached this monumental achievement is built with high-performance Samsung DDR5 components, and has shown to be stable under Memtest. Please refer to the screenshot below.
DDR5-6666 CL40 - Fastest on Intel XMP 3.0 List
Following in the footsteps of extreme-performance memory kits, the G.SKILL DDR5-6666 CL40 memory kit is currently the fastest memory kit on the Intel XMP 3.0 memory list. To view the list, please refer to this page.
45 Comments on G.SKILL Showcases DDR5-7000 CL40 Extreme Speed Memory
Hmmm, there seem to have been at least a couple after all:
DDR3 and DDR4 on one Motherboard? | OC3D News (overclock3d.net)
ASRock > B150M Combo-G
To give an example, framechasers (youtube) did some tests and got the below on a 10900K. the difference between DDR4-4400 with a ring of 40 vs a ring of 50 is 9% or 18fps but it only lowers latency 2.8 ns or about 6%. Now this is not the same as the memory latency discussed, this is total. Total is what we don't yet know.
I can't imagine a world where that thing doesn't just randomly lock up.
Gen 1 DDR5 vs the fastest DDR4 is not going to win... that's like comparing DDR4 2133 CL15 to the fastest DDR3 kits - it will get smoked. It's going to be at least few months until worthwhile DDR5 kits are available.
But notice how well it performs in gaming :
I really don't know on DDR5vsDDR4. I was around for DDR3->DDR4 and earlier transitions and yeah that's how it's always been. But for someone on say DDR4-3200 CL16 or some such, baseline DDR4-4800 (JEDEC) may very well be faster. We didn't get that heavy a MT/s bump when we went from DDR3-1600 to DDR4-1866/2133. I mean technically there is a DDR3-2133 JEDEC standard.
ofc the assumption here is that one is ok with spending an extra 100-200 on RAM if they are going DDR5 too.
So yeah, I would say Warzone should really be used as a benchmark.
Plus, that´s not the only game where 10900k completly smokes any other chip. Idk if you tried Halo Infinite Multiplayer Beta, but 10900k again dominated the charts and 5950x stood no chance. Won´t even mention 5800x or 5600x. Same happens in Escape From Tarkov or literally any other big map/world online game. 10900k is too good, it will be a 10 year chip just like sandy bridge. 10 cores on a single die and ability to use very fast ram in gear 1 is too good, no competition.
I am sure Alder Lake will beat 10900k on every console Port single player game or stuff like that, just like Zen 3 does. But in massive multiplayer games where latency is everything we all know 10900k will keep dominating. No chance for Alder Lake, not with this memory config.
Three more hours...
I'm really excited for Alder Lake though.
But for freaking Tomb Raider or Day´s Gone? Dude I literally lock all of that stuff at 60fps, try to use as much resolution and detail as possible and just have fun. Single Player gamers are the happiest ones. They can literallly get an i3 10100F, pair it with baseline 3200mhz ram and run every game at 60fps. For 80€, passive or 400rpm inaudible cooling and 30 watts while gaming :|
And this is proven by using a proper calculator like this one:
notkyon.moe/ram-latency.htm
On topic, those sticks should be CL32 at least, while ultra-low latency should be called anything bellow that value.
Anything above 10ns is junk, while good RAMs are the ones within 9nm or lower latencies.
Guess we need to wait for the 13rd Intel Core generation until we can get those.... Sadly.
My PC3600 timings are 14-14-14-34 = 14/3600 * 2000 = 7.78ns Ram is OLOY Blade PC4000 down clocked to PC 3600.
OLOY PC4000 timings are 15-15-15-36 14/4000 * 200 = 7.5ns
You could see why I clocked down. It was to use less voltage and pretty much get the same performance. This is also why I generally get the best RAM if I can get it on sale. Because my G.Skill is still a viable option for my Ryzen CPU's.