Friday, February 23rd 2024

AMD Ryzen 7 8700GE Engineering Sample Compared to Standard 8700G APU

Last week, AMD's Ryzen 8000GE desktop APU lineup appeared online—four lower power (TDP of 35 W) SKUs are set to join the already released 65 W TDP AM5 "Hawk Point" family. GucksTV has acquired a flagship 8000GE model, albeit in engineering sample form—a Hong Kong-based Ebay Store lists "AMD Ryzen 7 8700GE ES Tray" processors. At the time of writing only one unit remains in stock, priced at $298.99 with the option for free international delivery. The "hugohk" shop appears to specialize in supplying all sorts of Team Red engineering sample CPUs. GucksTV's German language video review pitches the Ryzen 7 8700GE engineering sample against the finalized retail release Ryzen 7 8700 APU.

AMD has not made any official release date announcements regarding the leaked Ryzen 8000GE range, but VideoCardz believes that "expectations are high that these variants will hit the market soon through system integrators." The GucksTV comparison video shows that: "On average, the single-core of 8700GE performance drops by 5%, while multi-core is 17% below 8700G. For graphics, that's a 23% average drop in performance while requiring 52% less power." The reviewer noted that his engineering sample was not allowing access to memory OC profiles, until a motherboard BIOS update was implemented (most likely via Beta firmware)—granting 6400 MT/s instead of the normal JEDEC rate of 5200 MT/s. The test platform utilized an ASRock A620I Lightning WiFi Mini-ITX mainboard—finalized Ryzen 7 8700GE APUs could be ideal candidates for usage in quiet/low temperature compact form factor systems.
Here is the GucksTV review video:


VideoCardz has kindly extracted relevant moments from review footage:
They also spent a chunk of time compiling said results into a comparison table:
Sources: Ebay Store - hugohk, VideoCardz
Add your own comment

3 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 8700GE Engineering Sample Compared to Standard 8700G APU

#1
Minus Infinity
Why do we need a separate power limited product when a BIOS that allows one to set the TDP would be much more preferable.
Posted on Reply
#2
sLowEnd
Minus InfinityWhy do we need a separate power limited product when a BIOS that allows one to set the TDP would be much more preferable.
These "E" chips (and Intel's low power "T" chips) typically end up in prebuilts, which often have locked-down BIOSes
Posted on Reply
#3
Minus Infinity
sLowEndThese "E" chips (and Intel's low power "T" chips) typically end up in prebuilts, which often have locked-down BIOSes
Fair enough, but why don't they tune the BIOS do a locked down lower power limit?
Posted on Reply
Apr 29th, 2024 08:20 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts