Wednesday, March 11th 2009

New Company - Caustic Graphics - Breaks Barriers in 3D Graphics

Caustic Graphics, a new 3D computer graphics company, launches today with a fundamental breakthrough in raytracing acceleration that is set to define a new era in professional 3D production and interactive consumer graphics. Raytracing, the gold-standard for creating 3D imagery, duplicates the natural physics of light, creating stunning images by meticulously tracing the path of light to and throughout any given scene.
Caustic's first-generation technology will deliver an average 20X increase in the speed used to create stunning, realistic 3D imagery for film and video, game development, as well as automotive and consumer product design. The second generation of Caustic's technology, due early next year, is expected to gain an additional order of magnitude in performance, offering 200X speed over today's state-of-the-art graphics products. This massive speed jump is due to Caustic's patent-pending raytracing algorithms implemented in a semiconductor design.
The computational complexity of producing cinema-quality, raytraced 3D images involves large, downstream costs, including slow "black box" design iterations and costly "render farm" server infrastructures. These costs are symptoms of a problem with today's computer designs where CPUs and GPUs are efficient at accelerating the rasterized graphics in video games but woefully inefficient at accelerating cinema-quality raytraced graphics. Caustic's forthcoming standards-based CausticRT platform enables highly parallel CPUs and GPUs to massively-accelerate raytracing, putting it on par with rasterization and resulting in cinema-quality 3D delivered interactively on low-cost PCs.

"Real-time raytracing has been the holy grail of computer graphics since 1979 - a dream always on the horizon but never within reach," said Dr. Jon Peddie, of Jon Peddie Research, the computer graphics market research firm in Tiburon, CA. "Demos have been done with 16 or more processors, super computers, and other esoteric devices, but never anything that was within reach of a PC budget. Caustic Graphics has made the breakthrough with a combination of a small hardware accelerator and some very innovative software to be able to deliver real-time, complex, high-resolution raytraced images - this is an amazing accomplishment." The Caustic management team is made up of technical visionaries and graphics experts from Autodesk, Apple, ATI, Intel and NVIDIA. Before starting Caustic, company founders James McCombe, Luke Peterson and Ryan Salsbury worked together at Apple, where McCombe was a lead architect for the company's OpenGL Graphics system and Chief Architect of Apple's rendering algorithms for the iPhone and iPod.

"For years, 3D professionals in multiple industries have labored under the yoke of slow iterations and unwieldy offline render farms," said Caustic Graphics CEO, Ken Daniels. "Caustic puts the power of a render farm, operating at interactive speeds, on every desktop, enabling designers and animators to get from concept to product faster, better and at lower cost." The Caustic product offering will be announced in April 2009.
Source: Caustic Graphics
Add your own comment

68 Comments on New Company - Caustic Graphics - Breaks Barriers in 3D Graphics

#51
IcrushitI
opengl vs directx

It says the the guys worked on opengl while at apple, does this mean their is a slim chance that we can run games without Directx down the road, wouldn't that be super for open source. Or am I going off on a tangent that doesn't exist.:)
Posted on Reply
#52
DRDNA
I want one....probably still going to be very expensive ...... I want ...I want ...I want...video technology is awsome stuff!

rofl ...I am still waiting for ATI to release a Avivo Video Converter that will work on Vista 64 with my graphic cards.....man oh man my x1800xtx and x1950xtx did a nice job of it and I mis it!
Posted on Reply
#53
BOSE
DRDNAI want one....probably still going to be very expensive ...... I want ...I want ...I want...video technology is awsome stuff!

rofl ...I am still waiting for ATI to release a Avivo Video Converter that will work on Vista 64 with my graphic cards.....man oh man my x1800xtx and x1950xtx did a nice job of it and I mis it!
Dude... you wont have any use for it. All this card does is crunches numbers at 20x speed then the cards do today doing same thing.

