Post your CrystalDiskMark speeds

[The King]

I'm using a Crucial T705 PCIe 5.0 M.2.




NVMe Mode
View attachment 393458


Default Mode
View attachment 393459


Current Setup
View attachment 393464

Something seems very off on those write speeds. You missing like 8000MB/s

 

[Arkz]

This is from about a year ago I think. KINGSTON SKC3000

 

[Strix_Gaming]

Something seems very off on those write speeds. You missing like 8000MB/s
View attachment 393478

This is from HWMonitor. Its Odd that my Writing Speed is not the same like here.

The Controller seems fine to me.

 

[AVATARAT]

Crucial T705 SSD 1TB, M.2 2280 / PCIe 5.0 x4

And here with PrimoCashe:

 

[nwgpcl]

I'm using a Crucial T705 PCIe 5.0 M.2.




NVMe Mode
View attachment 393458


Default Mode
View attachment 393459


Current Setup
View attachment 393464

Single Crucial T705 2TB on AMD EPYC 9004 series computer

These tests were performed with my 5950x 128GB ECC RAM CL22. Just going to leave this here.

i9-14900K DDR5-6400 RAM

 

[nwgpcl]

Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB

 

[nwgpcl]

Just bought 9pcs (1 hot swap) of E1.S PCIe 4.0 NVME 7.68T and 8pcs of PCIe 4.0 U.2 NVME 7.68T for hi-speed NAS

 

[Paramount]

WD SN8100 1TB Gen5

 

[nwgpcl]

HighPoint R7608A GEN5 RAID AIC with 8x Samsung PM1733 7.68T U.2 NVME installed

 

[Athlonite]

I see random 4k q1t1 reads still suck a donkey dick but otherwise holy shit that's quick.
Gotta love SMART counting a normal shutdown as an "Unsafe Shutdown" though

 

[nwgpcl]

I'm using tower case for my SAS HDDs NAS. Once the NVME's installation has completed, will put new motherboard and U.2/E1.S into a 2U NVME server case

I see random 4k q1t1 reads still suck a donkey dick but otherwise holy shit that's quick.
Gotta love SMART counting a normal shutdown as an "Unsafe Shutdown" though

Small block size is good for random R/W in a RAID array. Meanwhile large block size favors sequential R/W

 

[nwgpcl]

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-com...s-blistering-113-gb-s-speeds-in-computex-demo

Last month Phison had a demo of their new GEN5 SSDs and hit the speed of 113GB/s with 32pcs of GEN5 SSDs in RAID0

Instead I used 16 sets of 7.68T GEN4 NVME (U.2/E1.S - read intensified drives) and achieved the same read speed with bigger capacity

This dual EPYC workstation is under temporary trial setup for NAS. When the setup succeeds, a single EPYC CPU computer will be used for NAS.

Photo was taken during the benchmark

Remark: Settings have been restored to default after testing
Read Speed:110GB/s
Capacity: 110TB

 

[Canned Noodles]

SN8000S PCIe 4.0

 

[nwgpcl]

Recently I bought an AMD EPYC 9334 CPU, ASRock Rack GENOAD8X-2T/BCM server motherboard, 8x 48GB DDR-4800 ECC REG, Mellanox ConnectX-5 100G NIC, 2x 550W CRPS Redundant Power Supply and a 4U 8x PCIe slots server case for my new NVME NAS.
I have setup the Windows Storage Spaces 1-parity(total number of drives - 2drives) but the transfer speed is only one-third of RAID0. I surfed the internet but not that much information found regarding Storage Spaces parity. So I installed RAID5 instead. The read speed of RAID5 array still hits 100GB+/s, not bad for my private NAS
I dun get a deep pocket for GRAID, any members here who have setup GRAID before?

Still need time to brush up my knowledge about Storage Spaces in MS Server 2025