• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Xe Kicks the Door Open to Challenge the GeForce-Radeon Duopoly

Performance graph without numbers! Why do companies keep ignoring that lol. On top the chart makes it look like midrange is barely faster than integrated and same for enthusiast vs mid range lol. Not expecting much from intel the first go around.
 
Nkd said:
Performance graph without numbers! Why do companies keep ignoring that lol. On top the chart makes it look like midrange is barely faster than integrated and same for enthusiast vs mid range lol. Not expecting much from intel the first go around.
Click to expand...
Any numbers attached in this phase of the project would be somewhere between educated guess and wishful thinking.
Take these announcements for what they are: means to raise market awareness, so when a product will be delivered, we won't all be like "wow, look at Intel, they made a video card. again." Just read and move on. That's what I do.
 
Damn, seems the CPU duopoly want all the pie.
 
Just use the Iris branding, sounds nicer than that Xe or iBallz if they're gonna go with the kool sounding name
 
We need 400$ price for top dog cards back again.
 
I smell something in the air,

it is

aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS84L1UvMjcyNDc4L29yaWdpbmFsLzAwMF9BVElfTG9nb18xOTg1LnBuZw==
 
Given that the hardware is competitive, it needs to be priced right. Not to mention its first gen for Intel GPU's so.......
Also the most important concern i have is drivers if anyone has tried to get those integrated graphics drivers from Intel's website, its a mess. Hope they can sort all this out with new launch.
 
When those graphics cards come out, and i read some independent reviews, that's when we'll see if this is true or just usual intel bullshit. AMD is absolutely destroying them with Ryzen. And Zen 2 isn't even out yet. inetl got caught with their pants down, and they are obviously panicking right now, considering the amount of aggressive marketing they are doing for products still early in development.
 
killferd said:
Given that the hardware is competitive, it needs to be priced right. Not to mention its first gen for Intel GPU's so.......
Also the most important concern i have is drivers if anyone has tried to get those integrated graphics drivers from Intel's website, its a mess. Hope they can sort all this out with new launch.
Click to expand...

What problems do you have? I think they're more reliable at software than hardware tbh.

DuxCro said:
When those graphics cards come out, and i read some independent reviews, that's when we'll see if this is true or just usual intel bullshit. AMD is absolutely destroying them with Ryzen. And Zen 2 isn't even out yet. inetl got caught with their pants down, and they are obviously panicking right now, considering the amount of aggressive marketing they are doing for products still early in development.
Click to expand...

All they've done is make Intel rethink their consumer/HEDT strategy. And Intel still wears money hats as usual (and burns them occassionally).
 
Three way head to head competition would be fantastic. Let's hope it happens.
 
while competition is good, which I look forward to; knowing intel - they will have it at extortion prices like their CPU's. And then make poor excuses as to why they are so expensive.
 
sepheronx said:
while competition is good, which I look forward to; knowing intel - they will have it at extortion prices like their CPU's. And then make poor excuses as to why they are so expensive.
Click to expand...
You should look up i740. It was a rather cheap and disruptive card in its days.
 
Puting together a slide with zero information whatsoever is a long way from "challenging Radeon and Geforce".
 
I get the distinct feeling that this marvelous product, the second coming of iChristGPU, is actually going to turn out to be a sub $100 card, at least when it comes to performance, and as this is an intel product, definitely not high in value for money.

At least they admit it will suck at graphics work, and will only be good for Ai and compute freeks. Fair enough.
 
Vya Domus said:
Puting together a slide with zero information whatsoever is a long way from "challenging Radeon and Geforce".
Click to expand...

Well, it's Intel. It's easier to swallow than some random startup.

Sidenote: The capacity of this site to treat the biggest chip maker in the world as some ignorant group of chumps running a flea market tier electronics shop never ceases to amaze me. But it's the constant drumbeat over here. :P
 
  • Like
Reactions: bug
StrayKAT said:
Well, it's Intel. It's easier to swallow than some random startup.

Sidenote: The capacity of this site to treat the biggest chip maker in the world as some ignorant group of chumps running a flea market tier electronics shop never ceases to amaze me. But it's the constant drumbeat over here. :p
Click to expand...
Well, it hasn't been the biggest chip maker for a few years already, but the rest of your point stands.
 
bug said:
Well, it hasn't been the biggest chip maker for a few years already, but the rest of your point stands.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I had to look that up. Apparently Samsung is tops. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. :)
 
It's gonna be AMD licence tech.
 
Competition (or a try) is always a good thing in this kin of situation : nVidia high-end, very high-end/ high pricing & AMD Mid & High / Normal prices.
In addition to that, AMD doesn't address deep-learning very well, soooo, a third party is welcome (even Intel ^^)
 
Intel needs a breakthrough innovation nonetheless, imo. They need Raja's archenemy, Eric Demers, to keep the Wattman on his toes, or there won't be another RV770.
 
I'm all for competition in the GPU world, however, don't expect Intel to be our saviors. If they perform really well, I wouldn't expect them to be cheap. If they don't perform well, then don't expect Nvidia to slash prices either. I hope I'm wrong but we should temper expectations.
 
It's good to see they are making progress, and it shouldn't be too hard for them to at least eat into AMD's almost non existent mobile presence.
 
One cool (that I sort of touched on) is Intel is neck deep in Linux development. They have their own distro now, are a platinum member of the Linux Foundation, and have reiterated time and time again their dedication to hardware support (and even want to push Linux gaming).

To contrast:

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top