Do you want to watch your screen doing math problems all day?? You wont even see that, youll just see a progress bar going from left to right.
Posted on Reply
#54
DRDNA
BOSEDude... you wont have any use for it. All this card does is crunches numbers at 20x then cards do today doing same thing.

Do you want to watch your screen doing math problems all day?? You wont even see that, youll just see a progress bar going from left to right.
But I am very into video technology (all of it ) and dabble quite a bit with it ...just a hobby thats with in a hobby thats also a career thats more than a hobby.;)
Posted on Reply
#55
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
IcrushitIIt says the the guys worked on opengl while at apple, does this mean their is a slim chance that we can run games without Directx down the road, wouldn't that be super for open source. Or am I going off on a tangent that doesn't exist.:)
OpenGL is not open-source.


OpenGL: Open Graphics Language. Partnering vendors can come up with their own versions of it.
Posted on Reply
#56
BOSE
DRDNABut I am very into video technology (all of it ) and dabble quite a bit with it ...just a hobby thats with in a hobby thats also a career thats more than a hobby.;)
So you not like the rest of the kids here thinking they will have more FPS in their games.
Posted on Reply
#57
DRDNA
BOSESo you not like the rest of the kids here thinking they will have more FPS in their games.
lol fat chance you'll get FPS ....but when it comes to rendering HD then I am thinking big time potential.

i dont mean rendering as in watching HD.
Posted on Reply
#58
IcrushitI
btarunrOpenGL is not open-source.


OpenGL: Open Graphics Language. Partnering vendors can come up with their own versions of it.
What I was trying to say is that opengl is not dependent on directx, such as relying on MS, with opengl you can play games on different platforms, I think, have to go back in memory 7 to 10 years ago. Didn't we play quake using opengl as an example.
Posted on Reply
#59
BOSE
Yes quake is or was or still is, opengl. Thats why they used quake for so many years to test on newer hardware. It was the best opengl game for its time.
Posted on Reply
#60
DarkMatter
IcrushitIWhat I was trying to say is that opengl is not dependent on directx, such as relying on MS, with opengl you can play games on different platforms, I think, have to go back in memory 7 to 10 years ago. Didn't we play quake using opengl as an example.
Sadly that train parted long time ago and IMO we will never see the return. There was a time when OpenGL was better than DirectX, then they were equal for some time, but sonce little after the introduction to shaders DirectX is almost king. That's when it comes to capabilities, when it comes to percentage of usage is even worse for OpenGL (Actually, any game in the last 2 years is OGL? or probably what is the same: ET:QW how old it is?). My point is: if very few developers really supported OpenGL when this was better or equal to DirectX, can we hope it to return to games when it's clearly behind?
Posted on Reply
#61
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
IcrushitIWhat I was trying to say is that opengl is not dependent on directx, such as relying on MS, with opengl you can play games on different platforms, I think, have to go back in memory 7 to 10 years ago. Didn't we play quake using opengl as an example.
You were trying to link it to open-source (as in open-source software) by saying it would be benefitted. How else would you link games not using DirectX to being 'super' for open-source?

Common OpenGL games still had portions that relied on DirectX. For example, idTech3 games relied on DirectSound as a 3D audio API. Its Linux ports however made do with any available audio driver (OSS, ALSA, etc.)
Posted on Reply
#62
GSG-9
PCpraiser100No, but they will be begged for that technology. I betcha that Nvidia and ATI are going to race for a partnership.
I doubt that, if anything they will starve them out like what they did with Ageia.
Posted on Reply
#63
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
GSG-9I doubt that, if anything they will starve them out like what they did with Ageia.
Then buy them cheap.
Posted on Reply
#64
Disparia
We've yet to see a product, but you've already sold the company :D

Time for me to start a company, make big claims, and wait for the buyers to come knocking ;)
Posted on Reply
#65
imperialreign
btarunrOpenGL is not open-source.


OpenGL: Open Graphics Language. Partnering vendors can come up with their own versions of it.
most prominent example: 3DFX's Glide API: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glide_API
BOSEYes quake is or was or still is, opengl. Thats why they used quake for so many years to test on newer hardware. It was the best opengl game for its time.
Quake was not OpenGL compliant when it was released (neither was Raven Software's spin-off Hexen II) - OpenGL support came a year later with GLQuake, and was mostly fueled by acceptance of 3DFX's Glide API (of which it was also compliant).

Quake II, Quake III and Quake IV, though, ran via OpenGL (as did Doom3, Heretic II, Prey, and some other titles). In regards to Quake II, the biggest driving force again was not OpenGL itself, but 3DFX's Glide API.

Although ID Software (and partner company Raven Software) have been some of the largest supportive software developers that utilize OpenGL . . . OpenGL as we know it today, in regards to it's highly competitive visual capabilities and also it's performance abilities, owes a lot to 3DFX's pioneering of the Glide API - which was fully based off of the OpenGL API at the time, but was tweaked and targeted specifically for performance. The number of rendering calls were trimmed back to the extent that the API could be implimented solely via hardware, which allowed for games to be able to run extensively faster with Glide than with OpenGL (or DirectX). The performance margin in Glide, as well as OpenGL, was such that the early VooDoo series (through VooDoo3) have become legendary in the 3D graphics market. The Glide API brought new and fresh attention to OpenGL as well, with many new software developers taking a fresh look at OpenGL over DirectX . . . the newfound attention helped the API grow and evolve, and lead to substantial improvements with the API for OpenGl 2.0 released in 2006. The performance increasesand rendering tweaks from the Glide API were even visible for years after 3DFX's downfall and acquisition by nVidia . . . after nVidia acquired the company (and their intellectual property) in 2000, nVidia cards were notorious for outperforming ATI's cards in OpenGL applications through the X1900 series and early HD2000 series.
Posted on Reply
#66
GSG-9
I don't think that could have been said any better!
Posted on Reply
#67
IcrushitI
imperialreignmost prominent example: 3DFX's Glide API: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glide_API




Quake was not OpenGL compliant when it was released (neither was Raven Software's spin-off Hexen II) - OpenGL support came a year later with GLQuake, and was mostly fueled by acceptance of 3DFX's Glide API (of which it was also compliant).

Quake II, Quake III and Quake IV, though, ran via OpenGL (as did Doom3, Heretic II, Prey, and some other titles). In regards to Quake II, the biggest driving force again was not OpenGL itself, but 3DFX's Glide API.

Although ID Software (and partner company Raven Software) have been some of the largest supportive software developers that utilize OpenGL . . . OpenGL as we know it today, in regards to it's highly competitive visual capabilities and also it's performance abilities, owes a lot to 3DFX's pioneering of the Glide API - which was fully based off of the OpenGL API at the time, but was tweaked and targeted specifically for performance. The number of rendering calls were trimmed back to the extent that the API could be implimented solely via hardware, which allowed for games to be able to run extensively faster with Glide than with OpenGL (or DirectX). The performance margin in Glide, as well as OpenGL, was such that the early VooDoo series (through VooDoo3) have become legendary in the 3D graphics market. The Glide API brought new and fresh attention to OpenGL as well, with many new software developers taking a fresh look at OpenGL over DirectX . . . the newfound attention helped the API grow and evolve, and lead to substantial improvements with the API for OpenGl 2.0 released in 2006. The performance increasesand rendering tweaks from the Glide API were even visible for years after 3DFX's downfall and acquisition by nVidia . . . after nVidia acquired the company (and their intellectual property) in 2000, nVidia cards were notorious for outperforming ATI's cards in OpenGL applications through the X1900 series and early HD2000 series.
With what you said and seem to know, is there potential of using a raytracing card and opengl, I remember Intel being interested in raytracing. Is it possible for a third party to get into the graphics business using newer technology, or could they just compete with physx . I'm going out on a limb with this.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 23rd, 2024 14:12 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts