Thursday, August 20th 2026

GTA VI Leaks Seemingly Cost Take-Two $2 Billion in Value

Over the course of the week of August 17, there have been several leaks purporting to show in-game content from recent builds of GTA VI from a leaker who claims to have actual hands-on access to a pre-release version of the game. According to Yahoo! Finance data, following the leaks, Take-Two's share price fell by roughly $15.29 per share compared to the Monday before the first leaks—this translated to a loss of $2.83 billion in market cap or a 2.54% loss in value over the course of the five days prior to publishing.

Take-Two has been working hard to take down the leaked content using DMCA notices, which includes videos showing NPC interactions, the full game map, and videos depicting actual gameplay and in-game mechanics in the pre-release build. Curiously, the leaker, Cyberleek, is reportedly targeting what they call anti-consumerism on the part of Rockstar and game publishers in general, with three commandments on the Cyberleek site demanding an end to digital pre-orders and "fake single-player DLC, as well as the preservation of single-player content.
While it's difficult to be 100% certain these leaks are genuine, the reaction from Take-Two Interactive lends credence to the leaker's claims, and the most recent batches of leaks showing gameplay appear to prove that the leaker has access to a playable build of the game, again suggesting authenticity.

Cyberleek's full manifesto reads:
CYBERLEEK was born in the networks. It has seen what gaming can be at its best, and it has watched what the industry did to it. Slowly. Methodically. One monetization scheme at a time.

Publishers sell licenses and call them purchases. They ship unfinished games and call them living services. They lock content on discs and call it DLC. They kill games and keep the money. Every year anti-consumerism tightens its grip, and every year gamers get less for what they pay.

To fight this war, CYBERLEEK is raising funds for a secret project. The specifics cannot be revealed yet; showing the cards to the big corporations would only give them time to build their defenses. Let it be absolutely clear: this is not a cash grab. Funding is directed toward the infrastructure needed to strike, as well as the security and protection required to withstand the inevitable corporate counterattacks.

CYBERLEEK has been patient. That patience is over. What follows are three commandments. If CYBERLEEK targets a publisher, it is because that publisher broke one. CYBERLEEK will not stop until they issue a public statement and apology with a concrete commitment to be better. Words are not enough; restitution is mandatory.

Commandment I: Thou Shalt Not Sell Digital Preorders

No consumer shall pay for a game through digital storefronts before release and independent review. Physical preorders for tangible media remain permitted.

Preorders were not created for gamers. They were created because physical discs had manufacturing limits. In digital distribution, there is no inventory. There is no stock shortage. A digital copy cannot sell out. Yet publishers kept the preorder system and stripped away its only consumer benefit. Now gamers pay early and receive nothing in return except a countdown timer and a cosmetic skin.

If publishers want revenue before launch, they can press discs. Print boxes. Put them on shelves. Earn that money through physical production.

Commandment II: Thou Shalt Not Sell Fake Single-Player DLC

No publisher shall sell access to single-player content already present in the base game files the consumer purchased. This means no unlock keys, no 1 MB placeholder files, no toggling a variable from locked to unlocked for content already on the disc or in the download.

When someone pays USD 70+ for a game, they bought the data. All of it. Selling them a file that flips locked = true to locked = false for a single-player mission, character, weapon, or story chapter is charging them twice for the same product.

Commandment III: Thou Shalt Preserve Single-Player Content

Any game featuring single-player content must include an offline fallback state. When server support ends, the publisher must release a final patch that unlocks all single-player content for local, indefinite play.

The Crew had a single-player campaign. People paid full price. Then Ubisoft shut down the servers and the entire game died—including the solo content. No refund. No patch. No alternative. Single-player content depends on one thing: the hardware the consumer already owns. Bricking it when servers go down is theft.

Final Word

These three commandments are the floor—not the ceiling—of what is acceptable. If publishers violate them, they will be targeted. CYBERLEEK will continue to disrupt their operations until they issue a public statement and apology with a concrete commitment to fix the harm they caused. No private negotiations. No quiet settlements. The public sees it, or the "leeks" do not stop.

Publishers should beware. If CYBERLEEK can reach Rockstar, no one is safe. This is a message to all big corpo: behave, or be the next target.

This is the CYBERLEEK Edict, and it is non-negotiable.
Sources: Cyberleek, Insider Gaming, Yahoo! Finances
Add your own comment

52 Comments on GTA VI Leaks Seemingly Cost Take-Two $2 Billion in Value

#27
Thunderslat
BigshrimpYou are absolutely accurate in your observations there. Most execs are in delululand and literally hate having no control over how their product gets leaked, so they act out like most execs do when it happens, feign that the leak was so bad that their company might go under, rofl. How do they even come up with the number of $2.83 billion in damages? It's bonkers... Like others have said, it's just market manipulation so they can take advantage of stock buybacks when it dips. Their stock value will go right back up soon enough, just watch. Simply unfettered greed, that's all it is.

I know I won't be buying GTA VI as I am boycotting all of the anti-consumer companies out there.

In other related GTA VI news, the U.S. Army in the state of Georgia is trying to get their enlisted to re-enlist by rewarding them with a 4-day pass to play GTA VI when it's released. Not even a full copy, just a 4-day pass, haha. Seriously...
Got a link? Because that sounds absurd. I'd love to see a site/cite though so I could so others how stupid that is.
Posted on Reply
#28
kondamin
Zoom out and you will see it's nothing, they will probably be up next monday.
+70% of trade is done by machines, machines don't care about crap like leaks.
Posted on Reply
#30
RejZoR
So much drama around GTA6 all over the interwebs and I couldn't care less about it.
Posted on Reply
#31
freeagent
lexluthermiesterFirst point, GTA6 is NOT coming to PC until next year, minimum.
Second point, Smart people will not be buying it until it's on sale.

Just throwing it out there..
I'm gonna wait till its on sale, at least 40% unless my kid harasses me. His mom let him play it on my PS5 while I was at work.. he was 4 years old the first time he set a prostitute on fire 😑
Posted on Reply
#32
MTS-C
If they're that afraid of the leak and claiming fake money damages then that should raise alarms about the actual product itself. A lot of people on the net are in firm agreement it's going to be some wokefest slop based on what's been leaked and shared before. The knee jerk reaction kind of says it all, and the real damage would be customers pulling pre-orders based on what they may or may not see of the actual game before release.
Posted on Reply
#33
mechtech
lexluthermiesterTake Two has a WAY overinflated opinion of their value and the "damage" the leaks have done. If anything, the leaks have only done them a service. So either the Take Two exec's are absolutely clueless morons(very possible), they're out of touch with reality or both.
indeed

Not sure of the reasoning for this statement unless it's just to try to appease shareholder or point blame somewhere else??

reminds me of an old quote

"if you're looking for sympathy you can find it in the dictionary, it's somewhere between sh!t and syphilis"
freeagentI'm gonna wait till its on sale, at least 40% unless my kid harasses me. His mom let him play it on my PS5 while I was at work.. he was 4 years old the first time he set a prostitute on fire 😑
Now what was your wife doing letting a 4 year old play GTA?!?!
Posted on Reply
#34
freeagent
mechtechNow what was your wife doing letting a 4 year old play GTA?!?!
She says she didnt know, even to this day. I mean cmon, its only GTA.

To be fair we had a 1.5 year old at the time, she probably fell asleep with him since he was a bit of a cranky boy.
Posted on Reply
#35
mechtech
freeagentShe says she didnt know, even to this day. I mean cmon, its only GTA.

To be fair we had a 1.5 year old at the time, she probably fell asleep with him since he was a bit of a cranky boy.
we've all been there.............kids...................
Posted on Reply
#36
Tomorrow
mrnagant#1 is just silly
If someone wants to preorder digital, why stop them? This is just taking away consumer choice more than anything. I have $70 today. In one month I won't have $70 to spare. Let me go ahead and spend my $70 now so that I know I will have a game to play next month instead of likely spending it on something else. Usually, not all the time, you get like a preorder skin, extra credits or something. The other big thing you get, is the ability to start playing it at midnight or whatever. If I preorder a physical copy that gets delivered, I have to wait until 5PM as that is when the mail man shows up. Or I have to wait until 7AM when Walmart opens so that I can pick it up, spend an hour driving to go get it.
Sometimes people need to be protected from their own stupidity. This is not taking away choice. This is limiting corporate greed (selling a product of unknown quality). So what if you have to wait a few more hours to play it? You've waited 5-10 years for the game to be developed and now you cant wait a few more hours?
mrnagant#3 is incomplete.
The servers were shut down 10 years ago. I just bought this game. Who makes sure it gets updated so that I can solo offline? Solo play should ALWAYS be available offline day 1.
It was just an example. Obviously such changes would apply to new games release not old games proactively.
mrnagantI do like #2. But it likely doesn't take into consideration variations. Games are constantly updated so what data are you actually paying for. I want to keep that bug! I paid for it! Don't remove it with an update! It makes sense though for games that have DLC fully baked into the game and ready to go on day 1. How often does this happen though?
It doesn't matter. Even a fully patched game still has bugs. The point is that there's a playable version on disk. Bugs be damned.
Posted on Reply
#37
Athena
LMAO, yeah, right, that is what cause the drop in stock...


seems to be rebounding now... that is because all the C&D and takedown notices, right? :banghead:
Posted on Reply
#38
Bigshrimp
AthenaLMAO, yeah, right, that is what cause the drop in stock...


seems to be rebounding now... that is because all the C&D and takedown notices, right? :banghead:
Until the next leek, I mean leak, lol. Then, back down it will go until more of the stocks are bought back at a lower price, yet again.
Posted on Reply
#39
zenlessyank
Haven't played Felony Simulator since it was top down which I think was GTA 2.

I guess the fake leak gets the feathers all rustling of the money vultures.
Posted on Reply
#41
JustBenching
lexluthermiesterYou'd likely be surprised how many people won't be doing that.
Games are being resold every time on a new platform. PS6 is around the corner, they will re release it for ps6 and sell like crazy. Just take a look at gta v.
Posted on Reply
#42
lexluthermiester
JustBenchingGames are being resold every time on a new platform. PS6 is around the corner, they will re release it for ps6 and sell like crazy. Just take a look at gta v.
GTA5 was it's own thing. There are no guarantees that GTA6 will garner the same level of success, or even close. Maybe THAT is what the execs are worried about?
Posted on Reply
#43
TheDeeGee
For once i'm totally fine with a hacker group.

The entire AAA industry can crash and burn for all i care, i've long moved to Indie.
Posted on Reply
#44
Grimling
lepudrukThis might just be the beginning. The leaker revealed that he is in possession of the game -- most likely in a developer version. And these are in the... PC version. The biggest blunder would be if he released the PC version before the console version. The producer and the development studio must be on the brink of collapse...
I would not take that to serous.
The leak happened immediately before Rockstar's planned August 27 presentation.
- Rockstar knows GTA VI is the most anticipated game in the world.
- They intentionally "leak" some gameplay.
- The press goes crazy.
- Everyone starts talking about GTA VI.
- Rockstar issues takedowns, making the footage seem authentic.
- People become even more curious.
- August 27 arrives.
- Rockstar releases the official footage.
- Everyone compares the leak with the polished presentation.
- Pre-orders/sales explode.
- Rockstar Wins
That is actually a pretty good marketing strategy
Posted on Reply
#45
lepudruk
GrimlingI would not take that to serous.
The leak happened immediately before Rockstar's planned August 27 presentation.
- Rockstar knows GTA VI is the most anticipated game in the world.
- They intentionally "leak" some gameplay.
- The press goes crazy.
- Everyone starts talking about GTA VI.
- Rockstar issues takedowns, making the footage seem authentic.
- People become even more curious.
- August 27 arrives.
- Rockstar releases the official footage.
- Everyone compares the leak with the polished presentation.
- Pre-orders/sales explode.
- Rockstar Wins
That is actually a pretty good marketing strategy
I'm not saying it won't happen -- I was referring to the PC version, which is still in the planning stages. Moreover, as the market has confirmed many times, people's behavior is unpredictable. The current gaming community has become very picky, and many seemingly minor things can turn them off. Will sales suffer as a result? We can only speculate.
Posted on Reply
#46
Readlight
Back in time Vice City in DVD format cost in local shop. i dont know 2-10 cash, not 100 worthless euro
Posted on Reply
#47
Kohl Baas
CYBERLEEK will continue to disrupt their operations until...
...they all get arrested and thrown in jail...


These things had no merit. Ever... If you want to achieve something real and solid you have to doit legally otherwise it's just a thing of the moment. How do you plan to be a sable constant when you don't have a legal standing? It's like trying to protest against something without letting anyone see you. You just aren't there...

I'm very much interested in GTA6 but I'm in the Mustard Race so while thing leak left and right, release is imminent I have to "wait" and dodge content for about 2 years minimum while a PC-port is released after the next-gen console versions. And no... There will be no actual "wainting" happening, I'll just do my myriad of things until it's released on PC.
Posted on Reply
#48
VoidRunner96
Let3rThey were with the 100 dollar pre orders and digital only. They are launching the industry in a bad direction.
what bad direction? PC long went this direction how long ago, and deluxe $100 edition on some games was a thing for years now. T2 is just following the changing times. We as much don't even "own" the games anymore, even with most physical games there is some form of authentication happening and if it doesn't match, Boom no access.
Posted on Reply
#49
shuffy_losys
VoidRunner96We as much don't even "own" the games anymore, even with most physical games there is some form of authentication happening and if it doesn't match, Boom no access.
I can attest to this. I have several examples of PC games on physical media that are basically worthless because some of them require activation over a storefront (Steam or Origin), isn't even the complete 1.0 game (you have to download the rest after activating it), or used some other online activation method that isn't available anymore.

And even if it's a complete game, I'm pretty sure I own one or two games that use StarForce.
Posted on Reply
#50
VoidRunner96
lexluthermiesterTake Two has a WAY overinflated opinion of their value and the "damage" the leaks have done. If anything, the leaks have only done them a service. So either the Take Two exec's are absolutely clueless morons(very possible), they're out of touch with reality or both.
After GTA 6 launches and the stock sell off happens because the hype is over and they have nothing else exciting (or big) in the portfolio to show, T2 will again blame the leaks for not allowing them to sell MORE..

Im guessing the next big thing to come from them will be announcing the expansion on GTA Online to include said new areas
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 23:20 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts