• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD To Give Up Competing With Intel On x86? CPU Prices Already Shooting Up

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
15,925 (3.63/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
@cadaveca

So Intel own the market because they own the fabs to meet the demand, regardless of what happens? Yeah, I'll go with that. :toast:

I don't agree that more computing power isn't needed though. It's one of those things that's classically "never enough" and there's always an application to soak it all up. Even though it might just be the same thing done 100 times faster, this can still be enough to bring about a paradigm shift. To give you an example, take voice recognition. It's a notoriously difficult thing for a computer to do accurately and with little training, since computers don't have the awareness and the "smarts" that humans do, to implement a proper artificial intelligence. However, the speed of today's processors allow for this functionality to a passable extent.

Another one is weather prediction. It can be pretty accurate up to about three days in advance now and that's simply because of the huge amount of processing power available on today's supercomputers.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
543 (0.11/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name i7 Rig
Processor 970 @ 4.2Ghz @ 1.3vcore
Motherboard Asus P6T Deluxe V2
Cooling Thermalright TRUE Black Rev.C + Scythe S-Flex 120mm 1600RPM x2 Push/Pull
Memory Muskin XP12800 12GB DDR3 1600 7-8-7-20 1T
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8GB
Storage Intel 160GB G2 SSDx2 Raid 0 / WD 1TB Black 32mb / ESATA WD 2TB 64mb Green
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Cooler Master 690 II Advanced
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair Pro Series Gold AX750
Mouse G500
Keyboard G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Hyperthreading on. -= CPU Idle 36c Load 75c | GPU Idle 35c Load 58c =-
I am disappointed in AMD's inability to compete with Intel, but that does not make AMD a crappy company.

I suppose noone remembers when AMD held the performance crown back in the Athlon XP/64 days. This made Intel completely change the way they designed processors. They realized that you can make a fast processor by making it more efficient instead of just ramping up clockspeed(p4).

Intel wouldn't be what it is today if AMD never stepped in.

I don't know why they're having such a hard time, a few years ago they were doing great.

However, I don't think that Intel will slow down their development of extremely fast processors with AMD gone.

I will personally miss having great processors for a good price.

I just unlocked an Athlon II x4's L3 cache and clocked it to 3.5ghz for 100 bucks. Wish I could get that kind of bang for buck with Intel.

I have nothing against either processor manufacterer, competition is good for the consumer. These companies kept each other in check for years.

I hope AMD bounces back but it looks like the company is being ran by pussies now. They are ready to give up. Sad, really.

Just because Intel wins in synthetic benchmarks doesn't mean that AMD processors are crappy. Most users wouldn't see a difference while using a high end AMD machine vs a high end Intel machine.
I remember those days fondly and I still have an opteron 170 in my HTPC.

However, I don't think this is accurate at all.

"Intel wouldn't be what it is today if AMD never stepped in."

AMD got ahead because intel screwed up and was trying to push megahurtz as king until physics slapped them in the face.

Intel always has been and always will be bigger than AMD, and they recovered from the P4 with conroe. When you have deep pockets you can screw up and recover with ease AMD on the other hand doesn't have this luxury. I'd give them credit for fighting this David vs Goliath battle we have enjoyed for this many years but they were always fighting a the war they could never win! AMD just won a single battle with A64.

There would be no AMD without intel not the other way around.
 
Last edited:

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.05/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
I'm sorry, but this is just a load of FUD.

AMD is not leaving the market.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,478 (0.31/day)
Location
Orange County, CA
System Name Battle Station
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700x
Motherboard ASRock X370 Taichi
Cooling Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro
Memory GSkill Tridentz DDR4-3200 16 GB
Video Card(s) 1 x EVGA GTX 1080 Ti black edition
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 240 GB + 12TB storage
Display(s) LG 34UM94 3440x1440
Case Lian Li PC-80NB
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX + Ultrasone Pro 900 + JBL SLR 308 speakers and SLR 310 subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
Mouse Logitech G510
Keyboard Corsair K90
Software Window 10 Ultimate x64
I own a FX-6100 and an Intel Core i7 950 and with the same cards XFX 6970 and the same hard drive setups the only difference is the memory the Intel has 12Gb and the AMD has 8Gb and I play BF3 with NO differences. I do not have to OC the 6100 and the gameplay is smooth. Buy AMD even if you think BD is a failure... Maybe in the overclocking/power consumption dept it is a failure but who give s a rats arse.. Buy AMD and keep the competition... Then you will see Intel prices drop...

I know we all love to OC stuff and bench at times but in the end for me if the rig is snappy and the framerates rock who gives 2 cents... Just pwn n00bs!!!Now everyone go out and buy an FX chip!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :toast:
Why would the consumer pay more for a lesser product?
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
543 (0.11/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name i7 Rig
Processor 970 @ 4.2Ghz @ 1.3vcore
Motherboard Asus P6T Deluxe V2
Cooling Thermalright TRUE Black Rev.C + Scythe S-Flex 120mm 1600RPM x2 Push/Pull
Memory Muskin XP12800 12GB DDR3 1600 7-8-7-20 1T
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8GB
Storage Intel 160GB G2 SSDx2 Raid 0 / WD 1TB Black 32mb / ESATA WD 2TB 64mb Green
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Cooler Master 690 II Advanced
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair Pro Series Gold AX750
Mouse G500
Keyboard G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Hyperthreading on. -= CPU Idle 36c Load 75c | GPU Idle 35c Load 58c =-
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,223 (0.94/day)
Location
Geneva, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
"Intel wouldn't be what it is today if AMD never stepped in."

On the flip side of that, Intel could have been much more if AMD hadn't stepped in :)

Intel had a ~5 year top-down plan for introducing IA64 to the industry, from specialty applications to mobile. But after the first phase, who comes in and c-blocks them? AMD with x86-64. We got short-term gratification, but at what expense? Could theorize over several paragraphs, but I'll sum it up that could be have been driving flying cars by now.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,028 (1.28/day)
System Name Acer Aspire VX 15
Processor Intel Core i5 7300HQ
Motherboard KBL Wish_KLS
Cooling Dual fan cooling system
Memory Hyundai Electronics 4GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Storage Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 15.6"
Case Acer
Audio Device(s) Realtek onboard
Mouse Elephant ELE G7 wireless
Software Windows 10
I'm sorry, but this is just a load of FUD.

AMD is not leaving the market.
There aren't that many Burger King's or Wendy's here compared to KFC and McDonalds. Essentially they "gave up competing" and just kept what they already have but never expanded. But that doesn't mean they left the fastfood market here.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.05/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
There aren't that many Burger King's or Wendy's here compared to KFC and McDonalds. Essentially the "gave up competing" and just kept what they already have but never expanded. But that doesn't mean they left the fastfood market here.
That's what I mean. People are screaming like it's the cpu apocalypse, but the fact of the matter is, they are just admitting the position they have already been in for decades.

Nothing will really change.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,335 (1.43/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name STEAMBOX | GAMECUBE | EQC (Everyday Quad Core)
Processor i5 4590@3.7Ghz |i7 3770K@4Ghz -|- Athlon 5350@2.52Ghz
Motherboard GA-B85N PHOENIX | Asrock Z77E-ITX | Asus AM1I-A
Cooling Stock | Antec Kuhler 620 | Reeven Vanxie
Memory 2x4GB ADATA XPG 1600Mhz | 2x4GB Kingston 1866Mhz -|- 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix@1920Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 480 Nitro | Sapphire RX 480 w/Accelero Mono Plus | HD 8400 @ 720Mhz (IGP)
Storage LiteON 128GB mSATA+3TB Seagate | Seagate 1TBxSamung 64GB SSD (Intel RST) | Kingston v300 240GB
Display(s) Daewoo 49" 1080p | ASUS PA248Q 1920x1200 IPS
Case Corsair 250D | CoolerMaster Elite 110 | Acteck Fiji
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2 | Silverstone SFX-450 | 200w mini FLEX PSU
Software Windows 10 64bit
@cadaveca

So Intel own the market because they own the fabs to meet the demand, regardless of what happens? Yeah, I'll go with that. :toast:
It's very simple. Let's say that there's a market for five computers. Intel steps in an says, "hey, I can make 4 of those" and AMD says "I could make only one and I'm not so sure". Of course Intel will get more business.




About the article, the "We're at an inflection point. We will all need to let go of the old 'AMD versus Intel' mind-set, because it won't be about that anymore." quote doesn't mean that AMD will throw the towel with x86 CPUs. They're just saying "Don't expect out next CPU to be a Sandy Bridge killer".
 

Efraim

New Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
It's very simple. Let's say that there's a market for five computers. Intel steps in an says, "hey, I can make 4 of those" and AMD says "I could make only one and I'm not so sure". Of course Intel will get more business.




About the article, the "We're at an inflection point. We will all need to let go of the old 'AMD versus Intel' mind-set, because it won't be about that anymore." quote doesn't mean that AMD will throw the towel with x86 CPUs. They're just saying "Don't expect out next CPU to be a Sandy Bridge killer".
Think the post above is indeed the fact.AMD will be always be there in cpu market unless they fuck up again*should the change the marketing, this wont happen(most likely).

and if this is also part of their marketing, showing that they even 'throw the towel with x86 CPUs' and next time, they come up with something not so bad, the market trust may change again in their favor.At least they'll gain the share they had before the SB era.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
438 (0.09/day)
Location
NJ
System Name Gaming Rig
Processor AMD Ryzen 1800x @ 4.0ghz
Motherboard ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H100i Push/Pull
Memory G Skill TridentZ RGB F4-3200C14-8GTZR x2
Video Card(s) ASUS RX580 8gb Polaris 10
Storage 512GB ADATA XPG SX7000 M.2 PCIe NVME
Display(s) AOC 40" LCD C4008VU8 4K 3840x2160
Case Corsair Graphite Series 600T Mesh
Power Supply Antec True Power Quattro 1000W PSU
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Why would the consumer pay more for a lesser product?
Why is it lesser... that is subjective on your take. If you support AMD you buy the chip... it is not going to self destruct your pc... so the intel performs better.. who cares , my point is both PC's feel the same and game the same. 1 or 2 framerates and not going to kill you.... no one is telling you how to spend your money. I think my FX -6100 is a decent chip... I paid 130 for mine a lot less then a core i5
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
3,402 (0.63/day)
Location
Ancient Greece, Acropolis (Time Lord)
System Name RiseEN Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700X @ stock
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X370 GAMING X AM4
Cooling Corsair H115i PRO RGB, 280mm Radiator, Dual 140mm ML Series PWM Fans
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 580 8GB Nitro+ SE
Storage Corsair Force MP500 480GB M.2 (OS) + Force MP510 480GB M.2 (Steam/Games)
Display(s) Asus 27" (MG278Q) 144Hz WQHD 1440p + 1 x Asus 24" (VG245H) FHD 75Hz 1080p
Case Corsair Obsidian Series 450D Gaming Case
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries 5Hv2 w/ ASUS Xonar DGX PCI-E GX2.5 Audio Engine Sound Card
Power Supply Corsair TX750W Power Supply
Mouse Razer DeathAdder PC Gaming Mouse - Ergonomic Left Hand Edition
Keyboard Logitech G15 Classic Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro - 64-Bit Edition
Benchmark Scores I'm the Doctor.
IBM will never let AMD go under, absolutely no way. Who on earth want's Intel dictating what CPU technologies will be chosen? I don't so.

AMD will only change there strategy and compete on Price/Performance until they can get something competative out that blows Intel out of the water :D
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,028 (1.28/day)
System Name Acer Aspire VX 15
Processor Intel Core i5 7300HQ
Motherboard KBL Wish_KLS
Cooling Dual fan cooling system
Memory Hyundai Electronics 4GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Storage Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 15.6"
Case Acer
Audio Device(s) Realtek onboard
Mouse Elephant ELE G7 wireless
Software Windows 10
An Intel monopoly is actually the "best" monopoly you can ever have. They can never successfully stop progress in science and technology anyway. And the pace of development would still be staggering even under a monopoly. Which sets it apart from, for example, a company having a monopoly on oil.

I'm not saying that an Intel monopoly is automatically a good thing though, but rather it's not that worse as some (many?) are wont to paint it out.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
2,048 (0.58/day)
System Name The Stone that the Builders Refused / iJayo
Processor R5 1600/ R5 1600X
Motherboard Asrock AB350 Pro4 / Gigabyte B450 I Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Cryorig M9 / Artic Freexer 33
Memory G skill 16 Gigs ddr4 / 16 gigs PNY ddr4
Video Card(s) MSI r9 270 / MSI RX 570 Armor
Storage 120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 512 Scandisc M.2 ssd 2 x 1tb seagate hdd 120 gig Hyper X ssd
Display(s) 42" Nec retail display monitor/ 42" Nec retail display monitor
Case Pink Enermax Ostrog / NZXT 200i
Audio Device(s) Altec Lansing Expressionist Bass/ M-Audio monitors
Power Supply Corsair450 /Seasonic Focus 650 fx
Mouse corsair vengence M65 / Func Ms3
Keyboard corsair k70 cherry blue /corsair k95 cherry red
Software Window 10 pro / Windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
IBM will never let AMD go under, absolutely no way. Who on earth want's Intel dictating what CPU technologies will be chosen? I don't so.

AMD will only change there strategy and compete on Price/Performance until they can get something competative out that blows Intel out of the water :D
I like this guy:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
117 (0.03/day)
Location
El Salvador
System Name The K6 Killer III
Processor Intel Core i9 9900K
Motherboard ASUS TUF Z390 Plus Gaming (Wi-Fi)
Cooling Cougar Helor 360
Memory 2x 8GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3866
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 Ti Amp!
Storage 1TB Samsung M.2 970 EVO Plus + 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO
Display(s) Samsung 43RU7100
Case Cougar Panzer EVO RGB
Power Supply XFX 650W XXX Edition
Mouse Cougar Minos XT
Keyboard Cougar Ultimus RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
OMG, seriously, if AMD exits the x86 market...Intel will have monopoly and get ready for the freakin dark ages PC progression....it will slow to a halt. No more competition really sucks...for us all =/
I don't know. The future seems to be mobile, desktop computing is not going to last. I think not only AMD is in trouble, Intel needs to speed up its strategy toward smartphones and tablets.
 

JustaTinkerer

New Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
271 (0.09/day)
Location
Scotland
System Name Just need to tidy it up now
Processor FX-8120
Motherboard Asus M5A99X EVO 990X
Cooling Custom Water
Memory Corsair Vengeance 8GB
Video Card(s) BFG GTX 280 H2OC
Storage OCZ ocz vertex plus(60GB), 2TB hdd
Display(s) 1x ACER x19ws ( need new one)
Case Custom
Power Supply (GOT) OCZ GameXStream 1010 Watt
Software LOL
Benchmark Scores Soon, very very soon, just need to tidy it up.
Inflection: A turning or bending away from a course or position.

Very well could been a move away from there current bulldozer/piledriver strategy. Leaving the desktop sector would be crazy.

Push out what is left.

Cutting power consumption and price for piledriver.

Keep up the good work with the graphics cards.

Perhaps dabble in the smartphone/tablet sector. (Now I know Intel are meant to enter the smartphone market in 2012 but AMD could grab a sizeable share depending on price).

Down the line with a new architecture, Intel didnt see it coming because of the smartphone battle "BANG" AMD is back.


More what im saying is a move away from what AMD are doing right now is obvious, someone said if the marketing of the FX had been different this might not have happened, that is on the money.

Its the same mistake Intel made with the believe in GHz, AMD are just piling on the cores.
AMD could move away from the cores and look for something a little more refined.
 

Gjohnst4

New Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
223 (0.06/day)
Location
Batavia IL
System Name Girlfriend Likes My Spedo
Processor Phenom II 965 3.6 ghz
Motherboard MSI 790FX-GD70
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 Extreme Edition {5x Turbine 120mm, 2x Windtunnel 140mm, 1x 230mm Speedo Side fan}
Memory OCZ DDR3 1600 8GB Dual Channel
Video Card(s) Sapphire 5870 1GB Crossfire
Storage 2x 640 gb 7200 rpm 32mb cache raid 0, Seagate Momentum X Hybrid 500gb boot drive
Display(s) YAMASAKI 27" IPS
Case Thermaltake Spedo Advance
Audio Device(s) Creative Fatal1ty Platinum> Musiland Monitor 02> Little Dot MKIII> Audeze LCD-2
Power Supply Antec Quattro 850
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Benchmark Scores 3Dmark 06: 21,989
Are they killing off the road map now though? Can I still expect Piledriver with it's 10% gain, or is this what is being scrapped? :wtf:
 

JustaTinkerer

New Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
271 (0.09/day)
Location
Scotland
System Name Just need to tidy it up now
Processor FX-8120
Motherboard Asus M5A99X EVO 990X
Cooling Custom Water
Memory Corsair Vengeance 8GB
Video Card(s) BFG GTX 280 H2OC
Storage OCZ ocz vertex plus(60GB), 2TB hdd
Display(s) 1x ACER x19ws ( need new one)
Case Custom
Power Supply (GOT) OCZ GameXStream 1010 Watt
Software LOL
Benchmark Scores Soon, very very soon, just need to tidy it up.
Are they killing off the road map now though? Can I still expect Piledriver with it's 10% gain, or is this what is being scrapped? :wtf:
Cant see it being scrapped, to much work has already went in to it, even to break even it will still go ahead.
 

mysticjon

New Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
436 (0.09/day)
Location
CA, USA
Processor AMD Phenom x4 9850 black edition
Cooling big water 745
Memory Kingston 4gb(1gbx4) ddr2 (dual channel)
Video Card(s) ati sapphire radeon hd 6850
Storage 2tb
Display(s) samsung 226bw 22 inch wide lcd screen
Case apeiva qpack2
Audio Device(s) creative soundblaster X-fi fatal1ty series
Power Supply silent pro 600watt modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x86
i always loved amd over intel, amd needs a new buisness strategy, they will always be number 2. They (amd) lacks innovation and they seem afraid to start something new and fresh. theres all these companyies who are putting out the same products but with their own differences. All the tablets do the samething, there all touch based, the only thing tat sperates each tablet is the GUI and its hardware and whatever perks there apps have. If amd wants to strive to the top, they need a younger and fresher generation of minds/workers. You can only improve on a certain technology until you deplete its usage. The again with the bullshit US ecomony i doubt our generation will be able to repair our previous generations big whooping pile of bullshit they paved for us
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,028 (1.28/day)
System Name Acer Aspire VX 15
Processor Intel Core i5 7300HQ
Motherboard KBL Wish_KLS
Cooling Dual fan cooling system
Memory Hyundai Electronics 4GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Storage Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 15.6"
Case Acer
Audio Device(s) Realtek onboard
Mouse Elephant ELE G7 wireless
Software Windows 10
Are they killing off the road map now though? Can I still expect Piledriver with it's 10% gain, or is this what is being scrapped? :wtf:
I don't think that would be scrapped. Since they already have presence in pricepoints less than $250, they'll just be starting from there and going down in price. They're not going to just (╯°□°)╯︵ s∩ԀƆ doʇʞsǝp. They'll just stick to where they are currently and just "work" from there. Some improvements, but not expanding any further.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
28,256 (6.22/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
What i see AMD doing more of is providing a system platform, Vid Card GPUs, CHipsets, CPUs, and now Memory.

N tell u truth AMD has been a better choice for price/performance ratio. Yes the i series CPus are good from intel but in long run they will fall flat as software developers start releasing more threaded programs. AMD may not be the fastest in town but they are looking into the future of software development. FX isnt a disaster to say the least because many who have bought the product are actually very satisfied and happy with their purchase.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
261 (0.06/day)
hmmmmmmmmmmm interesting.

Well I doubt this will happen, I mean the gov would probably break up Intel for being a monopoly so Intel would probably even bail them out, who knows.

"And no is gonna buy sandbridge 3 if its only 100mhz faster than the last and with no IPC improvement."

From someones comment, well if AMD did say screw it and pulled out of the market, and 4 years down the road your mobo craps out and the sandy3 has diff pin config and its only 100mhz faster you are going to buy it cause you have no choice. And the Prescott sucked and people still bought them over the superior A64 at the time.

It would be the same thing if GM was the only car maker on the planet and after they got their monopoly they only made cavalier's, well the other option would be walk.

I just wish ATI didn't get bought out, as for the cpu I run a AMD 955BE and most of the time it idles, and I have no reason whatsoever to upgrade it. My wife's zacate E-350 1.6Ghz dual core laptop runs 'typical everyday' things smoothly.

As for the majority of people they don't know or care, as long as the pc starts when they push the button so they can check their email and watch youtube thats all that matters to them.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,478 (0.31/day)
Location
Orange County, CA
System Name Battle Station
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700x
Motherboard ASRock X370 Taichi
Cooling Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro
Memory GSkill Tridentz DDR4-3200 16 GB
Video Card(s) 1 x EVGA GTX 1080 Ti black edition
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 240 GB + 12TB storage
Display(s) LG 34UM94 3440x1440
Case Lian Li PC-80NB
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX + Ultrasone Pro 900 + JBL SLR 308 speakers and SLR 310 subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
Mouse Logitech G510
Keyboard Corsair K90
Software Window 10 Ultimate x64
Why is it lesser... that is subjective on your take. If you support AMD you buy the chip... it is not going to self destruct your pc... so the intel performs better.. who cares , my point is both PC's feel the same and game the same. 1 or 2 framerates and not going to kill you.... no one is telling you how to spend your money. I think my FX -6100 is a decent chip... I paid 130 for mine a lot less then a core i5
You still have not provide a logical reason why the consumer would pay more for a lesser product. I appreciate your brand loyalty but there are more applications than just gaming. AMD chip did not outperform Intel equivalent on those tasks while costing more and consuming more energy.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,311 (0.73/day)
Location
Essex Jct, VT
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard Gigabyte B450 Aurorus Elite
Cooling Stock
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengence LPX DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / Samsung EVO 860 500GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) AOC G2590FX
Case NZXT H500 Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
I will personally miss having great processors for a good price.

I just unlocked an Athlon II x4's L3 cache and clocked it to 3.5ghz for 100 bucks. Wish I could get that kind of bang for buck with Intel.

Just because Intel wins in synthetic benchmarks doesn't mean that AMD processors are crappy. Most users wouldn't see a difference while using a high end AMD machine vs a high end Intel machine.
Have you been asleep for the entire existance of Sandy Bridge? You can get an i3-2100 that would outperform that exact CPU in almost every task for basically the same price. The reason AMD is now losing is because with SB, they are barely holding on to their Price\Performance standing. Intel realized by aggressively pricing their consumer CPU's, they could deal massive damage to AMD's sustainability. The even more overshadowing truth, is that although you can get similar performance from AMD CPU's for cheaper, as of the last 2-3 years you have to consistantly wait 6-9 months after an Intel release to get it. They are constantly a generation behind, and it is killing them.

I'm sorry, but this is just a load of FUD.

AMD is not leaving the market.
Like I said, sensationalist garbage.

Why is it lesser... that is subjective on your take. If you support AMD you buy the chip... it is not going to self destruct your pc... so the intel performs better.. who cares , my point is both PC's feel the same and game the same. 1 or 2 framerates and not going to kill you.... no one is telling you how to spend your money. I think my FX -6100 is a decent chip... I paid 130 for mine a lot less then a core i5
Because it is worse in terms of Price\Performance. It goes for $160 on Newegg, when you can get even an i5-2400 for $190 which will outperform it across the board. Or you could even just get a Phenom II X4 for $110 that offers similar performance, or a true Six-Core Thuban for the same price or slightly cheaper. No matter how you slice it BD is not that great. If you were starting from scratch, building a budget system you go either i3-2100 or PII X4 (maybe X6) and for a mid-high level system you go i5-24/2500/k or i7-26/2700k. BD is NOT cost effective.
 
Top