Monday, April 25th 2022

Intel "Arctic Sound M" Enterprise Accelerator Shown Encoding AV1 Video

Intel showed off the video encode acceleration capabilities of its upcoming Data Center GPU codenamed "Arctic Sound M," which features AV1 video encode hardware-acceleration. Intel has been pushing for AV1 to be adopted as the streaming video standard for some years now, as it offers comparable bitrate savings and quality to H.265, but is royalty free, resulting in tens of millions of Dollars of royalty savings for streaming content providers such as Netflix, as well as consumer electronics manufacturers, particularly smart TV makers.

Intel's accelerator is a single-slot, full-height add-on card with a PCI-Express x16 interface. It relies on rack airflow for cooling, and features a metal-channel heatsink. Power is drawn from a single 8-pin PCIe power connector. There are no encoding performance numbers put out, except the 30% bitrate savings AV1 offers compared to the current industry standard, H.264. This 30% saving adds up in a big way for a streaming content provider.
Intel's video presentation follows.

Add your own comment

7 Comments on Intel "Arctic Sound M" Enterprise Accelerator Shown Encoding AV1 Video

#1
ModEl4
Sure 30% reduction in file size is fine and dandy but it's too heavy without dedicated acceleration, i hope YouTube to delay the AV1 adoption as far as it can be
Posted on Reply
#2
Steevo
I notice it says 2 of the GPU's on the test setup.

Its a fair trade off in quality, the H264 looks washed out in some areas, the AV1 looks more blurry in some.
Posted on Reply
#3
windwhirl
ModEl4Sure 30% reduction in file size is fine and dandy but it's too heavy without dedicated acceleration, i hope YouTube to delay the AV1 adoption as far as it can be
It's already done. Youtube just chooses to send you a VP9 stream or any other type according to whatever your browser is.
Posted on Reply
#4
ModEl4
windwhirlIt's already done. Youtube just chooses to send you a VP9 stream or any other type according to whatever your browser is.
Isn't AV1 internal YouTube encoding be dependent on the resolution, the views and the age of the video (when uploaded, I'm not talking for new content only)?
Sometime in the future for new content it may not stream VP9 for 4K resolution depending also on the view count making AV1 accelerated capable hardware a necessity in essence.
I don't know just asking, I haven't seen a roadmap regarding future YouTube requirements regarding AV1 acceleration.
Posted on Reply
#5
noel_fs
wasnt av1 supposed to be more efficient than 265? why are the even comparing it to 264? 30% is already done by 265?
Posted on Reply
#6
windwhirl
ModEl4Isn't AV1 internal YouTube encoding be dependent on the resolution, the views and the age of the video (when uploaded, I'm not talking for new content only)?
Sometime in the future for new content it may not stream VP9 for 4K resolution depending also on the view count making AV1 accelerated capable hardware a necessity in essence.
I don't know just asking, I haven't seen a roadmap regarding future YouTube requirements regarding AV1 acceleration.
They've been rolling it out slowly. Originally only available for very select UHD content and later for low-res videos (up to 480p). However, it's now more common (though not all content is available in AV1)
noel_fswasnt av1 supposed to be more efficient than 265? why are the even comparing it to 264? 30% is already done by 265?
I don't think that was the purpose, beating H265 I mean. The whole point of AV1 is being royalty free and doing away with closed standards. Besides, HEVC never really took off as H264 did (licensing being one of the reasons why).

Though, that aside, AV1 has been shown to beat H265 by a small margin (10-20%) in terms of compression efficiency in some tests.
www.cambridge.org/core/journals/apsipa-transactions-on-signal-and-information-processing/article/compression-efficiency-analysis-of-av1-vvc-and-hevc-for-random-access-applications/D2345DDC3750055AB0AA3D24FCF743BE
Posted on Reply
#7
Vya Domus
These comparisons are always hilarious because you can easily pick and choose videos that make it seem more impressive than it actually is at large, not to mention that once you turn everything into a JPEG it all looks the same anyway.
Posted on Reply
Apr 23rd, 2024 21:00 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts