Wednesday, October 18th 2023

Gigabyte Expands its Range of White Motherboards with Two AMD B650 Models

Just over a month ago, Gigabyte launched a pair of white motherboards for Intel CPUs and now the company has quietly released a pair of white models for AMD CPUs. The two models are the B650 AORUS Elite AX Ice and the B650M AORUS Elite AX Ice, the main difference being the form factor, as the latter is a microATX board. Besides the white PCB, all of the heatsinks are silver/white in colour, although all the connectors on the boards are black, just as with the Intel boards. The rear I/O shield has also been given the white treatment to better fit into a white case.

However, the Ice boards are not identical in terms of specs to their older siblings, as Gigabyte has done a few minor changes that aren't noticeable at first look. Gigabyte has shifted away from using MTK/AMD and Intel WiFi cards and is now using the Realtek RTL8852CE on these new boards. We should mention that Gigabyte are using the RTL8852CE on later revisions of the black versions as well. It's currently unknown when these new boards will be available and how much they'll retail for.
Sources: B650 AORUS Elite AX Ice, B650M AORUS Elite AX Ice, via @momomo_us on X/Twitter
Add your own comment

28 Comments on Gigabyte Expands its Range of White Motherboards with Two AMD B650 Models

#26
TheLostSwede
News Editor
bugAgreed, with a couple of observations.
1. Thunderbolt may be independent of USB-C, but reusing the connector instead of inventing a new one seems like a good move.
So why complain about it?
bug2. Do you honestly think that "clearly labeled" helps? Most of the time that port is close to the floor, facing the wall, good luck reading that label ;)
Well, put your PC on your desk, or label your cables...
bugWhat I think it would be acceptable it would be at one USB-C port at the front of the case that supports everything that USB-C does (perhaps not Thunderbolt), one port at the back supporting everything and at least a couple more USB-C port at the back supporting USB 3.2 2x2 transfer speeds. I, for one, would pay more for that if that saves me from managing adapters and USB-C to USB-A cables.
Problem with case connectors is that you've already lost 30 cm of cable length, so if you plan on plugging things in here with a cable, you might get slower than expected data speeds, as the host controller will decided that the cable is too long and throttle you back to 5 Gbps speeds.

Also, define everything. I doubt any single USB-C port out there supports "everything" since USB-C has some rather weird modes that haven't been widely implemented, such as that VR thingie that some graphics cards had and the analogue audio mode for example. Intel's Thunderbolt chips don't support USB speeds faster than 10 Gbps btw.
bugAlso, yeah, USB 2.0 on phones hurts big time. It's faster to upload your files to the cloud and download them from there to your PC than it is to transfer them via USB :(
The amazing thing here is that the phone SoC often supports USB 3.0 or even faster speeds, but the device makers don't bother adding the extra 50 cents of hardware to make it work.
Posted on Reply
#27
bug
TheLostSwedeSo why complain about it?
Not complaining about it, just wishing we'd see it actually implemented. Even if on the high-end and maybe a couple of more expensive mid-range mobos.
TheLostSwedeWell, put your PC on your desk, or label your cables...
Not an option, with a couple of monitors already there.
TheLostSwedeProblem with case connectors is that you've already lost 30 cm of cable length, so if you plan on plugging things in here with a cable, you might get slower than expected data speeds, as the host controller will decided that the cable is too long and throttle you back to 5 Gbps speeds.
If PD still works, I'm good. It's so convenient having a handy port that you can plug your phone into...
TheLostSwedeAlso, define everything. I doubt any single USB-C port out there supports "everything" since USB-C has some rather weird modes that haven't been widely implemented, such as that VR thingie that some graphics cards had and the analogue audio mode for example. Intel's Thunderbolt chips don't support USB speeds faster than 10 Gbps btw.
Good point, I didn't mean the exotic stuff. I meant full speed USB, Thunderbolt and USB-PD.
TheLostSwedeThe amazing thing here is that the phone SoC often supports USB 3.0 or even faster speeds, but the device makers don't bother adding the extra 50 cents of hardware to make it work.
I have a hunch this has to do with pushing users towards storing their stuff in the cloud. Or it's just me being paranoid. Either way, really, really petty when you charge $500+ for the phone.
Posted on Reply
#28
TheLostSwede
News Editor
bugNot an option, with a couple of monitors already there.
You can still label the cables, no?
bugIf PD still works, I'm good. It's so convenient having a handy port that you can plug your phone into...
Very few boards have front PD support so far.
bugGood point, I didn't mean the exotic stuff. I meant full speed USB, Thunderbolt and USB-PD.
You mean PCIe data tunneling over USB4? Forget about Thunderbolt, Intel has too many restrictions there.
Again, the cable length limit is very strict. The only way that this might work on a front case connector is if a redriver/retimer is added right next to the case connector. Maybe in the future, but right now, no-one is doing that due to extra cost.
bugI have a hunch this has to do with pushing users towards storing their stuff in the cloud. Or it's just me being paranoid. Either way, really, really petty when you charge $500+ for the phone.
Yet the Pixel phones support USB 3.0 or faster data speeds over the connector, but no DP Alt mode...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 21st, 2024 15:21 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts